Programmable Materials (2023), Vol.

1:e4 1–27
doi:10.1017/pma.2023.1

REVIEW ARTICLE

Programmable metamaterials
Rui Y. Wu 1,2 , Liang W. Wu1,2 , Shi He1,2 , Shuo Liu1,2* and Tie J. Cui1,2*
1 Institute of Electromagnetic Space, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
2 State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
*Authors for correspondence: Shuo Liu and Tie J. Cui, Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Received: 26 September 2022; Revised: 15 December 2022; Accepted: 10 January 2023
Keywords: digital metamaterials; information metamaterials; programmable metamaterials; space-domain programmable;
space–time programmable; time-domain programmable

Abstract
As a major approach for controlling electromagnetic (EM) waves, metamaterials have experienced an abundant
and rapid development in the 21st century. They have provided flexible and powerful techniques for controlling
EM waves and brought many unique applications that are difficult to realise with natural materials. With increasing
demands on dynamic controls of the EM waves, many innovations have been conducted in both three-dimensional
metamaterials and two-dimensional metasurfaces, in which the meta-atom has been gradually evolved from
passive to active. In 2014, coding and digital mechanisms were initially introduced to the metamaterials, further
advancing the appearance of digitally programmable metamaterials. The programmable metamaterials have shown
great potentials in not only real-time manipulations of the EM waves, but also direct information processing
on the EM wave level. In this article, we present an in-depth review of the programmable EM metamaterials
and metasurfaces, focusing on the programmable features including theoretical concepts, implementing methods
and applications in EM controls. We first give a short retrospect of traditional metamaterials and metasurfaces,
followed by the concepts and detailed discussions of digital coding and field-programmable metamaterials. Then,
we introduce space-domain, time-domain and space–time-domain programmable metamaterials and metasurfaces,
mainly focusing on their theories, functionalities, experimental implementations, and system-level applications.
Finally, we conclude the current advances of the programmable metamaterials and metasurfaces, and give a
prospect for the future developments.
Contents
Introduction 2
Programmable metamaterials for EM manipulations 5
Space-domain programmable metamaterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Time-domain and space–time programmable metamaterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
New implementations of programmable metamaterials 14
Light-driven programmable metamaterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Programmable metamaterials based on liquid crystal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Passive programmable metamaterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
System-level applications of programmable metamaterials 17
Information systems via programmable metamaterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Imaging systems via programmable metamaterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Smart system via programmable metamaterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Conclusions 21
References 23

© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction,
provided the original article is properly cited.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 2 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Introduction
Permittivity and permeability are two important properties of natural material for characterising their
electric and magnetic responses in electromagnetic (EM) waves. For natural materials, these two
parameters are usually larger than or equal to those in free space, thus the incident EM waves obey the
traditional Snell’s laws and show the ordinary EM reflections and refractions. Veselago (1968) proposed
theoretical analyses on the left-handed materials with negative permittivity and permeability, which
exhibit many exotic physical phenomena such as negative refraction, negative Doppler effect, and
backward Cherenkov diffraction. At the end of the 20th century, Sir John Pendry and co-workers have
successively proposed a series of physical models and experimental verification methods for realising
the first metamaterials (Pendry et al., 1996; Pendry, 2000; Smith et al., 2000, 2004; Shelby et al., 2001),
which later ignited the extensive researches on metamaterial.
Metamaterials are artificial EM materials and are composed of subwavelength-scale unit cells
(namely meta-atoms) periodically or aperiodically distributed in space. The early metamaterials are
usually designed in three-dimensional (3D) forms, in which the phases accumulate in the 3D space and
change in the space gradually. Figure 1a shows a classical meta-atom composed of a dielectric plate
with drilled hole (Ma and Cui, 2010). When different materials and height are selected, the effective
refractive index of such meta-atoms can be acquired via S-parameter retrieval method based on effective
medium theory (Smith et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2007; Ma and Cui, 2010). Such meta-
atoms with desired effective permittivity and permeability are periodically arranged in the 3D space to

Figure 1. 3D broadband and broad-angle transformation-optics lens. Reproduced from Ma and Cui
(2010). (a) Meta-atom design and the relationship between refractive index and diameter of the drilled
hole. (b) Graph of the 3D transformation-optics lens. (c) Beam-scanning performances at 12.5, 15 and
18 GHz.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 3

Figure 2. (a) Refraction schematics of the generalised Snell’s law. Reproduced from Yu et al. (2011). (b)
Gradient phase abrupt to achieve deflecting wave propagation. (c) Specific analysis of the generalised
Snell’s law for anomalous reflection and transmission. (d) Realisations of vortex beams using spiral
phase pattern.

realise different controls of EM wave. For example, the 3D broadband and broad-angle transformation-
optics lens in Figure 1b can achieve the beam scanning function in a wide frequency band from 12.5
to 18 GHz (Figure 1c). The emergence of metamaterials has brought many exotic physical phenomena
and engineering applications that cannot be realised with the naturally materials, such as perfect lenses,
invisibility cloaking, zero-refractive-index phenomena, and so on (Schurig et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2009;
Kundtz and Smith, 2010; Ma and Cui, 2010; Ramaccia et al., 2013).
However, the 3D metamaterials have some drawbacks such as complicated design, bulky size
and difficult integration with other devices. To address these disadvantages, two-dimensional (2D)
metamaterials, namely metasurfaces, have been proposed with a low-profile property (Holloway
et al., 2012; Ding et al., 2017). As the thickness of metasurface is typically less than a tenth of a
wavelength, traditional approaches for analysing 3D metamaterials are no longer valid for metasurfaces.
Yu et al. (2011) proposed the generalised Snell’s law as a rapid while efficient approach for designing
metasurfaces, which utilises the abrupt phase changes at the metasurface to control the shape and
direction of EM wavefront, realising excellent beam deflecting and vortex-beam radiations (Figure 2).
By elaborately designing phase profiles on metasurfaces, the reflected or transmitted waves can be
tailored at will to achieve designed EM functions such as beamforming, beam steering, random
refraction, and imaging (Sun et al., 2012; Pfeiffer and Grbic, 2013; Zheng et al., 2015; Chen et al.,
2017; Kim et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2021; Luo et al., 2022). Besides phase control, many other
attributes of EM waves such as amplitude, polarisation state and frequency have also been controlled
to implement multi-dimensional EM controls (Liu et al., 2014; Wan et al., 2016a; Xu et al., 2018, 2021;
Xu et al.,(2019a, 2019b); Wu et al.,(2020b) Li et al., 2022), realising more complicated and multi-
functional devices and systems.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 4 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Figure 3. (a) Schematic of coding and digital metamaterials/metasurfaces and a typi-

cal 1-bit meta-atom. (b) Three coding patterns ‘000000. . ./000000. . .’, ‘010101. . ./010101. . .’,
‘010101. . ./101010. . .’, and corresponding single-beam, dual-beam, four-beam radiations. (c) Meta-
atom of 1-bit programmable metamaterial. (d) Real-time control by programmable metamaterial.
Reproduced from Cui et al. (2014).

With the vast designs of metamaterial having different structures and exotic EM properties, many
attempts have also been devoted to achieve reconfigurable metamaterial with multiple functionalities
integrated in a single metasurface. In the early times, researchers could adjust EM coefficients in a small
range by loading varactors (Zhao et al., 2013). Then, more complicated active components and control
approaches allow the EM manipulations to be reconfigurable among several functions (Oliveri et al.,
2015; Bang et al., 2018). But the controlling approaches are still analog, and the types and number of
functions are still limited.
Cui et al. (2014) proposed the concept of coding and digital metamaterials/metasurfaces. Distin-
guished from the traditionally continuous phase representations, discrete digits are adopted here to
represent the reflected or transmitted phases. Figure 3a shows a 1-bit coding metamaterial, in which
the phase difference of the meta-atoms with digital states ‘0’ and ‘1’ is around 180◦ . Herein, these
binary meta-atoms are arranged in a 2D plane with pre-designed coding patterns to achieve desired EM
functionalities. Figure 3b shows three coding patterns ‘000000. . ./000000. . .’, ‘010101. . ./010101. . .’,
‘010101. . ./101010. . .’, and the realised single-beam, dual-beam, four-beam radiations. Due to the
Fourier transform relationship between the far-field radiation pattern and the coding pattern of coding
metamaterials, digital information embedded in coding patterns is directly manifested in the radiation
patterns. In addition, some researches have also focused on the fundamental problems about the
influence of digital and discrete properties in practical engineering. Shuang et al. (2022) demonstrated
that the 1-bit coding can satisfy the requirements in most practical scenarios compared to continuous

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 5

phase control. One can even adopt optimised ways or extend 1-bit to multi-bit states for more precise
manipulations and better performances (Cui et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2017). Combined with the
information science, some methods in signal processing such as convolution and addition theorems
have been introduced to assist coding pattern design to achieve more flexible EM information
manipulations (Liu et al., 2016b; Wu et al., 2018). The concept of information entropy has also been
introduced to measure the information capacity of coding metamaterials (Cui et al., 2016). Further, fast
algorithm was adopted to optimise the coding pattern and achieve automatic pattern design (Moccia
et al., 2017; Jing et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019c). Besides phase coding, other important EM properties
such as amplitude (Bao et al., 2018; Wu et al.,(2020b)), polarisation (Liu et al., 2016a; Ma et al., 2017)
and frequency (Liu et al. (2016c); Wu et al., 2017) have been jointly controlled to realise many other
interesting functionalities, including novel multi-functional, power-controllable, broadband or multi-
band coding metamaterials (Cui et al., 2017b; Wu et al., 2020a). Due to the strong connection with
information science, coding and digital metamaterials are also referred to as information metamaterials
(Cui et al., 2017a; Liu and Cui, 2017; Zhang et al., 2017; Cui, 2018; Ma and Cui, 2020; Wu and Cui,
2020).
More importantly, the digital and discrete properties of information metamaterials allow us to
reach more effective and dynamic controls in the programmable manner. As shown in Figure 3c,d,
by controlling the bias voltage across the loaded active components on the meta-atom, their digital
state can be dynamically controlled. Coding patterns are loaded to the coding metamaterials via
field programmable gate arrays (FPGA) to achieve real-time and digital manipulations on the far-
field radiations (Cui et al., 2014). Hence, the term ‘programmable metamaterials’ also emerges in
some other contexts as ‘information metamaterials’ (Cui, 2017; Li and Cui, 2019; Bao and Cui,
2020; Cui et al., 2020). The proposal of information metamaterials facilitates the development of the
programmable metamaterials, which can provide more flexible and powerful EM manipulating abilities
and information processing capacities.
In this article, we focus on programmable metamaterials, including their theoretical concepts, imple-
menting methods, and applications in EM controls. First, we introduce the evolution of metamaterials
and metasurfaces from the passive designs to digital coding representations, leading to the information
and programmable metamaterials and metasurfaces. Then, space-domain, time-domain and space–time
programmable metamaterials and metasurfaces are discussed in details, including the corresponding
theories, functionalities, experimental implementations, and system-level applications. Several novel
programmable technologies of meta-atom design and driven methods are emphatically analysed.
Finally, we give a summary and a prospect of the programmable metamaterials and metasurfaces for
the future studies and application potentials.

Programmable metamaterials for EM manipulations

A brief introduction of programmable metamaterial has been given in first section. In this section, we
will explain the design methods and functionalities of the programmable metamaterials in the space
domain, time domain, and space–time domain.

Space-domain programmable metamaterials

Space-domain programmable metamaterials are the most common form of programmable metama-
terials, in which the coding pattern formed on the entire aperture is simultaneous in time, and
the EM responses of each meta-atom in different positions are controlled by FPGA. For example,
we can achieve real-time anomalous beam reflection through by loading coding patterns to pro-
grammable metamaterials based on the generalised Snell’s law (Cui et al., 2014). Various space-domain
programmable metamaterials have been designed that can realise many different EM manipulating
functionalities, as illustrated in the following.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 6 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Figure 4. (a) Detailed structure of the binary programmable meta-atom. (b) Reflected amplitude
and phase responses of the binary meta-atom. (c,d) Different coding patterns and corresponding
radiation patterns. Reproduced from Wan et al. (2016a). (e) Transmission-type programmable meta-
atom. Reproduced from Bai et al. (2020).

Phase programmable metamaterials

Phase is the most popular coefficient that is engineered in metamaterial designs. Figure 4a shows a
typical phase programmable meta-atom from Wan et al. (2016a), where a positive-intrinsic-negative
(PIN) diode is loaded between two metallic patches. The working states of PIN diode are dynamically
controlled by external voltages through the feeding lines. Equivalent circuits of the PIN diode at the
‘OFF’ and ‘ON’ state are shown in the inset of Figure 4a, which come from the datasheet of PIN
diode and are verified by the co-simulation of EM wave and circuit. The reflecting performances of the
meta-atom are shown in Figure 4b, showing that the meta-atom can perform digital state ‘0’ and ‘1’
with 180◦ phase difference with large reflection amplitude when the PIN diode is switched. The spatial
coding pattern on the metamaterial composed of 400 binary meta-atoms can be modulated in different
forms to achieve different radiation patterns with different deflecting angles (Figure 4c,d). Note that

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 7

Figure 5. (a) Amplitude-coding programmable metamaterial with multifrequency modulations.

Reproduced from Hong et al. (2021). (b) Amplitude-phase-joint-coding programmable metamaterial.
Reproduced from Wang et al. (2022d). (c) Polarisation-controlled dual-programmable metamaterial.
Reproduced from Zhang et al. (2020b). (d) Programmable metamaterial for digital polarisation
conversion. Reproduced from Ma et al. (2020a).

space-domain phase programmable scheme is not restricted to reflection type, Bai et al. (2020) and
Chen et al. (2021) show a series designs of transmission-type programmable metamaterials, which
is achieved by stacking more layers to provide required phase changes for the transmitted wave. As
displayed in Figure 4e, the PIN diodes are loaded on the radiating layer to modulate the incidence
from the receiving layer with 1-bit phase difference. This type of meta-atom is more suitable for
array applications due to the relatively independent feed-line design, which effectively decreases the
complexity of the transmission-type programmable metamaterials.

Amplitude and polarisation programmable metamaterials

Besides phase programmable metamaterials, amplitude and polarisation of EM waves can provide
extra degree of freedom to EM manipulation. Hong et al. (2021) proposed an amplitude-programmable
metamaterial with multi-frequency modulations, as illustrated in Figure 5a. Two PIN diodes and chip
attenuators are integrated in the meta-atom. When the diodes are respectively in ‘On’ and ‘OFF’
states, the meta-atom is encoded as ‘11’, ‘10/01’ and ‘00’, indicating the 1-bit amplitude modulations
(high amplitude as ‘1’ and low amplitude as ‘0’) at 2.98, 4.11 and 5.73 GHz, respectively. For
experimental verification, a metamaterial array with 10 × 10 elements is fabricated. By changing
different coding patterns in real-time, the powers of radiating beams at different frequencies can be
controlled independently. Further, a new wireless communication system is designed based on the
amplitude programmable metamaterial (Hong et al., 2021).

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 8 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Amplitude coding scheme is also able to join with phase coding to achieve more complicated
functionalities (Liao et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022a). Figure 5b shows a novel amplitude-phase-joint-
coding programmable metamaterial using a PIN diode loaded on a single-layer reflection-type meta-
atom, which can be equivalent to a rheostat (Wang et al., 2022a). When the bias voltage changes from
0 V to 1 V, the effective resistance changes from 1 Ω to 10,000 Ω, enabling the realisation of 1-bit
phase coding with continuous amplitude control in a wide frequency range of 8–13 GHz. With such
techniques, both the radiation patterns and power can be controlled simultaneously, allowing even more
complicated functionalities such as diffraction order control and side-lobe suppression.
For polarisation-programmable metamaterials, dynamic manipulations of EM waves can be per-
formed on differently polarised states (Yang et al., 2016; Ma et al., 2020b; Zhang et al., 2020b). Zhang
et al., 2020b demonstrate a polarisation-controlled dual-programmable metamaterial, which can be
applied in exclusive-OR operation, wide-angle dual-beam scanning and dual-polarised aperture sharing,
as shown in Figure 5c. Four PIN diodes are centrally arranged in the meta-atom to achieve independent
1-bit-phase controls of x- and y-polarizations. Ma et al. (2020b) give another design of the polarisation
programmable metamaterial to achieve polarisation conversion. Polarisation state of each meta-atom is
determined by the PIN diode, which can be represented as ‘0’ and ‘1’ for two orthogonal polarizations.
By changing the 1-bit coding sequence, namely, the percentage of x- or y-polarised meta-atoms, real-
time polarisation conversions are achieved, as shown in Figure 5d.

Full-space programmable metamaterials

The abovementioned reflection- or transmission-type programmable metamaterials can only conduct
EM manipulations in half space. Hence, full-space controllable metasurfaces are proposed by consid-
ering the reflection and transmission spaces together (Li et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2019; Shang et al.,
2022), which are then promoted to the programmable cases. The first design is illustrated in Figure 6a,
which can realise the real-time switching of working space (i.e., radiation space). The meta-atom is
composed of multiple square-patch layers for phase manipulation, together with a slot layer with a
loaded PIN diode for space switching (Figure 6b). When the PIN diode is switched to the ‘ON’ and
‘OFF’ states with different equivalent circuits, the meta-atom performs as 1-bit reflection-type phase
coding and 2-bit transmission-type phase coding, respectively. By designing the corresponding phase-
coding patterns, the full-space programmable metamaterial can achieve real-time switching between
transmitting beam deflection and random reflection (Wu et al., 2019).
Inspired by this work (Wu et al., 2019), more novel programmable full-space metamaterials have
been proposed, such as anisotropic designs, absorbing-transmitting combining designs, and so on (Wu
et al., 2020d; Bao et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Hu et al., 2022; Ma et al., 2022). In 2021, Bao et al.
(2021) proposed to combine the real-time manipulations on beam reflection and beam transmission. By
elaborately designing the feed-line network, a full-space phase programmable metamaterial is achieved
by controlling the coding patterns on reflection side and transmission side independently, leading to an
independent while real-time control of reflecting and transmitting waves (Figure 6c,d). Hu et al. (2022)
proposed the novel concept of programmable omni-metasurface, which can integrate the reflection
mode, transmission mode, and duplex modes of simultaneous reflection and transmission. It can also
provide the full-space EM controls and indicate a multiuser wireless communication system for two
separate spaces.

Time-domain and space–time programmable metamaterials

Space-domain programmable metamaterials allow the dynamic manipulations on coding patterns and
corresponding EM functions, but stable in time domain. According to Fourier transform theory,
introduction of time-modulated signals with periodic variations can control EM waves in time domain
and thus generate responses in the frequency domain, even simultaneous controls of EM directions
in space domain and spectrum in frequency domain together. Hence, time-domain and space–time
programmable metamaterials are introduced to achieve multi-dimensional complicated manipulations
of the EM waves.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 9

Figure 6. (a,b) Illustration of full-space reflection-transmission amplitude programmable metamate-

rial and the structure of adopted meta-atom. Reproduced from Wu et al. (2019). (c,d) Illustration of
totally full-space programmable metamaterial and the structure of adopted meta-atom. Reproduced
from Bao et al. (2021).

Theory and examples of space–time programmable metamaterials

In Zhao et al. (2018), the theoretical analysis of time-domain programmable metamaterials is formu-
lated as:

∞
 
Er (f) = 𝜞 (f − fc ) = PF × TF · 𝛿 f − fc − kf0 , (1)
k=−∞

where Er ( f ) is the reflected waves, f 0 and fc are modulation frequency and incident frequency,
respectively, PF and TF represent pulse factor and time factor, respectively. In this case, spectrum of
the reflection coefficient is shifted to the frequency of the incident wave. Therefore, the spectrum of
the reflected wave can be controlled by designing different coding sequences in time-domain of the
time-domain programmable metamaterials.
Furthermore, time-domain coding scheme can be combined with space-domain coding scheme to
achieve more complex functionalities (Zhang et al., 2018). Now, each programmable meta-atom on
space–time programmable metamaterials has a unique time coding sequence with period T 0 , whose
digital state switches periodically in time domain. According to Fourier transform theory, a periodic
function in time domain produces a discrete harmonic spectrum distribution in frequency domain.
When a monochromatic plane wave with frequency fc is incident on the space–time programmable
metamaterials modulated by a signal with period T 0 in the time domain, the reflected energy will be
distributed to the fundamental wave fc and the harmonic waves fc + mf 0 , where f 0 = 1/T 0 . The spatial
distribution of the reflected waves at different harmonic frequencies can be manipulated independently
by combining the time-domain modulation signal with the space-domain coding patterns.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 10 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Figure 7. (a) Conceptual illustration of space–time programmable metamaterials. (b) 3D space–time

coding matrix and corresponding 2D case, respectively. The red and green dots represent ‘1’ and
‘0’ states, respectively. (c) Harmonic beam scanning by amplitude modulation. (d) Harmonic beam
scanning by phase modulation. Reproduced from Zhang et al. (2018).

Figure 7a gives an example of an 8 × 8 space–time programmable metamaterial to illustrate the

working mechanism. The variation in space domain and time domain is represented by a 3D space–time
coding matrix whose dimension is set as (M, N, L). M and N represent the length of the metamaterial in
the spatial dimension, and L represents the length in the temporal dimension. A 3D space–time coding
matrix with dimension of (8, 8, 8) can be generated as desired, as shown in Figure 7b. Green and
red dots represent ‘0’ and ‘1’ digits, respectively, which correspond to 0◦ and 180◦ phase responses.
For any programmable metamaterials represented by a 3D space–time coding matrix, the scattering
pattern at any harmonic frequency can be calculated. Hence, we can achieve harmonic beam scanning
functionality by optimising the matrix as shown in Figure 7c,d.
To give a theoretical analysis, Wu et al. (2020c) studied two kinds of mechanisms of space–
time programmable metamaterials from the view of information theory and analysed their unique
advantages in processing EM information. The study also reveals the information conversion efficiency
of the space–time programmable metamaterials, which provides theoretical guidance for information
processing applications based on space–time coding programmable metamaterial, such as wireless
communication, computational imaging and mathematical operations.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 11

The structural design of meta-atom of space–time programmable metamaterials is basically similar

to that of the space domain programmable metamaterials, but the time-varying properties requires faster
switching speed of digital states of the meta-atom (Castaldi et al., 2021; Zhang and Cui, 2021).

Harmonic amplitude and phase modulations

Harmonic manipulations have been deployed in many interesting regions such as the wireless commu-
nications, and biological monitoring. Traditional harmonic manipulations are achieved by additional
amplifiers and phase shifters to accurately control the harmonic amplitude and phase after the mixing
process, which leads to issues such as high costs and difficult system integration. Here, a method with
independent control of harmonic amplitudes and phases via a time-domain programmable metamaterial
is proposed by Dai et al. (2018, 2020). In this method, the frequency, amplitude and phase responses
of a specific harmonic wave are independently controlled, which allows us to manipulate the shape and
intensity of the harmonic spectrum of the reflected wave by controlling the bias voltages V1/V2 and
modulating periods T, as schematically shown in Figure 8.
This method serves as a guidance for time-domain programmable metamaterial to accurately control
the spectrum distribution of EM waves, which extends the potential applications of time-domain
programmable metamaterial and lay the foundation of time-domain programmable metamaterials for
their future application in new wireless communication systems.

Multi-bit phase coding via time-domain programmable metamaterial

Generally, the higher the number of coding states of a programmable metamaterial, the smaller the
phase quantization error and the more precise the EM wave can be achieved. However, the design
of multi-bit (greater than 2-bit) programmable metamaterial based on active components (e.g., PIN
diodes) is very challenging because total number of n PIN diodes are needed to be integrated on a single
meta-atom to achieve 2n coding states, which inevitably result in complex design of structure, DC bias
circuit layout and control system. An alternate approach to realise multi-bit coding functionality is to
use varactor diodes, but it suffers from larger loss and larger reverse bias voltages. In 2019, a method of
multi-bit phase coding based on 2-bit time-domain programmable metamaterial was presented (Zhang
et al., 2019b). Through vector synthesis analysis in Figure 9a, the EM incidence can be modulated to
the outgoing wave with arbitrary phase bit as shown in Figure 9a,b. Such a working scheme is also
applied in arbitrary polarisation construction (Ke et al., 2021; Hu et al., 2022).
In the future, multi-bit phase coding using time-domain programmable metamaterials are expected
favourable for realising novel phased-array antennas without traditional multi-bit phase shifters, saving
the cost and reducing the design complexity.

Nonreciprocal reflection based on space–time programmable metamaterial

Breaking reciprocity has always been an interesting topic in the fields of electromagnetism, physics and
information science, and have played an important role in communication, energy harvesting, and heat
radiation. For example, in a wireless communication system, a nonreciprocal antenna transmitter can
radiate a highly directional beam without receiving a reflected echo in the same direction. Conventional
approaches are to break time inversion by using magnetic or nonlinear materials, which are bulky,
expensive, and difficult to integrate. A new method is proposed to break the reciprocity by using
space–time programmable metamaterial (Zhang et al., 2019a), where a 2-bit meta-atom is used to
design an appropriate space–time gradient coding matrix to achieve nonreciprocal anomalous reflection
accompanied by efficient frequency conversion. Figure 9c shows by switching between different space–
time coding matrices, the angle and frequency of reflected waves can be dynamically controlled in
real-time under temporal inversion, leading to the programmable non-reciprocal effect. Due to this
excellent performance, space–time programmable metamaterials are expected to find wide applications
in isolators, mixers, duplexers, one-way transmission, wireless communication and radar systems in
future.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 12 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Figure 8. (a) Schematic diagram of the time-domain programmable metamaterial with harmonic
amplitude and phase controls. (b) The measured harmonic amplitude/phase distributions of the time-
domain programmable metamaterial at 3.7 GHz with different bias voltages V1/V2 and modulating
periods T. Reproduced from Dai et al. (2018).

Asynchronous space–time programmable metamaterial

As previously mentioned, space–time programmable metamaterials function as a powerful tool for
reaching more flexible EM manipulations beyond the space-domain programmable metamaterials.
However, all the above studies on space–time programmable metamaterials are carried out in a syn-
chronous framework, that is, all the meta-atoms on the aperture share the same modulation frequency.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 13

Figure 9. (a) Theoretical vector synthesis of multi-bit phase coding construction. (b) Schematic of
multi-bit phase coding via space–time programmable metamaterials. Reproduced from Zhang et al.
(2019b). (c) Nonreciprocal reflection based on space–time programmable metamaterial. Reproduced
from Zhang et al. (2019a).

Hence, an asynchronous space–time programmable metamaterial is proposed, where the meta-

atoms are manipulated by different time coding periods (Wang et al., (2022b)). It is shown that
when the metamaterial is operated under asynchronous conditions (all meta-atoms no longer share
the same manipulating frequency), the reflected waves will generate dynamic scattered wavefronts
in space due to the scattering echoes of each element. Therefore, the phase gradient between the

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 14 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Figure 10. (a) Schematic of asynchronous space–time programmable metamaterial. (b) Automatic
spatial beam scanning. (c) Dynamic RCS manipulations. Reproduced from Wang et al., (2022b).

meta-atoms is no longer constant with time, resulting in the time-varying characteristics of the
scattered EM waves. As shown in Figure 10a, the proposed asynchronous space–time programmable
metamaterial extends the traditional concept of ‘phase gradients’ further to ‘frequency gradients’, thus
the scattering pattern is not only a function of angle, but also a function of the distance and time.
By designing the spatial distribution of the manipulating frequency of meta-atoms, researchers can
realise various radiation patterns for beam scanning and dynamic radar cross-section (RCS) applications
(Figure 10b,c), providing more freedom for EM manipulations.

New implementations of programmable metamaterials

Examples in Part 2 show that varactors or PIN diodes are the most commonly used components to
provide real-time controls for programmable metamaterials. They bring rapid state switching, but at the
cost of complex feeding network designs and high-power consumption. In this part, we will show some
new implementations of programmable metamaterials with different advantages.

Light-driven programmable metamaterials

Feeding line network is one of the necessary designs in electrically-driven programmable meta-
materials, which may deteriorate the radiating performances. To solve this issue, optically-driven
programmable is proposed to achieve microwave reflection phase control using an optical interrogation

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 15

Figure 11. (a) Schematic of light-driven programmable metamaterial and EM functionalities. (b)
Actual experiment setup and environment. (c) Performances of cloaking and illusion. (d) Measured
results of the planar metamaterial and target ladder. Reproduced from Zhang et al. (2018).

network (OIN) (Zhang et al., 2018, 2020a), as illustrated in Figure 11a. The Meta-atom layer is
composed of metallic structures with loaded varactors to provide phase variation. The required voltage
change comes from the OIN, which is composed of a series photodiode array to receive optical signals
and convert to voltages for the varactors. The overall thickness of the whole structure is only ~0.085𝜆
at 6 GHz, much more compact than the electrically-driven programmable metamaterials. Hence,
for illuminating light with different patterns, the programmable metamaterial can perform different
functionalities such as external cloaking, illusion, and vortex beams (Figure 11b–d). Simulations and
experiments have verified all the functionalities, indicating this light-driven approach can offer us a
hybrid and integrating manner to achieve more flexible and complicated functions (Zhang et al., 2020a).

Programmable metamaterials based on liquid crystal

Liquid crystal (LC) can be introduced to the programmable metamaterials to realise terahertz-wave
manipulations in real-time (Wu et al., 2020e; Fu et al., 2022). Specially, 1-bit phase modulation of a
reflection-type meta-atom is achieved by controlling the bias voltage across LC. As LC needs to be
bounded in the structure, the meta-atom contains seven layers, including silicon substrate, metallic
back plate, polyimide (PI), LC, PI, complementary split ring resonator (CSRR), and quartz, as shown
in Figure 12a. Silicon substrate and ultra-thin quartz are used as supporting layers, PI layers are pre-
processed with parallel grooves for fix the pre-orientation of the LC, metallic back plate and CSRR also
act as electrodes for applying the bias voltage. Hence, the 1-bit phase responses of the LC-driven meta-
atom is controlled by changing voltages as shown in Figure 12b, and the phase coding pattern can be

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 16 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Figure 12. (a) Illustration of the beam steering-based terahertz programmable metamaterials, and
the topological structure of the LC programmable meta-atom. (b) 1-bit performance of the meta-atom.
(c) Dual-beam scattering pattern of the metamaterial at different frequencies, where the curves 1–5
represent the different coding sequences. Reproduced from Fu et al. (2022).

controlled in row for the programmable metamaterial to achieve anomalous reflection and wide-angle
beam steering (Figure 12c).

Passive programmable metamaterials

In industrial community, power consumption is one of the critical measures of real systems. Hence,
some low-power-consumption programmable metamaterials are proposed, which commonly use
motors to rotate the meta-atom or metamaterial to reconstruct the EM control functionalities (Yang
et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2022; Jeong et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022), or introduce the Kirigami technology
to mechanically reconfigure the EM performance (Phon et al., 2022; Zheng et al., 2022).
Researchers proposed a mechanical metamaterial platform to implement continuous and real-time
Pancharatnam–Berry (PB) phase control of circularly polarised EM waves (Xu et al., 2022). Different
from the conventional varactor-driven programmable metamaterial, the introduced PB meta-atoms are
rotated through a stepping motor and a series of gears (Figure 13a). With the change of the rotation
angle, the reflected phase can be modulated for 0 to 2𝜋 with a large reflected amplitude at 7 GHz.
To prove the flexible EM manipulating capacity, researchers first conduct a meta-lens to realise the
real-time scanning of focal point, as shown in Figure 13b. Then, four vortex beams with different
modes are also achieved by constructing corresponding phase patterns on the same aperture. Finally,
reprogrammable hologram imaging is achieved to show two different images as shown in Figure 13c.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 17

Figure 13. (a) Conceptional illustration of motor-driven PB phase programmable metamaterial.

(b) 1-bit performance of the meta-atom. (b,c) Performances of real-time moving of focal point and
reprogrammable hologram imaging. Reproduced from Xu et al. (2022).

System-level applications of programmable metamaterials

In addition to the powerful EM manipulating functionalities and devices that can be achieved with
programmable metamaterials, they can play more important role in system-level applications. Here,
we will present some applications of programmable information metamaterials in information, imaging
and smart systems.

Information systems via programmable metamaterials

In Part. 1, we have mentioned that the coding pattern determines the radiated beam pattern, thus the
information embedded in the coding pattern can be demodulated from the detected beams. Owing to
this unique property, Cui et al. (2019) proposed a novel direct information transmitting system. Without
traditional radio-frequency (RF) parts, programmable metamaterial entirely achieves the information
processing on the wave transmission directly. As shown in Figure 14a, the system major comprises of

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 18 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Figure 14. (a) Principle of direct information transmitting system via programmable metamaterials.
(b) The adopted programmable metamaterial and transmitting control unit. (c) The measured perfor-
mance of picture transmission. Reproduced from Cui et al. (2019). (d) Schematic of multi-channel
information transmitting system in near-field region. (e) Results of acquired signal of ‘111’, ‘110’ and
‘001’ in near field. Reproduced from Wan et al. (2019).

a 1-bit reflection-type programmable metamaterial and a feed horn antenna. By changing the coding
pattern with an FPGA, the programmable metamaterial can radiate different radiation patterns in far-
field region, which can then be captured by some of the receiving antennas. This communication scheme
ensures that all the transmitted information can only be correctly received by the receivers placed at the
designed locations, which provide an encryption communication at the physical level. The results are
shown in Figure 14c, in which the transmitted picture can be received in a low error rate.
Wan et al. (2019) introduced a multi-channel information transmitting system in the near-field
region. As shown in Figure 14d, the programmable metamaterial applies various phase coding patterns
controlled by the FPGA, constructing tri-channel information output in the near-field through multi-
focusing technology to mimic digital states of ‘111’, ‘110’, ‘001’ and any other cases (Figure 14e).
The transmitted digital states can be distinguished by weak and strong power, namely the amplitude
code ‘0’ and ‘1’. As there are almost no interaction among the three channels, a brief space division
multiplexing information modulator can thus be achieved, implying highly potential application in near-
field information communication and processing.
In particular, space–time programmable metamaterial can further manipulate the propagating direc-
tion and harmonic power distribution of EM wave, which make it more suitable for space and frequency
division multiplexing (Zhao et al., 2018; Dai et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021). A dynamic time-domain

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 19

Figure 15. (a) Information processing of the time-domain programmable metamaterial. (b) Schematic
of the proposed BFSK wireless communication system based on the time-domain programmable
metamaterial. Reproduced from Zhao et al. (2018). (c) A direct information-transmitting wireless
communication system based on space–time programmable metamaterial with space division and
frequency division multiplexing. (d) Prototype of dual-channel wireless communication system based
on space–time programmable metamaterial, which can transmit different pictures to two users
simultaneously and independently. Reproduced from Zhang et al. (2021).

programmable metamaterial that enables efficient manipulations on spectral harmonic distributions is

presented by Zhao et al. (2018). By dynamically manipulating the local phase of reflectance, the precise
control of different harmonics in a highly programmable manner can be achieved, which enable unusual
responses such as velocity illusions. As a related application, a novel binary frequency-shift keying
(BFSK) wireless communication system based on time-domain programmable metamaterial is also
proposed in Figure 15a,b, which largely simplifies the modern communication system architecture and
exhibiting excellent real-time signal transmission performance.
Further, a wireless communication scheme is proposed by Zhang et al. (2021) that uses space–time
programmable metamaterial for both space division multiplexing and frequency division multiplexing,
as shown in Figure 15c. The programmable metamaterial is vertically excited by a single-tone plane
wave with frequency fc , which is periodically switched according to the corresponding space–time
coding matrix with a time modulation period T 0 = 1/f 0 . Using a 2-bit space–time programmable
metamaterial, a two-channel direct information transmission system is built to transmit two different
photos to two users at different locations in space, as exhibited in Figure 15d. It also shows that the

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 20 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Figure 16. (a) Single-radar-single-frequency passive imaging system via programmable metamaterial.
Reproduced from Li et al. (2016). (b) The reprogrammable hologram imaging. Reproduced from Li
et al. (2017). (c) Intelligent recognizer. Reproduced from Li et al. (2019b). (d) machine-learning
metamaterial imager. Reproduced from Li et al. (2019a).

space–time programmable metamaterial can realise the information modulation and energy radiation
simultaneously, and can regulate the spatial and frequency spectrum characteristics of EM waves.
The system greatly extends the application scope of programmable metamaterial, suggesting potential
applications in wireless communication, secure communication, radar systems, even on-chip designs in
the future (Imani et al. (2022)).

Imaging systems via programmable metamaterials

Figure 16a shows a single-sensor and single-frequency passive imaging system based on transmission-
type 2-bit programmable metamaterial. For this system, multiple measuring patterns are necessary to
compose the generalised system response matrix G = (Gpj ), p = 1, 2,. . .,P, j = 1, 2,. . .,N (P is indicates
the total number of metamaterial patterns for the whole imaging, N is the number of sub-areas of the
image scene). Along with the original object-area vector 𝜎 = (𝜎), i = 1, 2,. . .,N, the measurement data
V = (V(p)i), p = 1, 2,. . .,P, is expressed as:
⎡ V (1) ⎤ ⎡ G11 G12 · · · G1N ⎤ ⎡ 𝜎1 ⎤
⎢ (2) ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢V ⎥ ⎢ G21 G22 ⎥ ⎢ 𝜎2 ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ .. ⎥ = ⎢ .. . .. ⎥ ⎢ .. ⎥ . (2)
⎢ . ⎥ ⎢ . ⎥ ⎢ . ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ V (P) ⎥ ⎢ GP1 GPN ⎥⎦ ⎢ 𝜎N ⎥
⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎣ ⎦
Hence, this equation can be solved by multiple programmable radiation and measurements illustrated
in Figure 16a. First, a random coding pattern is generated by computer and stored in the FPGA to encode

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 21

the metamaterial. Second, the plane EM wave emitted by the horn antenna is vertically incident on the
metamaterial, and the corresponding transmission mode is generated by the metamaterial modulation.
In the third step, the modulated radiation pattern impinges on the target, and the scattered signal is
collected by the same antenna. By repeating this process, a series of random coding patterns are
generated and the corresponding scattered signals are detected and recorded in order. Finally, the
target can be reconstructed by inverse scattering imaging algorithm, accomplishing the imaging of the
unknown target (Li et al., 2016).
Programmable metamaterials can also be used to compose active imaging system (Li et al., 2017).
As shown in Figure 16b, through setting different hologram coding patterns via modified Gerchberg–
Saxton (GS) algorithm, the programmable metamaterial can achieve different letters in real-time. With
the help of dynamic EM control, researcher have accomplished more complicated functionalities and
systems such as intelligent recognizer and machine-learning metamaterial imager (Li et al., 2019a,
2019b), as shown in Figure 16c,d.

Smart system via programmable metamaterials

Combined with artificial intelligence (AI) technology, programmable metamaterials can achieve self-
adaptive and recognised systems (Ma et al., 2019, 2020; Liu et al., 2021, 2022a). Further, researchers
adopt 5-layer transmission-type programmable metamaterial to construct a programmable artificially
intelligent machine (PAIM) (Liu et al., 2022a), which can control EM wave propagation and interaction
features (as shown in Figure 17). Each layer of PAIM has 8 × 8 meta-atoms, and each of them can be
regarded as neuron node of artificial neural network (ANN). Hence, the whole PAIM is a physical
implementation of ANN.
Specifically, when the incident EM wave is incident on a meta-atom, the amplitude and phase of
the transmitted wave can be directly manipulated by FPGA. When the modulated EM wave passes
through the meta-atom, it turns into a new source which radiates EM wave in all directions. Thus, the
output of the fifth metamaterial is taken as the final output of the whole PAIM. The whole forward
process can be regarded as the process of adjusting the EM energy distribution in the layer-by-layer
manner in free space. In this way, PAIM can accomplish various functionalities such as automatic image
recognition, reinforcement learning and communication coding and encoding, laying the foundation
of totally intelligent programmable metamaterial designs. Furthermore, this scheme can be used for
signal processing by elaborately designing the network of PAIM, and even for realising a completely
automatic information-receiving and operating system.

Conclusions
In this article, we comprehensively review the developments of programmable metamaterials and meta-
surfaces, which inherit the flexible and real-time EM manipulations and digital information processing.
The proposal of space-domain, time-domain and space–time-domain programmable metamaterials
and metasurfaces further enable more flexible EM functionalities and facilitate the realisation of
new-scheme and new-architecture information systems. We envision that the future programmable
metamaterials and metasurfaces should advance towards more programmable, adaptive, and intelligent
capabilities, along the following possible directions.

• More efficient programmable approaches. For the existing designs, electrically-driven diodes or
varactors are still the most common components for modulation. Hence, more new modulation
approaches and components such as phase-change materials and chips should be introduced to
programmable metamaterials to provide more efficient and powerful controls.
• Interactions with the information science. There having been several preliminary studies proposed
on the qualitative and quantitative analyses of the digital coding and programmable metamaterials

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 22 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Figure 17. (a) Schematic of the intelligent system via programmable metamaterials. (b, c) Theoretical
and physical model of PAIM. Reproduced from Liu et al. (2022a).

regarding their information processing capabilities. More theories should be studied and developed
for programmable metamaterial to further unleash its potential for information processing.
• Advanced programmable metamaterials. With the introduction of intelligent concept, programmable
metamaterials are no longer simple EM devices but an advanced information processing system.
Hence, more self-adaptive and self-feedback components should be integrated with programmable
metamaterials to accomplish more advanced intelligent functionalities.
• Actual programmable metamaterial applications. Programmable metamaterials have shown great
potential in many communication and information processing applications, which plays important
roles in Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface (RIS). In the next stage, more engineering requirements
and constraints need to be considered during the programmable metamaterial designs, aiming at real
applications in wireless communications or beam-controlling radar systems.
In conclusion, the programmable metamaterials have shown strong EM manipulating powers, and
will perform more important roles in the modern information technology, bringing out more functionali-
ties beyond imagination. We remark that this review focuses more details on the programmable features

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 23

of metamaterials than the previously published reviews on digital coding metamaterials and information
metamaterials (Cui, 2017, 2018; Cui et al., 2017, 2020; Zhang et al., 2017; Li and Cui, 2019; Bao
and Cui, 2020; Ma and Cui, 2020; Wu and Cui, 2020). Especially, this work emphasises the phase,
amplitude and polarisation programmable capabilities of a variety of reflection-type, transmission-
type, and full-space metamaterials and metasurfaces, and several new experimental realisations of the
programmable features such as liquid crystal and passive manners.
Funding Statement. This project was supported by the Basic Scientific Center of Information Metamaterials of the
National Natural Science Foundation of China (62288101), the National Key Research and Development Program of China
(2017YFA0700201, 2017YFA0700202, 2017YFA0700203), the China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents
(BX20200080), the China National Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M690603), the Natural Science Foundation of
Jiangsu Province (BK20210210, BK20212002), the 111 Project (111-2-05) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central
Universities (2242021R20022).

Competing Interests. The authors declare no competing interests exist.

Authorship Contributions. R.Y.W. wrote the article. L.W.W. contributed to the subsections of time-domain and space–time
programmable metamaterials. S.H. contributed to the subsections of space-domain programmable metamaterials. S.L. and T.J.C.
suggested the proposal, supervised the work and wrote the article.

References
Bai X, Kong F, Sun Y, Wang G, Qian J, Li X, Cao A, He C, Liang X, Jin R and Zhu W (2020) High-efficiency transmissive
programmable metasurface for multimode OAM generation. Advanced Optical Materials 8(17), 2000570.
Bang S, Kim J, Yoon G, Tanaka T and Rho J (2018) Recent advances in tunable and reconfigurable metamaterials.
Micromachines 9(11), 560.
Bao L and Cui TJ (2020) Tunable, reconfigurable, and programmable metamaterials. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters
62(1), 9–32.
Bao L, Ma Q, Bai GD, Jing HB, Wu RY, Fu XJ, Yang C, Wu JW and Cui TJ (2018) Design of digital coding metasurfaces
with independent controls of phase and amplitude responses. Applied Physics Letters 113(6), 063502.
Bao L, Ma Q, Wu RY, Fu XJ, Wu JW and Cui TJ (2021) Programmable reflection–transmission shared-aperture metasurface
for real-time control of electromagnetic waves in full space. Advanced Science 8(15), 2100149.
Castaldi G, Zhang L, Moccia M, Hathaway AY, Tang WX, Cui TJ and Galdi V (2021) Joint multi-frequency beam shaping
and steering via space–time-coding digital metasurfaces. Advanced Functional Materials 31(6), 2007620.
Chen K, Feng Y, Monticone F, Zhao J, Zhu B, Jiang T, Zhang L, Kim Y, Ding XM, Zhang S, Alu A and Qiu CW (2017)
A reconfigurable active Huygens’ metalens. Advanced Materials 29(17), 1606422.
Chen X, Grzegorczyk TM, Wu BI, Pacheco J and Kong JA (2004) Robust method to retrieve the constitutive effective
parameters of metamaterials. Physical Review E 70(1), 016608.
Chen L, Ma Q, Nie QF, Hong QR, Cui HY, Ruan Y and Cui TJ (2021) Dual-polarization programmable metasurface
modulator for near-field information encoding and transmission. Photonics Research 9(2), 116–124.
Cui TJ (2017) Microwave metamaterials—From passive to digital and programmable controls of electromagnetic waves. Journal
of Optics 19(8), 084004.
Cui TJ (2018) Microwave metamaterials. National Science Review 5(2), 134–136.
Cui TJ, Li L, Liu S, Ma Q, Zhang L, Wan X, Jiang WX and Cheng Q (2020) Information metamaterial systems. iScience
23(8), 101403.
Cui TJ, Liu S, Bai GD and Ma Q (2019) Direct transmission of digital message via programmable coding metasurface. Research
2019, 2584509.
Cui TJ, Liu S and Li LL (2016) Information entropy of coding metasurface. Light: Science & Applications 5(11), e16172.
Cui TJ, Liu S and Zhang L (2017a) Information metamaterials and metasurfaces. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 5(15),
3644–3668.
Cui TJ, Qi MQ, Wan X, Zhao J and Cheng Q (2014) Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable
metamaterials. Light: Science & Applications 3, e218.
Cui TJ, Wu RY, Wu W, Shi CB and Li YB (2017b) Large-scale transmission-type multifunctional anisotropic coding
metasurfaces in millimeter-wave frequencies. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 50(40), 404002.
Dai JY, Tang W, Yang LX, Li X, Chen MZ, Ke JC, Cheng Q, Jin S and Cui, TJ (2019) Realization of multi-modulation
schemes for wireless communication by time-domain digital coding metasurface. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation 68(3), 1618–1627.
Dai JY, Yang J, Tang W, Chen MZ, Ke JC, Cheng Q, Jin S and Cui TJ (2020) Arbitrary manipulations of dual harmonics
and their wave behaviors based on space–time coding digital metasurface. Applied Physics Reviews 7(4), 041408.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 24 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Dai JY, Zhao J, Cheng Q and Cui TJ (2018) Independent control of harmonic amplitudes and phases via a time-domain digital
coding metasurface. Light: Science & Applications 7(1), 90.
Ding F, Pors A and Bozhevolnyi SI (2017) Gradient metasurfaces: A review of fundamentals and applications. Reports on
Progress in Physics 81(2), 026401.
Fu X, Shi L, Yang J, Fu Y, Liu CX, Wu JW, Yang F, Bao L and Cui TJ (2022) Flexible terahertz beam manipulations based
on liquid-crystal-integrated programmable metasurfaces. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 14, 22287–22294.
Holloway CL, Kuester EF, Gordon JA, O’Hara J, Booth J and Smith DR (2012) An overview of the theory and applications
of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 54(2), 10–35.
Hong QR, Ma Q, Gao XX, Liu C, Xiao Q, Iqbal S and Cui TJ (2021) Programmable amplitude-coding metasurface with
multifrequency modulations. Advanced Intelligent Systems 3(8), 2000260.
Hu Q, Chen K, Zhang N, Zhao J, Jiang T, Zhao J and Feng Y (2022a) Arbitrary and dynamic Poincaré sphere polarization
converter with a time-varying metasurface. Advanced Optical Materials 10(4), 2101915.
Hu Q, Zhao J, Chen K, Qu K, Yang WX, Zhao JM, Jiang T and Feng YJ (2022b) An intelligent programmable omni-
metasurface. Laser & Photonics Reviews 16, 2100718.
Imani FM, Abadal S and Del Hougne P (2022) Metasurface-programmable wireless network-on-Chip. Advanced Science 9(26),
2201458.
Jeong H, Park E, Phon R and Lim S (2022) Mechatronic reconfigurable intelligent-surface-driven indoor fifth-generation
wireless communication. Advanced Intelligent Systems 7(10), 2200185.
Jing Y, Li Y, Zhang J, Wang J, Feng M, Sui S, Qiu T, Ma H and Qu SB (2018) Fast coding method of metasurfaces based
on 1D coding in orthogonal directions. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 51(47), 475103.
Ke JC, Dai JY, Chen MZ, Wang L, Zhang C, Tang WK, Yang J, Liu W, Li X, Lu YF, Cheng Q, Jin S and Cui TJ (2021)
Linear and nonlinear polarization syntheses and their programmable controls based on anisotropic time-domain digital coding
metasurface. Small Structures 2(1), 2000060.
Kim J, Yang Y, Badloe T, Kim I, Yoon G and Rho J (2021) Geometric and physical configurations of meta-atoms for advanced
metasurface holography. InfoMat 3(7), 739–754.
Kundtz N and Smith DR (2010) Extreme-angle broadband metamaterial lens. Nature Materials 9(2), 129–132.
Li L and Cui TJ (2019) Information metamaterials—From effective media to real-time information processing systems. Nano
8(5), 703–724.
Li L, Cui TJ, Ji W, Liu S, Ding J, Wan X, Li Y, Jiang M, Qiu CW and Zhang S (2017) Electromagnetic reprogrammable
coding-metasurface holograms. Nature Communications 8(1), 197.
Li Z, Dai Q, Mehmood MQ, Hu G, Yanchuk BL, Tao J, Hao C, Kim I, Jeong H, Zheng G, Yu S, Alu A, Rho J and Qiu
CW (2018) Full-space cloud of random points with a scrambling metasurface. Light: Science & Applications 7(1), 1–8.
Li SJ, Han BW, Li ZY, Liu XB, Huang GS, Li RQ and Cao XY (2022) Transmissive coding metasurface with dual-circularly
polarized multi-beam. Optics Express 30(15), 26362–26376.
Li YB, Li LL, Xu BB, Wu W, Wu RY, Wan X, Cheng Q and Cui TJ (2016) Transmission-type 2-bit programmable
metasurface for single-sensor and single-frequency microwave imaging. Scientific Reports 6, 23731.
Li L, Ruan H, Liu C, Li Y, Shuang Y, Alu A, Qiu CW and Cui TJ (2019a) Machine-learning reprogrammable metasurface
imager. Nature Communications 10(1), 1–8.
Li L, Shuang Y, Ma Q, Li H, Zhao H, Wei M, Liu C, Hao C, Qiu CW and Cui TJ (2019b) Intelligent metasurface imager
and recognizer. Light: Science & Applications 8(1), 1–9.
Liao J, Guo S, Yuan L, Ji C, Huang C and Luo X (2022) Independent manipulation of reflection amplitude and phase by a
single-layer reconfigurable metasurface. Advanced Optical Materials 10(4), 2101551.
Liu S and Cui TJ (2017) Concepts, working principles, and applications of coding and programmable metamaterials. Advanced
Optical Materials 5(22), 1700624.
Liu RP, Cui TJ, Huang D, Zhao B and Smith DR (2007) Description and explanation of electromagnetic behaviors in artificial
metamaterials based on effective medium theory. Physical Review E 76(2), 026606.
Liu S, Cui TJ, Xu Q, Bao D, Du LL, Wan X, Tang WX, Ouyang CM, Zhou XY, Yuan H, Ma HF, Jiang WX, Han JG,
Zhang WL and Cheng Q (2016a) Anisotropic coding metamaterials and their powerful manipulation of differently polarized
terahertz waves. Light: Science & Applications 5(5), e16076.
Liu S, Cui TJ, Zhang L, Xu Q, Wang Q, Wan X, Gu JQ, Tang WX, Qi MQ, Han JG, Zhang WL, Zhou XY and Cheng
Q (2016b) Convolution operations on coding metasurface to reach flexible and continuous controls of terahertz beams.
Advancement of Science 3(10), 1600156.
Liu R, Ji C, Mock JJ, Chin JY, Cui TJ and Smith DR (2009) Broadband ground-plane cloak. Science 323(5912), 366–369.
Liu C, Ma Q, Luo ZJ, Hong QR, Xiao Q, Zhang HC, Miao L, Yu WM, Cheng Q, Li LL and Cui TJ (2022a) A programmable
diffractive deep neural network based on a digital-coding metasurface array. Nature Electronics 5(2), 113–122.
Liu S, Ma S, Shao R, Zhang L, Yan T, Ma Q, Zhang S and Cui TJ (2022b) Moiré metasurfaces for dynamic beamforming.
Science Advances 8(33), eabo1511.
Liu C, Yu WM, Ma Q, Li LL and Cui TJ (2021) Intelligent coding metasurface holograms by physics-assisted unsupervised
generative adversarial network. Photonics Research 9(4), B159–B167.
Liu L, Zhang X, Kenney M, Su X, Xu N, Ouyang C, Shi Y, Han J, Zhang W and Zhang S (2014) Broadband metasurfaces
with simultaneous control of phase and amplitude. Advanced Materials 26(29), 5031–5036.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 25

Liu S, Zhang L, Yang QL, Xu Q, Yang Y, Noor A, Zhang Q, Iqbal S, Wan X, Tian Z, Tang WX, Cheng Q, Han JG,
Zhang WL and Cui TJ (2016c) Frequency-dependent dual-functional coding metasurfaces at terahertz frequencies. Advanced
Optical Materials 4(12), 1965–1973.
Luo X, Hu Y, Ou X, Li X, Lai J, Liu N, Cheng X, Pan A and Duan H (2022) Metasurface-enabled on-chip multiplexed
diffractive neural networks in the visible. Light: Science & Applications 11(1), 1–11.
Ma Q, Bai GD, Jing HB, Yang C, Li LL and Cui TJ (2019) Smart metasurface with self-adaptively reprogrammable functions.
Light: Science & Applications 8(1), 1–12.
Ma HF and Cui TJ (2010) Three-dimensional broadband and broad-angle transformation-optics lens. Nature Communications
1, 124.
Ma Q and Cui TJ (2020) Information metamaterials: Bridging the physical world and digital world. PhotoniX 1(1), 1–32.
Ma Q, Hong QR, Bai GD, Jing HB, Wu RY, Bao L, Cheng Q and Cui TJ (2020a) Editing arbitrarily linear polarizations using
programmable metasurface. Physical Review Applied 13(2), 021003.
Ma Q, Hong QR, Gao XX, Jing HB, Liu C, Bai GD, Cheng Q and Cui TJ (2020b) Smart sensing metasurface with self-
defined functions in dual polarizations. Nanophotonics 9(10), 3271–3278.
Ma Q, Hong QR, Gao X, Xiao Q, Chen L and Cui TJ (2022) Highly integrated programmable metasurface for multifunctions
in reflections and transmissions. APL Materials 10(6), 061113.
Ma Q, Shi CB, Bai GD, Chen TY, Noor A and Cui TJ (2017) Beam-editing coding metasurfaces based on polarization bit and
orbital-angular-momentum-mode bit. Advanced Optical Materials 5(23), 1700548.
Moccia M, Liu S, Wu RY, Castaldi G, Andreone A, Cui TJ and Galdi V (2017) Coding metasurfaces for diffuse scattering:
Scaling laws, bounds, and suboptimal design. Advanced Optical Materials 5(19), 1700455.
Oliveri G, Werner DH and Massa A (2015) Reconfigurable electromagnetics through metamaterials—A review. Proceedings
of the IEEE 103(7), 1034–1056.
Pendry JB (2000) Negative refraction makes a perfect lens. Physical Review Letters 85(18), 3966–3969.
Pendry JB, Holden AJ, Stewart WJ and Youngs I (1996) Extremely low frequency plasmons in metallic mesostructures.
Physical Review Letters 76(25), 4773–4776.
Pfeiffer C and Grbic A (2013) Metamaterial Huygens’ surfaces: Tailoring wave fronts with reflectionless sheets. Physical
Review Letters 110(19), 197401.
Phon R, Jeong H and Lim S (2022) Rotational Kirigami tessellation metasurface for tunable chirality. Advanced Materials
Technologies 7(10), 2101706.
Ramaccia D, Scattone F, Bilotti F and Toscano A (2013) Broadband compact horn antennas by using EPS-ENZ metamaterial
lens. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 61(6), 2929–2937.
Schurig D, Mock JJ, Justice BJ, Cummer SA, Pendry JB, Starr AF and Smith DR (2006) Metamaterial electromagnetic
cloak at microwave frequencies. Science 314(5801), 977–980.
Shang G, Hu G, Guan C, Wang Y, Zhang K, Wu Q, Liu J, Ding X, Burokur SN, Li H, Ding X and Qiu CW (2022) A
non-interleaved bidirectional Janus metasurface with full-space scattering channels. Nanophotonics 11(16), 3729–3739.
Shelby RA, Smith DR and Schultz S (2001) Experimental verification of a negative index of refraction. Science 292(5514),
77–79.
Shuang Y, Zhao H, Wei M, Cheng Q, Jin S, Cui TJ, Hougne DP and Li L (2022) One-bit quantization is good for
programmable coding metasurfaces. Science China Information Sciences 65(7), 1–15.
Smith DR, Padilla WJ, Vier DC, Nemat-Nasser SC and Schultz S (2000) Composite medium with simultaneously negative
permeability and permittivity. Physical Review Letters 84(18), 4184–4187.
Smith DR, Pendry JB and Wiltshire MCK (2004) Metamaterials and negative refractive index. Science 305(5685), 788–792.
Smith DR, Schultz S, Markoš P and Soukoulis, CM (2002) Determination of effective permittivity and permeability of
metamaterials from reflection and transmission coefficients. Physical Review B 65(19), 195104.
Sun S, He Q, Xiao S, Xu Q, Li X and Zhou L (2012) Gradient-index meta-surfaces as a bridge linking propagating waves and
surface waves. Nature Materials 11(5), 426–431.
Veselago VG (1968) The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative values of 𝜀 and μ. Soviet Physics Uspekhi
10(4), 509–514.
Wan X, Jia SL, Cui TJ and Zhou YJ (2016a) Independent modulations of the transmission amplitudes and phases by using
Huygens metasurfaces. Scientific Reports 6, 25639.
Wan X, Qi MQ, Chen TY and Cui TJ (2016b) Field-programmable beam reconfiguring based on digitally-controlled coding
metasurface. Scientific Reports 6, 20663.
Wan X, Zhang Q, Chen TY, Zhang L, Xu Wei, Huang H, Xiao CK, Xiao Q and Cui TJ (2019) Multichannel direct
transmissions of near-field information. Light: Science & Applications 8(1), 60.
Wang SR, Chen MZ, Ke JC, Cheng Q and Cui TJ (2022b) Asynchronous space-time-coding digital metasurface. Advanced
Science 9, 2200106.
Wang HL, Ma HF, Chen M, Sun S and Cui TJ (2021) A reconfigurable multifunctional metasurface for full-space control of
electromagnetic waves. Advanced Functional Materials 31(25), 2100275.
Wang HL, Zhang YK, Zhang TY, Ma HF and Cui TJ (2022a) Broadband and programmable amplitude-phase-joint-coding
information metasurface. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 14(25), 29431–29440.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 26 Rui Y. Wu. et al.

Wu RY, Bao L, Wu L and Cui TJ (2020a) Broadband transmission-type 1-bit coding metasurface for electromagnetic beam
forming and scanning. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 63(8), 1–9.
Wu RY, Bao L, Wu LW, Wang ZX, Ma Q, Wu JW, Bai GD, Galdi V and Cui TJ (2020b) Independent control of copolarized
amplitude and phase responses via anisotropic metasurfaces. Advanced Optical Materials 8(11), 1902126.
Wu RY and Cui TJ (2020) Microwave metamaterials: From exotic physics to novel information systems. Frontiers of
Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 21(1), 4–26.
Wu H, Gao XX, Zhang L, Bai GD, Cheng Q, Li LL and Cui TJ (2020c) Harmonic information transitions of spatiotemporal
metasurfaces. Light: Science & Applications 9(1), 1–13.
Wu H, Liu S, Wan X, Zhang L, Wang D, Li LL and Cui TJ (2017) Controlling energy radiations of electromagnetic waves
via frequency coding metamaterials. Advanced Science 4(9), 1700098.
Wu LW, Ma HF, Wu RY, Xiao Q, Gou Y, Wang M, Wang ZX, Bao L, Wang HL, Qing YM and Cui TJ (2020d)
Transmission-reflection controls and polarization controls of electromagnetic holograms by a reconfigurable anisotropic
digital coding metasurface. Advanced Optical Materials 8(22), 2001065.
Wu J, Shen Z, Ge S, Chen B, Shen ZX, Wang TF, Zhang CH, Hu W, Fan KB, Padilla W, Lu YQ, Jin BB, Chen J and Wu
PH (2020e) Liquid crystal programmable metasurface for terahertz beam steering. Applied Physics Letters 116(13), 131104.
Wu RY, Shi CB, Liu S, Wu W and Cui TJ (2018) Addition theorem for digital coding metamaterials. Advanced Optical
Materials 6(5), 1701236.
Wu RY, Zhang L, Bao L, Wu LW, Ma Q, Bai GD, Wu HT and Cui TJ (2019) Digital metasurface with phase code and
reflection–transmission amplitude code for flexible full-space electromagnetic manipulations. Advanced Optical Materials
7(8), 1801429.
Xu HX, Hu GW, Han L, Jiang MH, Huang YJ, Li Y, Yang XM, Ling XH, Chen LZ, Zhao JL and Qi, CW (2019a)
Chirality-assisted high-efficiency metasurfaces with independent control of phase, amplitude, and polarization. Advanced
Optical Materials 7(4), 1801479.
Xu HX, Hu G, Li Y, Han L, Zhao JL, Sun YM, Yuan F, Wang GM, Jiang ZH, Ling XH, Cui TJ and Qiu CW (2019b)
Interference-assisted kaleidoscopic meta-plexer for arbitrary spin-wavefront manipulation. Light: Science & Applications
8(1), 1–10.
Xu HX, Hu G, Wang Y, Wang CH, Wang MZ, Wang SJ, Huang YJ, Genevet P, Huang W and Qiu CW (2021) Polarization-
insensitive 3D conformal-skin metasurface cloak. Light: Science & Applications 10(1), 1–13.
Xu J, Li R, Wang S and Han T (2018) Ultra-broadband linear polarization converter based on anisotropic metasurface. Optics
Express 26(20), 26235–26241.
Xu Q, Su X, Zhang X, Dong L, Liu L, Shi Y, Wang Q, Kang M and Alu A (2022) Mechanically reprogrammable
Pancharatnam–berry metasurface for microwaves. Advanced Photonics 4(1), 016002.
Yang H, Cao X, Yang F, Gao J, Xu S, Li M, Chen X, Zhao Y, Zheng Y and Li S (2016) A programmable metasurface with
dynamic polarization, scattering and focusing control. Scientific Reports 6(1), 1–11.
Yang W, Chen K, Zheng Y, Zhao W, Hu Q, Qu K, Jiang T, Zhao J and Feng Y (2021) Angular-adaptive reconfigurable
spin-locked metasurface retroreflector. Advanced Science 8(21), 2100885.
Yang HH, Xu LM, Yang F, Cao XY, Xu SH, Gao J and Li SJ (2017) Phase quantization effects of coded metasurface on agile
scattering field control. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 59(3), 738–743.
Yu NF, Genevet P, Kats MA, Aieta F, Tetienne JP, Capasso F and Gaburro Z (2011) Light propagation with phase
discontinuities: Generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 334, 333–337.
Zhang L, Chen XQ, Liu S, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Dai JY, Bai GD, Wan X, Cheng Q, Castaldi G, Galdi V and Cui TJ (2018)
Space-time coding digital metasurfaces. Nature Communications 9(1), 4334.
Zhang L, Chen XQ, Shao RW, Dai JY, Cheng Q, Castaldi G, Galdi V and Cui TJ (2019a) Breaking reciprocity with space–
time-coding digital metasurfaces. Advanced Materials 31(41), 1904069.
Zhang L, Chen MZ, Tang W, Dai JY, Miao L, Zhou XY, Jin S, Cheng Q and Cui TJ (2021) A wireless communication
scheme based on space- and frequency-division multiplexing using digital metasurfaces. Nature Electronics 4(3), 218–227.
Zhang L and Cui TJ (2021) Space–time coding digital metasurfaces: Principles and applications. Research 2021, 9802673.
Zhang XG, Jiang WX, Jiang HL, Wang Q, Tiao HW, Bai L, Luo ZJ, Sun S, Luo Y, Qiu CW and Cui TJ (2020a) An
optically driven digital metasurface for programming electromagnetic functions. Nature Electronics 3(3), 165–171.
Zhang L, Liu S and Cui TJ (2017) Theory and application of coding metamaterials. Chinese Optics 10(1), 1–12.
Zhang Q, Liu C, Wan X, Zhang L, Liu S, Yang Y and Cui TJ (2019c) Machine-learning designs of anisotropic digital coding
metasurfaces. Advanced Theory and Simulations 2(2), 1800132.
Zhang XG, Tang WX, Jiang WX, Bai GD, Tang J, Bai L, Qiu CW and Cui TJ (2018) Light-controllable digital coding
metasurfaces. Advanced Science 5(11), 1801028.
Zhang L, Wang ZX, Shao RW, Shen JL, Chen XQ, Wan X, Cheng Q and Cui TJ (2019b) Dynamically realizing
arbitrary multi-bit programmable phases using a 2-bit time-domain coding metasurface. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation 68(4), 2984–2992.
Zhang XG, Yu Q, Jiang WX, Sun TL, Bai L, Wang Q, Qiu CW and Cui TJ (2020b) Polarization-controlled dual-
programmable metasurfaces. Advanced Science 7(11), 1903382.
Zhao J, Cheng Q, Chen J, Qi MQ, Jiang WX and Cui TJ (2013) A tunable metamaterial absorber using varactor diodes. New
Journal of Physics 15(4), 043049.

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press

 Programmable Materials 27

Zhao J, Yang X, Dai JY, Cheng Q, Li X, Qi NH, Ke JC, Bai GD, Liu S, Jin S, Alu A and Cui TJ (2018) Programmable time-
domain digital-coding metasurface for non-linear harmonic manipulation and new wireless communication systems. National
Science Review 6(2), 231–238.
Zheng Y, Chen K, Yang W, Wu L, Qu K, Zhao J, Jiang T and Feng Y (2022) Kirigami reconfigurable gradient metasurface.
Advanced Functional Materials 32(5), 2107699.
Zheng P, Dai Q, Li Z, Ye Z, Xiong J, Liu H, Zheng G and Zhang S (2021) Metasurface-based key for computational imaging
encryption. Science Advances 7(21), eabg0363.
Zheng G, Mühlenbernd H, Kenney M, Liu G, Zentgraf T and Zhang S (2015) Metasurface holograms reaching 80%
efficiency. Nature Nanotechnology 10(4), 308–312.

Cite this article: Rui Y. Wu, Liang W. Wu, Shi He, Shuo Liu, and Tie J. Cui (2023). Programmable metamaterials. Programmable
Materials, 1, e4, https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1

https://doi.org/10.1017/pma.2023.1 Published online by Cambridge University Press