Assignment 1 - HRDM 107
Assignment 1 - HRDM 107
Case Study 4
Questions:
1. What do you think of the reaction of the employees regarding the decentralization policy of
Karl?
I think the reaction of the employees regarding the decentralization policy of Karl, seems unworthy
to their job positions. Ken has the right to be worried since Wilmer passed away not only, he inherits
this to Karl just for inherited family matters, but Wilmer inherits the responsibilities and obligations
Ken to lead and manage its company over Karl. Ken is worried towards employees that had lost their
paths and self-esteem to work hard, because they feel unprioritized and worthless, as it is their
reaction regarding the decentralization policy that is implemented by Karl.
2. Do you consider the decentralization policy as a big mistake? why or why not?
In this situation, I consider the decentralization as a big mistake because Karl doesn’t know the real
purpose, control and goal, on how to govern the organization in a decentralization organizational
structure. Karl mismanagement the company’s policy and faradization, that is his way he only
prioritizes the top management level without thinking the employees who are mostly lots of sacrifice
and hard work, like Ken. Due to Karl’s policy, they can’t blame the employees to leave from their
organization since they felt that there is a negative workplace environment, and employees decrease
their productivity and efficiency to work longer, under the Karl’s authority and egoistic policy.
Rica Jean Q. Batusbatusan BSBA 3 HRDM
Case Study 5
Questions:
1. What, if any did the President Mr.Eradio failed to do? Explain your answer
Mr. Eradio failed to do is the unprofessional way of giving promotion to Ms. Abegail.
He did not consider and consult first the approval of Ms. Abegail, in putting her to a job position that
she seems not yet ready, to take risk to change her job career and profession.
Mr. Eradio must show his respect in a professionalism way on promoting Ms. Abegail to higher up
position because he seems have no good intention to convince her without manner and
professionalism.
Case Study 6
Questions:
The situation is not hopeless for Mary Grace, it’s not too late. From her permanent work as
administrative, as contented as she is to her work whether in any organization or company she
will be work on, it should be doesn’t matter to her. The situation is just an awful and
disappointing for Mary Grace because she couldn’t believe that the company of her aunt is in
negligence and disorganized workplace environment.
I would advise to Mary Grace that just follow what she wanted to do or change, as likely as it is
her permanent job in Eloisa’s company. She must negotiate to Eloisa to know what’s something
wrong and offer some help on how to resolve the problems or conflicts. Hence, with Eloisa’s
permission and approval, that’s the time to Mary Grace to make a change within its organization
and management, that she can contribute to the company, to organize the employees’ record,
to give the benefits they deserved. She must be fit to work in any organization, she must share
her knowledge, values, experience and capabilities to be a problem solver. This advice is an
advantage and opportunity to her to enhance, develop and improve her skills and experience
and to increase her productivity and efficiency as well.