0% found this document useful (0 votes)
283 views

Soil Test Report - Sample Format - 2

This document provides a summary of a subsoil investigation for a highway project. It includes: 1. Fieldwork was conducted including drilling one borehole 150mm in diameter to a depth of 10m and conducting standard penetration tests. Undisturbed and disturbed soil samples were collected. 2. Laboratory tests were performed on the soil samples including grain size analysis, liquid/plastic limits, specific gravity, moisture content, compression tests. 3. The subsoil was stratified based on the field and laboratory data. The upper stratum consisted of loose brownish grey silty fine sand with traces of grass roots.

Uploaded by

Tanveer Iqbal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
283 views

Soil Test Report - Sample Format - 2

This document provides a summary of a subsoil investigation for a highway project. It includes: 1. Fieldwork was conducted including drilling one borehole 150mm in diameter to a depth of 10m and conducting standard penetration tests. Undisturbed and disturbed soil samples were collected. 2. Laboratory tests were performed on the soil samples including grain size analysis, liquid/plastic limits, specific gravity, moisture content, compression tests. 3. The subsoil was stratified based on the field and laboratory data. The upper stratum consisted of loose brownish grey silty fine sand with traces of grass roots.

Uploaded by

Tanveer Iqbal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 30

DRAFT REPORT

ON
SUB SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK
FOR
4 LANING OF NH 31 FROM GHOSHPUKUR – BAGDOGRA, WEST BENGAL.
(CH. NO. 553+850)

CONTENTS

A. TEXT PAGE NO.


1. Introduction 3
2. Scope of Investigation 3 - 4
3. Field Work 4 - 5
4. Laboratory Investigation 6
5. Sub-Soil Stratification 7 - 10
6. Deep Foundations: R.C. Bored Pile 11 - 13
7. Recommendations 14 - 15

B. ANNEXURE
1. Borehole Location Plan 16
2. Borelog Data Sheets 17 - 22
3. Sub-Soil Profile with Depth Vs. Field ‘N’ Curves 23
4. Laboratory Test Results 24 - 25
5. Particle Size Distribution Curves 26 - 30
:: 3 ::

1. INTRODUCTION
The work of sub-soil exploration in connection with 4 laning of existing NH 31 from
Ghoshpukur to Bagdogra, in the District of Darjeeling, West Bengal was awarded to M/S.
GEOTEST ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. of 6A, Milan Park, Kolkata - 700 084 by the EPC
Contractor TOPLINE INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. & GANESH RAM DOKANIA of 203,
Vasudeo Vihar Apartment, Nageshwar Colony, Boring Road, Patna - 800 001(Bihar). The sub-
soil investigation purpose was to determine the sub-soil condition and to ascertain the
foundation types that would be suitable in connection with 4 laning of existing NH 31. The
Fieldwork was done in the month of July, 2018.

2. SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION
In an attempt for optimization in the design of foundations of various structures like minor
bridge ROB, VUP, culvert etc for 4 laning of existing NH 31 at this site, geotechnical
investigation programme had been divided mainly into two parts, like, field works part
unfurling the sub-surface deposit types and their states of occurrences in-situ and laboratory
tests part which would help to determine the relevant the geotechnical properties of the sub-
surface deposits leading to finalization of foundation type and foundation design bearing
capacity with particular reference to the sub-surface deposit types and their strength
parameters and settlement potentials in-situ. The scope is summarized as follows: -

(a) Sinking 1 (one) number, 150 mm. & 75 mm dia., (for sand, Silt, clay portion only)
exploratory drillhole, with termination depth of about 10.00 m below E.G.L. at prefixed
location at the site. The drillhole number, depth & location was finalized & fixed by the
EPC Contractor. For location of the exploratory drillholes please refer ‘Drillhole
Location Plan’ at the Annexure of this report.

(b) Collection of representative 100 mm dia. undisturbed soil samples as per the provisions
as laid down in IS: 2132 (1972) as well as representative disturbed soil samples from
the exploratory drillhole for carrying out detailed laboratory analysis which would help
adoption of strength, settlement and other relevant parameters of the sub-surface
:: 4 ::

deposits for finalization of foundation type and thereafter for design of foundations of
the pertinent structure.

(c) Carrying out standard penetration tests as per the provisions laid down in IS: 2131
(1981) in the drillhole and subsequently maintaining penetration chart, depth-wise, upto
the test depth in the exploratory drillhole at this site.

After completion of the above-mentioned field works, the appropriate laboratory tests, as were
applicable to the sub-surface deposit types which were encountered at the explored location,
were conducted to determine the relevant geotechnical properties of the sub-surface deposits
and subsequently to ascertain the SBC of shallow on deep foundation.

3. FIELD WORK
A brief description of boring method, field tests, sample collection etc. and type of equipment,
are furnished below.

3.1 Rig
The entire fieldwork was obviously done by deploying single number of rig.

3.2 Boring & Drilling


Boring through the soil (sand, silt & clay with some gravels) was carried out by Shell & Auger
boring technique upto the termination depth below E.G.L. in the drillhole by Mechanically
Power-Driven Winch, by providing casing throughout the explored depth. Drilling in gravel /
boulder deposit was done by using rotary cutting tool, tipped with diamond to recover cores.
Drillhole size was NX.

3.3 Representative Sample


Representative samples were collected from auger, S.P.T. sampler and cutting shoe of
undisturbed sampling assembly. This was done to maintain a continuous record of strata
encountered. The samples were labelled and placed in airtight polythene bags and shifted to the
laboratory for testing and classification.
:: 5 ::

3.4 Standard Penetration Test (S.P.T.)


This test was conducted at the drilling points at suitable intervals. The number of blows
required for last 30.00 cm penetration of split spoon sampler out of a total penetration of 45.00
cm driven by a 63.50 kg hammer falling freely through a height of 75.00 cm was recorded as
‘N’ values. The sample from split spoon were collected after each test and were labeled and
placed in air-tight polythene bags before sending to the laboratory for identification and
testing. The test procedure was performed to IS: 2131 (1981) (Reaffirmed 1987). The Split
Spoon Sampler was as per IS: 9640:1980 (Reaffirmed 1987).

3.5 Undisturbed Samples

Undisturbed samples were collected as per I.S.2132 (1986) by means of a two tier 100.00 mm
I.D. open driven sampling assembly having area ratio of 15 %. The sampling assembly (as per
I.S. 11594: 1985) was driven to the required depth manually with the help of jarring link.
Samples collected in the lower tube were retained, labelled and waxed at both ends before
sending it to the laboratory.

3.7 Reduced level of Drillhole


Reduced Level of E.G.L.
Drillhole No.
(m)
D.H1 102.654

NOTE: RL has been provided by the EPC contractor.


:: 6 ::

5. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
For proper identification and classification of the sub-surface deposits and for deriving
adequate informations regarding its relevant physical and the geotechnical properties at the
site under investigation, most or all of the following laboratory tests pertaining to the actual
soil types, occurring at this site, were conducted on the representative soil samples, collected
from the exploratory drillhole.
(a) Grain size analysis [IS: 2720 (Part – 4) – 1985]
(i) Hydrometer analysis for cohesive soil samples.
(ii) Sieve analysis for cohesionless soil samples.
(b) Liquid limit & plastic limit and for cohesive soil samples [IS: 2720 (Part – 5) -
1985].
(c) Specific Gravity [IS: 2720 (Part – 3 / sec – 1) – 1980].
(d) Natural moisture content [IS: 2720 (Part – 2) – 1973].
(e) Unconfined compression tests on undisturbed cohesive soil samples [IS: 2720 (Part –
10) – 1973].
(f) Triaxial shear tests in unconsolidated undrained condition on cohesive soil samples
for determination of strength parameter values like, cohesion, Cuu, and angle of
internal friction, uu [IS: 2720 (Part – 11) – 1971].
(g) Consolidation tests on cohesive soil samples for determination of settlement
potentials [IS: 2720 (Part – 15) – 1986].

All or most of the above mentioned laboratory tests on the representative soil samples were
conducted as per the relevant provisions as laid down in the different sections of IS: 2720.
The result after the relevant laboratory tests on the representative soil samples have been
presented in tabular form in ‘Laboratory Test Result Sheet’ at the end of this report.
:: 7 ::

5. SUB-SOIL STRATIFICATION
The sub-soil profile as revealed by the drillhole is shown in ‘Sub-Soil Profile’ and in ‘Table 1’.
On the basis of samples obtained from field tests like S.P.T. samples, disturbed samples,
undisturbed sample, their visual inspection and subsequent laboratory tests on undisturbed soil
sample, the classification of different strata were done and are discussed below:

Stratum I Loose brownish grey silty fine sand with traces of grass roots.

The extension of this layer in the Drillhole is as follows: -


Reduced Level (m) Measured With Respect To E.G.L. (m)
Drillhole Mark
From to From to
D.H.1 102.654 102.554 0.00 0.10

This layer consists of loose brownish grey silty fine sand with traces of grass roots.

For relevant Engineering Properties please see Subsoil profile Table No. - 2(A & B), Pg. No - 15

Stratum II Pebbles of vein quartz and quartz-feldspar-muscovite-rich Granite.

The extension of this layer in the Drillhole is as follows: -


Reduced Level (m) Measured With Respect To E.G.L. (m)
Drillhole Mark
From to From to
D.H.1 102.654 102.554 0.10 7.10

This layer contains pebbles of vein quartz and quartz-feldspar-muscovite-rich Granite. Field
‘N’ value of this layer is >100.

For relevant Engineering Properties please see Subsoil profile Table No. - 2(A & B), Pg. No – 15
:: 8 ::

Stratum III Stiff grey clayey sandy silt with traces of mica. (C- deposit layer)

The extension of this layer in the Drillhole is as follows: -


Reduced Level (m) Measured With Respect To E.G.L. (m)
Drillhole Mark
From to From to

D.H.1 95.554 93.554 7.10 9.10

This layer contains Stiff grey clayey sandy silt with traces of mica. It is C- deposit layer. Field
‘N’ value of this layer ranges from 21 to 24, indicating its very stiff state of consistency.

For relevant Engineering Properties please see Subsoil profile Table No. - 2(A & B), Pg. No - 15

Stratum IV Very stiff grey sandy silty clay with traces of mica.

The extension of this layer in the Drillhole is as follows: -


Reduced Level (m) Measured With Respect To E.G.L. (m)
Drillhole Mark
From to From to

D.H.1 93.554 91.554 9.10 11.10

This layer contains very stiff grey sandy silty clay with traces of mica. Field ‘N’ value of this
layer ranges from 22 to 25, indicating its very stiff state of consistency.

For relevant Engineering Properties please see Subsoil profile Table No. - 2(A & B), Pg. No - 15
:: 9 ::

Stratum V Fragments of Granite gneiss comprising mainly quartz, feldspar, muscovite


and biotite.

The extension of this layer in the Drillhole is as follows: -


Reduced Level (m) Measured with Respect To E.G.L. (m)
Drillhole Mark
From to From to

D.H.1 91.554 **77.554 11.10 **25.10

**Termination depths of the drillholes.

This layer contains Fragments of Granite gneiss comprising mainly quartz, feldspar, muscovite
and biotite. Field ‘N’ value of this layer is >100.

For relevant Engineering Properties please see Subsoil profile Table No. - 2(A & B), Pg. No - 15
: : 10 : :

TABLE 1
SUB-SOIL PROFILE

Field ‘N’ value

Avg. N-Value
Description

Bulk Density
Thickness

Range of
Stratum

parameter
Strength
(gms/cc)

Shear
Loose brownish grey silty fine
I 0.10 m. -- -- 1.711 --
sand with traces of grass roots.

Pebbles of vein quartz and


II quartz-feldspar-muscovite-rich 7.00 m. >100 §*62 1.729  =350
Granite.
Stiff grey clayey sandy silt with
III traces of mica. (C- deposit 2.00 m. 21 to 24 20 --
--
layer).

Very stiff grey sandy silty clay


IV 52.00 m. 22 to 25 §*51 --
with traces of mica. --

Fragments of Granite gneiss


comprising mainly quartz, More than  =350
V >100 -- --
feldspar, muscovite and 14.00 m.
biotite.
* = Corrected N value, § = Suggested Value
: : 11 : :

6. DEEP FOUNDATIONS: R.C. BORED PILE


The load carrying capacities of R.C. Bored Piles, for various dia., are calculated on the basis of
I.S. Code of Practice of design and construction of pile foundations, IS: 2911 (Part I / Sec 2) –
2010.

Using the static formula,

For piles in granular soils


Qu = Ap (1/2 D N + Pd Nq) +  K Pd tan  As [I.S. 2911 (Part I / sec-2)-
2010, Annex -B: clause 6.3.1.1 and 6.3.2],
Where, Ap = Cross-sectional area of pile toe.
D = Stem diameter.
 = Effective unit weight of soil at pile toe.
Pd = Effective overburden pressure at pile toe.
As = Surface area of pile shaft.
N, Nq = Bearing capacity factors depending on .

For piles in cohesive soils


Qu = Ap Nc Cp +   C As [I.S. 2911 (Part I / sec-2)-2010, Annex -B:
clause 6.3.1.1 and 6.3.2],
Where, Ap = Cross-sectional area of pile toe.
Nc = Bearing capacity factor = 9.0.
Cp = Average cohesion at pile toe.
 = Reduction factor.
C = Average cohesion throughout the length of pile.
As = Surface area of pile shaft.
: : 12 : :
: : 13 : :

TABLE – 2
Load Carrying Capacities of R.C. Bored Piles of Straight Shaft
R.L. of cut-off level = 101.00 m.
Recommended
Working Load Safe vertical Depth of
R.L of
R.L of on single pile Pull-out Fixity Safe
Termination Shaft Dia. of
Cut-off in Axial capacity Below Lateral
level of Length Pile
Length Compression with Cut– off Capacity*
pile (m) (mm)
(m) with F.O.S. = 3.00 Level (kN)
(m)
F.O.S. = 3.00 (kN) (m)
(kN)

1000  3927.00 2195.00 6.82 274.60


82.000 101.00 19.00
1200  5531.00 2830.00 7.92 363.70

N.B.: These are the geotechnical capacities of pile derived from sub-soil properties, not the
structural capacities. If the geotechnical capacity exceeds the structural capacity, design is
obviously to be based on structural capacity.
Pile is considered to be fixed head and considering Grade of Concrete to be M35.
: : 14 : :

7. RECOMMENDATIONS

From the information as supplied by the client, it is known that there is a proposal for the
construction of a MNBR at the site. However, whatever be the type, height and nature of the
Structure, its foundation design should satisfy two basic criteria. They are as follows:

(a) There must be adequate factor of safety against shear failure.


(b) The settlement of footings must be within permissible limits as defined in IS: 1904 (1986).

Considering the above mentioned criteria & subsoil condition in the entire site, it is suggested to
use deep foundations in the form of R.C. Bored Piles, the load capacities of which are provided in
TABLE 2, of pervious chapter, for foundation design purpose.

For R.C. Bored Piles, if used, the entire job is to be done as per relevant provisions of IS: 2911
(Part 1 / Sec 2), 2010.

For R.C. bored piles, to be provided, while considering the seismic effect, the pile load capacities,
as given in TABLE 2, may be increased by 50 % for skin friction component below 1.50 m. depth
as per Table 1 (clause 6.4.2.1) of IS: 1893 (Part I): 2016.

No local information regarding highest position of ground water table during Monsoon was
available from the site. However, for design purposes, it is advisable to consider the worst possible
condition of standing water level to merge with E.G.L., which has been done in present case.
Hence our results deep foundation, as given in TABLE 2, will not be affected by fluctuation of
Ground Water Table position, since those were determined under worst condition.
: : 15 : :

Last but not the least, due considerations should be given to open excavation of any sort. All sorts
of precautionary measures like earth retainment by any suitable method, are to be adopted to
avoid excessive ground settlement and damage to adjoining structures.

For and on behalf of GEOTEST ENGINEERS PVT. LTD.

[ALOK ROY]
B.E. (CIVIL), MCE (SOIL MECH. and FOUNDN. ENGG.)
MASCE, MIE, MIGS, M.I.P.H.E., M.A.C.I. (I), C. Eng. (I)
Chartered Engineer(I), Reg.No. M128469 – 4.
Director.
Annexure III

Contractor
Geotest Engineers Pvt.Ltd. 6A,
TOPLINE INFRA - PROJECTS PVT. LTD. & GANESH RAM DOKANIA (J.V.)
Milan Park , Kolkata
- 700 084.
Project Ghoshpukur - Bagdogra, West Bengal. Page
17 to 19
Structure MNB Chainage 553+850 Co-ordinates E 629773.000 N 2944739.000
D.H. No. Depth of Hole (m) Ground RL GWT (m) Date of Start 15.07.18
D.H.1 25.00 102.654 m. 1.80 Date of Completion 18.07.18
UDS:
Undisturbed Sample WS: Wash Sample RQD: Rock Quality Designation Job
DS: Disturbed Sample SPT: Standard Penetration Test CR: Core Recovery No
Scale Depth RL Log Description Sample Type Depth (m) SPT 'N' Values CR RQD Remarks
(m) (m) No From To 15 30 45 N (%) (%)
0.00 102.654 Loose brownish D/1 D 0.00 0.00 -- -- -- -- -- --
grey silty fine sand
0.10 102.554 with traces grass
roots. (SM)
Pebbles of vein P/1 P 0.10 0.45 31 47 58 >100 -- --
quartz and 0.10 1.10 -- -- -- -- 9 Nil
quartz-feldspar-
muscovite-rich
Granite.(GP)
1.00
1.10 2.10 -- -- -- -- 7 Nil

2.00
2.10 3.10 -- -- -- -- 6 Nil

3.00
3.10 4.10 -- -- -- -- 8 Nil

4.00
4.10 5.10 -- -- -- -- 5 Nil

5.00
5.10 6.10 -- -- -- -- 6 Nil

6.00 P/2 P 6.10 6.19 68 55 -- 100 -- --


6.10 7.10 -- -- -- -- Nil Nil

7.00
7.10 95.554
Stiff grey P/3 P 7.10 7.55 8 9 12 21 -- --
clayey sandy
silt with traces
of mica.
(C- ф deposit)
8.00
(ML)
P/4 P 8.10 8.55 7 11 13 24 -- --

9.00
9.10 93.554
Very stiff grey P/5 P 9.10 9.55 7 9 15 22 -- --
sandy silty clay
with traces of
mica.(MI)
Annexure III

Contractor
Geotest Engineers Pvt.Ltd. 6A,
TOPLINE INFRA - PROJECTS PVT. LTD. & GANESH RAM DOKANIA (J.V.)
Milan Park , Kolkata
- 700 084.
Project Ghoshpukur - Bagdogra, West Bengal. Page
17 to 19
Structure MNB Chainage 553+850 Co-ordinates E 629773.000 N 2944739.000
D.H. No. Depth of Hole (m) Ground RL GWT (m) Date of Start 15.07.18
D.H.1 25.00 102.654 m. 1.80 Date of Completion 18.07.18
UDS:
Undisturbed Sample WS: Wash Sample RQD: Rock Quality Designation Job
DS: Disturbed Sample SPT: Standard
Very stiff grey Penetration Test CR: Core Recovery No
Scale Depth RL Log sandy silty clay
Description Sample Type Depth (m) SPT 'N' Values CR RQD Remarks
(m) (m) with traces of No From To 15 30 45 N (%) (%)
mica.(MI)
10.00
P/6 P 10.10 10.55 9 11 14 25 -- --

11.00
11.10 91.554
Fragments of 11.10 12.10 -- -- -- -- 8 Nil
Granite gneiss
comprising
mainly quartz,
feldspar,
12.00
muscovite and
12.10 13.10 -- -- -- -- 7 Nil
biotite.(GP)

13.00
13.10 14.10 -- -- -- -- 5 Nil

14.00
14.10 15.10 -- -- -- -- 7 Nil

15.00
15.10 16.10 -- -- -- -- 8 Nil

16.00
16.10 17.10 -- -- -- -- 7 Nil

17.00
17.10 18.10 -- -- -- -- Nil Nil

18.00
P/7 P 18.10 18.40 51 67 -- >100 -- --
18.10 19.10 -- -- -- -- 6 Nil

19.00
19.10 20.10 -- -- -- -- 7 Nil
Annexure III

Contractor
Geotest Engineers Pvt.Ltd. 6A,
TOPLINE INFRA - PROJECTS PVT. LTD. & GANESH RAM DOKANIA (J.V.)
Milan Park , Kolkata
- 700 084.
Project Ghoshpukur - Bagdogra, West Bengal. Page
17 to 19
Structure MNB Chainage 553+850 Co-ordinates E 629773.000 N 2944739.000
D.H. No. Depth of Hole (m) Ground RL GWT (m) Date of Start 15.07.18
D.H.1 25.00 102.654 m. 1.80 Date of Completion 18.07.18
UDS:
Undisturbed Sample WS: Wash Sample RQD: Rock Quality Designation Job
DS: Disturbed Sample SPT: Standard Penetration Test CR: Core Recovery No
Scale Depth RL Log Description Sample Type Depth (m) SPT 'N' Values CR RQD Remarks
(m) (m) No From To 15 30 45 N (%) (%)
20.00
20.10 21.10 -- -- -- -- Nil Nil

21.00
P/8 P 21.10 21.35 57 69 -- >100 -- --
21.10 22.10 -- -- -- -- 8 --

22.00
22.10 23.10 -- -- -- -- 9 --

23.00
23.10 24.10 -- -- -- -- 7 --

24.00
24.10 25.10 -- -- -- -- 9 --

25.00 25.10 77.554


Borehole Terminated.
Annexure III

Contractor
Geotest Engineers Pvt.Ltd. 6A,
TOPLINE INFRA - PROJECTS PVT. LTD. & GANESH RAM DOKANIA (J.V.)
Milan Park , Kolkata
- 700 084.
Project Ghoshpukur - Bagdogra, West Bengal. Page
20 to 22
Structure MNB Chainage 553+850 Co-ordinates E 629747.000 N 2944778.000
D.H. No. Depth of Hole (m) Ground RL GWT (m) Date of Start 13.09.2018
D.H.2 25.00 104.545 1.30 Date of Completion 15.09.2018
UDS: Undisturbed Sample WS: Wash Sample RQD: Rock Quality Designation Job
DS: Disturbed Sample SPT: Standard Penetration Test CR: Core Recovery No
Scale Depth RL Log Description Sample Type Depth (m) SPT 'N' Values CR RQD Remarks
(m) (m) No From To 15 30 45 N (%) (%)
0.00 Top fill of loose D/1 D 0.00 -- -- -- -- --
brownish grey
silty fine sand
mixed with grass D/2 D -- 0.50 -- -- -- --
roots & gravels.

0.80 103.745
Medium
1.00 brownish grey U/1 U 1.00 1.45 -- -- -- --
silty medium
sand mixed
with Nx Drilling started form 1.50 m. depth below E.G.L.
1.50 103.045
gravels(SM)
Gravels , P/1 P 1.50 1.95 31 41 62 >100 -- --
cobbles & 1.50 2.50 -- -- -- -- 10 Nil
2.00 boulders in
mixed with
sand & clay
(GP)
2.50 3.50 -- -- -- -- Nil Nil

3.00

P/2 P 3.50 3.90 25 42 61 >100


3.50 4.50 -- -- -- -- 11 Nil

4.00

4.50 5.50 -- -- -- -- -- --

5.00

5.50 6.50 -- -- -- -- Nil Nil

6.00

6.50 6.95 10 19 35 54 -- --

7.00 7.00 97.545


firm grey
clayey sandy
silt with traces P/4 P 7.50 7.95 1 2 2 4 -- --
of mica.(ML)

8.00

9.00 P/5 P 9.00 9.45 2 2 3 5 -- --


firm grey
Annexure III
clayey sandy
silt with traces
of mica.(ML)
Contractor
Geotest Engineers Pvt.Ltd. 6A,
TOPLINE INFRA - PROJECTS PVT. LTD. & GANESH RAM DOKANIA (J.V.)
Milan Park , Kolkata
- 700 084.
Project Ghoshpukur - Bagdogra, West Bengal. Page
20 to 22
Structure MNB Chainage 553+850 Co-ordinates E 629747.000 N 2944778.000
D.H. No. Depth of Hole (m) Ground RL GWT (m) Date of Start 13.09.2018
D.H.2 25.00 104.545 1.30 Date of Completion 15.09.2018
UDS: Undisturbed Sample WS: Wash Sample RQD: Rock Quality Designation Job
DS: Disturbed Sample SPT: Standard Penetration Test CR: Core Recovery No
Scale Depth RL Log Description Sample Type Depth (m) SPT 'N' Values CR RQD Remarks
(m) (m) No From To 15 30 45 N (%) (%)
10.00

P/6 P 10.50 10.95 1 2 3 5 -- --

11.00

11.50 93.045
Fragments of
Granite gneiss
12.00 comprising P/7 P 12.00 12.45 23 40 49 89 -- --
mainly quartz,
muscovite and
biotite.(GP)

13.00

P/8 P 13.50 13.95 25 43 52 95 -- --

14.00

15.00 P/9 P 15.00 15.45 26 48 67 >100 -- --

16.00

P/10 P 16.50 16.95 19 44 59 >100 -- --

17.00

18.00 P/11 P 18.00 18.25 57 71 -- >100 -- --

19.00

P/12 P 19.50 19.80 60 76 -- >100 -- --

20.00
Annexure III

Contractor
Geotest Engineers Pvt.Ltd. 6A,
TOPLINE INFRA - PROJECTS PVT. LTD. & GANESH RAM DOKANIA (J.V.)
Milan Park , Kolkata
- 700 084.
Project Ghoshpukur - Bagdogra, West Bengal. Page
20 to 22
Structure MNB Chainage 553+850 Co-ordinates E 629747.000 N 2944778.000
D.H. No. Depth of Hole (m) Ground RL GWT (m) Date of Start 13.09.2018
D.H.2 25.00 104.545 1.30 Date of Completion 15.09.2018
UDS: Undisturbed Sample WS: Wash Sample RQD: Rock Quality Designation Job
DS: Disturbed Sample SPT: Standard Penetration Test CR: Core Recovery No
Scale Depth RL Log Description Sample Type Depth (m) SPT 'N' Values CR RQD Remarks
(m) (m) No From To 15 30 45 N (%) (%)

21.00 P/13 P 21.00 21.45 56 61 70 >100 -- --

22.00

P/14 P 22.50 22.95 50 59 67 >100 -- --

23.00

24.00 P/15 P 24.00 24.45 53 67 77 >100 -- --

25.00 25.00 79.545 P/16 P 25.00 25.15 76 -- -- >10 -- --


Borehole Terminated.
Geotest Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
6 A, Milan Park, Garia, Kolkata - 700 084.
Project : Ghoshpukur - Bagdogra, West Bengal.

Density and Moisture Shear Strength Consolidation

Free Swell Index (%)


Grain Size Analysis
Structure / Chainage

Atterberg Limits

Corrected 'N' Value


Bore Hole Number

Test Parameters Characteristics

Specific Gravity Gs
Field 'N' Value
Sample Depth

Classification
Sample No.

Natural Moisture

Silt Factor
Shrinkage Limit
Plasticity Index
Bulk Density

Compression
Liquid Limit

Type of Test
Plastic Limit

Cohesion, C
Dry Density
Content (%)

Initial Void
(m)

Index, Cc
(degrees)
(gms/cc)

(gms/cc)

(kg/cm )
Cobbles
Description

2
Gravel

Ratio,
Cc

Sand

Clay
(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)
(%)

(%)
Silt

e0
f
1+e0

Brownish grey silty fine sand


D-1 0.00 - - - - 90 *10 - 1.711 - Non-plastic SM - - - - - - - - -
with traces of mica.
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 0.10 m. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ -
P-1 0.10 Pebbles of vein quartz and >100 62 - 3 83 *14 - 1.729 - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - - -
quartz-feldspar-muscovite-
1.10 0rich Granite. - 100 - - - - - - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -

6.10 - 100 - - - - - - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -


⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 7.10 m. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
P-2 7.10 Grey clayey sandy silt with 21 - - - 38 44 18 - - - 29 13 16 8 ML - - - - - - - - -
Design CH. 553 + 850

traces of mica.(c-f deposit)


D.H. - 01 (MNB)

P-3 8.10 24 - - - 39 45 16 - - - 30 13 17 9 ML - - - - - - - - -
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 9.10 m. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
P-4 9.10 Grey sandy silty clay. 22 - - - 23 33 44 - - - 62 22 40 20 MI - - - - - - - -

P-5 10.10 25 - - - 25 33 42 - - - 61 20 40 21 MI - - - - - - - - -
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 11.10 m. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
11.10 Fragments of Granite gneiss - 100 - - - - - - Non-plastic - - - - - - - -
comprising mainly quartz, GP -
P-6 18.10 feldspar, muscovite and >100 55 100 - - - - - - Non-plastic - - - - - - - - -
biotite.
18.10 - 100 - - - - - - Non-plastic - - - - - - - -

P-7 21.10 >100 49 - 42 48 *10 - 1.776 - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - - -

21.10 - 100 - - - - - - Non-plastic - - - - - - - -


⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 25.00 m. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Page No. - 24
* Combined % of silt and clay.

1
Geotest Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
6 A, Milan Park, Garia, Kolkata - 700 084.
Project : Top Line Infra Project, Ghoshpukur – Bagdogra.

Density and Moisture Shear Strength Consolidation

Free Swell Index (%)


Grain Size Analysis
Structure / Chainage

Atterberg Limits

Corrected 'N' Value


Bore Hole Number

Test Parameters Characteristics

Specific Gravity Gs
Field 'N' Value
Sample Depth

Classification
Sample No.

Natural Moisture

Silt Factor
Shrinkage Limit
Plasticity Index
Bulk Density

Compression
Liquid Limit

Type of Test
Plastic Limit

Cohesion, C
Dry Density
Content (%)

Initial Void
(m)

Index, Cc
(degrees)
(gms/cc)

(gms/cc)

(kg/cm )
Cobbles
Description

2
Gravel

Ratio,
Cc

Sand

Clay
(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)
(%)

(%)
Silt

e0
f
1+e0

D-2 0.50 Brownish grey silty fine sand - - - 5 81 *14 - 1.725 - Non-plastic - - - - - - - - - -

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 0.80 m. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯


U-1 1.00 Brown silty fine sand with - - - 13 74 *13 19.87 1.658 - Non-plastic SM DS 0 31 - - - - - -

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 1.50 m. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯


P-1 1.50 Gravels cobbles & boulders in >100 94 - 60 39 *1 - 1.768 - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -
sandy matrix.
P-2 3.50 >100 76 - - - - - - - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -

P-3 6.50 54 39 - 48 30 *22 - 1.772 - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -


⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 7.00 m. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
P-4 7.50 Grey clayey sandy silt with 4 5 - - 36 46 18 - - - 33 18 15 11 ML - - - - - - - - -
traces of mica.
P-5 9.00 5 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Design CH. 553+ 850

P-6 10.50 5 5 - - 38 46 16 - - - 30 17 13 10 ML - - - - - - - - -
B.H. - 02 (MNB)

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 11.50 m. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯


P-7 12.00 Fragments of Granite gneiss 89 53 - 20 74 *6 - 1.778 - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -
comprising mainly quartz,
P-8 13.50 muscovite and biotite. 95 54 - - - - - - - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -

P-9 15.00 >100 55 - - - - - - - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -

P - 10 16.50 >100 54 - - - - - - - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -

P - 11 18.00 >100 53 - - - - - - - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -

P - 12 19.50 >100 50 - - - - - - - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -

P - 13 21.00 >100 44 - 51 48 *1 - 1.782 - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -

P - 14 22.50 >100 48 - - - - - - - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -

P - 15 24.00 >100 48 - 58 40 *2 - 1.788 - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -


-
P - 16 25.00 >100 47 - - - - - - - Non-plastic GP - - - - - - - -
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ 25.00 m. ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Page No. - 25
Abbreviations used: (i) DS = Direct Shear Test. * Combined % of silt and clay.

You might also like