Cardioid S
Cardioid S
Yevheniia Frankevych
October 2023
1 Introduction
A cardioid is a plane curve that can be defined in a variety of ways. In this arti-
cle are shown synthetic proofs of some definitions and properties of a cardioid.
For Theorems A and B no preliminary knowledge is required, but for the proof
of Theorem C the reader should be familiar with basic properties of parabolas
and inversion. We will start at this simple geometrical construction:
Construction:
Two circles ω1 and ω2 with centres O1 and O2 intersect at two points A and
B. Let l be an arbitrary line that passes through B and intersects ω1 and ω2
at points M and N respectively. Tangents to ω1 at M and to ω2 at N intersect
at X. Let L be the locus of all points X. Line AX intersects circumcircle ω of
△O1 AO2 at Y .
Call ω the generating circle of L. Let O be the circumcenter of this circle and
R be its radius.
Theorem A: XY = 2R.
Theorem B: Let Ω be a circle with center O and radius 3R, and let a tan-
gent through X to L intersect Ω at points C, D (where C is closer to the point
A1 = AO ∩ L). Then CD = CA1 .
1
2 Proofs
Proof (Theorem A, Figure 1):
Now the cardioid can be also defined as a locus of all points X such that
XY = 2R (for every point Y on ω there exist two points X and both of them
lie on cardioid, more details in Lemma 3 ). Thus, the locus does not depend on
ω1 and ω2 . In fact, it only depends on the generating circle. Now lets prove
some properties of L.
2
Figure 1: Theorem A
Lemma 1. ω3 touches L at X.
Proof : The fact that ω3 touches L means that there is a unique point X on ω3
such that XY = 2R (Y = XA ∩ ω).
That is true as having a point X one can uniquely determine P = Y O ∩ ω.
Thus, we can uniquely constuct a circle ω3 .
Lemma 2. Let ω1 , ω2 and ω3 be three circles such that they pass through
A and touch L. The second points of intersection of these circles are collinear.
Proof: Notice that we can still define X1 similarly to X but for another l.
So the proof that X1 Y = 2R is the same as the proof of the Theorem 1. Hence,
X1 Y = XY = 2R
3
Figure 2: Theorem B
4
Therefore, C1 C = XD1 = 2R (Theorem A).
So OC = OC1 + C1 C = R + 2R = 3R ⇒ C ∈ Ω.
D1 C1 ∥ DC ⇒ △D1 OC1 ∼ △DOC. Thus, OD = OC = 3R because OD1 =
OC1 . So D ∈ Ω. Finally,
COA1 = 180◦ − ̸ AOC = 180◦ − 2̸ AEC1 (ω)
̸
= 180 − AEX = 180◦ − 2̸ AXD (as DC is tangent to (AEX))
◦
2̸
= 180◦ − ̸ OCD (AX ∥ OC) = ̸ DOC (△DOC is isocleles with OD = OC)
Thus, we have ̸ COA1 = ̸ DOC, so CD = CA1 .
Figure 3: Lemma 6
5
Lemma 6. For every two points X, X1 on L such that ̸ XAX1 = 120◦ tangents
to L in these points are parallel.
So there are tree exactly three tangents to a cardioid in every orientation ex-
cept of the direction perpendicular to AA1 (points X, X1 , X2 ). If X = A, the
tangents to L in X1 and X2 coincide.
Figure 4: Theorem C
6
Proof (Theorem C, Figure 4):
3 Conclusion
There are three equivalent definitions of a cardioid:
1. Fix a circle ω with center O (generating circle), radius R and a point A on
it. Cardioid is a locus of points X such that XY = 2R where Y = XA ∩ ω.
2. Fix two circles with centres in point O and radiuses R and 3R. Cardioid
is an envelope of chords CD in a bigger circle such that CD = CA1 (A1 is a
fixed point on a bigger circle). Smaller circle will be a generating circle of this
cardioid.
3. A cardioid is the inverse curve of a parabola with its focus at the center of
inversion.
4 References
1. A post in Art of Problem Solving about the construction:
https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/q1h361816p1983439
2. A. Akopian, ’Geometry in Figures’ (pp. 123)