0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views

Unit and Invertible 2

This document contains proofs of properties of rings and definitions of concepts like units and zero divisors. It proves things like: - 0a = a0 = 0 for all a in a ring R - (-a)b = a(-b) = -ab for all a, b in R - The units of the polynomial ring R[x] are the units of R - If a function f from [0,1] to R is not a unit or zero, then it is a zero divisor

Uploaded by

Colton Carter
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views

Unit and Invertible 2

This document contains proofs of properties of rings and definitions of concepts like units and zero divisors. It proves things like: - 0a = a0 = 0 for all a in a ring R - (-a)b = a(-b) = -ab for all a, b in R - The units of the polynomial ring R[x] are the units of R - If a function f from [0,1] to R is not a unit or zero, then it is a zero divisor

Uploaded by

Colton Carter
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

IMMERSE 2008: Assignment 1

1.1) Let R be a ring. Prove

(a) 0a = a0 = 0 for all a ∈ R.


Proof: Let a ∈ R. Then

0a = (0 + 0)a = 0a + 0a

From the additive inverse law we get 0a + (−(0a)) = 0a + 0a + (−(0a)) which


becomes 0 = 0a. Similarly, if we start with a0 and follow the same type of
argument we get a0 = 0. Thus 0a = a0 = 0. 
(b) (−a)b = a(−b) = −(ab) for all a, b ∈ R.
Proof: Let a, b ∈ R.

(−a)b = (−a)b + 0 = (−a)b + (ab + (−(ab))) = ((−a)b + (ab)) + (−(ab)) =


b((−a) + a) + (−(ab)) = b0 + (−(ab)) = −(ab)
Similarly, if we follow the same proof but add (a(−b) + (−(a(−b))) then we get
(−a)b = a(−b). Thus (−a)b = a(−b) = −(ab). 
(c) (−a)(−b) = ab for all a, b ∈ R.
Proof: Let a, b ∈ R.
(−a)(−b) = (−a)(−b) + 0 = (−a)(−b) + (ab + (−(ab)))
By 1.b, −(ab) = (−a)b which means we have
(−a)(−b) + ab + (−a)b = (−a)(−b) + (−a)b + ab = (−a)((−b) + b) + ab =
(−a)0 + ab = ab.
Thus (−a)(−b) = ab. 
(d) If R has an identity 1, then the identity is unique and −a = (−1)a.
Proof: Let x, y ∈ R. Suppose xa = ya where a 6= 0 and x and y are two
identities.
xa + (−ya) = 0
(x + (−y))a = 0
x + −y = 0
x=y
Thus the identity is unique and by hypothesis it is equal to 1.
Then -a=(-a)1 and by 1b and the commutative property (-a)1=a(-1)=(-1)a. 

1.2) Problems involving zerodivisors:

(a) Prove that a unit element of a ring cannot be a zerodivisor.

Solution. Let a be a unit element and a zero divisor. Then by definition, a 6= 0


and for b ∈ R and b 6= 0, ab = 0. Since a is a unit, a−1 exists. So a−1 (ab) =
(a−1 a)b = 0 · b, so b = 0. But this contradicts our assumption that b is non-zero.
Therefore, a unit element cannot be a zero divisor.

1
(b) Let a and b be elements of a ring whose product ab is a zerodivisor. Show that
either a or b is a zerodivisor.

Solution. Let a,b ∈ R and suppose ab is a zero divisor. Then ab 6= 0 and for
c ∈ R and c 6= 0, (ab)c = 0, and so a(bc) = 0. Note that a 6= 0 and b 6= 0
because ab 6= 0. So consider the cases when bc = 0 or when bc 6= 0. If bc 6= 0,
then since a 6= 0, a is a zero divisor. On the other hand, if bc = 0, then since
b 6= 0 and c 6= 0, this implies b is a zero-divisor. Therefore, either a or b is a
zero-divisor.

(c) Is the sum of two zerodivisors necessarily a zerodivisor? If so, give a prove. If
not, give a counterexample.

Solution. There are cases where the sum of two zerodivisors is a zerodivisor. In
Z/8, for instance, 4 and 6 are zerodivisors since 4 · 6 = 0 (mod 8) and 4 + 6 = 10
and 4 · 10 = 0 (mod 8). The claim is not true in general, however. Consider
Z/6 where 2 and 3 are zero-divisors since 2 · 3 = 0 (mod 6), but 2 + 3 = 5 is not
a zero-divisor in Z/6.

1.3) Let R be an integral domain. Determine the units of R[x].


Claim: The units of R[x] are the units of R.

Proof: Let R be an integral domain. We know that units of R[x] are elements u
for which there exists an r such that u · r = 1. Furthermore, we know u and r are of
the form

u = a0 x0 + a1 x1 + ... + an xn (1)
0 1 m
r = b0 x + b1 x + ...bm x . (2)

It is apparent, because of the form of our elements, that an and bm can both be
defined as nonzero, because if the last term of u or r were zero, we could simply
decide our last term were the term before it. Also, if u or r were simply the zero
polynomial, the product u · r 6= 1.

The last term, or the term of highest power in u·r is (an xn )(bm xm ) = an bm xm+n .
Because of how we constructed u and r, either m + n = 0 or m + n > 0. If m + n > r,
then xm+n 6= 1, so for u · r = 1, an bm = 0. But we know neither an or bm is equal
to zero, and because R is an integral domain, there are no zero divisors, and their
product cannot be zero. Thus m + n = 0, so that m = 0 and x = 0, and we are left
with u = a0 x0 and r = b0 x0 . The product u · r = a0 b0 = 1, and since a0 and b0 are
both elements in R and their product is 1, they must be units in R. Hence units in
R[x] are units in R.

1.4) Let R be an integral domain. Determine the units of R[[x]].

1.5) Let A be the ring of all functions from [0, 1] to R.

2
(a) What are the units of A?
Claim: The units of A are all functions from [0, 1] to R which have entirely
nonzero ranges.

Proof: Since these functions are real-valued, it follows that functions whose
ranges are all units in the real numbers are units in A. The units of R are all
nonzero real numbers, thus the units of A are those with nonzero ranges.
(b) Prove that if f is not a unit and not zero, then f is a zero divisor.
Proof: Assume f is not a unit and is not zero. then define g to be the function
such that where f is not zero, g is zero and where f is zero, g is not zero. Then
g is also not zero, and the multiplication f · g = 0, so f is a zero divisor.
1.6) Let A be the ring of all continuous functions from [0, 1] to R.
(a) What are the units of A?
Proof: A∗ = {f (x) ∈ A|f (x) 6= 0 for all x ∈ [0, 1]}.
Let f (x) ∈ A∗ , with f (x) 6= 0. Thus there exists some g(x) ∈ A such that
f (x)g(x) = 1, for all x ∈ [0, 1]
That is, f (x) 6= 0 for all x ∈ [0, 1]. Thus
A∗ ⊆ {f (x) ∈ A|f (x) 6= 0 for all x ∈ [0, 1]}.
Next let f (x) ∈ A such that f (x) 6= 0 for all x ∈ [0, 1]. Since f is continuous,
g := f1 is also continuous. Thus since
1
f (x) = 1,
f (x)
1
for all non-zero f (x) ∈ A there exists g(x) defined by g(x) := f (x) such that
f (x)g(x) = 1. Therefore {f (x) ∈ A|f (x) 6= 0 for all x ∈ [0, 1]} ⊆ A∗ , so
A∗ = {f (x) ∈ A|f (x) 6= 0 for all x ∈ [0, 1]}. 
(b) Give an example of an element which is neither a unit nor a zero divisor.
Proof: The function f (x) = x is neither a zero divisor nor a unit in A. Since
f (0) = 0, f (x) ∈
/ A∗ , and g(x) = 0 is the only continuous function such that
f (x)g(x) = 0.
Thus f (x) is not a zero divisor. 
(c) Give an example of a zero divisor in A.
Proof: The following two functions are zero divisors in the ring:
(
0 for all x ∈ [0, 12 ]
h(x) =
x − 21 for all x ∈ ( 12 , 1]
and (
1
x− 2 for all x ∈ [0, 21 ]
g(x) =
0 for all x ∈ ( 21 , 1]


3
1.7) Determine whether the following polynomials are irreducible in the rings indicated.
For those that are reducible, determine their factorization into irreducibles. The
notation Fp denotes the finite field Z/pZ, where p is a prime.

(a) x2 + x + 1 in F2 [x].
(b) x3 + x + 1 in F3 [x].
(c) x4 + 1 in F5 [x].
(d) x4 + 10x2 + 1 in Z[x].

1.8) Let R be a non-zero ring. Prove that the following are equivalent:

(a) R is a field.
(b) The only ideals in R are (0) and (1).
(c) Every homomorphism of R into a non-zero ring B is injective.

Proof: (a)⇒(b). Assume R is a field. Suppose that there exists an ideal, I, of R


such that I 6= (0) and I 6= (1). Since I 6= (0), there exists an a ∈ I such that a 6= 0.
Now, a−1 ∈ F since F is a field. By the definition of ideal, a−1 a ∈ I. But a−1 a = 1
which implies that I = R, a contradiction.
(b)⇒(c). Now assume that the only ideals in R are (0) and (1). Say φ is a
homomorphism such that φ : R → B. We much show that φ is injective. To do so,
say φ(x) = 0 for some x ∈ R. Then x ∈ Ker φ, which is an ideal of R. Since the only
ideals of R are (0) and (1), Ker φ = (0) or Ker φ = (1) = R. We also know that φ is
not the trivial homomorphism since φ(1) = 1. Thus Ker φ = (0), in other words if
x ∈ Ker φ, x = 0. So φ is injective.
(c)⇒(a) Now assume that every homomorphism of R into a non-zero ring B is
injective. We must show that R is a field. Let a ∈ R such that a 6= 0. Consider the
canonical map

φ :R → R/(a)
x 7→ x

Since φ is a homomorphism by (c) it is injective. However φ(a) = 0 which implies


that a = 0, a contradiction since a was assumed to be nonzero. This means that
R/(a) = 0 and so R = (a). Now, since R is a ring there exists 1 ∈ R so 1 ∈ (a),
meaning that 1 is a multiple of a, in other words ax = 1 for some x ∈ R. Therefore
a has a multaplicative inverse and R is a field. 

4
1.9) Let f : R → S be a ring homomorphism.

(a) Prove that Ker f is an ideal of R.


Solution. Note that Ker φ is non-empty since 0 ∈ Ker φ. Let a ∈ Ker φ, and let
r ∈ R. Then φ(ar) = φ(a)φ(r) = 0·r = 0, so ar ∈ Ker φ. By a similar argument,
ra ∈ Ker φ. Now let r, s ∈ Ker φ. Then φ(r + s) = φ(r) + φ(s) = 0 + 0 = 0.
Therefore, r + s ∈ Ker φ.

(b) Prove that if J is an ideal of S then f −1 (J) is an ideal of R that contains Ker f .
Solution. Note that φ−1 (J) = r ∈ R|φ(r) ∈ J. Let a, b ∈ φ−1 (J). Then a and
b are also contained in R, and φ(a + b) = φ(a) + φ(b) ∈ J, so a + b ∈ φ−1 (J).
Now suppose a ∈ φ−1 (J), r ∈ R. Then φ(ar) = φ(a)φ(r) where φ(a) ∈ J and
φ(r) ∈ S. Thus, φ(ar) ∈ J and ar ∈ φ−1 (J). Similarly, ra ∈ φ−1 (J). Therefore,
φ−1 (J) is an ideal of R.
To show Ker φ is contained in φ−1 (J), let ar ∈ Ker φ. Then φ(ar) = 0. Since
0 ∈ J, then ar ∈ φ−1 (J). Therefore, Ker φ is contained in φ−1 (J).

(c) Prove that if P is a prime ideal of S then f −1 (P ) is a prime ideal of R.


Solution. Consider φ−1 (P ) = x ∈ R|φ(x) ∈ P . We know that φ−1 (P ) is non-
empty since φ : 0 → 0, so let ab ∈ φ−1 (P ). We want to show that a ∈ φ−1 (P )
or b ∈ φ−1 (P ). Since ab ∈ φ−1 (J), φ(ab) ∈ P and φ(ab) = φ(a)φ(b). Since P
is prime, either φ(a) or φ(b) ∈ P . So without loss of generality, let φ(b) ∈ P .
Then b ∈ φ−1 (P ), and therefore, φ−1 (P ) is prime.

1.10) Let p be a prime and consider the ring of polynomials in x with coefficients in Fp . This
ring is denoted by Fp [x]. Let ϕ : Fp [x] → Fp [x] be the map given by ϕ(f ) = f p . Prove
that ϕ is an endomorphism. This map is called the Frobenius endomorphism.

Solution.: Let f , g ǫ Fp [x].


a)Then ϕ(f ∗ g) = (f ∗ g)p = f p ∗ g p = ϕ(f ) ∗ ϕ(g).
p . By the binomial theorem (f + g)p = p f p +

b) Then ϕ(f + g) = (f + g) 0
p p−1 p
+ pp g p . Since p0 = 1 and pp = 1 we can rewrite
  p−1   
1 f g + ... + p−1 fg
(f + g)p = f p + S + g p where S = p1 f p−1 g + ... + p−1 p
  p−1
f g . We know that in
p
 p! (p−1)!
general for p 6= 0, p then k = k!(p−k)! = p ∗ k!(p−k)! . And since p is prime, p has no
factors. Thus k! does not divide p and (p − k)! does not divide p. Thus there will
always be a factor of p out in front of every coefficient in S. And since our coefficients
are coming from Fp [x] then all coefficients of S will be equal to 0 in Fp [x]. Then
S = 0 ∗ f p−1 g + ... + 0 ∗ f g p−1 = 0. Therefore in Fp [x], (f + g)p = f p + f g . Thus we
have ϕ(f + g) = (f + g)p = f p + g p = ϕ(f ) + ϕ(g). Thus ϕ is an endomorphism. 

1.11) Let S ⊆ R and let I be an ideal of R. Prove that the following statements are
equivalent:

(a) S ⊆ I.
(b) (S) ⊆ I.

This fact is useful when you want to show that one ideal is contained in another.

5
1.12) Prove the following equalities in the polynomial ring R = Q[x, y]:

(a) (x + y, x − y) = (x, y).


(b) (x + xy, y + xy, x2 , y 2 ) = (x, y).
(c) (2x2 + 3y 2 − 11, x2 − y 2 − 3) = (x2 − 4, y 2 − 1).

This illustrates that the same ideal can have many different generating sets and that
different generating sets may have different numbers of elements.

1.13) Let R be a ring and let I, J and K be ideals of R.

(a) Prove that I ∩ J is an ideal of R.


Proof: First, note that 0 ∈ I and 0 ∈ J. Therefore, 0 ∈ I ∩ J. Next, let
x, y ∈ I ∩ J, then x, y ∈ I and x, y ∈ J. So, since I and J are both ideals,
x + y ∈ J and x + y ∈ I. Therefore, x + y ∈ I ∩ J. Finally, let x ∈ I ∩ J and let
r ∈ R. Then x ∈ I and x ∈ J and since I and J are ideals, xr ∈ I and xr ∈ J
so xr ∈ I ∩ J
Therefore, I ∩ J is an ideal of R. 
(b) Prove that I(J + K) = IJ + IK.
Proof: (⊆) Let a ∈ I(J + K). In other words, a ∈ { si xi (yi P
P
+ zi )|xi ∈ I, yi ∈
s
J,
Pzs i ∈ K} where P s is the sizePof the set I(J +P K). However, Pn i xi (yi + zi ) =
s s m
i xi yi + xi zi = i xi yi + i xi zi . So a ∈ { i xi yi + i xi zi )|xi ∈ I, yi ∈
J, zi ∈ K}. So I(J + K) ⊆ IJ + IK.
(⊇) Let a ∈ IJ + IK, then a ∈ { m
P Pn
i xi yi + i xi zi |xi ∈ I, yi ∈ J, zi ∈ K}.
However, 0 is in both IJ and IK so we can add zeroes P to each ofP the sums
t t
and
Pt make them the
Pt same size of t = m +
Pt n. So then x y
i i i + i xi zi =
i xi yi + xi zi = i xi (yi + zi ). So a ∈ { i xi (yi + zi )|xi ∈ I, yi ∈ J, zi ∈ K}.
So, I(J + K) ⊇ IJ + IK.
Therefore, I(J + K) = IJ + IK. 
(c) Prove that if either J ⊆ I or K ⊆ I then I ∩ (J + K) = I ∩ J + I ∩ K. (modular
law)
Proof: Without loss of generality, assume that J ⊆ I.
(⊆) Let x ∈ I ∩ (J + K) then x ∈ I and x ∈ J + K i.e. x ∈ {s + t|s ∈ J, t ∈ K}.
So x ∈ s + t for some s, t. Note also s ∈ I and s ∈ J. Since x = s + t,
t = x − s and x, s ∈ I so t ∈ I. So, s ∈ I ∩ J and t ∈ I ∩ K. This implies that
x ∈ {s + t|s ∈ I ∩ K and t ∈ I ∩ K}. Hence, x ∈ I ∩ J + I ∩ K. Therefore,
I ∩ (J + K) ⊆ I ∩ J + I ∩ K.
(⊇) Let x ∈ I ∩ J + I ∩ K i.e. x ∈ {m + n|m ∈ I ∩ J, n ∈ I ∩ K}. So m ∈ I and
m ∈ J and n ∈ I and n ∈ K. Since m, n ∈ I, x = m + n for some m, n must
also be an element of I i.e. x ∈ I. So, x ∈ I ∩ (J + K). Therefore I ∩ J ⊇ I ∩ K.
Therefore I ∩ (J + K) = I ∩ J + I ∩ K. 

1.14) In the ring of integers Z compute the ideals:

(a) (2) + (3),


(b) (2) + (4),

6
(c) (2)((3) + (4)),
(d) (2)(3) ∩ (2)(4),
(e) (6) ∩ (8),
(f) (6)(8)

1.15) Let Q[x, y]. Compute the ideals:

(a) (x) ∩ (y),


(b) (x + y)2 ,
(c) (x, y)2 ,
(d) (x2 ) ∩ (x, y),
(e) (x2 + xy) ∩ (xy + y 2 ),
(f) (x) + (y),
(g) (x + 1) + (x),
(h) (x2 + xy)(x − y),
(i) (x2 ) ∩ ((xy) + (y 2 )),
(j) (x − y)((x) + (y 2 ))

1.16) Let R√be a ring. The nilradical 0 of R√is the set of nilpotent elements of R. Prove
that 0 is an ideal, and if xn = 0 in R/ 0 for some n then x = 0.

Proof: Let x, y ∈ 0. Then ∃n, m ∈ N such that xn = y m = 0. By the binomial
theorem,
n+m
X 
n+m n + m i n+m−i
(x + y) = xy
i
i=0

For i > n, xi = xn xn−i = 0 · xn−i = 0. Thus, n+m


 i n+m−i
i xy = 0. For i < n,
n + m − i > m. Thus, y n+m−i = y m y n−i = 0 · y n−i = 0, so n+m xi y n+m−i = 0.
√ i
Therefore, (x + y)n+m = 0, so x + y ∈ 0.

Let x ∈ 0, r ∈ R. Then ∃n ∈ N such that xn = 0. √ Since multiplication is
commutative, (rx)n = rn xn = rn · 0 = 0. Therefore, rx ∈ 0.
√ √
Finally, 01 = 0, so 0 ∈ 0. Therefore, 0 is an ideal of R.

Let x ∈ R and x be the image of x under the canonical map R → R/ 0. Suppose √
xn = 0 for some n ∈ N. That is, x · · · x = x · · · x = xn = 0. Therefore xn ∈ √0.
Thus, ∃m ∈ N such that (xn )m = 0. Since (xn )m = xnm and nm ∈ N, then x ∈ 0.
Therefore, x = 0. 
√ √
1.17) Let R be a ring, and I ⊆ 0 an ideal, where 0 is the nilradical of R. Prove that if
x is a unit of R/I then x is a unit of R.

Proof: Assume that x is a unit of R/I, thus there exists y ∈ R/I such that xy = 1.
It follows that:

xy = i + 1 for some i ∈ I, and thus xy − 1 ∈ I.

7
By the definition of I, (xy − 1)n = 0 for some n ≥ 1. The binomial expansion gives
that
n  
n
X n
(xy − 1) = (xy)i (−1)n−i = 0 for some n ≥ 1.
i
i=0

Every term of this series contains an x except for the case when i = 0, which gives
the term ±1. Subtract 1 from both sides and factor an x out of the remaining terms,
which yields:
 X n   
n i−1 i n−i
x ± x y (−1) =1
i
i=1

Let r = ± ni=1 ni xi−1 y i (−1)n−i . Thus r ∈ R since it is a linear combination of


P 

ring elements. Therefore xr = 1 for some r ∈ R, so x is a unit of R. 

1.18) Let R be a ring and P a prime ideal of R. Let I be the ideal generated by all the
idempotent elements of P . Prove that R/I has no non-trivial idempotents.

IMMERSE 2008: Extras 1

1.19) A (not neccessarily commutative) ring R is boolean if x2 = x for all x ∈ R. If R is a


boolean ring show that

(a) 2x = 0 for all x ∈ R,


(b) R is commutative,
(c) every prime ideal p is maximal, and R/p is a field with two elements, and
(d) every finitely generated ideal is principal.

1.20) Let R be a ring in which every ideal of R except (1) is prime. Prove that R is a
field.

Solution. We first note that R is an integral domain because zero divisors would
contradict the primality of h0i. Now assume there exists a non-unit r ∈ R. Then r
must be in hr2 i. We write r = ar2 for some a ∈ R. Then (ar − 1)r = 0, and since
ar 6= 1, r = 0. Thus the only non-unit in R is 0 and R is a field.

1.21) For ideals I and J in a ring R their ideal quotient is

(I :R J) = {x ∈ R | xJ ⊆ I}.

Let R be a ring and let P be a finitely generated prime ideal of R with (0 :R P ) = 0.


Prove that (P :R P 2 ) = P .

1.22) Let K be a field and let R be the ring of polynomials in x over K subject to the
condition that they contain no terms in x or x2 . Let I be the ideal in R generated
by x3 and x4 . Prove that x5 6∈ I and x5 I ⊆ I 2 . (This shows that the assumption
that P is prime in 1.21 is necessary.)

8
1.23) Let F be a field and let E = F × F . Define addition and multiplication in E by the
rules:

(a, b) + (c, d) = (a + c, b + d) and (a, b)(c, d) = (ac − bd, ad + bc)

Determine conditions on F under which E is a field.

1.24) Find all the monic irreducible polynomials of degree less than or equal to 3 in F2 [x],
and the same in F3 [x].

9
1.25) Construct fields of each of the following orders:

(a) 9
(b) 49
(c) 8
(d) 81

1.26) Exhibit all the ideals in the ring F [x]/(p(x)), where F is a field and p(x) is a poly-
nomial in F [x] (describe them in terms of the factorizations of p(x)).

1.27) An element x of a ring is idempotent if x2 = x. Prove that a local ring contains no


non-trivial idempotents. (The trivial idempotents are 0 and 1.)

10

You might also like