Usability Report Full1
Usability Report Full1
Abby Bumgardner
Executive Summary
The usability test was conducted with the purpose of discovering how
user-friendly Williams-Sonoma’s website is. The test was conducted on
September 23, 2023 beginning at 12pm Eastern Time.
The test consisted of one participant, my mother, Jody Bumgardner. The test
took Jody approximately 40 minutes to complete. Jody is a 48 year old
mother who cooks as a hobby, so she would be considered a part of
Williams-Sonoma’s typical client base.
Methodology
Sessions
After the last task was completed, the test administrator asked the participant
to rate the website overall on a scale of 1-5 (Strongly Disagree to Strongly
Agree) for seven subjective measures including:
● The website was easy to navigate.
● I would return to this website again in the future.
● I could easily understand where I was within the website at
all times.
● The website structure was simple to comprehend.
● I could find what I was looking for quickly.
● The website was very aesthetically pleasing.
● The website felt very clean and organized.
In addition, the test administrator asked the participants the following overall
website questions:
● What the participant liked most.
● What the participant liked least.
● Recommendations for improvement.
Participants
- - - - - 1
Evaluation Tasks/Scenarios
Results
Task Completion Success Rate
For example:
The participant successfully completed tasks 1-5. The participant had difficulty
in completing task 6. When reentering her Williams-Sonoma website account,
there were 2/10 items that had previously been saved that were missing from
her account.
1 √ √ √ - √ -
Success 1 1 1 0 1 0
Completion
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0%
Rates
Task Ratings
After the completion of each task, participants rated the ease or difficult of
completing the task for three factors:
● It was easy to find my way to this information from the
homepage.
● As I was searching for this information, I was able to keep track of
where I was in the website.
● I was able to accurately predict which section of the website
contained this information.
The 5-point rating scale ranged from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly
agree). Agree ratings are the agree and strongly agree ratings combined with
a mean agreement ratings of > 4.0 considered as the user agrees that the
information was easy to find, that they could keep track of their location and
predict the section to find the information.
The participant started off with difficulty in finding a rolling pin due to the
mass amount of categories to search through and not being sure how the
company would label a rolling pin within their website. Luckily, the search bar
at the top allowed the participant to quickly find the rolling pin rather than
searching herself.
The participant was able to quickly create a free member account. There were
no issues regarding this task according to the participant, and she was able to
create the account within a timely manner and continue shopping. The
participant also mentioned that she likes this feature because it creates a
sense of importance and loyalty as a customer regarding the company.
The participant performed this task very quickly. There is a tab on the top of
the home page labeled ‘College Kitchen’ that allowed the participant to go
directly to a page full of college friendly items to purchase.
The participant had difficulty and was overall unsuccessful in adding an item
to the checkout cart. When selecting the ‘Add to Cart’ button, the website
would show a blank screen and not allow her to purchase any products. This
could be a personal laptop or signal issue, but it seemed consistent
throughout all attempts.
The participant was able to locate a useful cooking tool for under $30. The
tool was a cooking spatula. While the variety of items within this price range
were very slim, there are some options for those on a tighter budget.
6. Saving Item in the ‘Liked’ Section and Finding Them After Logging Out of the
Website Account.
After logging out of her account, exiting the website, reentering the website,
and relogging into her account, the participant was only able to locate 8 of
her 10 saved items in the ‘Liked’ portion of her account. This scenario would
be frustrating if you originally had difficulty in locating this item and did not
want to search for it again. This issue could cost the company income.
2 5 5 5 5
3 5 5 5 5
4 2 5 4 3.7
5 3 3 3 3
6 4 4 3 3.7
Time on Task
The task that took the most amount of time for the participant to complete
was task 1, locating a rolling pin. While the search bar made this task
completion go very quickly, it took the participant a while to notice the search
bar, and therefore left her searching for quite some time for the rolling pin.
The task that took the least amount of time was task 3, locating a college
friendly item. Due to the tab on the homepage, the participant quickly went to
a page designated to college friendly items and easily completed the task.
Time on Task
P1 Avg. TOT*
Task 1 720 720
● Ease of use
● Frequency of use
● Difficulty of keeping track of where they were in the site
● How quickly most people would learn to use the site
● Getting information quickly
● Homepage’s content facilities exploration
● Relevance of site content
● Site organization
For example:
The participant preferred the tasks that had obvious tabs on the website.
There were several tasks that took longer to complete due to difficulty of
location.
Strongly Strongly
Disagree Neutral Agree
Disagree Agree
Thought Website
1
was easy to use
Would use website
1
frequently
Found it easy to
keep track of
1
where they were in
website
Thought most
people would learn
1
to use website
quickly
Can get
1
information quickly
Homepage’s
content makes me
1
want to explore
site
Website is well
1
organized
*Percent Agree (%) = Agree & Strongly Agree Responses combined
Liked Least
The following comments capture what the participants liked the least:
The site felt very cluttered in some ways. There were too many categories to
navigate through. If you were new to cooking and did not understand how to
categorize tools and appliances, you would have to rely solely on the search bar.
Recommendations
The recommendations section provides recommended changes and
justifications driven by the participant success rate, behaviors, and
comments. Each recommendation includes a severity rating. The following
recommendations will improve the overall ease of use and address the areas
where participants experienced problems or found the interface/information
architecture unclear.
[Provide the task title and an overview of the task. In a table, present the
change, justification for the change and the severity rating for the change. Do
this for each recommendation]
For example:
Find Organizational or Individual Funding Information (Task 2)
Task 2 required participants to find organization funding (Test 1) or individual funding (Test 2).
Conclusion
The participant thought that the website overall was very aesthetic. The
variety of products made navigation difficult, but from the perspective of a
cook, it was very exciting to search through the high-end options. The
organization could use some changes, but overall the experience was exciting
and not too difficult. The participant said she would definitely return to the
site to attempt future purchases.