Experiment 0 METE215
Experiment 0 METE215
EXPERIMENT 0
Group 7
Hüseyin Turan
Student Name: Taha Berkay Şengül
Mert Adil Tokat
Student ID: 2447837
Mertcan Kipri
Instructor: Eda Aydoğan Güngör
1
Abstract
explore the separation of coffee beans using various sieves with different pore sizes. The
method employed in the creation of ground coffee from the coffee bean can greatly influence
the ultimate flavor of the product [4]. By systematically employing these sieves, precise
measurements of particle sizes and coffee bean weights are obtained. When the resulting
dataset is carefully analyzed and visualized, an intriguing revelation emerges: the relationship
between particle size and weight follows a polynomial function. This innovative discovery not
only advances our understanding of the topic but also offers valuable insights into the
intricacies of the sieve method itself. In summary, this experiment not only evaluates the
effectiveness of the approach, but also provides a detailed evaluation of the pros, cons, and
impact of kernel size on taste, making this a key resource for future research efforts.
Introduction
Coffee, considered one of the most significant food products globally, offers a wide
array of brewing and extraction techniques, each tailored to individual preferences. With a
selection of over 30 distinct coffee bean varieties, the choice of beans significantly impacts
the coffee's quality and flavor. However, the pivotal stage lies in the grinding process, which
directly affects both the coffee's quality and taste. Moreover, the grinding technique plays a
crucial role in naming the coffee product. Meeting high standards and achieving a delightful
taste while obtaining the optimal particle size for the preferred method underscores the
2
Various mechanical grinding methods are utilized to reduce the size of coffee beans,
all sharing a common goal, albeit with unique effects on the final product. While the overall
objective remains consistent among these methods, the key difference lies in the
particle sizes, as it significantly influences the potential quality of the end product. In essence,
a narrower particle size distribution simplifies the path to creating a high-quality coffee
product. Consequently, it's important to note that the use of different types of grinders directly
impacts the particle size distribution, resulting in distinct outcomes and contributing to the
diversity of coffee products available to consumers. This diversity arises from the interplay of
grinding techniques, each leaving its unique mark on the final product's attributes.
The initial step involves determining the particle size distribution, a crucial aspect of
the analysis. Various methods can be employed for this purpose, including fundamental
techniques like image analysis, the Ro-Tap sieve method, or more advanced and intricate
methods such as laser particle size analysis. The basic sieve method will be explained in detail
The sieve method stands as one of the earliest and most essential techniques used in
characterizing particle size distribution. It is particularly well-suited for analyzing dry, non-
agglomerated particles, as demonstrated in this experiment with coffee beans. The core of this
method involves a systematic procedure: after evenly distributing all the material on the top
sieve, the sieve system undergoes agitation, either manually or with the help of a sieve shaker.
The critical aspect of using various sieves with distinct gap sizes is to separate particles of
similar sizes. Following this thorough sieving process, the contents of each sieve are
3
individually examined for analysis. This evaluation provides valuable data regarding the mass
of particles retained on each sieve, thereby creating a comprehensive profile of the particle
distribution across the range of sieve sizes. Additionally, the results enable the determination
of mass fractions, a quantitative assessment that adds depth to the analysis and enhances our
Experimental
Material:
• Coffee Beans
Equipment:
• Grinder
• Weighing Machine
• Test Sieves
• Laboratory Shaker
Procedure:
To initiate the particle size analysis, the coffee beans are first ground. After grinding,
the resulting coffee grounds, which encompass a variety of distinct particle sizes, are
quantified by weight. These precisely measured coffee grounds are then placed on a series of
sieves, each equipped with different mesh sizes to ensure higher result accuracy.
Subsequently, these sieves are either subjected to vibration or manually shaken, with the sieve
having the largest holes positioned at the top, creating a gradient where hole size decreases
from the top sieve to the lower ones. Particles can only pass through the openings in the
sieves that are appropriately sized for them. Following this sieving process, each individual
sieve is accurately weighed using a precision scale. This comprehensive analysis not only
4
provides the mass fraction for each sieve but also supplies the essential data needed to create
Before classifying coffee beans by their size, an initial amount of 200 grams of coffee
is used. Various types of coffee beans, each with their own distinct shapes, are then separated
using a range of sieves with different opening sizes. This separation yields multiple batches of
coffee, each displaying a specific size. After the experiment, all of the single sieves are
There is no apparent correlation between particle size and weight. Upon a thorough
examination of the graph and the data obtained from the experiment, it is evident that both
extremely small particles and significantly larger ones make up only a small portion of the
5
The potential of sieve analysis is limited by the number of segments it can create. To
illustrate this limitation, consider the case of using 5 sieves, which can only yield 5 distinct
experimental results. In such scenarios, automating the sieving process is not feasible.
time-consuming task, whether dealing with very small or relatively larger particles.
As indicated by the data shown in Figure 2, the ideal particle size for brewing
espresso is in the range of roughly 200-250 μm. In this experiment, there are precisely
36 grams of coffee beans falling within this size range. To make a delightful cup of
espresso, you need around 20 grams of coffee. So, with the available 36 grams, it's
6
possible to brew nearly two regular cups of espresso or one strong double espresso
serving.
The connection between taste and particle size can be illustrated by examining
the particle size distributions of various pre-ground coffee options. Figure 3 presents a
comparison of size distributions for Filter, Smooth Roast, and Espresso coffees. The
findings reveal that the Espresso variant possesses a notable fine fraction, contributing
to its distinctive bitter flavor. As the coffee's particle size increases, the resulting taste
7
Conclusion
The size of the coffee grounds is a crucial factor in shaping the ultimate qualities of
the brewed beverage. When grinding, it's essential to be cautious and make sure the particle
size aligns with the desired taste profile for the specific product being prepared. This
experiment provides a direct assessment of the strengths and limitations of sieve testing. It
becomes clear that for materials like coffee, which consist of a wide range of particles, there
are more efficient techniques available for their analysis and separation. In this study, we
achieve this using the implemented system, but there are other methods that offer greater
advantages.
size and size distribution on the taste of coffee. Given its crucial role in flavor, the precision in
discerning coffee beans is of utmost importance, particularly in specialized areas like the
culinary sector.
8
REFERENCES
htps://www.911metallurgist.com/blog/perform-test_sieves-analysis
2. BodnariucMy, D. (n.d.). How Coffee Grind Size Affects Coffee Extraction and Taste.
coffee-affection
3. Ephraim, Daniel. Op�mizing Brewed Coffee Quality Op�mizing Brewed Coffee Quality.
content/uploads/2019/12/scaa_2010_0.pdf
4. Malvern Instruments Ltd. (n.d.). Mastersizer 3000 - Coffee Particle Size Analysis - Ata
content/uploads/2017/02/MRK1884-01-MS3K-coffee-particle-analysis.pdf
5. Moeenfard, M., Silva, J., Borges, N., Santos, A. and Alves, A. (2014). Diterpenes in