Chapter Three
Chapter Three
2022
CHAPTER THREE
o Planning – is the dynamic process of making decisions today about future actions; and it
is a selection or choice among alternatives as to: What missions or objectives be
achieved, What actions should be taken, What organizational positions be assigned, How
the end can be achieved, When to achieve it, Who is to do it, Where to do it. It bridges
the gap between where we are now and where we want to be.
o Planning - is preparing today for tomorrow; it is the activity that allows managers to
determine what they want and how to get it: They set goals and decide how to reach
them. Planning focuses on the future: what is to be accomplished and how.
Answers six basic questions in regard to any intended activity:
Planning involves selecting missions and objectives and the actions to achieve to them; it
requires decision-making, that is, choosing from among alternative future courses of actions.
Managers who develop plans but do not commit themselves to action are simply wasting time.
The outcome of the planning function is a plan, a written document that specifies the courses of
action a firm will take.
Nature of Planning
Discussing the following points can highlight the nature of planning.
Although in practice all the functions mesh as a system of action, planning is unique in that it
involves establishing the objectives necessary for all group effort. The entire gist of initiating,
exercising, and activating the managerial functions of organizing, staffing, directing and
controlling is to bring the objectives formulated during planning into fruition. In fact, the concept
of especially control would be unthinkable without planning because any attempt to control
without plans is meaningless, since there is no way for people to tell whether they are going
where they want to go (the result of the task of control) unless they first know where they want
to go (part of task of planning). Plans thus furnish the standards of control. Since planning and
controlling are so much inseparable, they are treated as the Siamese twins of management.
As shown in the figure below, unit plans are summed up to form sectional plans and these in turn
form departmental plans. Finally, the different divisional plans when summarized at corporate
level, form corporate plan.
Departmental/divisional plans
Sectional plans
Operational plans
5. It promotes efficiency
Planning provides the opportunity for a greater utilization of the available organizational
resources - because in planning we determine how many resources are necessary to reach the
goals, and how to use these resources.
7. Developing managers
The act of planning involves high level of intellectual activity. Those who plan must be able to
deal with abstract and uncertain ideas and information. Planners must think systematically about
the present and the future. Through planning, the future state of the organization can be
improved if its managers take an active role in moving the organization toward that future.
Planning then implies that managers should be proactive and make things happen rather than
reactive and let things happen. Through act of planning, managers not only develop their ability
to think futuristically but, to the extent that their plans are effective, their motivation to plan is
reinforced. Also, the act of planning sharpens manager's ability to think as they consider abstract
ideas and possibilities for the future. Thus, both the result and the act of planning benefit both the
organization and its managers.
Limitations of Planning
a. Planning is risky
This is because of uncertainties in the future and absence of accurate and adequate data.
These two objectives are consistent, but they differ in that the manufacturing department alone
cannot ensure accomplishing the company’s objectives.
Goals and objectives can be used interchangeably.
Nature of Objectives
1. Goals are predetermined or stated in advance.
2. Goals describe future desired results toward which present efforts are directed.
3. Goals should be specific and measurable. If possible, goals should be expressed in
quantitative terms.
4. Goals should have defined time period. They should specify the time period over which
goals will be achieved and measured. However, the long-range objectives should provide the
direction for short-range objectives.
5. Objectives should be continually adjusted in light of environmental changes. However,
too frequent changes and adjustments may cause confusion and disruption of plans,
strategies, policies, budgets, etc.
6. Goals should be challenging but realistic. If a goal is too difficult employees may give up.
If too easy, and routine type they may not feel motivated. Therefore, goals should be set
within the existing resource base and not beyond the department’s time, equipment, labor,
and financial resources. This gives workers job satisfaction and a great desire to work hard.
A difficult job is something beyond the resource capacity of the organization and the
individual employee. It ends up with failure to achieve the stated goals.
7. Objectives have hierarchy
In short, like all management activities objectives have hierarchy. It ranges from the broadest
organizational objectives to specific /individual objectives. Organizations typically have three
levels of goals: strategic, tactical, and operational.
Strategic goals - are broadly defined targets or future end results set by top-level management.
Such goals typically address issues relating to the organization as a whole rather than specific
divisions or departments and may sometimes be stated in fairly general terms. Strategic goals
are sometimes called official goals because they are formally stated by top management.
Tactical goals - are targets or future end results usually set by middle management for specific
departments or units. Goals at this level spell out what must be done by various departments
to achieve the results outlined in the strategic goals. Tactical goals tend to be stated in more
measurable terms than is sometimes true of strategic goals.
Operational goals - are targets or future end results set by lower management that address
specific, measurable outcomes required from lower levels.
The three levels of goals can be thought of as forming a hierarchy of goals. With a hierarchy,
goals at each level need to be synchronized so that efforts at the various levels are channeled
ultimately toward achieving the major goals of the organization. In this way, the various
levels of goals form a means-end chain, in which the goals at the operational level (means)
must be achieved in order to reach the goals at the tactical level (end). Likewise, the goals at
the tactical level (means) must be reached in order to achieve the goals at the strategic level
(end).
8. Multiplicity of objectives
Even though there is only one broad and overall organizational objective, there are other multiple
(many) objectives that are under the umbrella of the overall plan which are directed to attain the overall
plan. It would have been relatively easy to achieve an objective and its sub-objective had an
organization had only a single basic objective. But in reality organizations do have a multitude of
objectives and any attempt to disregard this fact can invite failure to organizations.
9. Integrating character
In order to achieve the broad organizational objective there should be harmony or integration
among objectives.
Benefits of Objectives
i.Objectives provide basis for the performance of all managerial functions. They serve as a
benchmark for the formulation of plan, policies, strategies, rules, budgets, procedures, etc.
Organizing exists when there are objectives and courses of action required for implementing
plans, organizing signifies the need for staffing by creating jobs and positions and coordinating
all organizational efforts to desired results.
ii.Objectives provide guidelines for action. They help clarify expectations. When goals are set,
organization members are more likely to have a clear idea of the major outcomes that they are
expected to achieve. Without goals, organization members can all be working very hard but may
collectively accomplish very little as if they were rowers independently rowing the same boat in
different directions and together making very little progress. Goals direct and channel
employees’ efforts by describing future desired results. They provide focus and direction for
employees by prescribing what ‘should be’ done. And, they also help to allocate resources and
tell employee how and where to direct their strongest efforts. Goals are basic for cooperative and
organized effort.
iii.Objectives can limit employee activities. They serve to prescribe what ‘should be done’ and
‘what should not be done’ by the employees.
v. An organization’s goal can serve as a source of employee motivation. It helps to uplift their
morale. By presenting a challenge, goals tell what characterizes success and how to achieve it.
Accomplishment of organizational goals provides employees a sense of achievement and
satisfaction. The added motivation develops from meeting goals, feeling a sense of
accomplishment, and receiving recognition and other rewards for reaching targeted outcomes.
On the other hand, managing employees based on the accomplishment of objectives rather than
on the tasks and activities of every worker (management by objectives-MBO) can serve as an
incentive to employees.
vi. Objectives provide performance standards and bases for control. Control is the function of
measuring, comparing and evaluating performance against predetermined standards. Thus,
control will be meaningless in the absence of standards provided by objectives.
Goal Content: Goals that are effective in channeling effort toward achievement at
the strategic, tactical, and operational levels have a content that reflects five major
characteristics. Goals should be challenging, attainable, specific and measurable, time limited,
and relevant.
Work Behavior: Given goals and commitment, how does the goal-setting process
ultimately influence behavior? Research so far suggests that goal content and goal commitment
affect an individual's actual work behavior by influencing four work behavior factors: direction,
effort, persistence and planning.
Direction: Goals provide direction by channeling attention and action toward activities related to
those goals, rather than to other activities. Thus goals to which we are committed can help us
make better choices about the activities that we will undertake.
Effort: In addition to channeling activities, goals to which we are committed boost effort by
mobilizing energy. As indicated by the research on goal setting, individuals are likely to put forth
more effort when goals are difficult than when they are easy.
Persistence: Persistence involves maintaining direction and effort on behalf of a goal until it is
reached, a requirement that may involve an extended period of time. Commitment to goals
makes it more likely that we will persist in attempting to reach them.
Planning: In addition to the relatively direct efforts on direction, effort and persistence, goals
also have an important indirect effect on work behavior by influencing planning. Goal setting
affects planning because individuals who have committed themselves to achieving difficult goals
are likely to develop plans or methods that can be used to attain those goals. With easy goals,
however, little planning may be necessary.
Feedback: feedback to employees as to their performance will let them know if they
have worker as to the expectation. By comparing their performance with the set goals, managers
should give feedback on employees’ performance that will help them evaluate themselves and
direct their effort towards achievement.
Like other managerial activities planning has its own processes or series of steps. These steps are
interrelated and there is no rigid boundary between or among these steps, and one is the base for
the other.
1. Establishing objectives
As objectives provide the direction for all other managerial functions, especially planning,
objective setting is an important first step in the planning process. Objectives specify the
expected results and indicate the end points of what is to be done, where the primary emphasis is
t be placed, and what is to be accomplished by the network of strategies, policies, procedures,
rules, budgets, and programs. They provide the direction necessary for achievement and without
them there is little to keep a manager from simply wandering in all directions. Objectives are
then, the ‘guiding light’ for the entire management process.
Objective setting is a three steps process, which involves assessing the present situation,
anticipating future conditions, and then setting the objectives. It is only after the managers have
at least the rudimentary knowledge about their capabilities and available opportunities that
objective setting does make sense.
Organizations do not have one set of objectives, which each manager attempts to achieve.
Rather, setting objectives involves establishing objectives for the entire organization, each
subordinate work unit, and the long range as well as the short range. The hierarchy of objectives
starts at the top of the organization with overall organizational objectives and proceeds
downwards with narrower and more specific objectives for each level managers, derived from
the objectives at the level
Objectives developed by organizational levels and peer managers should be compatible with one
another. Top-level management should set the stage for goal setting by lower level management,
thereby ensuring maximum use of resources. Enterprise objectives give direction to the major
plans which define the objective of every major department. Major department objectives, in
turn, control the objectives of subordinate departments and so down the line.
2. Developing premises
Planning premises are assumptions about the environment within which the plan is to be carried
out. Once objectives are established managers have to investigate the company's environment to
know factors that facilitate or block the attainment of these objectives. This involves examining
the external and internal factors which affect the performance of the organization: the external
environment (for Treats and Opportunities) through PEST analysis and internal environment (for
Strengths and Weaknesses) through Self-Audit.
• Strengths are internal competencies possessed by the organization in comparison with the
competitors. These include structure and policies of the organization, location, financial
soundness, knowledge of personnel, qualities of facilities, and so on.
The key element of planning at this stage is forecasting. It is based on the forecasts made in
different areas that premises are made.
Because the future is so complex, it would not be profitable or realistic to make assumptions
about every detail of the future environment of a plan. Therefore, premises are, as a practical
matter, limited to assumptions that are critical, or strategic, to a plan, that is, those that most
influence its operation.
i. Scope/Breadth Dimension
Scope refers to the comprehensiveness of the plan, or it refers to the level of management where
plans are formulated. This dimension creates hierarchy of plans. Based on scope/breadth we can
classify plans into: Strategic, Tactical and Operational.
Tactical Plan: refers to the implementation of activities and the allocation of resources
necessary for the achievement of the organization’s objectives.
- is an intermediate plan that helps to reduce long range planning into intermediate one by
increasing the amount of specificity and making the actions goal oriented. Tactical plans are
specific and more goal oriented than strategic plans. Middle level management in
consultation with lower level management develops them.
- Tactical plans are the means charted to support the implementation of the strategic plans and
achievement of tactical goals. They are concerned with shorter time frames and cover a
narrower scope (narrower range of activities).
- Structures a firm’s resources to achieve maximum performance.
- Concerned with what the lower level units within each division must do, how they must do it,
and who will have the responsibilities for doing it.
- Tactical plans make premises for operational plans.
- is narrower in scope than strategic plan and wider than operation plan; but more detailed than
strategic plan and less detailed than operational plan
E.g. what is the best pricing policy?
Which city or town is suitable for marketing our products?
Operational Plan: is concerned with the day to day activities of the organization and is made at
the lower level management in consultation with middle level management. Operational plans
spell out specifically what must be accomplished to achieve specific/operational goals. It is
concerned with the efficient, day-to-day use of resources allocated to a department manager’s
area of responsibility.
- Operational plans have relatively short time frame (< 1 yr). It is the most detailed (more
specific) and narrowest plan compared to the above two; because it is to be implemented day-
to-day.
• Unless operational goals are achieved in organizations, tactical and strategic plans will not
be successful and goals at those levels will not be achieved.
Standing Plans: are plans that provide an ongoing guidance for performing recurring activities.
- They are plans which are formulated to be used again and again for the day-to-day operation
of the organization. That is, repetitive situations or actions require the development of such
plans. They become necessary when the same kinds of actions are to be taken over and over
again. Standing plans become valuable under relatively stable situations.
Once established, standing plans allow managers to conserve time used for planning and
decision-making because similar situations are handled in a predetermined, consistent manner.
E.g. A bank can more easily approve or reject loan requests if criteria are established in advance
to evaluate credit ratings, collateral assets, and related applicant information.
The major types of standing plans are policies, rules and procedures.
• Policies are usually established formally and deliberately by top managers of the
organization. They can also emerge informally and at lower levels in the organization from a
seemingly consistent set of decisions on the same subject made over a period of time.
b. Rules: spell out specific required action or non-actions, i.e., actions that must be or must not
be taken, allowing no discretion, in a given situation.
E.g. No smoking, cheating is prohibited.
A rule is an ongoing, specific plan for controlling human behavior and conduct at work.
The purpose of policies is to guide decision-making by marking off areas in which managers
can use their discretion. Although rules also serve as guides, they allow no discretion in their
application.
Rules are the most explicit of standing plans and are not guides for thinking or decision-
making. Rather, they are substitutes for them. The only choice a rule leaves is whether or not
to apply it to a particular set of circumstances.
When we compare the above three, policies, procedures and rules, we can understand that all are
alike in the sense that they are directives to guide people’s behavior to the desired ends and they
are plans which are to be followed in the future. Conversely, procedures and rules are different
from policies in that the formers are guides to actions while the latter are guides to thinking. So,
procedures and rules render no freedom and hence should be used when we want to discourage
initiative or repress thinking. But, policies must permit freedom within limits and hence are used
when people’s involvement, participation or initiative is desired.
Though both rules and procedures repress thinking, they are different. Unlike procedures, rules
(1) guide actions without specifying a time sequence (2) spell out that a certain action must or
must not be taken. Procedures, however, specify a time sequence. In fact a procedure may be
looked upon as a sequence of rules. A rule, however, may or may not be part of a procedure.
Single use plans: are plans aimed at achieving a specific goal that, once reached, will most
likely not recur in the future and dissolved when these have been accomplished.
- Are designed to accomplish a specific objective usually in a relatively shorter period of time
and it is non repetitive.
- They are detailed courses of action that probably will not be repeated in the same form in the
future.
The major types of single use plans are programs, projects, and budgets.
E.g. A firm planning to build a new warehouse-location, construction costs, labor
availability, zoning restrictions.
b. Projects: is a plan that coordinates a set of limited scope activities that do not need to be
divided into several major projects in order to reach a major non-recurring goal.