Remotesensing 14 01726
Remotesensing 14 01726
Article
Ground-Based MAX-DOAS Measurements of Tropospheric
Aerosols, NO2, and HCHO Distributions in the Urban
Environment of Shanghai, China
Haoyue Wang 1 , Wanlin Wei 1 , Huizheng Che 2,3 , Xiao Tang 4 , Jianchun Bian 5 , Ke Yu 6, * and Weiguo Wang 1
Abstract: Aerosol extinction profiles at 550 nm were retrieved by applying multi-axis differential
optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) and lookup table. Then the tropospheric NO2 and
HCHO vertical column densities were retrieved using a two-step method from 28 July to 5 August
of 2015 in Shanghai. The retrieved results were compared with the satellite products, and then
Citation: Wang, H.; Wei, W.; Che, H.;
their diurnal variation was observed. A consistency check was performed before the inversion to
Tang, X.; Bian, J.; Yu, K.; Wang, W.
obtain a correction factor. Based on the sensitivity of geometric angles to oxygen dimer air mass
Ground-Based MAX-DOAS
factor (O4 AMF, AMF is the ratio of the slanted column density to the vertical column density), the
Measurements of Tropospheric
parameterization scheme of geometric angles in the lookup table is optimized. The results show that
Aerosols, NO2, and HCHO
Distributions in the Urban
the aerosol increased significantly in the afternoon. The diurnal variation of tropospheric NO2 and
Environment of Shanghai, China. HCHO vertical column densities (VCDs) are bimodal and unimodal patterns respectively, and their
Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1726. https:// values are higher than those of GOME-2 and OMI satellite products. A process of aerosol reduction
doi.org/10.3390/rs14071726 and recovery are related to ground particulates and meteorological elements. The chemical sensitivity
of local ozone production also has a clear diurnal variation.
Academic Editor: Daniele Bortoli
Received: 10 December 2021 Keywords: multi-axis; differential optical absorption spectroscopy; lookup table; aerosol extinction
Accepted: 28 March 2022 coefficient profile; tropospheric vertical column densities
Published: 3 April 2022
and bulk concentrations, diffusion measurements in or on aerosol particles have been per-
formed using remote sensing techniques. Multi-axis differential absorption spectroscopy
(MAX-DOAS) can obtain the vertical column densities (VCDs) and vertical distribution of
aerosol and trace gases by measuring the ultraviolet/visible absorption spectrum of zenith
and multiple off-axis directions (Platt and Stutz, 2008; Irie et al., 2011) [1,2]. In addition,
as a remote sensing observation method, MAX-DOAS has the advantages of large-scale,
continuous real-time monitoring and simple structure. It can identify the types of clouds
and aerosols, and verify satellite data and chemical model data. To deeply investigate the
pollution characteristics in Shanghai, this article uses MAX-DOAS to retrieve the aerosol
profiles and the troposphere NO2 , HCHO VCDs [3–5].
In order to reduce the impact of aerosol vertical distribution to trace gas inversion,
the trace gas inversion process is usually split into two steps. That is, retrieval of aerosol
profiles firstly, and retrieval of trace gas considering the aerosol information (Wang et al.,
2013a, b) [6,7]. Wagner et al. (2011) [8] retrieved the aerosol, HCHO, and NO2 profiles of
Milan in the summer of 2003 using the lookup table. Li et al. (2010, 2013) [9,10] performed
MAX-DOAS measurements to retrieve aerosol extinction coefficient profile and the vertical
distribution of NO2 , HCHO, and CHOCHO by lookup table during the PRiDe-PRD2006
campaign in the Pearl River Delta region 50 km north of Guangzhou, China, for four
weeks in June 2006. The lookup table method is simple and can retrieve aerosol optical
depth (AOD) and boundary layer height accurately. Its inversion targets are several
parameters, which contain the profile information. Moreover, Wagner et al. (2004) [11]
proposed that they can use O4 absorption to retrieve aerosol extinctions. In addition, the
optimal estimation method is also a commonly used inversion method. Vlemmix et al.
(2015) [12] applied the lookup table method and optimal estimation method to retrieve
the tropospheric NO2 and HCHO VCDs. They found the best agreement between the two
methods for tropospheric NO2 (HCHO) VCDs and a correlation of 0.99 (0.95). However, the
two methods also have systematic bias, which is more accurate and needs to be tested by
direct detection in the future. However, Irie et al. (2012) [13] compared the tropospheric
NO2 VCDs with three satellites in six sites in East Asia to find these deviations were small.
So, the retrieval by MAX-DOAS technique is accurate and representative.
In this paper, the aerosol extinction coefficient profile of Shanghai was retrieved by a
lookup table in the summer of 2015, and then the retrieval of tropospheric NO2 and HCHO
VCDs used the two-step method. Comparing the retrieval results with satellite data was to
verify the accuracy of the inversion algorithm. A process of aerosol concentration reduction
and recovery was chosen to analyze the change reason. Finally, the diurnal variation of
chemical sensitivity of local ozone production (PO3 ) was explored. Of note, the lookup
table parameterized design scheme in this paper is based on the previous study (Li et al.,
2010; Wang, 2012) [9,14] using the results of O4 AMF sensitivity to geometric angles to
interpolate geometric angles reasonably is for improving efficiency and reducing error.
The measured scattered light spectra are analyzed using QDOAS software (Danckaert
T, Fayt C, Van Roozendael M, De Smedt I, Letocart V, Merlaud A, Pinardi G.; Version
2.109; Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB);Uccle, Belgium; 9 April
2015) to retrieve the differential slant column density (DSCD). The concentration of a
given absorber integrated along the effective light path is relative to the amount of the
same absorber in a measured reference spectrum (DSCD = SCD-SCDref) of O4 , NO2 ,
and HCHO. In order to remove the Fraunhofer lines in the solar spectrum, the reference
spectrum chose the measured spectrum at solar zenith angle (SZA) = 13.2◦ at 12:00 LT
(local time, LT = UTC + 8 h) on 4 August 2015. The following O4 , NO2, HCHO DSCDs
were determined by a DOAS fit in the wavelength range 337~370 nm, 411~435 nm, and
336~359 nm, respectively. Table 1 gives cross-sections used in DOAS fitting, and the
absorption structure of Ring effect is calculated using QDOAS software in advance. In this
paper, we only considered the data with high signal noise ratio (SNR), which refers to the
DSCD data whose ratio of the obtained DSCD deviation by inversion to the DSCD is less
than 0.2. Only data with root mean square (RMS) less than 1 × 10−4 were used. Based on
the above criteria, 10% of the original data were removed.
Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1726 4 of 15
Here, the clear sky condition was chosen as the experiment period during the entire
observation period. Meena et al. (2004) [15] propose whether the O4 DSCD changes with
the SZA show a smooth “U” feature that can be used to determine whether the weather
is clear. According to the above method, the experiment period was selected from 6:00 to
18:00 LT in 28 July–5 August 2015. However, some afternoons were eliminated.
3. Retrieval Algorithm
Figure 2 is the flow chart for retrieving the extinction profile and tropospheric NO2 and
HCHO VCD. There are three steps. First, a consistency check comparing the measured O4 DSCD
with simulated O4 DSCD on clear-sky days with low aerosol load was conducted to obtain a
correction factor. Second, a lookup table was used to retrieve the aerosol extinction coefficient
profiles. Finally, the troposphere NO2VCD and HCHO VCD were inverted by using the two-
step method. Here, the radiative transfer model SCIATRAN3.2 was used, and the temperature
and pressure profiles from 0 to 30 km in the model have been replaced with sounding data from
IGRA Shanghai (58,362) site to make the model closer to the actual situation.
very precise. The correction factor was about 1.5, namely DSCD corrected ≈ 1.5 × DSCD
uncorrected. The correction factor of 1.5 is the ratio of the simulated value to the measured
value. From now on, unless stated differently, the O4 DSCD mentioned in this paper refers
to the corrected DSCD.
Figure 2. Flow chart for the aerosol extinction coefficient profile and tropospheric NO2 and HCHO
VCD retrieval process.
Figure 4. Consistency check of A, B, C test: the model simulated DSCDs, measured DSCDs, and
corrected DSCDs at 18◦ ELE. The red lines refer to the O4 DSCDs simulated by the SCIATRAN model,
the blue lines represent the O4 DSCDs measured by the MAX-DOAS instrument, and the black lines
are the measured O4 DSCDs multiplied by the correction factor.
Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1726 6 of 15
where E(z,λ) is the aerosol extinction coefficient with wavelength λ at height z, H denotes
the boundary layer height, τ(λ) is Tropospheric aerosol optical depth, F is the fraction of
the τ(λ) residing in the boundary layer, β(λ) is the normalization factor, and ξ is the scaling
height for aerosol.
Figure 5. Flow diagram of aerosol optical properties retrieval using a lookup table.
15km
Z
E(z, λ)dz = τ (λ) (2)
0km
(1 − F ) · τ ( λ )
β(λ) = (3)
− Hξ − 15km
ξ · (e −e ξ )
Based on Equations (1)–(3), the aerosol extinction coefficient profiles in different states
can be obtained by using different configurations of H, τ(λ), F, β(λ) and ξ parameters (as
shown in Table 2). Putting different profiles into the SCIATRAN model to produce O4
DAMF (DAMF is the difference between the tropospheric AMF in the off-axis direction
and zenithal directions) can set up a lookup table for the relationship between aerosol
parameters and O4 DAMF. It should be noted that relative to the version of Li et al., 2010
and 2013 [9,10], we used the geometric angle of the average time for the inversion to reduce
the computation time. Then based on the O4 AMF sensitivity experiment to geometric
angles, we interpolated the geometric angles reasonably to reduce the deviation between
the average geometric angle and the measured geometric angle.
Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1726 7 of 15
Parameter Value
0.1~1.3, interval: 0.1; 1.5~3.0, interval: 0.25;
τ
3.0~4.0, interval: 0.5
F 0.1~1.0, interval: 0.1
H (km) 0.2~1.5, interval: 0.05
Ξ (km) 5
ELE (◦ ) 3, 6, 10, 18, 90
averaging the measured values and
SZA (◦ ) and RAA (◦ )
interpolating
Figure 6 shows the variation and slope of O4 AMF with SZA at RAA = 90◦ and with
RAA at SZA = 45◦ . For other angles, they have the same change trend and were not shown
here. It can be seen from the figure that (1) the variation trend of off-axis direction and
zenith direction is roughly the same, but the slope is different, so they need to be considered
separately; (2) The slope of O4 AMF changes with SZA is one magnitude greater than RAA,
so the interpolation scheme mainly considers the influence of SZA. The range of observation
SZA from the MAX-DOAS instrument is from 10◦ to 80◦ . According to the result of the
geometric angle sensitivity experiment, for the off-axis direction, we interpolated one time
in average geometric angle when SZA is 40◦ ~60◦ , and interpolated two times when it is
60◦ or more. For the zenith direction, it was interpolated one time every two times.
Figure 6. The variation and slope of O4 AMF with SZA when RAA = 90◦ (left), and the variation and
slope of O4 AMF with RAA when SZA = 45◦ (right). The slope graph indicates the slope of the O4
AMF change with SZA (left) and RAA (right), where the red lines refer to the off-axis direction and
the blue lines indicate the zenith direction.
which is the hourly average of measured O4 DAMF. σ ( DAMFmeas (α)) represents the
standard deviation of the DAMF measured value, and DAMFmodel (α) represents the
DAMF simulated value.
18◦ 2
DAMFmeas (α) − DAMFmodel (α)
χ (τ, F, H ) = ∑ (
2
) (4)
α =3◦
σ( DAMFmeas (α))
dSCD= SCD (α) − SCD (90◦ ) = ( DSCD (α) + SCDre f ) − ( DSCD (90◦ ) + SCDre f )
(5)
= DSCD (α) − DSCD (90◦ )
4. Data Analysis
4.1. Aerosol
Figure 7 shows the diurnal variation of the aerosol profiles in Shanghai from 28 July to
5 August 2015. We inverted O4 DSCD in the wavelength range of MAX-DOAS, and then we
inverted the 550 nm extinction coefficient using O4 DSCD in the radiative transfer model.
Since the aerosol particles were mainly concentrated in the lower troposphere, we discuss
the aerosol situation at 0~4 km, here. It can be seen that aerosol particles were mainly
distributed on the boundary layer, and the diurnal variation of aerosol was clear. The
aerosol content is low and mainly concentrated in the low layer in the morning, increasing
gradually. The aerosol content of the whole layer was increased in the afternoon, and then
gradually decreased. Within these nine days, the aerosol content was low on 30 and 31 July,
and the aerosol content was high on 28–29 July and 1 August. At 15:00 on 29 July and
at 13:00 on 1 August, the extinction coefficient content of low-level aerosols reached the
maximum value of 2.0 km−1 in the nine days.
Figure 7. Time series of aerosol extinction coefficient profiles (1~4 km) at 550 nm retrieved from MAX
DOAS measurement in Shanghai from 28 July to 5 August 2015 (6:00~18:00 LT).
Figure 8. Diurnal variation of AOD and boundary layer height in Shanghai from 28 July to
5 August 2015 (6:00~18:00 LT). The red dots indicate the tropospheric AOD, and boundary layer
height retrieved by MAX-DOAS through the lookup table method.
Figure 9. Time series of tropospheric vertical column densities of NO2 and HCHO retrieved from
MAXDOAS measurement in Shanghai from 28 July to 5 August 2015(6:00~18:00 LT).
low pollution areas. Moreover, the unconsidered trace gas would influence the accuracy of
retrieval results, which is too high during the spectral data analysis process by QDOAS.
Figure 10. Comparison of concentrations of (a) NO2 and (b) HCHO tropospheric vertical column
densities retrieved by MAX-DOAS technique with satellite products. The black dots represent the
tropospheric NO2 and HCHO VCDs retrieved by DOAS, the blue dots represent the tropospheric NO2
and HCHO VCDs from the satellite products, and the red dots represent the ratio of the tropospheric
VCDs retrieved by DOAS to the tropospheric VCDs from the satellite products.
Figure 11 shows that the linear correlation between satellite products and retrieved
results. Among them, there were three satellite products having a positive correlation
with the retrieved NO2 , as shown in Figure 11a–c, while the retrieved HCHO and all its
satellite products were a linear positive correlation, as seen in Figure 11d–f. The correlation
coefficients between retrieved NO2 tropospheric VCDs and satellite products of GOME-
2/MetOp-B/NASA, GOME-2/MetOp-B/TEMIS, and OMI/TEMIS were 0.5172, 0.8449 and
0.5223, respectively. The correlation coefficients between retrieved HCHO tropospheric
VCDs and satellite products of GOME-2/MetOp-A/NASA, GOME-2/MetOp-B/NASA,
and OMI/NASA were 0.8632, 0.8896, and 0.3453, respectively. Because the samples of each
satellite product are different in the correlation analysis process, it is impossible to tell
which satellite product is closer to the retrieved result.
Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1726 12 of 15
Figure 11. Correlation analysis of NO2 tropospheric VCD satellite products from (a) GOME-2/MetOp-
B/NASA; (b) GOME-2/MetOp-B/TEMIS; (c) OMI/TEMIS and retrieved results, Correlation analysis
of HCHO tropospheric VCD satellite products from (d) GOME-2/MetOp-A/NASA; (e) GOME-
2/MetOp-B/NASA; (f) OMIL2/NASA and retrieved results (unit: 1015 molec·cm−2 ).
Figure 12. Diurnal variation of (a) PM10 and PM2.5, (b) wind direction and wind speed in Shanghai
from 28 July to 5 August 2015, and (c) Inversion layer at 20:00 on 29 July, 30 July, and 1 August.
Figure 12c shows the inversion layer occurred during this process. There are inversion
layers below 60 m at 20:00 LT on 29 July and 30 July, which inversion intensities were 0.656
and 0.345, respectively. There was no inversion layer on 31 July, and an inversion layer
whose inversion intensity was 0.687 appeared at 420 m to 680 m at 20:00 LT on 1 August.
So, the inversion layer was related to the aerosol content, that aerosol content decreased
(increased) when the inversion layer weakened (enhanced), by analyzing the relationship
between the inversion layer with this aerosol process.
Figure 13. The ratio of tropospheric HCHO and NO2 vertical column densities in Shanghai from
28 July to 5 August 2015 (6:00~18:00 LT).
5. Conclusions
Aerosol extinction profiles at 550 nm were retrieved using multi-axis differential
optical absorption spectroscopy and a lookup table/. Then the tropospheric NO2 and
HCHO vertical column densities were retrieved by applying a two-step method from
28 July 2015 to 5 August 2015 in Shanghai. The results show that the aerosol in summer in
Shanghai will increase in the afternoon, and the tropospheric NO2 and HCHO VCD have
concave and convex structures, respectively. The retrieved tropospheric NO2 and HCHO
VCDs are significantly higher than satellite products. Wind direction and inversion layer
can influence the aerosol pollution process. PO3 has an obvious diurnal variation during
the experimental period.
The lookup table used in this paper can retrieve the aerosol extinction coefficient
profile accurately. The O4 AMF sensitivity experiment to the geometric angle can be used
to optimize the geometrical angle configuration in the lookup table. However, the aerosol
profile shape setting is too single and needs further optimization.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, K.Y. and W.W. (Weiguo Wang); methodology, W.W.
(Wanlin Wei); software, K.Y.; validation, K.Y., H.W. and W.W. (Wanlin Wei); formal analysis, H.C.;
investigation, J.B.; resources, K.Y.; data curation, X.T. and H.W.; writing—original draft, X.T.; prepara-
tion, K.Y.; writing—review and editing, W.W. (Wanlin Wei); visualization, H.W.; supervision, K.Y.;
project administration, H.W.; funding acquisition, All authors have read and agreed to the published
version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research was funded by [Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research
Program (STEP)] grant number [2019QZKK0604]; funded by [National Science Fund for Distinguished
Young Scholars and the National Natural Science Foundation of China] grant number [41825011,
41807308, 21777026, 41641044, and 21477021]; funded by [Open Project of Shanghai Key Laboratory
of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP3)] grant number [FDLAP19009].
Institutional Review Board Statement: “Not applicable” for studies not involving humans or animals.
Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement: The data are not publicly available due to the data will be used in
future studies.
Acknowledgments: Thanks to the observations data of the MAX-DOAS instrument provided by
Fudan University. The QDOAS software we used for DOAS analysis is provided by the Belgian
Institute for Space and Aeronomy (IASB/BIRA). Furthermore, we would like to thank the Institute
of Environmental Physics (IUP) and Remote Sensing (IFE) at Bremen University, which provide
the SCIATRAN model. We also acknowledge the free use of tropospheric NO2 and HCHO column
data from NASA and TEMIS. This work was supported by the “Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific
Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1726 15 of 15
Expedition and Research Program (STEP)” (grant no. 2019QZKK0604), the National Science Fund
for Distinguished Young Scholars and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant
nos. 41825011, 41807308, 21777026, 41641044, and 21477021), and the Open Project of Shanghai Key
Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP3) (grant no. FDLAP19009).
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Platt, U.; Stutz, J. Differential Absorption Spectroscopy. Phys. Earth Space Environ. 2008, 29, 2458–2462.
2. Irie, H.; Takashima, H.; Kanaya, Y.; Boersma, K.F.; Gast, L.; Wittrock, F.; Brunner, D.; Zhou, Y.; Roozendael, M.V. Eight-Component
Retrievals from Ground-Based MAX-DOAS Observations. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2011, 4, 1027–1044. [CrossRef]
3. Cracknell, A.P.; Varotsos, C.A. New Aspects of Global Climate-Dynamics Research and Remote Sensing. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011,
32, 579–600. [CrossRef]
4. Varotsos, C.; Ondov, J.; Tzanis, C.; Öztürk, F.; Nelson, M.; Christodoulakis, J. An Observational Study of the Atmospheric
Ultra-Fine Particle Dynamics. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 94, 312–319. [CrossRef]
5. Varotsos, C.; Tzanis, C.; Cracknell, A. The Enhanced Deterioration of the Cultural Heritage Monuments Due to Air Pollution.
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2009, 16, 590–592. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Wang, Y.; Li, A.; Xie, P.H.; Chen, H.; Mou, F.S.; Xu, J.; Wu, F.C.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, J.G.; Liu, W.Q. Measuring Tropospheric Vertical
Distribution and Vertical Column Density of NO2 by Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy. Acta Phys. Sin.
2013, 62, 000138–151. [CrossRef]
7. Wang, Y.; Li, A.; Xie, P.H.; Chen, H.; Xu, J.; Wu, F.C.; Liu, J.G.; Liu, W.Q. Retrieving Vertical Profile of Aerosol Extinction by
Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy. Acta Phys. Sin. 2013, 62, 180705. [CrossRef]
8. Wagner, T.; Beirle, S.; Brauers, T.; Deutschmann, T. Inversion of Tropospheric Profiles of Aerosol Extinction and HCHO and NO2
Mixing Ratios from MAX-DOAS Observations in Milano during the Summer of 2003 and Comparison with Independent Data
Sets. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2011, 4, 2685–2715. [CrossRef]
9. Li, X.; Brauers, T.; Shao, M.; Garland, R.M.; Wagner, T.; Deutschmann, T.; Wahner, A. MAX-DOAS Measurements in Southern
China: Retrieval of Aerosol Extinctions and Validation Using Ground-Based In Situ Data. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 2079–2089.
[CrossRef]
10. Li, X.; Brauers, T.; Hofzumahaus, A.; Lu, K.; Li, Y.P.; Shao, M.; Wagner, T.; Wahner, A. MAX-DOAS Measurements of NO2 , HCHO
and CHOCHO at A Rural Site in Southern China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 2133–2151. [CrossRef]
11. Wagner, T.; Dix, B.; von Friedeburg, C.; Frieß, U.; Sanghavi, S.; Sinreich, R.; Platt, U. MAX-DOAS O4 Measurements: A New
Technique to Derive Information on Atmospheric Aerosols—Principles and Information Content. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2004,
109, D22205. [CrossRef]
12. Vlemmix, T.; Hendrick, F.; Pinardi, G.; De Smedt, I.; Fayt, C.; Hermans, C.; Piters, A.; Wang, P.; Levelt, P.; Van Roozendael, M.
MAX-DOAS Observations of Aerosols, Formaldehyde and Nitrogen Dioxide in the Beijing Area: Comparison of Two Profile
Retrieval Approaches. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015, 8, 941–963. [CrossRef]
13. Irie, H.; Boersma, F.; Kanaya, Y.; Takashima, H.; Xiaole, P.; Wang, Z. Quantitative bias estimates for tropospheric NO2 columns
retrieved from SCIAMACHY, OMI, and GOME-2 using a common standard for East Asia. In Proceedings of the AGU Fall
Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA, 3–7 December 2012; pp. 2403–2411.
14. Wang, S.S. Study on the Retrieval of NO2 and Aerosol Pollution in Shanghai Urban Area Based on the Passive DOAS Technique.
P.D. Thesis, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 2012.
15. Meena, G.S.; Bhosale, C.S.; Jadhav, D.B. Influence of Tropospheric Clouds on Ground-Based Measurements of Stratospheric Trace
Gases at Tropical Station, Pune. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 3459–3468. [CrossRef]
16. Qiu, J.; Zong, X.; Zhang, X. A Study of the Scaling Height of the Tropospheric Aerosol and Its Extinction Coefficient Profile. J.
Aerosol Sci. 2005, 36, 361–371. [CrossRef]
17. Xu, X.F.; Qiu, J.H.; Niu, S.J.; Tang, L.L. Optical Depth of Atmospheric Aerosol at 12 Stations in China over the Past 45 Years. Acta
Sci. Circumstantiae 2009, 29, 488–495.
18. Clémer, K.; Roozendael, M.V.; Fayt, C.; Hendrick, F. Multiple Wavelength Retrieval of Tropospheric Aerosol Optical Properties
from MAXDOAS Measurements in Beijing. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. 2010, 3, 863–878. [CrossRef]
19. Duncan, B.N.; Yoshida, Y.; Olson, J.R.; Sillman, S.; Martin, R.V.; Lamsal, L.; Hu, Y.; Pickering, K.E.; Retscher, C.; Allen, D.J.
Application of OMI Observations to A Space-Based Indicator of Nox and VOC Controls on Surface Ozone Formation. Atmos.
Environ. 2010, 44, 2213–2223. [CrossRef]