Disaster Management
Disaster Management
The slope, aspect, geology, structures, land use/land cover, road network,
slope curvature, drainage density, lineament density, and many other pieces of
information are needed to determine the risk of landslides. These data, which are
kept in a GIS database for analysis, are gathered from field observations, digital
data, remote sensing, and already-existing maps.
The socio-economic statistics, such as population, economic situation,
educational level, level of disaster awareness, etc., that collectively indicate their
coping capacity are what are needed for vulnerability mapping. The risk map,
however, takes into account both social and technological factors, making it useful
for prioritising the areas for measures to reduce landslide risk. Each bigger landslide
that has the potential to disrupt infrastructure, settlements, or agricultural areas
should be thoroughly researched because each one should be seen as being unique
in nature.
1.2 Possible data that can be used and the source of data
Landslide is the disaster we select for this disaster management. The state of
Selangor is where this study was carried out. Since we know that landslides must
harm that state, one of our study's goals is to identify regions that are susceptible to
them.
As an appropriate pilot area to assess the frequency and distribution of
landslides, the eastern region of Selangor state was chosen. This region has seen
significant landslide damage as a result of heavy rainfall. The Malaysian peninsula's
southwest coast is where the Selangor region is situated. State of Perak, Pahang,
and Negeri Sembilian, Melaka, form its northern and eastern and southern
boundaries, respectively. One of the 13 states that make up the Federation of
Malaysia is Selangor. There are roughly 3 million people living there.
For probabilistic landslide hazard analysis, precise location detection of
landslides is crucial. The utilisation of remote sensing data, such as satellite photos
and aerial photographs, is beneficial to obtaining comprehensive and affordable
knowledge on landslides. Aerial images taken at a scale of 1:25,000 were used in
this investigation to locate the landslides. The landslides were found through picture
interpretation, and the locations were confirmed by fieldwork. These images were
taken between 1981 and 2000. Breaks in the forest canopy, bare soil, or other
geomorphic features like head and side scarps, flow tracks, and soil and debris
deposits below a scar were used to identify recent landslides. A total of 327
landslides were mapped in a mapped area of 182,406,000 km2 in order to compile a
database to evaluate the surface area and quantity of landslides in the study area.
The approach utilised in this work and many others is predicated on the
fundamental tenet that the probability of a slope stability issue is equivalent to the
actual frequency of landslides. Lineament, land cover, and vegetation index values
were extracted from Landsat TM satellite images, and topographical and lithological
databases were built. Analyses of meteorological data were used to obtain the
distribution of precipitation. Then, in ARC/INFO, the calculated and extracted factors
were transformed into a 1010 m grid. Frequency ratio and logistic regression models
were used to investigate the geographical correlations between the site of the
landslide and each component associated with it. The relationship was used as a
rating for each factor in the overlay analysis using the frequency ratio. Based on the
associations, a formula predicting the likelihood of a landslide occurring was
developed using logistic regression. The landslide hazard index was created using
this formula, and the index was then used to map the landslide hazard. Finally,
success rates were calculated after the maps were cross-checked and compared
using known landslide locations.
A spatial database that takes into account landslide-related characteristics
was created in order to use the probabilistic technique. In Malaysia, this statistics are
accessible in hard copy or as digital maps. Table 1 displays the spatial database that
was created. The likelihood was determined by taking into account ten elements that
were retrieved from the created geographic database. In a GIS setting, they were
converted into a vector-type spatial database. Additionally, data on landslide-related
elements was taken from the database. From the topographic database, a digital
elevation model (DEM) was first produced. A DEM with a resolution of 10 m was
created using contour and survey-based points with elevation values from the
1:25,000-scale topographic maps.
Slope angle, slope aspect, and slope curvature were computed using the
DEM. Positive curvatures represent convexity, zero curvatures represent flat
surfaces, and negative curvatures represent concavity. The Environmental Systems
Research Institute (ESRI) routine in Arc View was used to create the curvature map.
Additionally, the topography database was used to compute the separation from
drainage. In 1-m intervals, the drainage buffer was determined. The lithology was
taken from the geology database, and the distance from the lineament was
determined. A geological map at a scale of 1:250,000 was used to create the
lithology map. In 1-m intervals, the lineament buffer was determined. A soil map at a
scale of 1:250,000 was used to create the soil map.
A LANDSAT TM image was used to classify land cover data using an
unsupervised classification algorithm and topographic map. The land cover map was
divided into six categories for land-cover mapping: dense forest area, barren land,
agriculture, rubber, residential area (concrete), sparse forest area, and residential
area (non-concrete). Finally, LANDSAT TM satellite pictures were used to create the
NDVI map. The equation NDVI=(IRR)/(IR+R) was used to obtain the NDVI value,
where IR stands for the infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum and R
stands for the red portion. Areas of vegetation in an image are indicated by the NDVI
value. Utilizing data from meteorological stations across the entire Peninsula of
Malaysia during the previous 20 years, precipitation data was interpolated.
The logistic regression and frequency ratio models were applied to the factors
using a raster grid of 1010 m cells. The area grid measured 14,140 rows by 12,900
columns, or 182,406,000 rows and columns. 327 cells had landslides.
The training area's frequency ratio data for each element were added to
determine the Landslide Hazard Index (HSI). The relative risk of a landslide
occurring is shown by the landslide hazard value. As a result, the risk of a landslide
occurring increases with increasing value and decreases with decreasing value.
(HSI: Landslide Hazard Index; Fr: rating of each factor’s type or range)The landslide hazard
map was made using the HSI values and for interpretation is shown.