Pest Analysis
Pest Analysis
net/publication/273260564
CITATIONS READS
6 3,219
1 author:
Tripti Mahara
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
50 PUBLICATIONS 514 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Tripti Mahara on 16 August 2016.
© Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.0
ABSTRACT
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) packages are used to integrate business processes of an
organization through shared information flow. Majority of the large organizations within
India have either implemented or are implementing ERP software. With the increasing
market competition and globalization, small and medium enterprise (sme) are keen to deploy
them, but the high cost involved in implementation of these packages is a major hurdle to go
ahead with this decision. The solution is to go for cost effective ERP solution. ERP on Cloud
is one of the viable options, as there is no initial hardware or software infrastructure
investment needed making it a cost effective solution. A framework called PEST-
Benefit/Threat is presented in this paper to analyze the factors that should be addressed by
sme to select ERP in cloud environment. This framework categorizes a factor in the PEST
framework as political, economical, social or technological. A factor can either be benefit or
a threat to sme. If a factor is a benefit, it will create a positive influence on the sme to go for
this solution. But if a factor is a threat, a sme can take appropriate measure to mitigate the
threat. Thus this framework will assist sme to assess the ERP on cloud as a viable option for
their organization.
1. Introduction
1. Introduction
ERP system is a result of efforts in the field of computer science and business management to
produce a single IT platform, incorporating all the essential business logic. It is a
comprehensive packaged software solution that integrates organizational processes through
shared information and data flows (Rosemann, 2001). An ERP system optimizes a
company’s day-to-day business, whereby optimization is a process of reducing the space of
potential problems and enhancement of business by utilizing the integration between business
units. Current industry demand to implement ERP system is fast growing (Ho et al., 2004)
despite the fact that ERP projects are the largest information technology projects in terms of
project investment worldwide (Gattiker, 2005). Mostly all large organization in India has
invested huge in ERP implementation. For instance, ONGC, invested around 95 crore Indian
rupees for SAP R/3 installation and around 30 months of time. Similarly, Goodlass Nerolac
Paints implemented SAP R/3 in around 18 months with approximate investment of 18 crore
rupees. Other organizations that have successfully implemented ERP packages are BPCL,
Apollo tyres, Siemens, Samsung, Cadbury India, Times of India, Sony India, Kirloskar Oil
Engines, GE India, Bharati Cellular, Dr. Reddys Lab, Hyundai Motors and the list is
exhaustive.
With the saturation in ERP market for large organizations (Deep, 2008), and with the fact that
around 95% of industrial units in India are smes (Sharma, 2010), the focus of leading ERP
vendors like SAP, Oracle and Ramco has shifted to capture the sme market in India (Saini,
2012). The ERP market for SME is projected to be Rs. 728 crore ($160 million), 47% of the
overall market (Munjal, 2006) of Rs. 1,550 crore ($341 million) as per the study conducted
by IDC. Even the smes have started to show deep interest in ERP implementation due to
following reasons (Sharma 2010, Kale 2010).
The alternate solution under consideration for smes, should be cost effective as compared to
the traditional ERP solutions. Cloud based ERP is one such technology that allows
organizations, users or individuals to access and use ERP software installed on vendors site
through internet access on demand (Saini, 2012). The main reasons to consider this option are
the low entry cost, as no initial investment is required to set up IT infrastructure and pay-per-
use model as no license fees needs to be payed upfront. This paper explores the option of
selecting ERP in the Cloud as compared to traditional ERP package. The factors that need to
be considered while selecting ERP in cloud are discussed in this paper. A PEST (Political,
Economic, Social and Technological)- Benefit/Risk framework is presented to evaluate these
factors as benefits or risks to an organization while selecting ERP.
The outline of the paper is as follows. Section 2 gives an overview of cloud computing and
ERP, followed by section 3 that presents PEST- Benefit/Threat framework to analyze various
factors that are important for considering ERP solution in cloud followed by conclusion in
section 4.
The term Cloud Computing (CC) was coined in 2006 and it is a technological platform that
allows users, organizations or individuals, to access and use computer resources via the
internet on demand. AJAX, Multitenancy and Virtualization are the three technologies that
lead to emergence and development of cloud computing (Schubert, 2011). AJAX enables the
client to communicate with the server dynamically; multitenancy describes shared use of
single software by multiple clients through their private and individual data space whereas
virtualization allows for sharing of physical resources. Three services namely Saas (Software
as a Service), Iaas (Infrastructure as a Service) and Paas (Platform as a Service) are provided
by different clouds for different service models as depicted in figure 1 (Schubert, 2011). In
the Saas model, the cloud provides software to the users. Many customers use the same
software in their own private data space. Users are not required to install any application on
their PCs to access the software services provided by the cloud. They can use the software
utility but have no rights to control or manage the infrastructure. The minimum requirement
to access cloud services are internet connection with a PC. For IaaS model the cloud provides
capability to the users to use various computing resources, instead of buying them. The users
have right to control the storage, operating system and deployed applications. The services
are billed for their usage. In case of PaaS, cloud provides platform to build user applications
and software. Deployed application can be accessed from anywhere and the space for these
applications can be increased and decreased based on the usage. The users have rights to
control their deployed application and several application hosting environment configurations.
Private, Community, Public and Hybrid clouds are the deployment models that are supported
in the cloud computing environment. In case of Private cloud, the cloud infrastructure is
operated solely for one organization whereas infrastructure is shared by multiple customers/
organizations in public cloud. For Community cloud, infrastructure is shared by several
organizations that has common concerns and are managed either by one of the participating
organization or a cloud vendor. Hybrid cloud is a composition of two or more clouds (public,
private) that remain unique entities, but are bound together by standardized or proprietary
technology. Each deployment model instance has one of two types: internal or external.
Internal clouds reside within an organization infrastructure and an external cloud resides
outside the organization and is provided by a cloud provider.
More than 20 definitions to describe and focus on certain aspects of cloud technology
(Geelan, 2011) exists, but the following definition best suits for the area of ERP systems that
is the major focus of the study here. “Cloud Computing is an information technology service
model where computing services (software) are delivered on demand to customers over a
network in a self-service fashion, independent of device and location” (Marston, 2011).
Software as a
Cloud can be.
service -SaaS 1. Private Cloud
2. Public Cloud
Platform as a 3. Community
Service - PaaS Cloud
4. Hybrid Cloud
Infrastructure as a
Service - IaaS
SaaS service model is best suited for selection of ERP software on cloud platform. In this
model the ERP software is be deployed on the vendor’s server. This will not involve upfront
IT hardware and software investment. No hefty licence fees needs to be paid as the main
advantage of SaaS is pay-per-use. The Paas model is not applicable as the organization is not
involved in coding and testing of the ERP software. Regarding the Iaas model the only
infrastructure required by sme to use this software would be the internet connection with
good bandwidth and hence this model is also not evaluated for the study.
In the next section, various factors that affect the selection of ERP software in cloud are
compiled and a PEST analysis is done. PEST – (Political, Economic, Social, Technological)
analysis of these factors will provide valuable information to analyze the selection of ERP for
sme (Neves, 2011) from four important perspectives namely political, economical, social and
technological in an organization. For example, if the PEST analysis highlights that politically,
many people perceive lack of control while ERP selection, it needs to be addressed. Once the
PEST analysis is done, the factors that fall in the one of the PEST category will be grouped as
either benefit or threat to an organization for ERP selection in cloud. All threat factors need
to be addressed by proper mitigation strategies. This will highlight how prepared the business
is for the required change. Some mitigation strategies will be mentioned for the risk factors.
In this section, PEST analysis( Neves, 2011) for factors that contribute to selection of ERP in
Cloud by sme is given in table 1 (Makkar, 2012; Saini, 2012; Marston, 2011; Motalab, 2011;
Hadidi, 2010, 2011; Hosseini, 2011; Sohag, 2011; Djohnson, 2010; Koehler, 2010; Hofmann,
2010; Clarke, 2010; Mozafari, 2012; Rassule, 2010). These factors of PEST analysis can
either be a benefit or a threat to an organization that wants to go for ERP in Cloud. The table
2 presents the PEST analysis in two categories namely: Benefit- Threat. For the factors that
are considered as threat for an organization, a possible mitigation approach has been
mentioned.
Agreement).
Non Compliance To be mentioned in
Issues SLA.
Vendor Credentials Market study to know
and Market about the vendor and
existence. the products.
Economical Flexible
Payment- Pay per
use
Low Entry Cost.
Low Operational
Cost.
Low IT
manpower
requirement.
Low
Implementation
time.
Social Reaching the Loss of key staff Change Management
extended user members. to be adopted within
community. an organization. Get
Resistance to change users involved,
by people. motivated and focused
on the project. Define
roles and
responsibilities.
Perceived lack of Clearly define roles
control. and responsibilities for
users. List resources
needed and their usage
before ERP adoption.
Technological Elasticity Ubiquitous access High internet speed
connection to be taken
by organization and
study of network
issues to be done.
Customization Service quality To be discussed and
finalized with vendor
and included in SLA.
User friendliness Data Lock in Policies to be framed
for retrieving and
migrating data to other
vendors cloud.
Availability To be discussed and
finalized with vendor
and included in SLA.
Backup and Storage It can be improved by
using redundant sites.
PEST-Benefit/Threat Analysis indicates that there are economical benefits involved when a
sme decides to go for ERP software in cloud. The cost incurred to go for such a solution is
much lower than implementing the traditional ERP solution for sme as there is no investment
in IT infrastructure required. The cost related to IT personnel’s also reduces. There is a need
to pay a hefty license fees to traditional ERP vendors whether or not the organization
consistently uses the ERP software, but in cloud platform there is flexible payment
depending upon the usage of the software service. It is termed as pay-per-use. As the number
of users and processes on cloud scale the payment needs to be done. Thus there is a huge
amount of cost saving, if an organization specially a sme goes for ERP solution in cloud.
Social and Political are the two major threats that an organization faces for ERP selection.
Social threats are mainly related to people’s perception within an organization and political
threats are those that an organization faces from outside. Effective change management
strategies are needed to overcome the social threats within a sme. For instance, resistance that
an organization faces when deciding to move for ERP system can be handled by providing
them training to make them realize the benefits of ERP, how to use the software. Incentives
can also be a part of this so that the persons who are involved get rewarded. Some of the
political as well as technological threats need to be addressed before the final selection of
ERP on cloud and a possible mitigation solution to be given in the Service Level Agreement
(SLA) with the vendor (Hadidi, 2011). Technologically the ERP on cloud will support high
elasticity and medium customization. The technology threats with respect to security,
availability of data, performance and other issues can be handled by specific mitigation
approaches duly addressed in SLA.
4. Conclusion
The main focus of this study is to provide a theoretical framework called PEST/Benefit-
Threat Analysis, to decide the factors for selection of ERP in Cloud by sme. The framework
categorizes the factors as benefits or threat to a sme who is considering an option of ERP in
Cloud on four organization perspectives namely political, economical, social and
ASIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH 371
Volume 3 Issue 2, 2013
The problem of stereotype management in Indian higher education
Shanthakumari. R, Somalingam. A
technological. The main benefit areas for an organization are economic and technology
benefits. There are more of political and social threats, but they can be dealt with suitable
mitigation approach. Further study includes collecting data from smes in India to find out the
most relevant factors for selection of ERP in cloud.
5. References
1. Clarke, R., (2010), Computing Clouds on the Horizon? Benefits and Risks from the
User’s Perspective, 23rd Bled eConference Etrust: Implications for the Individual,
Enterprises and Society, June 20-23, Bled, Slovenia.
2. Deep, A., Guttridge, P., Dani, S., & Burns, N. (2008). Investigating factors affecting
ERP selection in made-to-order SME sector. Journal of Manufacturing Technology
Management, 19(4), pp 430-446.
4. Fui-Hoon, Nah., Lau, S., Kuang, J., (2001), Critical Factors for Successful
Implementation of Enterprise Systems, Business Process Management Journal, 7(3),
pp 285-296.
5. Gattiker, T.F., Goodhue, D., (2005), What happens after ERP implementation:
understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level
outcomes, MIS Quarterly, 29(3), pp 559-585.
6. Geelan, J., (2011), Twenty one experts define cloud computing. Virtualization,
Electronic Magazine, available at http://virtualization.sys-con.com/node/612375,
accessed on 20th April 2011.
7. Haddara, (2011), ERP Adoption Cost Factors in SMES, European, Mediterranean &
Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems 2011.
8. Hofmann, P., (2008), ERP is Dead, Long Live ERP, IEEE Internet Computing, 12(4),
pp 80-84.
9. Hofmann, P., (2010), Cloud Computing: The Limits of Public Clouds for Business
Applications, Internet Computing, 14(6), pp 90-93.
10. Hadidi, R., (2011), What Managers of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Need
to Know about Cloud Computing and Services, European Journal of Management,
11(4), pp 79-87.
11. Hadidi, R., (2010), Exploring the use of SWOT Analysis in the Adoption of Cloud
Computing Services for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), European
Journal of Management, 10(3), pp 109-116.
12. Hosseini, A,K., Sommerville, I., Bogaerts, J., Teregowda, P., (2011), Decision
Support Tools for Cloud Migration in the Enterprise, IEEE Cloud, pp 541-548.
13. Kale, T., Banwait. S., Laroiya, C., (2010), Performance evaluation of ERP
implementation in Indian SMEs, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,
6(21), pp.758-780.
14. Koehler, P., Anandasivam, A., Cloud Services from a Consumer Perspective, (2010),
Proceedings of the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS),
Lima, Peru.
15. Makkar G.D., Bist, M., (2012), EaaS - ERP as a Service, Journal of Information and
Operations Management, 3(1), pp 141-145.
16. Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., Ghalsasi, A., (2011), Cloud
Computing- The business Perspective, Decision Support Systems, 51, pp 176-189.
17. Motalab, M., Sohag, S., (2011), Cloud Computing and the business Consequences of
ERP Use, International Journal of Computer Applications, 28(8),
18. Mozafari, M., Asli, M., Bejestani, N.,(2012), Why Selecting an Open Source ERP
over Proprietary ERP? A Focus on SMEs and Suppliers Perspectives, Journal of Basic
and Applied Scientific Research, 2(1), pp 680-684.
19. Munjal (2006), Small is beautiful: ERP for SME, available at http://www.domain-
b.com/infotech/itfeature/20060601_beautiful.htm, accessed during September 2012.
20. Neves, F,T., Marta, F,C., Correia, A., Neto, M., (2011), The Adoption of Cloud
Computing by SMes: Identifying and Coping with External Factors, Paper Presented
at 11th CAPSI, 19th -21st October.
21. Rosemann, M., Shanks, G., (2001), Extension and Configuration of Reference Models
for Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, Proceedings of the 12th Australian
Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2001), eds.: G. Finnie, D. Cecez-
Kecmanovic, B.Lo. Coffs Harboour, pp 537-546.
22. Saini, I., Khanna, A., Kumar, V., (2012), ERP Systems: Problems and Solution with
Special Reference To Small and Medium Enterprises, International Journal of
Research in IT & Management, 2(2), pp 715-725.
23. Schubert, P., (2011), Cloud Computing for Standard ERP Systems: Reference
Framework and Research Agenda, available at http://academia.edu/
Documents/in/Enterprise_Systems.
24. Sharma, M., Mehra A., Jola, H., Kumar, A., (2010), Scope of cloud computing for
SMEs in India, Journal of Computing, 2(5), pp 144-149.