Lecture Notes Chapter 3 Literature Review
Lecture Notes Chapter 3 Literature Review
Bien Maunahan
CHAPTER 3
LITERATURE REVIEW
STAGES OF LITERATURE
The first stage is the preliminary review. The aim is to identify the research gap and
justification for the study, which was discussed in Chapter 2
The objective of the comprehensive review, which constitutes the second phase, is to
formulate a framework or hypothesis. In this instance, the literature review should not "cover
the field" or generate a "shopping list" of works authored by various authors. An extensive
literature review is unnecessary, particularly if it encompasses tangential works. Reviewing
the fundamental concepts is adequate for constructing the framework or causal mechanism.
The fundamental objective of the literature review is to familiarize oneself with prior
research in order to facilitate a comparison of one's own findings. Local contexts must be
taken into account for the comparison to make meaning.
It is more efficient to review the latest publications first rather than start from older
publications. The more recent publications would have reviewed earlier studies.
FRAMEWORK
Furthermore, the utilization of role theory brings role ambiguity in the field of
construction project management. Similarly, to societal roles, stakeholders may confront
standards. Difficulties may arise, for instance, among stakeholders regarding the function of
governmental entities in overseeing construction operations. These disparities could
potentially be attributed to different ethical positions, comparable to how conservatives
advocate for limited government involvement in construction projects while liberal campaign
for stricter regulations pertaining to safety and quality control.
anticipated conduct within the construction industry, which is in accordance with the
common values of quality, safety, and sustainability.
Another example is how to develop a framework to guide the research concerning the
study of smart cities. Here, the researcher is not looking for the causes of smart cities.
Instead, the study is exploratory. The goal is to understand and explore the potential of smart
cities in using informatics and technology to improve the organization and efficiency of
municipal services.
Consequently, a framework is necessary to guide the exploration of what is a smart
city and how it works. It may include the definitions of smart cities, types of smart cities,
goals, defining features, development of a smart city ecosystem of firms and workers, pilot
programs, integrative standards, costs, equity, inclusiveness, and other issues.
In summary, the role theory is the framework, but this alone is not sufficient. The
researcher needs to develop the framework by enriching it with related ideas. Hence, the
researcher must establish different roles' values, rules, expectations, perspectives, and
constraints. Additionally, developing the framework with additional relevant and practical
concepts aids the researcher in attaining a broader understanding of the values, regulations,
anticipations, viewpoints, and limitations associated with the specific subject matter or
situation under study
HYPOTHESIS
In the case of a hypothesis, the literature review is used to develop the causal
mechanism. It may be in textual, symbolic, mathematical, or physical form. A hypothesis is a
tentative answer to a research problem that is advanced so that it can be tested.
It is appropriate to use a hypothesis when you are testing a theory. If you expect how
your research question will be answered (the outcome), then it is fair to say you have an idea
in mind. If you ask your research question, 'What is the expected outcome?' and have an
answer, you can ask why? What is my thinking behind this prediction? This is essentially the
theory that you will be testing.
If you cannot predict the answer to your question, then your approach is not one of
theory testing, and you should not proceed with developing hypotheses to test. Your research
questions remain as such. This will be the case if your research is descriptive or exploratory.
Developing hypotheses requires that you identify one character, variable, or descriptor
of a sampling unit that causes effects or influences another character, variable, or descriptor
of the same or other sampling units. The character, variable, or descriptor that affects other
variables or sampling units is called the independent variable. The character, variable, or
descriptor affected by the independent variable is called the dependent or response variable.
A hypothesis often follows a basic format of "If [this happens], then [this will happen]." One
way to structure your hypothesis is to describe what will happen to the dependent variable if
you change the independent variable.
The basic format might be: "If [these changes are made to a certain independent
variable], then we will observe [a change in a specific dependent variable]."
A hypothesis predicts a relationship between one or more factors and the problem
under study that can be tested.
Kinds of Hypotheses:
(a) The question form of Hypotheses - At best, it represents the simplest level of
empirical observation.
(b) Declarative Statement - Provide an anticipated relationship or difference between
variables. This would imply that the hypothesis developer has examined existing
evidence, which led him to believe a distinction may be anticipated as additional
evidence.
(c) Directional Statement - A hypothesis may be directional, which brings an expected
direction in the relationship or difference between variables.
(d) Non-Directional Hypothesis - A hypothesis may be stated in the null form, which
asserts that no relationship or difference exists between or among the variables.
The form null hypothesis is a statistical hypothesis that is testable within the
framework of probability theory. It is also a non-directional form of a hypothesis.
Types of Hypotheses
1. Simple - the relationship between the dependent (DV) and the independent
variable (IV). Example: Smoking (IV) leads to lung cancer (DV)
2. Complex – the relationship between two or more DV and two or more IV.
Example: Smoking and drinking (IV) leads to lung cancer and liver disease (DV)
3. Null Hypothesis – there is no relationship between DV and IV. For example; there
is no relationship between smoking and stomach pain
4. Research – the opposite of the Null hypothesis. That is the research there is an
existing relationship between the DV and IV. For example, there is a relationship
between smoking and lung cancer.
5. Directional – will show the relationship between the DV and IV and will show the
direction or the exact nature of the variables either positive or negative. For
example, there is a positive relationship between the experience of the nurses and
job satisfaction.
6. Non-directional – opposite of the directional it shows the relationship between
two variables but does not show the direct either positive or negative. For
example, there is a relationship between the experience of the nurses and the job
satisfaction. (it means does not show the direction positive or negative)
7. Causal – It shows the cause and effect relationship. For example, smoking leads
(IV) to lung cancer (DV).
8. Associative – association or connection of two variables. As the DV changes the
IV changes. For example, for a diabetic person, lowering the level of blood sugar
will decrease the level of infection.
Formulation of Hypothesis
1. Deriving (obtain or identify) a hypothesis from related work or study. Can be taken
from the experience, literature review, observation, or consulting with an expert
person
2. Identifying the dependent and independent variables
a. Independent is responsible to make changes and the dependent variable is the
topic under the study.
i. Examples
Smoking (IV) leads to lung Cancer (DV)
Drinking cold water (IV) leads to Throat Pain (DV)
3. Stating the Hypothesis using the independent and the dependent in a simple sentence
or a concise manner. To show the relationship between the two variables using words
like needs too, lesser than, greater than, associated with or different from, and others.
Once a researcher has formed a testable hypothesis, the next step is to select a
research design and start collecting data. The research method depends mostly on exactly
what they are studying. There are two basic types of research methods: descriptive research
and experimental research.
If you are doing the literature review, you have to decide which test to use by
reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of each approach before making the decision.
Besides, you will need to improve the model or apply it in a different context as part of your
research contribution. The improved model is your research hypothesis.
In summary, the literature review for causal analysis is not an ad hoc list of authors or
an attempt to cover everything on the topic. It focuses on the research problem and how to
develop a hypothesis for testing. Only the critical research publications or representative
papers in competing explanations are cited to give readers a sense of how the main ideas are
connected.
Recall that, other than developing the hypothesis, you should review the literature to
improve the research methodology. Finally, you should also review previous findings to
compare your results.
To get from your prima facie questions to a final question, you have to do some
work:
If you have the questions in context, it means rethinking your initial question and then doing
a bit of groundwork (foundation). It involves what is sometimes called a recursive design to
your research.
Your research changes as you proceed; you will have new ideas, which will affect the
direction and progress of your research. They are not bad backward works; they are back in
the sense of letting you think again and refine your initial questions. “Go into your research
with an open mind, knowing that you will be changing and varying, but once you have
decided, be decisive and go for it.”
The term literature refers to the knowledge of a particular area of investigation in any
discipline, including theoretical, practical, and research studies. It is a collection of all the
scholarly writings on a topic. The term review means organizing the knowledge of the
specific area of research to evolve a structure of knowledge to show that the study would be
an addition to this field.
• Opportunity to discover productive ways of doing your research so that you can
benefit from previous studies.
• Familiarize yourself with previous findings so that you can compare your results.
It is essential to pay attention to the local contexts so that the comparison makes
sense.
• Develop the framework or hypothesis
• Discover productive ways to improve the methodology and data analysis
• Include all fundamental studies and theories
• The review of literature for the research proposal does not need to be extensive as
that for the final write-up
• Describing
• Summarizing
• Compare and contrast
• Critically evaluate
• Analyze
• Organize
The task of the review of literature is highly creative and tedious because the
researcher has to synthesize the available knowledge of the field in a unique way to provide
the rationale for his study.
The literature review fills in the gaps in your knowledge, or indeed, it may create some new
gaps for you. In other words, the literature review helps you to refine your question.
Steps How to Write Literature (for discussion refer to the other lecture notes 3.1)
Some other more academic places you can access are the following:
1. Google Scholar
2. EBSCO
3. MEDLINE
4. ECONLIT
5. PROQUEST
6. OPEN ACCESS
7. STANFORD SEARCHWORKS
JU/JIT Construction Engineering and Management 14
Scientific Research Methods Dr. Engr. Bien Maunahan
Assignment 1
• Submit five full published articles that will support your research topic
• Write a list of standard references (Vancouver as well as Harvard styles), assuming
utilized in your write up
STEP 2 LOG, CATALOG, and SYNTHESIS (see other lecture notes 3.1)
Critical Reading: The references and material which seem useful as a result of
preliminary reading are noted down and are read critically, and a severe evaluation
of the available information and data.
Try reading it once more, but move on quickly if it does not make sense the second time.
2. Writing
1. Once you have your information from your literature search, you need to make
sense of it and join it into a meaningful story.
2. Your literature review should be more like a story than a list.
3. You should be connecting this bit with that bit,
1. saying how these fits but that does not and
2. showing how there is a theme (or not) through the literature that you
are reviewing
3. If, inconveniently, there is not a theme, say so. Suggest some reason
why this might be.
One of the big problems with students’ literature reviews is that they look like lists rather
than stories.
Do not be upset by the difference in opinion that you find. Take pleasure in them, and use
them to understand your field of study.
Try to understand why these exist: try to create a story and explain the story.
➢ Then, use your understanding to modify your initial questions. You can then
progress from here.
Drawing Storyboards
A storyboard helps you get a mental map of the subject you intend to study.
➢ Toto illustrates the point: suppose that you are studying something in
your field of specialization; what was the design parameter to apply? Is
that a very clearly defined issue or question as it stands?
A storyboard will enable you to think about some of the issues surrounding those parameters
Drawing a storyboard is helpful to check whether the problem and all primary, directly
contributing factors or significant components have been covered
Hint:
Making Headway
What you must now do is to establish and make clear how your argument will proceed.
Sequencing of gathered literature concerning parameters is a good start
Common Ground
The opening context should contain some common grounds on which everyone can
agree.
The second thing to do in setting out your likely argument is to establish the problem on the
ground that you have cleared. You have straightened things out a bit. Now you can be clear
about where the issues lie.
What is missing in the gathered data, and what data does not make sense in your
topic?
REFERENCE CITATION
When you are writing, you are required to refer to the work of other authors.
– Each time you do so, it is necessary to identify their work by making reference to it
in-text and reference list
References must be provided whenever you use someone else’s opinions, theories, or data
organization of material.
• Vancouver System
• Harvard System
• Others
Vancouver System
Then at the end of the paper or chapter (of a book), the references will be listed in that order,
using the format described below:
For an article:
Example:
Alemayehu, E. Experimental Studies on T-Beam
Connection. International Journal of Civil Engineering.
2019; 1(2):59-62
For a book:
Example:
Example:
Briggs, C., Flick, U. and Stringer, E.T. Appropriate
Technologies In Boerma T and Bennett J 2nd Ed. Construction
Engineering. Amsterdam: KIT Press, 1999; p. 51-68.
Harvard System
References are referred to more fully in the text, putting the surname of the author and
year of the publication referred to between brackets, Ex:(Agon, 2011).
In this citation system, the references at the end of the proposal should be listed in
alphabetical order, and the publication year comes following the author's names in
brackets.
For a book:
Example:
Vancouver System
The contrast between toughness and strength should be noted; the former
measures energy, whereas the latter measures the stress required to fracture the
material [10]. Hardness, or resistance to wear, is an essential property of
concrete used in roads and in-floor surfaces Subjected to heavy traffic [8].
Harvard System
“et al.” is a scholarly abbreviation of the Latin phrase et alia, which means “and others.” It is
commonly used when you do not want to name all the people or things in a list and works
roughly the same way as “etc.”
The “al.” in this phrase needs a period after it to indicate it is an abbreviation of Alia, but it
is incorrect to put a period after “et.”
When you cite sources of information in the text of your report, regardless of
whether you quote, copy, paraphrase, or summarize, you should include:
• Author prominent
• Information prominent
Author prominent
This way gives prominence to the author by using the author‘s surname (family name) as
part of your sentence with the date and the page number in parentheses (round brackets).
• Paraphrase example
Alemayehu (2018) suggests that, unlike the final year project, research
must follow a series of steps and be rigorous.
Information prominent
The other way of citing references gives prominence to the information, with all the
required referencing details in parentheses at the end of the citation.
It has been argued that “research must be systematic and a rigid standard
protocol” (Alemayehu, 2018, p. 52).
• Paraphrase example
unlike the final year project, research must follow rigorous steps (Alemayehu,
2018).
Websites
All cited literature in the text should be given in the reference list.
Vancouver System:
[1] Bryan, S.E. Pumice rafting and faunal dispersion during 2001 – 2002 in the
Southwest Pacific: the record of a dacitic submarine explosive eruption from
Tonga, Earth, and Planetary Science Letters. 2004; 135-154.
[2] Moufti, M.R., Sabtan, A.A., El-Mahdy, O.R., Shehata, W.M. Assessment
of the industrial utilization of scoria materials in central Harrat, Saudi Arabia,
Engineering Geology. 2000; 57 (2): 155-162.
[3] Assefa, G. The mineral industry of Ethiopia: present conditions and future
prospects. Journal of African Earth Sciences. 1984; 3(3): 331-345.
Harvard System:
Bryan, S.E. (2004). Pumice rafting and faunal dispersion during 2001 – 2002
in the Southwest Pacific: a record of a dacitic submarine explosive eruption
from Tonga. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 135-154
Avoid Plagiarism
In writing, we draw upon others’ words and ideas and the intellectual heritage
underlying human progress.
The scholarship entails researching, understanding, and building upon the work of
others but also requires that proper credit be given for any borrowed material.
What is Plagiarism?
Plagiarism is stealing other researchers’ data or work and presenting them as one’s work. It is
a severe offense, and you should give proper credit when it is due. This does not mean that
one should cite everything, which is overkill.
Using words, ideas, computer code, or any work without giving proper credit
is plagiarism.
Any time you use information from a source of any kind, you must cite it.
Citation Methods
Two other methods are footnotes and endnotes, which use raised numbers at the end
of an idea or quoted words to link the reader to the source, given at the bottom of the
page (footnote) or the end of the paper (endnote).
For all three methods, you must include the source in a reference list at the end of the paper,
fully identifying each source by author‘s name, title, publisher‘s name, year of publication,
and page numbers.
The exception is that the superscript numbers should be placed before dashes.
➢ When a footnote must be placed at the end of a clause,1 add the number after
the comma.
➢ When a footnote must be placed at the end of a sentence, add the number after
the period.2
➢ Numbers denoting footnotes should always appear after punctuation, except
for one piece of punctuation3—the dash
Sample of Footnote.
Citation to electronic resources such as websites should include the exact URL / URI, the
date last revised, and any available information about the writer, publisher, and/or creator of
the site.
Example:
UC Berkeley Teaching Library Internet Workshops Style Sheets for Citing
Resources (Print & Electronic) at
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Style.html
1. Paraphrase
2. Cite
3. Quoting
4. Citing Quotes
5. Citing your materials
6. Referencing
Paraphrase
You have found information that is perfect for your research paper. Read it and put it
into your own words. Make sure that you do not copy completely more than two
words in a row from the text you have found. If you use more than two words
together, you will have to use quotation marks.
Cite
Citing is one of the effective ways to avoid plagiarism. Follow the document
formatting guidelines used by educational institutions or the institution that issued the
research request. This usually entails the addition of the author(s) and the publication
date or similar information. Citing is that simple.
Quoting
When quoting a source, use the quote exactly the way it appears. No one wants to be
misquoted—most institutions of higher learning frown on “block quotes” or quotes of
40 words or more. A scholar should be able to paraphrase most material effectively.
This process takes time, but the effort pays off! Quoting must be done correctly to
avoid plagiarism allegations.
Citing Quotes
Citing a quote can be different than citing paraphrased material. This practice usually
involves adding a page number or a paragraph number in the case of web content.
If you used some of the material you are using for your research paper in your current
class, a previous one, or anywhere else, you must cite yourself. Treat the text the same
as you would if someone else wrote it. It may sound odd, but using the material you
have used before is called self-plagiarism, and it is not acceptable.
REFERENCING
One of the most important ways to avoid plagiarism is to include a reference page or
page of works cited at the end of your research paper. Again, this page must meet the
document formatting guidelines used by your educational institution. This information
is particular and includes the author(s), date of publication, title, and source.
Original Source:
Highway engineers must take into account future traffic flows, design of
highway intersections/interchanges, geometric alignment, structural design
pavement thickness, and pavement maintenance
The author believed that highway engineer should consider all the relevant
engineering parameters in the design and maintenance of highway pavements
(Rogers, 2002).
The author discussed that “Highway engineers …must consider future traffic
flows, design of highway … structural design of pavement thickness, and
pavement maintenance. (Rogers, 2002).”
Always cite words, information, and ideas you use if they are new to you
(learned in your research). No matter where you find it
– even in on the Internet or in an encyclopedia,
YOU CITE IT!