Scribd
Upload
436 views1 page

People v. Usana Case Digest

The Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled on a case involving three individuals charged with drug and firearm offenses after a checkpoint stop. The Court found that checkpoints during election periods to enforce gun bans need not be announced. It also determined the search of the vehicle was valid due to consent from the owner. However, the drug convictions of two individuals were reversed due to lack of evidence directly linking them to the drugs found in the vehicle's trunk.

Uploaded by

maushi.abinal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
436 views1 page

People v. Usana Case Digest

The Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled on a case involving three individuals charged with drug and firearm offenses after a checkpoint stop. The Court found that checkpoints during election periods to enforce gun bans need not be announced. It also determined the search of the vehicle was valid due to consent from the owner. However, the drug convictions of two individuals were reversed due to lack of evidence directly linking them to the drugs found in the vehicle's trunk.

Uploaded by

maushi.abinal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

People v.

Usana, 323 SCRA 754 (2000)


Facts:
• Accused-appellants Virgilio T. Usana and Jerry C. Lopez, along with Julian D.
Escaño, were charged with various offenses before the Regional Trial Court of
Makati City.
• The charges included the violation of Section 4, Article II of Republic Act No.
6425 (R.A. 6425) for the sale, distribution, and transportation of hashish (a
prohibited drug), as well as illegal possession of firearms and ammunition.
• The incident in question took place during the election period when a gun ban
was imposed.
• The accused argued that the checkpoint conducted by the police was illegal, as it
should have been announced and was conducted in an arbitrary and
discriminatory manner.
Issues:
• The legality of the checkpoint and whether it was conducted in violation of the
accused's constitutional rights.
• The validity of the search of the vehicle and whether the accused consented to it.
• The conviction of the accused for drug-related offenses and illegal possession of
firearms.
Ruling:
• Checkpoints during the election period to enforce a gun ban do not need to be
announced, and the manner in which they are conducted may be justified by the
exigencies of public order.
• The search of the vehicle was deemed valid because there were indications that
Escaño, the owner of the car, consented to it. This was further supported by the
testimony of other witnesses.
• The conviction of Usana and Lopez for drug-related offenses was reversed and
set aside due to a lack of evidence linking them to the prohibited drug found in
the trunk of the car. Their acquittal was based on reasonable doubt. They were
ordered to be released unless further detention was justified for other lawful
reasons.

You might also like