PHIL100 Hurdle Task
PHIL100 Hurdle Task
1. Research Question: Argue a case for or against one philosophical theory of identity
address practical concerns related to one's identity - such as memory, morality, and
beliefs- that are critical aspects in our daily lives. Additionally, this approach
The psychological continuity theory can account for changes in our bodily features:
- Our physical appearance can change over time due to aging, injury, or cosmetic surgery.
- However, we still consider ourselves to be the same person despite these changes. The
(Parfit, 1984).
- The psychological continuity theory can explain this phenomenon by positing that our
beliefs, desires, and personality traits, rather than our bodily features.
- Psychological continuity can extend across changes in the body, brain, or environment, as
long as there is a sufficient degree of overlap or similarity between past and present
psychological states.
- According to Locke, a person's identity is determined by their ability to remember their
past experiences, and this memory continuity is what makes them the same person over
time.
The psychological continuity theory is consistent with empirical evidence from psychology and
neuroscience:
- Studies have shown that our sense of self is highly malleable and context-dependent.
- Our memories, beliefs, and values are constantly shaped and reshaped by our experiences
- This suggests that our sense of personal identity is a dynamic and ongoing process, rather
The psychological continuity theory can provide a more robust and flexible framework for
psychological continuity theory can accommodate a wide range of practical, cultural, and
empirical considerations.
- This can provide a more nuanced and sophisticated understanding of identity and
selfhood that can better capture the complexity and diversity of human experience.
- There are four specific criteria that most of us use most of the time when establishing
“which person today is identical with which person in the past” (Searle, 2005, pg. 285)
Boeker, R. (2021). Locke’s kind-dependent approach to identity. Locke on Persons and Personal
Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science.
Philosophy.
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/locke-personal-identity/#LockPersPersIdenBa
si
- Formats and explains the different aspects of Locke’s theory of identity in a clear and
concise way
- Easy to understand
Searle, J. R. (2005). The Self. In A brief introduction (pp. 279–299). essay, Oxford University
Press.
Weinberg, S. (1970, January 1). Shelley Weinberg, Locke on personal identity. PhilArchive.
https://philarchive.org/rec/WEILOP-2
https://1000wordphilosophy.files.wordpress.com/2022/02/psychological-approaches-to-personal-
dentity.pdf