Proponent Site Engineering A

Controls P
P
E
N
D
I
X

1
 APPENDIX 1. ILLUSTRATIVE PROPONENT SITE ENGINEERING CONTROLS
TO BE IMPLEMENTED

SITE DESCRIPTION: A contaminated site was a former power plant facility with stored
transformers (PCB containing) and the site is currently being used as a motor pool area where
change oil and other vehicle maintenance activities are being undertaken. The COPC (PCB;
Aroclors and its congeners) containing transformers will be disposed-off according to the
COPC management plan timelines submitted to the DENR-EMB Chemicals Division
pursuant to the Phase-Out plan of the Government as commitment to the Stockholm
Convention in 2019.

The Proponent or the facility has not designated a Pollution Control Officer (PCO), no
inventory of the transformer stored and no submission of reports i.e. SMR; to DENR. No
records of accidental spills and other environment-related activities.

SITE CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION: The different activities can be implemented. Further, it

is viewed that during the site control implementation, the proponent has its own Pollution
Control Officer (PCO), have registered for CCO and have submitted its COPC Management
Plan.

Immediate Activities: Site Control Level 1 (SC1)

SC1: Good Housekeeping and Provision of PPEs

• Transformers properly labeled and stored
• Pallets with spill drain should be provided
• Provision of respirator with RC 203 to all staff with access to the
contaminated areas

SC2: Administrative Control

• Install signage and
barricades
• Information Education
Campaign (IEC)
• Employ security guards

SC2: Engineering Controls*

• Screening
• Selection
SITE CONTROL LEVEL 2: ENGINEERING CONTROLS

Step 1: Screening Procedure

Rank the control measures from highest to lowest with 1 as the highest. Choose 2 measures
with highest ranking and proceed to selection process using selection criteria

Table A. Site Control: Perimeter Wall Enclosure of the Contaminated Site

Site Control Technical Environmental Social Total Rank

Option (50%) (25%) (25%)

1. Concrete wall 1 1 4 1st

with provision of
sump pit in
compliance with
the CCO for PCBs
2. Concrete wall 1 2 2.5 5.5 2nd
with provision of
absorbent pads
3. Cyclone wire 3 3 2.5 8.5 3rd

Option no. 1 (Concrete wall with provision of sump pit) and Option no. 2 (Concrete wall
with provision of absorbent pads) were chosen during the screening process and will
proceed to the next step.

Step 2: Selection Procedure

Table B. Perimeter Wall

Parameter/Criteria Economic Legal Stability Total Rank

1. Concrete with 1 1.5 1 3.5 1st

sump (compliance
with the CCO for
PCBs)
2. Concrete with 2 1.5 2 5.5 2nd
absorbent pad

Option no. 1 (Concrete wall with provision of sump pit) was selected as the site control
technology option for the economic, legal and stability criteria.

However, it should be noted that the final selection will depend on the Proponent’s decision
on what technology option to implement.
Matrix of Site Control Hierarchy A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X

2
 APPENDIX 2. MATRIX OF SITE CONTROL HIERARCHY APPLICATION WITH INDICATIVE COSTS

Environmental Indicative Cost

Controls/Component Risks Mitigating Measures Monitoring
Impacts (PhP)
Provision of PPEs (Responsible Person/Entity: Proponent)
Infiltration of PPEs (suit, gloves, 5,000/person
COPC contaminated Risk of exposure to Fit test of PPEs
COPC into the footwear, headgear,
soil and groundwater COPC appropriate to COPC
soils and respirators and safety
percolation goggles) for the
groundwater Proponent personnel
within and at who will manage the
the vicinity of COPC wastes and
the other hazardous
contaminated wastes in the area
area. Ingestion
of COPC by
freshwater
organisms and
consequent
human
ingestion of
these aquatic
organisms with
COPC.
Inhalation and
skin contact
with COPC by
human,
particularly
workers
assigned in the
area.
 Environmental Indicative Cost
Controls/Component Risks Mitigating Measures Monitoring
Impacts (PhP)
Administrative Controls (Responsible Person/Entity: Proponent)
Infiltration of Proponent shall 365,000/year
COPC contaminated Risk of exposure to
COPC into the commit for the
soil and groundwater COPC @
soils and provision of security
percolation Security provision 500/day/security
at the contaminated
groundwater guard for two (2)
site with proper PPE.
within and at security.
the vicinity of
the 3,000/signage
The administration
contaminated Made of marine
area. Ingestion of Proponent shall
see to it that the plywood or sheet
of COPC by Signage (no entry to
signage is intact until metal with steel
freshwater unauthorized
organisms and the COPC framing, steadfast
personnel)
consequent contaminated site and water proof
human has been remediated. that withstand
ingestion of weather
these aquatic
50,000
organisms with
COPC. An Information and A two (2) time IEC
Inhalation and Education Campaign shall be done.
skin contact
Stakeholders (IEC) shall be done The IEC shall
with COPC by
awareness and by Proponent to entail cost for the
human,
particularly engagement inform or warn the refreshments of
workers general public of the the participants.
assigned in the health risk of the The 2nd IEC shall
area. COPC contamination. be done after the
proposed site
 Environmental Indicative Cost
Controls/Component Risks Mitigating Measures Monitoring
Impacts (PhP)
control
procedures were
implemented and
initial results of
environmental
monitoring are
already available.

10,000/soil
sample and
5,000/water
Quarterly monitoring sample
of soils and
groundwater for Includes auger
COPC, particularly drilling for soil
drinking water sampling, purging
sources within and in of stagnant water
the vicinity of in well prior to
affected area. sampling, sample
preparation and
transportation
cost.

Engineering controls (Responsible Person/Entity: Proponent). Presented below are different choices of engineering
controls
Infiltration of The security 89/m2
Area isolation by
Risk of Exposure COPC into the provision shall
COPC contaminated fencing with barbed The height of the
to COPC soils and monitor the fence
soil, groundwater wire barbed wire fence
percolation that shall be put up,
 Environmental Indicative Cost
Controls/Component Risks Mitigating Measures Monitoring
Impacts (PhP)
groundwater the provided security is 1.90 meters.
within and at shall see to it that the The entrance gate
the vicinity of COPC contaminated with padlock is
the site is out of reach of made of barbed
contaminated the general public wire in steel frame
area. Ingestion until the COPC with an opening of
of COPC by contaminated site
4 meters and
freshwater has been remediated.
height of 2.3
organisms and
consequent meters.
human
ingestion of
these aquatic
organisms with
COPC.
Inhalation and
skin contact
with COPC by
human,
particularly
workers
assigned in the
area.

The provided 206/m2

Placement of cover to security as
For cover using
prevent COPC administrative
HDPE sheet.
migration by measure shall see to
rainwater it that the COPC
5,100/m2
contaminated site is
 Environmental Indicative Cost
Controls/Component Risks Mitigating Measures Monitoring
Impacts (PhP)
out of reach of the For facility with
general public until existing concrete
the COPC enclosure
contaminated site competent enough
has been remediated. to carry G.I.
corrugated roof
and steel truss.
This option is
more secured
than by just
placement of
HDPE cover.
Quarterly monitoring 10,000/soil
of soils, groundwater sample and
and surface water for 5,000/water
COPC, particularly sample
drinking water
Includes auger
sources within and in
drilling for soil
the vicinity of
Stakeholders sampling, purging
affected area. This
awareness on fate of of stagnant water
COPC through soil and should be made
in well prior to
water monitoring downstream of
sampling, sample
contaminated site.
preparation and
If existing well/s transportation
exist in the vicinity, cost.
this can be used to
150,000/monito
reduce cost of
ring well
 Environmental Indicative Cost
Controls/Component Risks Mitigating Measures Monitoring
Impacts (PhP)
developing Includes drilling,
monitoring well. uPVC casing,
gravel pack,
cement grout well
development,
pumping test and
well head
protection and
security. Borehole
diameter is
150mm and
casing diameter is
75mm.

Reporting (Responsible Person/Entity: Proponent)

50,000
An Information and
Education Campaign Second IEC shall
(IEC) shall be done be done after the
by Proponent to proposed site
Stakeholders/ control measures
inform the general
Transparency are implemented
public of the results
and initial results
of site control at the
of environmental
vicinity of the
monitoring are
contaminated site. already available.
The IEC shall
entail cost for the
 Environmental Indicative Cost
Controls/Component Risks Mitigating Measures Monitoring
Impacts (PhP)
refreshments of
the participants.
Indicative Costs for Technology A
Options P
P
E
N
D
I
X

3
 APPENDIX 3. INDICATIVE COSTS FOR TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS
AN ILLUSTRATION for a PCB CONTAMINATED SITE INDICATED IN APPENDIX 1
(Costings based on September 2016 prices)

Area Isolation by Fencing

I. Concrete/ CHB Perimeter Wall
Area to be Fenced = 1.2 Hectares = 12,000 m2

CHB:
Height above H.G.L. = 240 m
Height below H.G.L. = 0.40 m
Total Height = 2.80 m
100 m

120 m

A120 = 120 x 2.80 x 2 = 672 m2

A100 = 100 x 2.80 x 2 = 560 m2
Total area to be covered by CHB = 1,232 m 2
Total number of 6” CHB = 1232 x 12.5 = 15,400
Total number of columns @ 3m spacing = (33+1)2 + (40+1)2 = 68 + 82 = 150
Volume of columns = 0.30 x 0.30 x 3 x 150 = 40.5 m 3
Volume of footings = 1.00 x 1.00 x 0.25 x 150 = 37.5 m 3
Volume of base concrete = 0.20 x 0.15 x 440 = 13.2 m3
Volume of gravel base = 0.20 x 1.00 1.00 x 150 = 30 m 3

Total volume of concrete = 40.5 + 37.5 + 13.2 = 91.2 m 3

Concrete:
Cement = 91.2 x 7.84 = 715.008 = 716 bags
Sand = 91.2 x 0.44 = 40.128 = 41 m 3
Gravel = 91.2 x 0.88 = 80.256 = 81 + 30 = 111 m3

Plaster:
A = 2.40(120 x 2) + 2.40(100 x 2) = 576 + 480 = 1,056 m 2
V = 1,056 x 0.012 x 2 = 25.42 m3
Cement = 25.43 x 5.50 = 139.37 = 140 bags
Sand = 25.43 x 0.90 = 22.806 = 23 m3

Mortar:
15400 pcs x 0.0028 = 43.12 m 3
Cement = 43.12 x 12.04 = 519.16 = 520 bags
Sand = 43.12 x 0.97 = 41.83 = 42 m3

Rebars:
Columns = 4 x 3.25 x 150 = 1,950
1,950/7.5 = 260; 260 pcs – 12 mmϕ x 750 m
260 pcs – 16 mmϕ x 7.50 m
Ties: 16 x 1.50 x 1.50 = 3,600
3,600/6 = 600; 600 pcs – 10 mmϕ x 6.00 m

Footings = 150 nos. = 8 x 2 150 x 1.20 = 2880

2880/6 = 480; 480 pcs – 16 mmϕ 6.00 m

CHB:
Vertical bars (10 mmϕ @ 0.60) = 2(120/0.06) + 2(100/0.06) = 400 + 334 = 734
Height of CHB = 3.25
734 x 3.25 = 2,385.50
2,385.50/7.5 = 318.07; 319 pcs – 10 mmϕ x 7.50 m
Horizontal bars (12 mmϕ @0.60)
6 Layers: (120 x 2) + (100 x 2) = 440 x 6 = 2,640
2,640/7.5 = 352; 352 pcs – 12 mmϕ x 7.50

Entrance/Pedestrian gate:
Cyclone wire
A = 4 x 2.30 = 9.20 m2 = 10 m2
G.I. pipe = 50 mmϕ x 6 m SCH 40
= (4 x3) + (4 x 2.30) = 12 + 9.2 = 21.2
= 21.2/6 = 3.53 = 4 pcs
4 pcs – 50 mmϕ x 6 m G.I. pipe SCH 40
1 pcs – 25 mmϕ x 6 m G.I. pipe SCH 40

Flat Bar = 25 mm x 5 mm x 6 m
= (2.3 x 4) + (4 x 4) = 9.2 = 16 = 25.2
= 25.2/6 = 4.2 = 5 pcs
5 pcs – 25mm x 5mm x 6m

Round Bar:
1 pc – 19 mmϕ G.I. Plain Bar
1 pc – 20 mmϕ Plain round bar

Heavy duty padlock:

1 pc

Materials Cost :

6” CHB = 15,400 pcs x ₱15.00/pc = ₱ 231,000.00

Cement = 1,376 bags x ₱220.00/bag = ₱ 302,720.00
Sand = 106 m3 x ₱225.00/m3 = ₱ 23,850.00
Gravel = 111 m3 x ₱250.00/m3 = ₱ 27,750.00

Rebars:
16 mmϕ x 7.50 m = 260 pcs x ₱313.00/pc =₱ 81,380.00
16 mmϕ x 6.00 m = 480 pcs x ₱250.00/pc = ₱ 120,000.00
12 mmϕ x 7.50 m = 612 pcs x ₱189.14/pc = ₱ 115,753.68
10 mmϕ x 7.50 m = 319 pcs x ₱123/pc = ₱ 39,237.00
10 mmϕ x 6.00 m = 600 pcs x ₱98/pc = ₱ 58,800.00

Entrance/Pedestrian gate:
Cyclone wire = 10 m2 x ₱160.00/m2 =₱ 1,600.00
G.I. pipe:
50 mmϕ x 6 m = 4 pcs x ₱942.50/pc =₱ 3,770.00
25 mmϕ x 6 m = 1 pcs x ₱467.00/pc =₱ 467.00

Flat Bar: 25 mm x 5 mm x 6 m = 5 pcs x ₱333.00/pc =₱ 1,665.00

Round Bar:
19 mmϕ G.I. Plain bar = 1 pc x ₱595.00/pc =₱ 595.00
20 mmϕ Plain bar (round) = 1 pc x ₱662.00/pc =₱ 662.00

Heavy duty padlock: 1 pc x ₱1,000.00/pc =₱ 1,000.00

Total = ₱1,010,249.68

Materials = ₱1,010,249.68 = ₱1,010,249.68

Labor (30%) = 0.30(₱1,010,249.68) = ₱ 303,074.90
Contingency (5%) = 0.05(₱1,010,249.68 + 303,074.90) = ₱ 65,666.23

Total Cost = ₱1,378,990.81

Description:
Total cost of concrete/CHB perimeter wall
= ₱1,378,991.00

Unit Cost / Square Meter = ₱ 115.00

Area to be covered = 1.2 Hectares = 12,000 m 2

Height of 6” CHB wall from finish ground level (F.G.L.) = 2.40 m

Cyclone wire entrance and pedestrian gate with padlock:

Opening = 4.00 m
Height = 2.30 m
II. Cyclone wire/ CHB perimeter wall

CHB:
Height above F.G.L. = 0.40 m
Height below F.G.L. = 0.40 m
Total Height = 0.40 + 0.40 = 0.80 m
Fence Perimeter = 2(100) + 2(120) = 200 + 240 = 440 m
Total area to be covered by CHB = 0.80 x 440 = 352 m 2
Total number of 6” CHB = 352 x 12.5 = 4,400
Total number of columns @ 3 m spacing = 150
Volume of columns1 = 0.30 x 0.30 x 3.00 x 6 = 1.62 m3
Volume of columns2 = 0.15 x 0.15 x 1.00 x 144 = 3.24 m3
Total volume of columns = 1.62 + 3.24 = 4.86 m 3
Volume of footings1 = 1.00 x 1.00 x 0.25 x 6 = 1.50 m3
Volume of footings2 = 0.80 x 0.80 x 0.25 x 144 = 23.04 m 3
Total volume of footings = 1.50 + 23.04 = 24.54 m3
Volume of base concrete = 0.20 x 0.15 x 440 = 13.20 m3
Volume of gravel base1 = 0.10 x 1.00 x 1.00 x 6 = 0.60 m 3
Volume of gravel base2 = 0.10 x 0.80 x 0.80 x 144 = 9.22 m 3
Total volume of gravel base = 0.60 + 9.22 = 9.82 ≈ 10.00 m 3

Total volume of concrete = 4.86 + 24.54 + 13.20 = 42.60 m3

Concrete:
Cement = 42.60 x 7.84 = 333.98 = 334 bags
Sand = 42.60 x 0.44 = 18.74= 19 m3
Gravel = 42.60 x 0.88 = 37.49= 38 m3

Plaster:
A = 0.40x 440 = 176 m 2
V = 176 x 0.012 x 2 = 4.224 m 3
Cement = 4.224 x 5.50 = 23.23 = 24 bags
Sand = 4.224 x 0.90 = 3.80 = 4 m3

Mortar:
4,400 pcs x 0.0028 = 12.32 m 3
Cement= 12.32 x 12.04= 148.33= 149 bags
Sand = 12.32 x 0.97 = 11,95= 12 m3

Rebars:
Columns1 = 4 x 3.25 x 6 = 78
78/7.5 = 10.4 = 11;
11 pcs – 12 mmϕ x 7.50 m
11 pcs – 16 mmϕ x 7.50 m

TIES: 16 x 1.50 x 6 = 144

144/6 = 24; 24 pcs – 10 mmϕ x 6.00 m

Columns2 = 4 x 1.80 x 144 = 1,036.80

1,036.80/6 = 172.8 = 173; 173 pcs – 16 mmϕ x 6.00 m

TIES: 4 x 0.65 x 144 = 374.4

374.4/6 = 62.4 ; 63 pcs – 10 mmϕ x 6.00 m

Footings1 = 8 x 2 x 1.20 x 6 = 115.20

115.20/6 = 19.2 = 20; 20 pcs – 16 mmϕ x 6.00 m

Footings2 = 6 x 2 x 1.00 x 144 = 1,728

1728/6 = 288; 288 pcs – 16 mmϕ x 6.00 m

CHB:
Vertical Bars: (10 mmϕ @ 0.60)
= 2(120/0.60) + 2(100/0.60) = 400 + 334 = 734

Height of CHB = 0.80

734 x 0.80 = 587.20

587.20/7.5 = 78.29; 79 pcs – 10 mmϕ x 7.50 m

Horizontal Bars: (12 mmϕ @ 0.60)

2 Layers = 440 x 2 = 880
880/7.5 = 117.33; 118 pcs – 12 mmϕ x 7.50 m

Entrance/ Pedestrian gate:

Cyclone wire:
A = 4 x 2.30 = 9.20 = 10 m2
G.I. pipe = 50 mmϕ x 6.00 m SCH 40
= (4 x 3) + (4 x 2.3) = 12 + 9.2 = 21.2
= 21.2/6 = 3.53 = 4 pcs
4 pcs – 50 mmϕ x 6.00 m G.I. pipe SCH 40
1 pc – 25 mmϕ x 6.00 m G.I. pipe SCH 40

Flat bar = 25 mm x 5 mm x 6 m
= (2.3 x 4) + (4 x 4) = 9.2 + 16 = 25.2
= 25.2/6 = 4.2 = 5 pcs
5 pcs – 25 mm x 5 mm x 6 m

Round bar:
1 pc – 19 mmϕ G.I. Plain bar
1 pc – 20 mmϕ plain round bar

Heavy duty padlock: 1 pc

Materials Cost :

6” CHB = 4,400 pcs x ₱15.00/pc =₱ 66,000.00

Cement = 507 bags x ₱220.00/bag =₱ 111,540.00
Sand = 35 m3 x ₱225.00/m3 =₱ 7,875.00
Gravel = 48 m3 x ₱250.00/m3 =₱ 12,000.00

Rebars:
16 mmϕ x 7.50 m = 11 pcs x ₱313.00/pc =₱ 3,443.00
16 mmϕ x 6.00 m = 481 pcs x ₱250.00/pc =₱ 120,250.00
12 mmϕ x 7.50 m = 129 pcs x ₱189.14/pc =₱ 24,399.06
10 mmϕ x 7.50 m = 79 pcs x ₱123/pc =₱ 9,717.00
10 mmϕ x 6.00 m = 87 pcs x ₱98/pc =₱ 8,526.00

Entrance/Pedestrian Gate:
Cyclone wire = 10 m2 x ₱162.00/m2 =₱ 1,600.00
G.I. Pipe = 50 mm x 6m – 4 pcs x ₱942.50/pc =₱ 3,770.00
= 25 mm x 6m – 1 pcs x ₱467.00/pc =₱ 467.00
Flat Bar = 25 mm x 5 mm x 6 m - 5 pcs x ₱333.00/pc =₱ 1,665.00
Round Bar = 19 mmϕ G.I. Plain bar – 1 pc x ₱595.00/pc =₱ 595.00
= 20 mmϕ Pain bar (round) – 1 pc x ₱662.00/pc =₱ 662.00
Heavy Duty padlock: 1 pc x ₱1,000.00/pc =₱ 1,000.00

Cyclone wire fence A = 836 m 2

= 836 m2 x ₱160.00/m2 = ₱ 133,760.00
G.I. pipe SCH 40: 50 mmϕ x 6m
= 205 pcs x ₱942.50/pc = ₱ 193,212.50
Flat bar: 25 mmϕ x 5 mm x 6m
=245 pcs x ₱333.00/pc =₱ 81.585.00

= ₱ 782,066.56

Materials = ₱782,066.56 = ₱ 782,066.56

Labor (30%) = 0.30(782,066.56) = ₱ 234.619.97
Contingency (5%) = 0.05(782,066.56 + 234.619.97) = ₱ 50,834.33

Total cost = ₱1,067,520.86

Description:

Total cost of Cyclone Wire/ CHB Perimeter wall

= ₱1,067,520.86

Unit Cost / Square Meter = ₱ 1,067,521.00 / 12,000 = ₱ 89.00

Area to be covered = 1.2 hectares = 12,000 m 2

Cyclone wire fence height = 1.90 m
Height of 6” CHB wall from finish ground level (F.G.L.) = 0.40 m
Cyclone wire entrance and pedestrian gate with padlock.
Opening = 4.00 m
Height = 2.30 m
 A
SCAP Scoping Checklist P
P
E
N
D
I
X

4jok\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
 APPENDIX 5. SCAP SCOPING CHECKLIST

Step 1. Is the site Contaminated ? ( Y N M)

• If answer is Y (Yes), Show proof (ESA) and go to question 2.
• If answer is N (No), show proof (ESA or Environmental Sampling Results) and no
site control measures are required. I no proof can be shown, conduct ESA.
• If answer is M (Maybe), conduct an ESA and Proceed to question No. 2.

Step 2. What is/are the COPC/s and concentration/s present on site?

a. Pesticides - Aldrin, Chlordane, Dichlorodiphenyltricloroethane (DDT), Dieldrin,
Endrin, Heptachlor, Hexachlorobenzene (HCB), Mirex and Toxaphene;
b. Industrial Chemicals – HCB, Mirex and COPCs - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (209
congeners),
c. Unintended by-products - Dioxins (75 Congeners), Furans (135 Congeners) and
HCB.

Suggested Matrix to be filled up

Contaminant Concentration Suspected Supporting

Area/Location Documents

Note: If Step 2 is sufficiently answered, Proceed to Step 3. Else, go back to Step 1.

Step 3. Was/were the hotspot/s identified?

• A map delineating the contaminated area within a facility should be shown or
the identified hotspots based on the ESA document and validation sampling.
• Results of analysis can also be attached.

Note: If the hotspots were clearly delineated, proceed to Step 4, else validate ESA.

Step 4. Are there receptors around the identified contaminated site? Specify and
Identify.

Human Receptors
d. Persons visiting or working at the site and its adjacent land-use;
e. Persons living near the site or temporarily living in the site;
f. Construction workers who may be involved in future construction works at the
site.
g. Persons who have access to the possibly COPC contaminated areas

Environmental Receptors
o Soil within the area
o Nearest surface water
 o Groundwater that may be possibly contaminated by COPC

Other Receptors Information

• Receptors coordinates (based on available info) N, S, E, W or Northing /Easting
• Map identifying the receptors (nearest river, nearest communities, neighboring
areas, among others)
• Attached the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) generated rom the ESA study

Note: If Step 4 is answered completely, proceed to Step 5, else validate results of

ESA.

Step 5. Applicable Site Control Measures

Always consider the inverted triangle: Hierarchy of Site Control Measures of a

Contaminated Site, shown below, when developing the site control options.

Proposed Site Control Measures Matrix to be filled up

Type of Site Control Description of Concerned Responsible
Measures Activities/Tasks Receptor Person

Site Control Level 1

Good Housekeeping
Provision of PPEs
Institutional Controls
(DENR EMB to fill up)
Site Control Level 2
Administrative Controls
Engineering Controls
Others
Monitoring