Assignment of Modern Prose

Bertrand Russell discusses three possible futures for mankind: 1) Complete human extinction from nuclear war. 2) Reversion to barbarism if cities are destroyed and few survive. 3) Establishment of a world government to prevent war. Russell prefers a world government dominated by America to ensure civil liberties, though admits the challenges of nations surrendering sovereignty. His overall aim was promoting peace and humanity's survival in a nuclear age.

Uploaded by

Qurat sarwar

Available Formats

Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

32 views

Assignment of Modern Prose

Uploaded by

Qurat sarwar

Available Formats

Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 5

Assignment of Modern Prose

Topic: Future of Mankind by Russell

Roll no: Huss201101046

Class: 7th A
Submitted by: Qurat Ul Ain
Submitted to: Ms. Hira Yousaf
The Future or Mankind by Bertrand
Russell

Who is Bertrand Russell?

Bertrand Russell is the most quoted name in the world of politics. He opened his eyes on 18
May 1872 in Trellech. Russell was proficient in mathematics, philosophy, logic, history and in
social criticism. His collection of essays, known as "Unpopular Essays" is a mark of his accurate
foresight.
Russell surely disproves the common established notion about philosophers, that, they are
absent-minded and always busy their heads in making speculations, when he meditates on the
possibilities regarding “The Future of Mankind”. He has done so, because of his high sensitivity
and deep concern towards human beings. He was called as a traitor to his country because of
his anti-war stand during the First World War. But his only concern was towards ‘humanity’.
Later he was awarded a Noble Prize for his contribution towards peace. In the words of Erich
From:

“Bertrand Russell fights against the threatening slaughter- because he is a man

who loves life.”

The Future of Mankind

Possibilities:
Russell discuses three possibilities about “The Future of Mankind.” According to him,

 One is the complete extinction of human life on earth

 The second is that human life will be reduced to barbarism
 Third is that there will be a world government that will control all nations and countries

First possibility:
Among these the first possibility, which he describes, is the complete extinction of all human
beings. This might happen after the Second World War in which the atomic weapons will be
used. Russell deals it logically, for he says, if still there will be some life after the end of that
war, there would soon be another war, for there would such “diehards” in the super powers,
who would prefer the extermination of life, than surrendering to the victory of the other
power.
And if any man would miraculously be able to escape from death, he may consider himself to
be the emperor of the whole world, but his reign would not be long and his subjects would be
only dead bodies and Russell says:

“With his death the uneasy episode of life will end, and the peaceful rocks will
revolve unchanged, until the sun explodes.”

Second possibility:
The second possibility, which Russell discusses, is the reversal of civilization to its primitive
conditions. Russell suggests if the Second World War fails to eliminate all signs of life, still that
destruction would take world to the age of “barbarism”. For in the war, the major cities and
industrial areas would be destroyed and the bacteriological warfare would destroy crops and
cause famine. Russell says there may be a few libraries and laboratories and scientists. But the
people might kill the remaining few scientists, in hope of some “Golden Age”, for:

“Extreme hopes are born of extreme misery and in such a world hopes could
only be irrational.”

Third possibility:
The third possibility, according to Russell, is the establishment of a universal government all
over the world. He discusses this idea in more than one ways in which it could occur. The one is
the victory of America, in the Second World War. Other is the victory of Russia, or the world
government, would emerge as a result of mutual agreement. The best among these ways is the
idea of mutual agreement.
Russell’s view of the world government has been criticized greatly. People have raised
arguments considering it as a “Utopian ideal”. Most of the people think that such an alliance
cannot be brought peacefully, for no nation would surrender her liberty. Russell also admits
that the chances of world government in a formal ways are extremely remote. He thinks that a
world government would not be formed voluntarily, but it would have to be brought about by
force.
Some object that there is no need of a ‘world government’, because the wars are a part of
human history and civilization but still humanity has survived from them. Wars create heroism
and are necessity of life, without which human beings would feel frustrated. To refute this
argument, Russell has given his logical reasoning, that the present condition of cold war would
certainly lead to a dreadful atomic war and eventually it would bring a complete devastation.
And now modern wars are very different from the wars in the past. Russell says;
“There lies before us, if we choose continual progress in happiness, knowledge and wisdom.
Shall we instead choose death, because we cannot forget our quarrels?”
Then he visualizes the “new world” after the emergence of either of the two super powers i.e.
Russia and America, as a victor of the war. Russell perceives a secure peace prevailing in the
long run. Though there would be occasional murders and minor revolts but in such a state, any
large scale rebellion would be out of question.
Russell prefers America to control the world government and he has given many reasons for his
preference to America but his preference has no political or ideological basis, but it totally
depends on the probable condition of people under these states. The major reason to prefer
America is that, she respects the values of civilized life like freedom of thought, freedom of
inquiry and humaneness. But on the other hand, in communistic countries like Russia, there is
not liberty for individuals and the government has a strict hold on the common masses. Thus
Russell says:

“It’s only aim is to promote the mindless repetition of party slogans and to have
the ability of shifting sides rapidly, so as to be always on the side of received
opinions.”
Moreover, there is considerably less orthodoxy in America than in Russia. There, scientist,
authors and philosophers can choose any subject regardless of state interest. While in Russia
such things are also influenced by official views.
Russell suggests yet another way to prevent a horrible war. In his opinion, America would make
an alliance with the British common wealth nations and with other European nations who want
to join them. All the military power, of these countries, and weapons should be united and then
they should declare war on the nation. In this way Russia might also be agreed to join the
alliance just by the threat of war. But still he does not leave the possibility of Russian refusal.
In such an alliance, there should also be a legal check on the power of the leader, by other
nations, so there would not be a “chance of corruption”, which is sure to
accompany Tower”. In other cases, it would be such a combination of states...

“Where force is not a prerogative of private individuals or nations, but is

exercised only by a neutral authority in accordance with rules laid down in
advance”.
Among the many advantages, of a single world government is that the defense expenditures of
every nation would diminish and by this way human beings would be happier than before.
But a little earlier than this, Russell’s suggestions did not seem to be implemented to the world.
For, China has emerged, as a world power with nuclear weapons and it would certainly not like
America as the only dominant nation to control both, East and West.
But now, after, nine-eleven, once again Russell’s idea of the world government seems to be
possible, for, America and Britain has started to dominate the poor nations of the world, only in
order to establish their hold on the world.

Conclusion:
However, Russell’s chief concern in all this discussion was his good will and sincere concern
towards peace and survival of mankind. We can surely conclude that he was a true optimist,
pacifist and humanist.