Embodied Carbon Australia Construction Infrastructure
Embodied Carbon Australia Construction Infrastructure
embodied
carbon
within Australia’s construction
and infrastructure sector
October 2023
KPMG.com.au
Tackling embodied carbon within Australia’s construction and infrastructure sector 2
Executive summary
As Australia and the rest of the world transition to a net zero economy,
there is growing scrutiny surrounding the contribution of the infrastructure
industry to global carbon reduction targets. While the focus has typically
been on the operational aspects of infrastructure, the embodied carbon
within an infrastructure project is also making a significant contribution
to emissions.
Globally, the current embodied carbon proportion of an infrastructure asset is 22 percent of an asset’s total carbon
emissions, with operational emissions accounting for the remaining 78 percent.
Strategies for reducing operational emissions are being successfully implemented through a range of initiatives, including
renewable energy supply, low carbon transport and construction equipment.
The focus has now turned to embodied carbon.
Efforts to understand, measure, reduce and mitigate embodied carbon have commenced and are at different stages
across the globe. A more coordinated effort is required in Australia to meet the challenge of a net zero economy. In order
to do this, a combination of policy and frameworks, as well as low-carbon construction methodologies will be needed to
drive a comprehensive approach.
In this publication we explore:
– how the increasing need for infrastructure will see significant growth in the construction sector to 2050
– what embodied carbon is, how it is measured and why it should be managed
– initiatives globally and in Australia to address embodied carbon
– examples outlining how embodied carbon is already being addressed in infrastructure and property construction
projects, using the PAS 2080 principles of build nothing, build less, build clever and build efficiently – as supported
by the Green Building Council, the Infrastructure Sustainability Council, Australian Constructors Association
and Consult Australia
– our views on accelerating a reduction in embodied carbon, including where in the process initiatives need to be
considered and what stakeholders are involved.
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
Framework mapping
Currently, policy frameworks vary across the globe. One of the common factors that promote and incentivise consistency
among development projects includes the presence of Green Building Councils, which have led the way in the property
sector with rating tools that include embodied carbon and life cycle assessment (refer to Section 1). Processes and
methodologies developed in the property construction sector can be applied in the infrastructure sector to tackle the
embodied carbon challenge.
70
embodied carbon life cycle assessment
ISO
FOR PRODUCTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PRODUCT DECLARATIONS (EPDs), WHICH
INCLUDE EMBODIED CARBON CONTENT
standards
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGIES
To effectively address embodied carbon, the World Green Building Council (WGBC) outlines the following potential activities,
in order of carbon footprint, with ‘build nothing’ having the smallest footprint. Established methodologies and technology
are available to implement this framework.
Adaptive use of assets Use existing buildings Clever materials Interrogate methods to
Reuse of fit-outs and expand (including SCM and be fit for purpose
Materials recycling green steel) Use more efficient
Flexible working.
Refurbish existing Increase recycled construction methods
building material content Offsite construction
Reduce transportation
Employ technology
Build capability
Logistics
Target carbon strategy
design
Construction
emission
6 strategy 4
Legends
Policymakers/ Architects/
Government Bodies Engineers 5
Tenants/ Contractors/
Corporates Subcontractors
Legends
TECHNOLOGY
Leveraging technology such as KPMG’s Asset Impact tool to allow for tracing of building materials and
enable the reporting of GHG emissions, giving asset owners transparency around embodied carbon in
a building or asset.
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
Foreword
A staggering 40 percent of the world’s carbon
emissions derive from the built environment,
and in Australia, embodied carbon emissions are
expected to increase by 65 percent by 2050.1,2
At such scale, reducing embodied carbon is
an integral lever to limit global warming. The Stan Stavros
infrastructure sector, construction industry and Partner – National Deal Advisory
and Infrastructure Lead
related key input industries like steel, cement,
and aluminium have a critical role to play.
Nigel Virgo
Partner – National Property,
Construction & Logistics Lead
1
Climate Group (2023), Built Environment, https://www.theclimategroup.org/built-environment
2
CEFC (2021), Australia’s opportunity to cut embodied carbon in buildings and infrastructure, https://www.cefc.com.au/media/media-release/huge-potential-
australia-s-opportunity-to-cut-embodied-carbon-in-buildings-and-infrastructure
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
Contents
CHAPTER 1: The climate impact of embodied carbon 08
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
3
United Nations News. (2022). Global perspective Human stories News Brief 11 July 2022. https://news.un.org/en/audio/2022/07/1122292
4
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Population Projections, Australia 2017 (base)- 2066. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/population-
projections-australia/latest-release
5
Budget 2023-24: Strengthening Australia’s $120 billion infrastructure pipeline | Ministers for the Department of Infrastructure
6
Infrastructure Australia. (2023). Infrastructure Priority List. Search the Infrastructure Priority List | Infrastructure Australia
7
Infrastructure Australia. (2023). Infrastructure Priority List. Search the Infrastructure Priority List | Infrastructure Australia
8
National Housing Finance and Investment Corporation. (2023). State of the Nation’s Housing Report 2022 -23
9
NSW Govt Media Release – The Premier, Minister for Housing, Minister for Planning and Public Spaces – June 15, 2023).
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
With current projections estimating Coupled with the commitment to a types, including offices, retail assets,
a construction shortfall of 134,000 50 percent reduction in greenhouse industrial assets, warehousing,
dwellings over five years and a planning gas emissions by 2030, it is clear the factories, transport buildings,
system in which development approval construction industry will come under entertainment and recreation
processing times has blown out from increased pressure to do more, more buildings, short term accommodation
69 days on average in July 2021 to efficiently, and with less emissions. buildings (e.g. hotels and resorts),
116 days in March 2023, the NSW education buildings and aged care
Government has realised that it buildings. The study estimates that
needs to take proactive steps to
INCREASE IN COMMERCIAL the floor area of commercial buildings
reduce this shortfall. BUILDINGS will increase from just over 820 million
To support the increase in population, m2 in 2020 to just over 1.3 billion m2
As a result, the NSW Government
additional commercial buildings in 2050. This represents an increase
will improve the planning system
will be required to provide services of 58 percent in commercial building
to incentivise residential housing
and workplaces to the population. floor area, requiring a significant
developers that include at least
The Commercial Building Baseline amount of construction activity.
15 percent affordable housing in their
plans. This one announcement alone Study 202210 provides statistics for
will result in an increase in spending the number and use of commercial
and investment in infrastructure and buildings across Australia. Commercial
construction over the next five years. buildings cover a wide range of asset
10
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Commercial Building Baseline Study 2022
11
https://resources.oxfordeconomics.com/hubfs/Future%20of%20Construction_Full%20Report_FINAL.pdf
12
Infrastructure Australia. (2023). Infrastructure Priority List. Search the Infrastructure Priority List | Infrastructure Australia
13
Mordor Intelligence. (2022). The Australian Construction Market is anticipated to register a CAGR of more than 5% during 2023 – 2028 – Market Size, Share,
Forecasts, and Trends Analysis Report by Mordor Intelligence.
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
carbon?
extraction and production of materials, ‘Carbon emissions associated with
transportation and the construction material and construction processes
process itself. Downstream activities throughout the whole life cycle of a
Different types of carbon emissions relate to emissions associated with building or infrastructure.’
are described using three scopes. use and the end of life of a product and
Figure 3 illustrates the life cycle of an
Scope 1 emissions represent those include the use of the sold products and
asset, highlighting the corresponding
directly emitted by an organisation services, maintenance of the product
stages, which includes the upstream
where an organisation directly burns and end-of-life disposal of the product.
and downstream emissions of an
a fuel. Scope 2 emissions are direct
These emissions require transparency asset. The process progresses from
emissions, typically relating to the
across suppliers and contractors, the manufacturing of components to
purchase of electricity. Scope 3
to account for the production and the end of the asset’s life. The World
emissions are all emissions outside
transport of goods and services Green Building Council’s definition of
the direct operational control of an
delivered as part of a project. embodied carbon encompasses the
organisation. Scope 3 emissions are
four stages depicted in the diagram,
produced in the supply and delivery When calculating the embodied
excluding operational energy use.
of goods and services in the design, carbon of a project, we are focused
construction, maintenance, and ultimate on Scope 3 emissions. Projects need
disposal of our business operations. to account for the entire emissions
They are typically described as upstream impact of the goods and services
or downstream emissions. Upstream received, working collaboratively
emissions, being those required to with suppliers to source and
procure low-carbon materials.
sup ateri
Pro
ces
m
sa
Tr t
or
Raw
an
l
s
sp
ing
sp
or an
t Tr
Deconst
ruction
Manufacturing
ment
Replace t Tr
en an
hm sp
fur
bis ir
a
or
t Upfront
Use nce
e
Co
R p
Re
carbon
ns
a
Energy use
en
tru
int
Use stage
embodied Operational
carbon
carbon
Carbon emissions associated
with materials and processes
required for the upkeep of the
built asset throughout its
life cycle
14
World Green Building Council. (2019). Bringing Embodied Carbon Upfront. https://worldgbc.org/article/bringing-embodied-carbon-upfront/
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
embodied carbon? measuring embodied carbon in product life cycle, allowing consumers
products is using Environmental Product to make informed procurement
Declarations (EPDs) – declarations of choices. Global Warming Potential
the ecological impacts of a specific (GWP) is a key indicator relevant to
WHAT IS A LIFE CYCLE product over its lifetime. These are embodied carbon in these EPDs and
ASSESSMENT (LCA)? defined in the International Standard provides the potential of greenhouse
gases – such as carbon dioxide – to
ISO 14025 and called a Type III
A life cycle assessment (LCA) is declaration. The aim of the declaration increase absorption of heat reaching
a systematic analysis of potential is to ‘qualify environmental information Earth’s atmosphere, intensifying
environmental impacts of products, on the life cycle of a product to enable the natural greenhouse effect.
process, or services throughout their comparisons between products This measure, provided in kg CO2
complete life cycle.15 fulfilling the same function’. The EPD equivalent, indicates the embodied
The inclusion of LCA in Green Star methodology has been sourced from carbon contribution per tonne of
rating tools encourages construction the Life Cycle Assessment tool from reinforcing if the product was to be
and building project teams to conduct the ISO 14040 series. This includes incorporated into a project.17, 18
comprehensive assessments defining the product, undertaking While efforts have been made to ensure
throughout a project’s lifespan, a life cycle assessment study, some consistency, there is currently
showcasing better performance creating the EPD and having it no global harmonisation of Product
in various impact categories while verified and published. Category Rules and EPDs, with different
minimising the negative trade-offs. To aid in consistency in EPDs, Product regions having different standards.
The LCA also acts as a credit which Category Rules provide guidance on
can be used to enhance both demand One limiting factor of EPDs is that
life cycle scope and methodology for the International Standards are
and accessibility of life cycle data, similar products in the same category.
while also strengthening the industry’s relatively recent in their preparation,
This allows comparison of products with ISO 14025 first published in 2000
ability to conduct project comparisons of the same category to inform
based on life cycle assessments. and ISO 14040 in 1997. Any materials
consumers of the impact of using produced prior to this are unlikely to
The LCA initiatives are designed different products. have an EPD or an equivalent life cycle
to evolve and become more For example, companies assessment that includes embodied
comprehensive over time, influenced by manufacturing reinforcing bar carbon. This means that determining
data obtained from Green Star Projects and mesh, such as the Australian the embodied carbon of older building
and major changes from consultation Reinforcing Company (ARC) stock is extremely difficult.
with industry partnerships.16 and Infrabuild, have produced
15
Sphera. (2020). What is Lifecycle Assessment. https://sphera.com/glossary/what-is-a-life-cycle-assessment-lca/
16
Green Building Council of Australia. (2023). Lifecycle assessment (LCA) and Environmental Product Declarations (EPD). https://new.gbca.org.au/life-cycle-
assessment-lca-and-environmental-product-declarations-epd/
17
The Australian Reinforcing Company. (2022). Environmental Product Declaration, SP-00858_ARC-Reinforcing-Bar-Mesh-EPD_2022.pdf (epd-australasia.com)
18
InfraBuild. (2022). Environmental Product Declaration. SP-00857_Reinforcing-Bar-and-Mesh-EPD-InfraBuild-Reinforcing_2022.pdf (epd-australasia.com)
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
of reducing
of which, ~11 billion tCO2 -e (22 percent) them in the planning and design
comes from embodied carbon phases of the project. This is the point
emissions from new infrastructure where an organisation can determine if
embodied carbon and building development.
Studies have shown that embodied
the asset needs to be built in the first
place, what parameters require design,
From 2020 to 2050, embodied carbon which can ensure the asset is not over-
carbon can be reduced by between
will be responsible for almost half engineered, and what materials are
24 percent and 46 percent through
of new construction emissions.19 required to complete the project.
low-cost measures such as careful
For example, in high-performance material selection and minimising Figure 4 shows the stages of a project
new buildings in Australia, embodied material usage. This could equate to and the phases where embodied
carbon represents 45 percent of a reduction of up to 5 billion tCO 2 -e carbon reduction is most effective.
whole-life carbon emissions. 20 Unlike embodied carbon emissions per year.21 It shows that as a project progresses it
operational carbon, which can be becomes harder to reduce embodied
reduced over time with energy- Modern methods of construction have
carbon, and once the asset is built
efficient measures and renewable been developed that can be adopted
there is a baseline of carbon that
energy sources, embodied carbon to aid with this, including modular,
cannot be physically reduced.
emissions are generally locked in prefabricated and precast building
once the asset is built. which focus on offsite construction,
mass production and factory assembly.
19
World Green Building Council. (2019). Bringing embodied carbon upfront. https://worldgbc.org/article/bringing-embodied-carbon-upfront/
20
Clean Energy Finance Corporation, the Green Building Council of Australia and the Infrastructure Sustainability Council. (2021). Opportunities for cutting
embodied carbon
21
Rocky Mountain Institute. (2021). Reducing embodied carbon in buildings Low-Cost, High-Value Opportunities
22
World Green Building Council. (2019). Bringing embodied carbon upfront. https://worldgbc.org/article/bringing-embodied-carbon-upfront/
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
184
The broadEMISSIONS
EMBODIED market is LIMITS
likely to see softer cap rates as the
IN CONSTRUCTION
cycle of interest rate increases continues.
Currently in place in Finland, Sweden, France, the
Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada and parts of the
United States of America Countries with Green
Rated buildings
70
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
23
Publicly available specifications
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
– an Australian
decarbonises through increased Australia (GBCA) in 2021, which
penetration of renewable energies, estimates that embodied emissions
the focus is shifting toward embodied represented 16 percent of the carbon
perspective emissions from construction
materials. The Clean Energy Finance
footprint of buildings in 2019, with this
ballooning to 85 percent in 2050 if no
Australia’s building and construction Corporation (CEFC) identifies significant action is taken.
industry traditionally focused on the great potential to cut emissions in
operational energy of a building or the building sector by addressing
infrastructure asset to reduce carbon embodied carbon from materials.
FIGURE 6. CURRENT AND FORECAST SHARE OF EMBODIED EMISSIONS IN THE TOTAL EMISSION FOOTPRINT OF BUILDINGS 24
16%
EMBODIED
16% 85%
EMBODIED
EMISSIONS Potential EMISSIONS
Emissions emissions
in 2019
84%
OPERATIONAL 84%
by 2050
15%
OPERATIONAL
EMISSIONS EMISSIONS
Industry has been pushing for FIGURE 7. KEY FRAMEWORKS FOR EMBODIED CARBON EMISSIONS IN AUSTRALIA
movement in this area, and as a
result, industry bodies and some
government bodies have responded.
With embodied emissions now being
front and centre in the environmental
agenda, leading industry and
government bodies such as National
Australian Built Environment Rating
System (NABERS), the GBCA and
the NSW Government are running
working groups and developing
frameworks, policy and incentives
to provide standardisation and foster
quick adoption of a diversity of
initiatives to reduce upfront embodied
emissions from construction projects.
Figure 7 illustrates some of the key
embodied carbon frameworks and
drivers in Australia.
24
Green Building Council Australia. (2021). Embodied Carbon & Embodied Energy in Australia’s Buildings.
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
25
Climate Change Authority. (2022). First Annual Progress Report
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
26
Infrastructure Australia evaluates business cases for nationally significant investment proposals for inclusion on the Infrastructure Priority List and assess
proposals seeking more than $250 million in Australian Government funding.
27
NSW Environment Protection Authority. (2023). NSW kickstarts decarbonisation and circular design in infrastructure. https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/news/media-
releases/2023/epamedia230224-nsw-kickstarts-decarbonisation-and-circular-design-in-infrastructure-nsw
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
This follows the release of the GISA is driving circular economy Acknowledging the absence of a
Decarbonising Infrastructure Delivery outcomes specifically targeting consistent method in Australia for
Discussion Paper in October 2022 embodied carbon, including the measuring and reporting embodied
by INSW. The paper provided encouragement of: emissions, NABERS collaborated with
guidance to reduce embodied industry and government stakeholders
– certification schemes such as
emissions from public infrastructure, to assess market feasibility and
Green Star and Climate Active on
outlining principles and actions perform a technical analysis for the
new projects, placing a stronger
to promote reductions from early creation of a NABERS Embodied
emphasis on embodied emissions
project development stages. In Emissions framework. A crucial
which will increase over time,
February 2023, the NSW Minister for insight from the industry was the
increasing demand for materials
Infrastructure, Rob Stokes, mandated urgent need for a national standard
and products sourced as part of
the measurement of carbon costs to measure, compare, and establish
a circular economy model
in business cases for future NSW reduction targets for embodied
Government infrastructure projects. – the inclusion of embodied carbon emissions in buildings.
This decision aims to drive down into new zero-emissions targets
In response, NABERS is developing
emissions and costs, as part of the for both government and private
a national framework to allow
government’s efforts to address organisations, in relation to the
building owners to set robust and
climate change and transition development of major projects.
measurable targets for reducing
towards a more sustainable and
Further, the SA Department for embodied emissions in buildings,
environmentally friendly economy.
Environment and Water (DEW) enhance transparency and reporting
is currently developing a net-zero to investors, and enable organisations
South Australia program for SA Government agencies, to set embodied carbon targets
The South Australian Government which is expected to start driving for the buildings they will occupy.
introduced independent statutory emission reduction initiatives related This framework will help increase
authority Green Industries SA (GISA) to SA Government’s emissions the demand for low-carbon design
in 2004, under the Green Industries inventory. It is expected that practices and construction materials
SA Act 2004. The authority acts as government projects will increasingly from the construction industry, creating
an enabler and driver of change, focus on emissions associated with a common language for embodied
supporting development of the circular capital works projects (embodied carbon emissions in Australia.
economy through diverse collaborations carbon) and the built environment,
and partnerships which improve as well as goods and services used
productivity, resilience, resource in buildings and facilities. 30
efficiency and the environment. 28
GISA aims to keep South Australia INDUSTRY STANDARDS
at the forefront of green innovation
in waste management, resource NABERS embodied
recovery and the circular economy. It emissions framework
also aims to increase economic growth
The National Australian Built
for South Australia by reducing waste
Environment Rating System
and pollution, improving business
(NABERS) identified that measuring
practices and efficiencies and building
and managing embodied emissions
South Australia’s competitive edge and
in buildings, despite being a huge
resilience. This includes building the
challenge, needs to be tackled if
state’s capability and resilience in the
Australia is to achieve its net-zero
area of disaster waste management. 29
emissions target by 2050.
28
Government of South Australia. (2023). Green Industries SA. https://www.greenindustries.sa.gov.au/
29
Government of South Australia. (2023). Circular Economy SA Government Financing Authority https://www.safa.sa.gov.au/
30
Government of South Australia. (2023). Circular economy in South Australia’s built environment, https://www.greenindustries.sa.gov.au/
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
NABERS is currently consolidating – Proposal 10 – A Roadmap for The GBCA and NABERS are
and responding to public consultation Future Development of the tool, collaborating on developing an aligned
undertaken on the following 10 key providing visibility over proposals method for calculating upfront carbon
proposals to inform the development that are likely to increase in scope, emissions reductions against a fixed
of the embodied emissions framework: to increase the impact of the tool benchmark, expected to be released
over time. in late 2023. The GBCA will amend
– Proposal 1 – Only new buildings
the Green Star credits to allow fixed
and major refurbishments will be
The Green Star rating system benchmarks as an acceptable method.
eligible to certify.
The Green Building Council of Australia Regardless, an approach against a
– Proposal 2 – Only upfront reference building will continue to be
(GBCA) operates the Green Star rating
emissions will be included. accepted under certain circumstances.
system, Australia’s leading voluntary
– Proposal 3 – Emissions from rating system for sustainable buildings.
demolitions are excluded. The Green Star rating system Infrastructure Sustainability
promotes embodied carbon reductions Council and the IS Rating
– Proposal 4 – Cold shell is the Scheme
and rewards Green Star projects that
default building scope.
demonstrate improvements over The Infrastructure Sustainability
– Proposal 5 – Only carbon conventional buildings. Council is a member based peak
emissions will be included. body focused on ensuring all
All new Green Star rating tools include
infrastructure delivers social, cultural,
– Proposal 6 – NABERS will an Upfront Embodied Emissions
environmental and economic benefit.
encourage verified product- credit with the aim to reduce upfront
The key mechanism for this is the
specific emissions data and will carbon emissions of Green Star rated
Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Rating
apply conservative defaults where buildings. The Green Star credits
Scheme. The IS Rating Scheme is a
no emissions data is available. currently allow two methods to
collection of 6 rating tools providing
demonstrate best practice in upfront
– Proposal 7 – Stored carbon benchmarks and assurance at
embodied emissions. The first method
and carbon-neutral products every stage of an assets lifecycle,
is to use a life cycle assessment
will be disclosed on NABERS planning, design, construction and
(LCA) to compare the proposed
Rating Certificates via a Carbon operations. The tools can be utilised
building against a reference building
Removal Indicator. They will not be on infrastructure projects, assets,
built to minimum code requirements.
recognised within the star rating portfolios or networks. The rating tool
Improvements demonstrated over
on the certificate. and scheme is voluntary and used
the reference building determine
– Proposal 8 – A statistical analysis across Australia and New Zealand.
the number of points achieved under
of Bill of Quantities data is the the credit. Currently there are 393 projects and
preferred approach to creating assets under rating with a total Capex
The second method allowed in Green
whole-of-building benchmarks. of $282.4 billion. The tool promotes
Star is to complete the GBCA’s upfront
– Proposal 9 – Projects receive the upfront consideration and
carbon emissions calculator which
certification following practical inclusion of sustainability, rather than
considers environmental footprint
completion with some options to an operational reflection.
of materials from raw extraction,
review progress along the way. transportation and manufacturing.
We welcome the recent announcement from the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, The Honourable
Chris Bowen MP, regarding the commitment from the Australian Government to develop decarbonisation
plans for six sectors, which includes the built environment.
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
Adaptive use of assets Use existing buildings Clever materials Interrogate methods to
Reuse of fit-outs and expand (including SCM and be fit for purpose
Materials recycling green steel) Use more efficient
Flexible working.
Refurbish existing Increase recycled construction methods
building material content Offsite construction
Reduce transportation
Employ technology
Build capability
31
Office of Energy and Climate Change & NSW Treasury. (2023). Circular design guidelines for the built environment
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
Build Nothing
By using existing buildings, carbon introduced through the construction process is eliminated. Existing
infrastructure can be repurposed with low levels of investment to achieve a sound environmental outcome and an
almost complete reduction in carbon potential. The ‘build nothing’ approach requires a questioning of need, and
the exploration of alternative options, such as the adaptive use of assets (i.e. using the same building for multiple
purposes at the same time, such as a school which also acts as a community space), encouraging the re-use of
fit-outs between tenants where possible (e.g. hospitality fit-outs used by multiple sequential businesses), and
embracing flexible working (to reduce the need for new offices, and maximise the utility of existing spaces). 32
School Infrastructure NSW (SINSW) provides opportunities for its assets to be used collaboratively for
multiple purposes. Through shared use arrangements with government agencies, local councils, sporting
organisations and not-for-profits, facilities such as halls, libraries and sporting fields can be shared with
the wider community outside of school hours, removing the need for new facilities to be built.
SINSW collaboration opportunities available include:
– Joint Use Arrangements, which are entered into between the department and another party to share
the costs of building and maintaining a new school asset such as a sporting facility that can be
shared by both the relevant school and the community outside of hours.
– Community Use Arrangements, which are entered into between the department and another
organisation for access to school facilities outside of hours.
– Share Our Space (SOS) School Holiday Activities, which are run during the school holiday SOS
program in outdoor school areas and involve the department entering into an agreement with
organisations to hold free activities.
32
ISOA, Climate Works Australia & Asbec. (2020). Reshaping Infrastructure: for a Net Zero emissions Future.
33
School Infrastructure NSW. (2023). https://www.schoolinfrastructure.nsw.gov.au/
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
Build Less
Utilising existing assets and conducting refurbishments and upgrades can decrease embodied carbon emissions,
as the primary structure is already in place. This approach minimises the need for new materials, reducing the
overall environmental impact.
ISPT have elected to refurbish the commercial office building at 500 Bourke Street, Melbourne, rather than
demolish the structure and build from new. While the refurbishment still involves a significant financial
investment of $130 million, the environmental savings from the project are significant. The project is
expected to be completed in mid-2023 and includes retention of the main structure and facade.
The life cycle assessment of the project indicates that 57,000 tonnes of CO2 -e will be saved, including
40,000 tonnes from retaining the structure.
34
Photo credit – Wikipedia. (2022). Quay Quarter Tower. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quay_Quarter_Tower
35
Multiplex. (n.d). Quay Quarter Tower ACAA Technical Paper
36
MECLA. (n.d). 500 Bourke St Case Study. https://mecla.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/500-Bourke-Street-Aurecon.pdf
37
Photo credit – N. Dorgan & M, Ogg. (2022). Former Probuild development 500 Bourke revived with $150m redesign
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
25,000
kg CO2/t material
20,000
15,000
Units
10,000
5,000
-5,000
MDF − with carbon storage
Pressure pipe
Hardwood
Double glazed
40 MPA
Clay
Sheet
Rebar
Standard
MDF
CLT
Aluminium PVC Steel Glass Timber Bitumen Bricks Concrete Asphalt Timber
38
J. Watts. (2019). Concrete the most destructive material on earth. The Guardian
39
BBC News. (2018). Climate Change: The massive CO2 emitter you may not know about. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46455844
40
F. Harvey. (2021). Cement makers across world pledge large cut in emissions by 2030. The Guardian.
41
International Energy Agency. (2020). GlobalABC Roadmap for Buildings and Construction 2020 – 2050
42
Clean Energy Finance Corporation. (2021). Australian Buildings and Infrastructure: opportunities for Cutting Embodied Carbon
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
Figure 9 shows the typical split of embodied carbon by material for infrastructure projects.
3% 4%
9%
2% 4% 4%
7%
30%
17% 42%
48%
47% 29% 56%
66%
27%
The pie charts in Figure 9 show that the most significant materials contributing to embodied carbon in infrastructure
projects are concrete, steel and asphalt. While other materials have a large carbon footprint per tonne of material, they are
used in lower volumes and have lower overall weight in a project.
43
Clean Energy Finance Corporation. (2021). Australian Buildings and Infrastructure: opportunities for Cutting Embodied Carbon
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
FIGURE 10. VARYING LEVELS OF SCM IMPLEMENTATION IN CONCRETE MIXES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE BENEFITS TO COST AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS 44
500
$0.80
Emissions (kg/m 3)
400
$0.70
300
200
$0.60
100
$0.50 0
10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Emissions Cost
44
I.M. Chethana S. Illankoon, Vivian W.Y. Tam, Khoa N. Le, & J.Y. Wang. (2018). Journal of Cleaner Production. Lifecycle costing for obtaining concrete credits in
green star rating system in Australia
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
ROZELLE INTERCHANGE AND WESTERN HARBOUR TUNNEL (WHT) ENABLING WORKS NSW 45
Currently underway, the Rozelle Interchange and Western Harbour Tunnel Enabling Works is
one of the largest infrastructure projects in Australia. John Holland and CPB Contractors Joint
Venture (JHCPB) have enacted several initiatives to reduce the embodied carbon footprint of their
construction activities, including the replacement of traditional reinforcing steel in R53 General
works with recycled plastic fibres. The project has committed to a 15 percent reduction in material
consumption across the project.
45
Clean Energy Finance Corporation. (2021). Opportunities for cutting embodied carbon Industry Report. https://www.cefc.com.au/media/ovrkk5l3/australian-
buildings-and-infrastructure-opportunities-for-cutting-embodied-carbon.pdf
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
46
CSIRO. (2022). Steeling ourselves: How Australia can support the transition to net-zero steel
47
Infrastructure Magazine. (2020). New Viribar 750 fitment is sustainable and easy to substitute
48
Infrastructure Sustainability Council. (n.d). InfraBuild’s Journey to Making Sustainable Steel
49
Materials & Embodied Carbon Leaders’ Alliance (MECLA). (2022). Low Emissions Aluminium
50
Infrastructure Sustainability Council. (2022). Parramatta Light Rail Stage 1 Infrastructure Works – As Built
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION
For material and equipment transportation in construction projects, fuel consumption is the key source of
emission, which varies on the mode of transport and the type of carrier. For major projects, a substantial
amount of fuel is consumed for the transportation of building materials and equipment across domestic and
international routes.
In the Australian construction industry, the economic value of the materials used is approximately $75 billion.51
Around $10 billion is being imported, with 60 percent of that originating from China. The import of bricks alone
amounted to $10.3 million in 2020,52 coming from Italy, Spain, Denmark, United Kingdom, China and another
eight countries. With a significant import of ceramic goods from Italy, Spain and India, a substantial portion of
materials found on our construction sites have travelled immense distances at considerable cost.
Much of Australia’s concrete and timber supplies are imported, and in the case of timber there is currently
no price signal to drive local uptake.
Manufacturing in Australia does not come without its own challenges. Whilst the carbon intensity of electricity supply
will reduce relatively quickly, transport emissions are the next key focus areas given the large size of the country.
Given the absence of a universal carbon price, Australia is reliant upon the Safeguard Mechanism, targeting high
emitting industries, as well as procurement policies to promote the purchase of locally supplied low-carbon materials.
DEVELOPMENTWA 53
51
Clean Energy Finance Corporation. (2021). Opportunities for cutting embodied carbon Industry Report. https://www.cefc.com.au/media/ovrkk5l3/australian-
buildings-and-infrastructure-opportunities-for-cutting-embodied-carbon.pdf
52
World Integrated Trade Solution. (2020). Australia Ceramic building bricks imported by country in 2020
53
Materials & Embodied Carbon Leaders’ Alliance (MECLA). (n.d). Case Study: Development WA Building Circularity
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
54
Green Vehicle Guide. (2023). 2020 Toyota Hilux. Individual Vehicle | Green Vehicle Guide
55
Electric Vehicle Myths | US EPA
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
Digital twins 59 32 9
Modular/off-site manufacturing 24 54 22
Machine engineering and design 44 40 16
Artificial intelligence 63 33 4
Augmentable reality 60 32 8
Virtual reality 53 34 13
Smart sensors (tracking people and productivity, security, etc.)) 39 44 17
Drones (remote monitoring, quantity verification, construction) 28 48 25
3D printing 69 27 5
Cognitive machine learning 73 22 4
Robotics process automation/digital labour 64 30 6
Radio frequency identification 58 31 10
Building information modelling 25 43 32
Mobile platforms 27 44 29
Use of advanced data analytics 36 47 17
Use of basic data analytics 12 47 42
Integrated project management information system (PMIS) 21 39 40
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Have not adopted Just started with a few projects Adopting across all projects
56
KPMG Global. (2023). 2023 Global Construction Survey: Familiar challenges – new approaches
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
It can be seen from the figure that deliver the greatest overall return on a key role in future projects to design
the top five technologies adopted investment. They were the use of embodied carbon out of a project.
across all projects are the use of basic digital twins, which rose 11 percent,
As well as looking at the design
data analytics, PMIS, BIM, mobile and offsite manufacturing, which
phase of a project to avoid embodied
platforms, and drones. The majority rose 31 percent. Both technologies
carbon, technology will be required
of the top five relate to design and have significant scope to reduce
to measure the embodied carbon
project management activities, which embodied carbon in a project. The
being proposed for a project. Tools
allows them to be levers for embodied use of digital twins to form a baseline
are available, including in Australia
carbon management. model and then a secondary model to
to assist with this process, which
assess scenarios that may reduce the
An interesting outcome from the have the capacity to highlight areas
embodied carbon of a building through
2023 Global Construction Survey was of high embodied carbon and drive
different configurations, construction
two areas which had not previously decisions on material selection to
methods or material choices, can play
been assessed for their potential to achieve better outcomes.
CASE STUDY
Government delivery agencies and major infrastructure providers are working through practical pathways to meeting state-
based and national decarbonisation and net-zero commitments. The first step to understanding and reducing carbon emissions is
measurement. With an initial focus on school projects, KPMG Origins Asset Impact was used to assess embodied carbon impact
across the design and construction phases.
Measuring embodied carbon at the design phase enables organisations to understand the emissions impact early on at a time
where material selection decisions are still available. KPMG Origins Asset Impact enabled infrastructure portfolio owners to
understand the impact of building projects on their overall portfolio emissions as well as supporting decision-making around
delivery using modern methods of construction. Refining inputs with the relevant design and sustainability consultants helps
identify the most carbon-intensive elements and determine lower-impact alternatives. It also enables developers to specify
embodied emissions targets to head contractors for delivery.
Verification of as built embodied carbon against the designs enables organisations to obtain an additional level of confidence that
actual emissions are in line with design aspirations. KPMG Origins Asset Impact was used to update and refine inputs available
at the design stage with more accurate and specific information on the materials used, such as quantities, sources, suppliers,
transport distances and installation processes. Data captured at this stage enabled portfolio owners to access a breakdown across
each building element and use the data for reporting and communication.
For organisations starting on the embodied carbon measurement journey, beginning with a simple project helps capture key learnings
for future portfolio delivery decisions. Using KPMG Origins Asset Impact across multiple projects has highlighted key learnings:
– Understanding the data required to calculate embodied carbon is crucial for achieving accurate and reliable results. The project
teams can understand how to collect and manage data on materials specifications, quantities, sources, transport distances and
recycling rates.
– Incorporating data requirements into materials and contractor procurement is essential for ensuring data availability and quality.
Understanding the required data helps inform procurement documents that specify data requirements for each material and
contractor involved in the project. It also helps establish data collection processes and systems that facilitate data sharing and
verification among different parties.
– Starting to capture embodied carbon data early enables project teams and portfolio owners in preparing for upcoming
regulatory requirements around disclosure, reporting and benchmarking. Creating an early baseline will enable strategic
decision-making around procurement and delivery in alignment with overall decarbonisation objectives.
57
KPMG Origins. (2022). Asset Impact | Embodied Carbon
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
KPMG Origins Asset Impact helps organisations commissioning, designing and delivering construction
projects to understand the data requirements, enable simple data collection from consultant and
contractor teams, while enabling streamlined measurement and reporting of embodied carbon at the
individual asset and portfolio level. This will drive their ability to meet current and future regulatory
obligations as well as unlock sustainability-linked financing from banks and other financiers that are
placing greater value on understanding Scope 3 financed emissions in their value chains.
Recently, KPMG Origins have been engaged with School Infrastructure New
South Wales (SINSW), and the NSW Building Commissioner to work with
property developers, architects, builders, and consultants to measure and
“Understanding the carbon
report the embodied carbon for their projects. Under a NSW Government
initiative, the Department of Education has been designing and building new
associated with the building
schools using Modern Methods for Construction (MMC) to improve the is going to be increasingly
efficiency, reduce the cost, and lower the embodied carbon emissions for
these projects. To validate this strategy, KPMG Origins Asset Impact platform important, so any tool that
was utilised by the SINSW team to upload the required documents for an
as-designed upfront embodied emissions calculation. Construction data was
can allow us to track that
collated and uploaded to Asset Impact, and compared with the as-designed from very early on in the
benchmark for Embodied Carbon. The insights provided by the data, presented
in an easily accessible way have introduced greater transparency during the process all the way through
construction process, and allowed construction professionals and developers
to make informed decisions about chosen materials and methods early in
to later on in life is going to
the construction process. A portfolio of four new schools is now using Asset
Impact to further understand their embodied emission profiles and inform
be a good thing.”
efficiencies. This portfolio approach is also providing data for benchmarking
and comparing different materials and methods as the NSW Government WILLIAM PAYNE
initiative is further developed to inform sustainable practices for future works. Chief Digital Officer, Mirvac
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
58
Deloitte. (2019). Point of View on Digital Construction – The business case of incorporating digital technologies into the construction industry
59
Lendlease & The University of Queensland. (2022). Stepping Up the Pace: Fossil Fuel Free Construction.
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
CASE STUDY
Additionally, a kit of parts approach has been utilised where a standardised building component kit, similar to flat-pack furniture, is
transported to site for easy assembly resulting in a reduced requirement for the use of heavy machinery and ultimately a lower
carbon footprint.
60
School Infrastructure NSW. (n.d). Modern methods of construction.
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
FIGURE 12. POTENTIAL IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS TOWARDS LOW CARBON CONSTRUCTION 61
9 1 Procurement
Renewable Target
energy carbon
design
8 2
Nature -based Low-carbon
solutions material
strategy
Carbon
Low-carbon optimisation Sourcing
7
material
strategy
framework support
3
Logistics
Target carbon strategy
design
Construction
emission
6 strategy 4
Construction
Embodied carbon
Legends
61
Based on KPMG India analysis
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
POLICYMAKERS AND – Continue the existing process of incorporating embodied carbon into policy. NSW is leading the
GOVERNING BODIES way in requiring embodied carbon to be measured, with other states and territories needing to
develop their own policy.
– As standard measurement tools are developed, consider implementation of minimum
performance standards.
– Ensure that standard measurement tools include methods to calculate embodied carbon
across the building life cycle, to ensure that appropriate decisions can be made on whether
to refurbish or rebuild. This will require assessment of embodied carbon in existing buildings.
– Provide frameworks to require EDPs to be produced, so that embodied carbon decisions can
be made in projects.
INVESTORS/LENDERS/FUNDS – Include ESG investment criteria in investment decisions, including the need for low carbon projects.
– Provide green loans and encourage low-carbon pathways, that includes embodied carbon,
not just operational energy intensity.
– Provide transition support to other stakeholders to create a highly sustainable
infrastructure value.
– Ensure due diligence before investments with respect to climate risks to avoid severe effects
of the climate, thus bringing in monetary gains.
ASSET OWNERS/DEVELOPERS – Require low-carbon development and retrofits and enable processes aligned to the net-zero goals.
– Promote the use of greener material across the built environment, including embodied carbon
requirements in fit-out guides.
– Collaborate with suppliers to reduce embodied emissions in products, for example, concrete
mixes, aluminium facades and steel, to drive more demand for low embodied carbon products.
ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS – Train staff on technologies to enable embodied carbon assessment and measurement.
– Promote carbon modelling for the selection of suitable material.
– Promote the selection of low-carbon sustainable material or alternative materials.
– Collaboration with the stakeholders to encourage creation of sustainable low-carbon infrastructure.
CONTRACTORS/ – Accelerate new technology adoption which promotes low embodied carbon due to installation
SUBCONTRACTORS and site transfers.
– Build capability of staff to effectively use adopted technology.
– Plan to decarbonise activities conducted, so that fuels are no longer used.
SUPPLIERS/MANUFACTURERS/ – Plan to decarbonise activities so that fuels are no longer used, and energy consumed reduces.
VENDORS – Create emission databases and EDPs to assist customers in making informed decisions.
TRANSPORTERS/ – Plan to decarbonise activities and fleets so that fuels are no longer used.
FREIGHT FORWARDERS – Create transparency across the supply chain.
– Become agile to the market demands.
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
FIGURE 13. OPPORTUNITY TO REDUCE CARBON IN A PROJECT LIFE CYCLE WITH MARGINAL SPEND 63
Opportunity to reduce carbon in a project life cycle with marginal spend
2-5% 0-1%
100% 5-10% 1-2%
10-15%
8-10%
Potential opportunity to reduce
50-60%
embodied carbon
20-45%
50%
25-30%
5-10%
0%
Planning Design Procurement & Construction Operational
Supply Chain Refurbishment
Adapting the Building design Bringing carbon to Use of green steel Refurbishment
right strategies with a focus on cost, quality, and and cement of green
embodied along time triangle material/
Setting up with a reduction Use of low embodied equipment/
targets by in operational Pre-qualification of carbon emission fit-out
baselining and emission vendors based on materials such as
benchmarking low embodied ashcrete, green tiles Use of
embodied Targeting carbon products renewable
emissions sustainable and supply chain Promote use of less power against
alternatives with with green transit concrete intensive traditional
low embodied building such as grid power
carbon emission Use alternate mode timber based
of transport construction
Element based
design Promoting use of
specifications electric machines
over fuel based
Optimising
design
[The list is not exhaustive]
Reduction potential in each phase Reduction potential by spending minimal additional capex
62
Rocky Mountain Institute. (2021). Reducing embodied carbon in buildings Low-Cost, High-Value Opportunities
63
Based on KPMG India analysis
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
TECHNOLOGY
Leveraging technology such as KPMG’s Asset Impact tool to allow for tracing of building materials and
enable the reporting of GHG emissions, giving asset owners transparency around embodied carbon in a
building or asset.
64
Based on KPMG India analysis
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
With a global network of specialists in climate change, decarbonisation and net zero transition, as well as
expertise in technology, policy and industry sectors, we are uniquely positioned to bring together the experience
and expertise needed to embed sustainability into an organisation’s core business strategy and delivery on its
transformation goals at speed.
KPMG in Australia supports clients with:
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to KPMG India and our Australian team for their time and effort in
developing this report.
Contributors
Luke Harvey Palmer Kate Gardiner Alexandra Vandeness Sarah Afzaly
Head of Sales Director Associate Director IAP ESG Manager
KPMG Australia KPMG Australia KPMG Australia KPMG Australia
Rhonda Lenardon Matt Holmes Maddy English Sally Boden
Director Associate Director Manager Consultant
KPMG Australia KPMG Australia KPMG Australia KPMG Australia
Max Soyref Abdul Obeid Uli Demeneghi Lachie Randello
Director Associate Director Manager Consultant
KPMG Australia KPMG Australia KPMG Australia KPMG Australia
Callum Henderson
Consultant
KPMG Australia
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company
limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
KPMG.com.au
The information contained in this document is of a general nature and is not intended to address the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular individual or entity. It is provided
for information purposes only and does not constitute, nor should it be regarded in any manner whatsoever, as advice and is not intended to influence a person in making a decision, including,
if applicable, in relation to any financial product or an interest in a financial product. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such
information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a
thorough examination of the particular situation.
To the extent permissible by law, KPMG and its associated entities shall not be liable for any errors, omissions, defects or misrepresentations in the information or for any loss or damage
suffered by persons who use or rely on such information (including for reasons of negligence, negligent misstatement or otherwise).
©2023 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English
company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.
The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.