Professional Enquiry - An Essay On Knowledge Management
Professional Enquiry - An Essay On Knowledge Management
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Enabling Effective Knowledge Sharing and Collaboration
TABLE OF CONTENT
TABLE OF CONTENT 2
Academic Report 1
1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 4
3. DISCUSSION 17
4. Conclusion 20
5. References 21
1. INTRODUCTION
Knowledge is often stated as an infinite asset because it is the only asset that in-
creases when shared. Knowledge management is the process of acquisition, sharing and
application of knowledge. (Groff and Jones, 2012)
Academic Report 2
In a business set-up, Knowledge Management (KM) is treated as tools and tech-
niques to retain, organize and share business expertise. Individuals and organisations can
enhance their decision-making abilities, innovate and achieve sustainable growth. KM is a
critical part of professional enquiry which aids the acquisition, sharing and application of
knowledge. (Groff and Jones, 2012)
In the discussion section of the essay, we will the advantages of using Knowledge
Management in an organisation with examples from case studies.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
A literature review is critical for developing a deep understanding of a particular
topic. For this essay, we want to create a good conceptual understanding of what Knowl-
edge Management (KM) means and what are its main components. There is also a need to
differentiate between types of knowledge available in an organisation and explore the re-
lationship between Data, Information & Knowledge. We will also discuss Knowledge
Management Processes (KMP) & Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) & Knowl-
edge Management Tools (KMT).
Academic Report 3
a. Data: Data is raw in nature without any context. It exists in various forms irre-
spective of its usability.
b. Information: The data which has meaning by providing context is known as in-
formation. The information helps us gain insight into the raw data.
c. Knowledge: Knowledge is information combined with the capability to under-
stand to decode hidden insights. Knowledge also provides a certain level of pre-
dictability which comes from recognising patterns which help us in effective decision-
making. Therefore, we can say that Knowledge guides our actions whereas informa-
tion and data confuse us without relevant context. Todd R. Groff, Thomas P. Jones
(2003)
The graph indicates that when information is processed it can potentially become
knowledge. Information is processed once we see some patterns emerging about data and
information. And when one can understand the patterns and their implications then the
data and information collected becomes knowledge. Figure 1.1 also indicates that knowl-
Academic Report 4
edge is less dependent on context, unlike data and information. It means that knowledge
can create its context through the understanding of patterns. Uriarte, F. (2008)
Wisdom is the final stage of this conceptual flow. The usage of knowledge accurately
and consistently to one’s benefit indicates the presence of wisdom.
Now that we have understood the relationship between Knowledge, data and infor-
mation, we need to understand the types of knowledge which is available at any organisa-
tion and the relationship between them.
Now that we have classified knowledge into various categories, it is important to un-
derstand what Knowledge Management means in a broader sense and its pillars.
Academic Report 5
2.3 Pillars of Knowledge Management
The pillars of knowledge management are foundational principles and elements that
form the basis of an effective knowledge management strategy within an organization.
These pillars provide a framework for managing knowledge assets and promoting knowl-
edge sharing and collaboration. These pillars were first identified by Michael Stankosky
and he coined these principles as the “four pillars” of effective Knowledge Management
(KM) in 1999. Various workshops were conducted to find out the relationship between
each pillar and its importance in the KM. (Stankosky, 2005)
The following are commonly recognized as the key pillars of knowledge manage-
ment.
a. Management & Organisation: This can be considered the most important pillar of
KM. The commitment from top-level management is key to any KM system. The top-
level management can display its commitment in two ways. Firstly, by demonstrating
leadership skills and by serving as a role model to other associates by using and shar-
ing knowledge themselves. It instils confidence in other associates to indulge in the
knowledge management system. Secondly, creating an organisational structure to sup-
port knowledge management which includes financial, technological and human re-
sources. Creating a new knowledge management department under a Chief Knowl-
edge Officer could be the way forward for organisations. Another aspect of this pillar
entails the recording and storage of knowledge related to customers which must be
generated, shared and organised. The knowledge accumulated can help an organisa-
tion with crucial insights into the customer journey and behaviour. Uriarte, F. (2008)
Academic Report 6
b. Infrastructure: Effective Knowledge Management systems rely on technology
and infrastructure support. The complexity of business processes requires appropriate
Academic Report 7
portant pillar while others feel that people are the most important aspect of knowledge
management. Uriarte, F. (2008) People in an organisation are the carriers of tacit knowl-
edge and sharing tacit knowledge is important in knowledge management. Therefore, peo-
ple in an organisation should be given equal importance along with material resources and
processes which facilitate knowledge management. People and culture are considered en-
ablers of knowledge management. There are three key elements to this a) the redefinition
of organizational structure, (b) the corresponding human resource practices, and (c) a con-
sistent organizational culture. Uriarte, F. (2008)
Academic Report 8
Figure 2.1 Knowledge Management Process Cycle
Figure 2. Displays a KM cycle model. These types of cycle models can help us un-
derstand the correlation between PM Processes and Organsationaltional Processes. We
can see that effective Knowledge Management Processes positively impact Organisational
Processes like Innovation, Individual & Collective Learning, Inter-departmental collabo-
ration and Decision-Making.
According to Nonka (1994), there are four modes of knowledge creation, one of the
key components of the KM Process.
a. Socialisation: Creation of new tacit knowledge through social interaction &
shared experiences.
b. Combination: Creation of new tacit knowledge by the means of merging, cate-
gorising and synthesising explicit knowledge.
c. Externalisation: Convert tacit knowledge into new explicit knowledge. In prac-
tice, we can see organisations create a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) database
for employees and customers alike.
d. Internalisation: Creation of new tacit knowledge through explicit knowledge. In-
ternalisation is a time-intensive process. Employees gain valuable experience from us-
ing explicit knowledge like manuals and instructions effectively. Over time they figure
out the best way of using explicit knowledge and convert it into tacit knowledge. W.R.
King (2009)
Academic Report 9
2.5 Knowledge Management Systems
a. Document management system: Documents are the most commonly used source of
knowledge and information in an organisation. Huge amounts of data and information are
stored in documents both physically and digitally. Systematically organising and collating
these documents are done through a Document Management System. Adopting such sys-
tems can help an organisation optimise and save a considerable amount of time & money.
MS Sharepoint and Oracle iFS are a few examples of Document Management systems
used by corporates. These systems enable the flow of knowledge within all departments of
an organisation. Uriarte, F. (2008)
Academic Report 10
b. Enterprise Portal: Enterprise portals are single point-of-contact platforms which
facilitate easy access to knowledge. It is an important tool for Knowledge Management
because it provides easy and uncomplicated access to knowledge. Portals are usually
Web-based applications which makes it easier for employees to search for information on-
line (intranet) with the help of a few clicks. Portals can also integrate teams working on
similar projects and provide added features like shared workspace, audio and video con-
ferencing. Presentations and reports can also be shared through portals with enhanced on-
line editing. Uriarte, F. (2008)
c. Knowledge Map & skills management: In organisations where people are consid-
ered critical company assets, skill development and management of capabilities, and inter-
est is very important Skill management systems are web-based tools which help organisa-
tion distribute workload and keep track of progress. Employees can also get in touch with
Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) from a curated expert directory. A good skill manage-
ment system helps department reach their targets and focus on individual development.
Uriarte, F. (2008)
Academic Report 11
projects. Microsoft Exchange & Lotus Notes are examples of collaborative tools. The use
of collaborative tools can also save travel time and finances. Uriarte, F. (2008)
One of the biggest challenges of Knowledge management lies in its execution. Peo-
ple in professional set-ups are quite often reluctant to share knowledge freely. Hoarding of
knowledge creates duplication of work along with inefficiencies and high costs. The cul-
tural change issue might be the biggest challenge in implementing Knowledge Manage-
ment effectively. Programs should be created to reach out to individuals within the organi-
sation. These programs should ideally deal with training, advocacy, communication, poli-
cies and incentives. Uriarte, F. (2008)
A robust framework should be formulated to implement Knowledge Management ef-
fectively. The framework should also have a clear structure to it.
Academic Report 12
Figure 2.2 Knowledge Implementation Framework
From Figure 2.2 we can deduce that a good Knowledge Management Framework is
multi-layered. The top layer consists of Enablers. These are individuals from top-level
management and they provide organisational leadership and know-how to implement
Knowledge Management. They contribute by sharing their tacit knowledge with other de-
partments and colleagues. The second level of the framework consists of Levers. They
amplify the contribution of knowledge by creating processes and measurement systems.
Uriarte, F. (2008)
The deployment of Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) happens in 5 stages:
Academic Report 13
between data, information and knowledge and how they interact with each other. We also
discussed the implementation of KM in an organisation with the help of a framework and
the stages in which it should be deployed.
3. DISCUSSION
In this section of the essay, we look at some of the benefits of effective knowledge
management with the help of case study examples.
Academic Report 14
3.1 Benefits of Effective Knowledge Management
Academic Report 15
tering a holistic understanding of organizational performance. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D.
(1996)
Case Study Example: Toyota Production System (TPS) is a great example of how
knowledge management can streamline and revolutionise an entire industry. The avail-
ability of data made it possible for Toyota to practice a lean management system or just-
in-time system. Free flow of timely knowledge is the key to their success.
Academic Report 16
managing knowledge. Choosing the right data sets is of great importance as the organisa-
tion's decisions will be based on those data sets. Any mistake will lead to the failure of
Knowledge Management processes as the systems will generate inaccurate knowledge
which.
4. Conclusion
We finally conclude this essay by realising that Knowledge Management is indis-
pensable for professional enquiry. It is a powerful tool to empower individuals and organi-
sations because it harnesses the power of knowledge to advance innovation, improve deci-
sion-making, and create an environment of learning in an organisation through collabora-
tion. Knowledge management has the power to leverage the collective expertise of its em-
ployees to stay ahead of the curve in an increasingly competitive environment for busi-
nesses and organisations. Individuals benefit as well from participating in the process of
Knowledge Management. It helps them develop their professional skills and knowledge
base by collaborating with others.
5. References
Academic Report 17
2. Uriarte, F. (2008) Introduction to Knowledge Management. Asean Foundation,
Jakarta.
3. W.R. King (2009), Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, 3 An-
nals of Information Systems 4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_
4. Stankosky, M. (2005) Creating the Discipline of Knowledge Management. 1st
ed. Taylor and Francis. Available at:
https://www.perlego.com/book/1626115/creating-the-discipline-of-knowledge-
management-pdf (Accessed: 30 June 2023).
5. Lin, X. (2019) Review of Knowledge and Knowledge Management Research.
American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9, 1753-1760. doi:
10.4236/ajibm.2019.99114.
6. Li, L.C., Grimshaw, J.M., Nielsen, C. et al. Use of communities of practice in
business and health care sectors: A systematic review. Implementation Sci 4, 27
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-27
7. David J Skyrme, Knowledge Management: Where Now? Where Next? presenta-
tion to Aslib KIMnet, July 2004. (accessible at www.skyrme.com/kmpresentations/
8. Jason Kellington (2023) Fueling Microsoft’s knowledge sharing culture with
Microsoft Viva Topics https://www.microsoft.com/insidetrack/blog/fueling-
microsofts-knowledge-sharing-culture-with-microsoft-viva-topics/
9. Mark Dodgson, David Gann, Ammon Salter (2006) R&D Management, Volume
36, Pages 333-346 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x
10. Kimiz.D (2005) Knowledge Management in Theory & Practice, Pages 15-17.
11. Nonaka (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Orga-
nizational Science 353 5(1): 14–37
12. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1996) The Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business
Review Press. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/836878/the-balanced-
scorecard-translating-strategy-into-action-pdf (Accessed: 30 June 2023).
13. Gupta, B., L.S. Iyer, and J.E. Aronson, “Knowledge Management: Practices and
Challenges, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 100, No. 1. 2000, 17-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570010273018
Academic Report 18