Dicom Standard Part 1
Dicom Standard Part 1
1
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
Page 2
A DICOM® publication
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 3
Table of Contents
Notice and Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................. 7
Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................. 9
1. Scope and Field of Application ............................................................................................................................. 11
1.1. Scope of DICOM ........................................................................................................................................ 11
1.2. Field of Application ..................................................................................................................................... 11
1.3. History ..................................................................................................................................................... 11
1.4. Principles .................................................................................................................................................. 12
1.4.1. Global Applicability and Localization ........................................................................................................ 12
1.4.2. Continuous Maintenance ....................................................................................................................... 12
1.4.3. Information Objects and Unique Object Identification ................................................................................... 13
1.4.4. Conformance ...................................................................................................................................... 13
1.4.5. Consistency of Information Model ............................................................................................................ 13
2. Normative References ....................................................................................................................................... 15
3. Definitions ....................................................................................................................................................... 17
4. Symbols and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................. 19
5. The DICOM Communication Model ....................................................................................................................... 21
6. Overview of The Content of The DICOM Standard ................................................................................................... 23
6.1. Document Structure .................................................................................................................................... 23
6.2. PS3.2: Conformance ................................................................................................................................... 23
6.3. PS3.3: Information Object Definitions .............................................................................................................. 25
6.4. PS3.4: Service Class Specifications ............................................................................................................... 25
6.5. PS3.5: Data Structure and Semantics ............................................................................................................. 25
6.6. PS3.6: Data Dictionary ................................................................................................................................ 26
6.7. PS3.7: Message Exchange ........................................................................................................................... 26
6.8. PS3.8: Network Communication Support For Message Exchange ........................................................................ 26
6.9. PS3.9: Retired (formerly Point-to-point Communication Support For Message Exchange) ......................................... 27
6.10. PS3.10 Media Storage and File Format for Media Interchange ........................................................................... 27
6.11. PS3.11: Media Storage Application Profiles .................................................................................................... 28
6.12. PS3.12: Storage Functions and Media Formats For Data Interchange ................................................................. 29
6.13. PS3.13: Retired (formerly Print Management Point-to-point Communication Support) ............................................. 29
6.14. PS3.14: Grayscale Standard Display Function ................................................................................................ 29
6.15. PS3.15: Security and System Management Profiles ......................................................................................... 29
6.16. PS3.16: Content Mapping Resource ............................................................................................................. 30
6.17. PS3.17: Explanatory Information .................................................................................................................. 30
6.18. PS3.18: Web Services ............................................................................................................................... 30
6.19. PS3.19: Application Hosting ........................................................................................................................ 30
6.20. PS3.20: Imaging Reports using HL7 Clinical Document Architecture ................................................................... 31
6.21. PS3.21: Transformations between DICOM and other Representations ................................................................. 31
6.22. PS3.22: Real-Time Communication (DICOM-RTV) .......................................................................................... 31
7. Referencing The DICOM Standard ....................................................................................................................... 33
- Standard -
Page 4 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 5
List of Figures
5-1. General Communication Model ......................................................................................................................... 22
6.2-1. Construction Process for a Network Conformance Claim ...................................................................................... 24
6.2-2. Construction Process for a Media Conformance Claim ........................................................................................ 24
6.10-1. DICOM Communication Model for Media Interchange ........................................................................................ 28
6.11-1. Relationship Between an Application Profile and Parts of DICOM ......................................................................... 29
6.19-1. Interface Between a Hosted Application and a Hosting System ............................................................................ 30
6.19-2. Illustration of Platform Independence via the Hosted Application .......................................................................... 31
- Standard -
Page 6 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 7
NEMA standards and guideline publications, of which the document contained herein is one, are developed through a voluntary
consensus standards development process. This process brings together volunteers and/or seeks out the views of persons who have
an interest in the topic covered by this publication. While NEMA administers the process and establishes rules to promote fairness
in the development of consensus, it does not write the document and it does not independently test, evaluate, or verify the accuracy
or completeness of any information or the soundness of any judgments contained in its standards and guideline publications.
NEMA disclaims liability for any personal injury, property, or other damages of any nature whatsoever, whether special, indirect,
consequential, or compensatory, directly or indirectly resulting from the publication, use of, application, or reliance on this document.
NEMA disclaims and makes no guaranty or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of any information
published herein, and disclaims and makes no warranty that the information in this document will fulfill any of your particular purposes
or needs. NEMA does not undertake to guarantee the performance of any individual manufacturer or seller's products or services by
virtue of this standard or guide.
In publishing and making this document available, NEMA is not undertaking to render professional or other services for or on behalf
of any person or entity, nor is NEMA undertaking to perform any duty owed by any person or entity to someone else. Anyone using
this document should rely on his or her own independent judgment or, as appropriate, seek the advice of a competent professional
in determining the exercise of reasonable care in any given circumstances. Information and other standards on the topic covered by
this publication may be available from other sources, which the user may wish to consult for additional views or information not covered
by this publication.
NEMA has no power, nor does it undertake to police or enforce compliance with the contents of this document. NEMA does not cer-
tify, test, or inspect products, designs, or installations for safety or health purposes. Any certification or other statement of compliance
with any health or safety-related information in this document shall not be attributable to NEMA and is solely the responsibility of the
certifier or maker of the statement.
- Standard -
Page 8 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 9
Foreword
The DICOM Standards Committee is an independent, international standards development organization comprising biomedical pro-
fessional societies whose specialties include the use of medical imaging, manufacturers of medical imaging equipment and related
information systems, and government agencies, trade associations, and other standards development organizations with an interest
in standardization of medical imaging information and related data. Membership is open to all organizations with a material interest
in the work of the Committee. The Committee collaborates closely with other standards development organizations in the fields of
Healthcare Informatics and Electrical Equipment in Medical Practice. The Secretariat of the Committee is the National Electrical
Manufacturers Association and its Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance division.
The principal product of the Committee is this Standard, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM).
This DICOM Standard was developed according to the procedures of the DICOM Standards Committee.
The DICOM Standard is structured as a multi-part document using the guidelines established in [ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2].
The Standard is published as NEMA Standard PS3, and its Parts are identified by the numbering of the NEMA publication (PS3.1,
PS3.2, etc.).
DICOM® is the registered trademark of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association for its standards publications relating to di-
gital communications of medical information, all rights reserved.
HL7® and CDA® are the registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International, all rights reserved.
SNOMED®, SNOMED Clinical Terms®, SNOMED CT® are the registered trademarks of the International Health Terminology
Standards Development Organisation (IHTSDO), all rights reserved.
LOINC® is the registered trademark of Regenstrief Institute, Inc, all rights reserved.
- Standard -
Page 10 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 11
• For network communications, a set of protocols to be followed by devices claiming conformance to the Standard.
• The syntax and semantics of Commands and associated information that can be exchanged using these protocols.
• For media communication, a set of media storage services to be followed by devices claiming conformance to the Standard, as
well as a File Format and a medical directory structure to facilitate access to the images and related information stored on interchange
media.
• Information that must be supplied with an implementation for which conformance to the Standard is claimed.
• The implementation details of any features of the Standard on a device claiming conformance.
• The overall set of features and functions to be expected from a system implemented by integrating a group of devices each claiming
DICOM conformance.
This Standard has been developed with an emphasis on diagnostic medical imaging as practiced in radiology, cardiology, pathology,
dentistry, ophthalmology and related disciplines, and image-based therapies such as interventional radiology, radiotherapy and surgery.
However, it is also applicable to a wide range of image and non-image related information exchanged in clinical, research, veterinary,
and other medical environments.
This Standard facilitates interoperability of systems claiming conformance in a multi-vendor environment, but does not, by itself,
guarantee interoperability.
1.3 History
With the introduction of computed tomography (CT) followed by other digital diagnostic imaging modalities in the 1970's, and the in-
creasing use of computers in clinical applications, the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the National Electrical Manufacturers
Association (NEMA) recognized the emerging need for a standard method for transferring images and associated information between
devices manufactured by various vendors. These devices produce a variety of digital image formats.
The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) formed a joint committee
in 1983 to develop a standard to:
• Facilitate the development and expansion of picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) that can also interface with
other systems of hospital information
- Standard -
Page 12 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
• Allow the creation of diagnostic information data bases that can be interrogated by a wide variety of devices distributed geograph-
ically.
ACR-NEMA Standards Publication No. 300-1985, published in 1985 was designated version 1.0. The Standard was followed by two
revisions: No. 1, dated October 1986 and No. 2, dated January 1988. These Standards Publications specified a hardware interface,
a minimum set of software commands, and a consistent set of data formats.
ACR-NEMA Standards Publication No. 300-1988, published in 1988 was designated version 2.0. It included version 1.0, the published
revisions, and additional revisions. It also included new material to provide command support for display devices, to introduce a new
hierarchy scheme to identify an image, and to add data elements for increased specificity when describing an image.
In 1993, ACR-NEMA Standard 300 was substantially revised and replaced by this Standard, designated Digital Imaging and Commu-
nications in Medicine (DICOM). It embodies a number of major enhancements to previous versions of the ACR-NEMA Standard:
• It is applicable to a networked environment. The ACR-NEMA Standard was applicable in a point-to-point environment only; for op-
eration in a networked environment a Network Interface Unit (NIU) was required. DICOM supports operation in a networked envir-
onment using the industry standard networking protocol TCP/IP.
• It is applicable to off-line media exchange. The ACR-NEMA Standard did not specify a file format or choice of physical media or
logical filesystem. DICOM supports operation in an off-line media environment using industry standard media such as CD-R, DVD-
R and USB and common file systems.
• It is a service oriented protocol, specifying the semantics of commands and associated data, and how devices claiming conformance
to the Standard react to commands and data being exchanged. Specified services include support for management of the workflow
of an imaging department. The ACR-NEMA Standard was confined to the transfer of data with only implicit service requirements.
• It specifies levels of conformance. The ACR-NEMA Standard specified a minimum level of conformance. DICOM explicitly describes
how an implementor must structure a Conformance Statement to select specific options.
In 1995, with the addition of DICOM capabilities for cardiology imaging supported by the American College of Cardiology, the ACR-
NEMA Joint Committee was reorganized as the DICOM Standards Committee, a broad collaboration of stakeholders across all
medical imaging specialties.
1.4 Principles
1.4.1 Global Applicability and Localization
DICOM is a world-wide standard that can be used in every locale. It provides mechanisms to handle data that support cultural require-
ments, such as different writing systems, character sets, languages, and structures for addresses and person names. It supports the
variety of workflows, processes and policies used for biomedical imaging in different geographic regions, medical specialties and
local practices.
Localization to meet the requirements of national or local health and workflow policies can be done without deviating from the
Standard. Such localization may include specifying code sets (e.g., procedure codes), or profiling data element usage (both specifying
locally allowed values, and making elements that are optional in the Standard mandatory for local use).
Localization and profiling can be specified in a number of mechanisms outside the purview of the DICOM Standard. One such
mechanism is Integration Profiles from the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) organization. It is important that Profiling adhere
to the concept of non-contradiction. A Profile can add requirements but should not contradict DICOM requirements, as that would
make it impossible to comply with both DICOM and the Profile.
A requirement in updating the Standard is to maintain effective compatibility with previous editions.
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 13
Retirement does not imply that these features cannot be used. However, the DICOM Standards Committee will not maintain the
documentation of retired features. The reader is referred to earlier editions of the Standard.
The use of the retired features is discouraged for new implementations, in favor of those alternatives remaining in the Standard.
Each instance is identified by a globally unique object identifier, which persists with the instance across all exchanges. Changes to
the semantic content of an instance are defined to create a new instance, which is assigned a new globally unique object identifier.
1.4.4 Conformance
Conformance to the DICOM Standard is stated in terms of Service-Object Pair (SOP) Classes, which represent Services (such as
Storage using network, media, or web) operating on types of Information Objects (such as CT or MR images).
SOP Class specifications in the DICOM Standard are only changed in a manner that is intended to be forward and backward compatible
for all editions of the Standard. Conformance requirements and conformance claims are therefore referenced to the identifier of the
SOP Class, and never referenced to an edition of the Standard.
Each implementation is required to provide a Conformance Statement, in accordance with a consistent pro forma structure, facilitating
comparison of products for interoperability.
New information objects defined in DICOM will typically conform to this existing common information model, allowing reuse of imple-
mentations with minimal changes to support the new objects.
- Standard -
Page 14 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 15
2 Normative References
[ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2] ISO/IEC. 2016/05. 7.0. Rules for the structure and drafting of International Standards. http://www.iec.ch/
members_experts/refdocs/iec/isoiecdir-2%7Bed7.0%7Den.pdf .
[EBU-SMPTE-VSF JT-NM Phase 2 Report] , , and . 2015. v1.0. Joint Task Force on Networked Media (JT-NM) Phase 2 Report-
Reference Architecture. https://static.jt-nm.org/RA-1.0/JT-NMReferenceArchitecturev1.0%20150904%20FINAL.pdf .
[ISO/IEC 8822] ISO/IEC. 1994. Information Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Connection Oriented Presentation
Service Definition.
[ISO/IEC 8649] ISO/IEC. 1996. Information Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Service Definition for the Association
Control Service Element. Withdrawn 2012. .
[SMPTE ST 2110-10] Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE). 2017. Professional Media over IP Networks:
System Timing and Definitions.
[SMPTE ST 2110-20] Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE). 2017. Professional Media over IP Networks:
Uncompressed Active Video.
[SMPTE ST 2110-30] Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE). 2017. Professional Media over IP Networks:
PCM Digital Audio.
- Standard -
Page 16 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 17
3 Definitions
Attribute A property of an Information Object. An Attribute has a name and a value that are independent
of any encoding scheme.
Command Element An encoding of a parameter of a command that conveys this parameter's value.
Command Stream The result of encoding a set of DICOM Command Elements using the DICOM encoding scheme.
Conformance Statement A formal statement that describes a specific implementation of the DICOM Standard. It specifies
the Service Classes, Information Objects, Communication Protocols, Security Profiles, and Media
Storage Application Profiles supported by the implementation.
Data Dictionary A registry of DICOM Data Elements that assigns a unique tag, a name, value characteristics,
and semantics to each Data Element.
Data Element A unit of information as defined by a single entry in the data dictionary.
Data Set Exchanged information consisting of a structured set of Attributes. The value of each Attribute in
a Data Set is expressed as a Data Element.
Data Stream The result of encoding a Data Set using the DICOM encoding scheme (Data Element Numbers
and representations as specified by the Data Dictionary).
Information Object An abstraction of a real information entity (e.g., CT Image, Structured Report, etc.) that is acted
upon by one or more DICOM Commands.
Note
This term is primarily used in PS3.1, with a few references in PS3.3. It is an informal
term corresponding to a formal term that is introduced in PS3.3. In all other parts of the
DICOM Standard this formal term is known as an Information Object Definition.
Information Object Class A formal description of an Information Object, which includes a description of its purpose and the
Attributes it possesses. It does not include values for these attributes.
Note
This term is only used in PS3.1. It is an informal term corresponding to a formal term
that is introduced in PS3.4. This formal term is known as a Service-Object Pair Class
or more commonly as a SOP Class.
Information Object Instance A representation of an occurrence of a real-world entity, which includes values for the Attributes
of the Information Object Class to which the entity belongs.
Note
This term is only used in PS3.1. It is an informal term corresponding to a formal term
that is introduced in PS3.4. This formal term is known as a Service-Object Pair Instance
or more commonly as a SOP Instance.
Message A data unit of the Message Exchange Protocol exchanged between two cooperating DICOM
Applications. A Message is composed of a Command Stream followed by an optional Data
Stream.
Part Subdivision of the DICOM Standard that covers related subject material.
Service Class A structured description of a service that is supported by cooperating DICOM Applications using
specific DICOM Commands acting on a specific class of Information Object.
- Standard -
Page 18 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
Service-Object Pair Class (SOP The pair of an Information Object and either a DIMSE Service Group, a Media Storage Service,
Class) or a Web Service.
Essence Video, audio or data type of source, as defined in [EBU-SMPTE-VSF JT-NM Phase 2 Report].
Flow A sequence of Grains from a Source; a concrete representation of content emanating from the
Source, as defined in [EBU-SMPTE-VSF JT-NM Phase 2 Report].
Grain Represents an element of Essence or other data associated with a specific time, such as a frame,
or a group of consecutive audio samples, or captions, as defined in [EBU-SMPTE-VSF JT-NM
Phase 2 Report].
Source An abstract concept that represents the primary origin of a Flow or set of Flows, as defined in
[EBU-SMPTE-VSF JT-NM Phase 2 Report].
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 19
RESTful A RESTful Web service is a Web service implemented using REST architecture and HTTP (see http://www.ics.uci.edu/
~fielding/pubs/dissertation/fielding_dissertation.pdf)
- Standard -
Page 20 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 21
• Addresses the semantics of Commands and associated data. For devices to interact, there must be standards on how devices are
expected to react to Commands and associated data, not just the information that is to be moved between devices.
• Addresses the semantics of file services, file formats and information directories necessary for off-line communication.
• Is explicit in defining the conformance requirements of implementations of the Standard. In particular, a conformance statement
must specify enough information to determine the functions for which interoperability can be expected with another device claiming
conformance.
• Is structured to accommodate the introduction of new services, thus facilitating support for future medical imaging applications.
• Makes use of existing international standards wherever applicable, and itself conforms to established documentation guidelines
for international standards.
Figure 5-1 presents the general communication model of the Standard, which spans both network (on-line) and media storage inter-
change (off-line) communication. Applications may utilize any of the following transport mechanisms:
• the DICOM Message Service and Upper Layer Service, which provides independence from specific physical networking commu-
nication support and protocols such as TCP/IP.
• the DICOM Web Service API and HTTP Service, which allows use of common hypertext and associated protocols for transport of
DICOM services
• the Basic DICOM File Service, which provides access to Storage Media independently from specific media storage formats and
file structures
• DICOM Real-Time Communication, which provides real-time transport of DICOM metadata based on SMPTE and RTP.
- Standard -
Page 22 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
Medical Images
and related information
Security Layer
DICOM Upper Layer HTTP RTP
(Optional)
<FILE>
<FIELD>
...
TCP/IP Transport Layer TCP/IP Transport Layer UDP Transport Layer ...
<FIELD>
</FILE>
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 23
• PS3.2: Conformance
• PS3.9: Retired
• PS3.13: Retired
These parts of the Standard are related but independent documents. A brief description of each Part is provided in this section.
• Conformance requirements. PS3.2 specifies the general requirements that must be met by any implementation claiming conformance.
It references the conformance sections of other parts of the Standard.
- Standard -
Page 24 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
• Conformance Statement. PS3.2 defines the structure of a Conformance Statement. It specifies the information that must be present
in a Conformance Statement. It references the Conformance Statement sections of other parts of the Standard.
PS3.2 does not specify a testing/validation procedure to assess an implementation's conformance to the Standard.
Figure 6.2-1 and Figure 6.2-2 depict the construction process for a Conformance Statement for both network communication and
media exchange. A Conformance Statement consists of the following parts:
DICOM Conformance
Statement Document
PS3.14 PS3.16
Grayscale Standard Content Mapping Implementation
Display Function Resource Model
PS3.15 PS3.8
Network
Communication
Security Profiles Communications
Stack
Support
Security Measures
DICOM Conformance
Statement Document
PS3.14 PS3.16
Grayscale Standard Content Mapping Implementation
Display Function Resource Model
Security Measures
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 25
Two types of Information Object Classes are defined: normalized and composite.
Normalized Information Object Classes include only those Attributes inherent in the real-world entity represented. For example the
study Information Object Class, which is defined as normalized, contains study date and study time Attributes because they are inherent
in an actual study. Patient name, however, is not an Attribute of the study Information Object Class because it is inherent in the patient
on which the study was performed and not the study itself.
Composite Information Object Classes may additionally include Attributes that are related to but not inherent in the real-world entity.
For example, the Computed Tomography Image Information Object Class, which is defined as composite, contains both Attributes
that are inherent in the image (e.g., image date) and Attributes that are related to but not inherent in the image (e.g., patient name).
Composite Information Object Classes provide a structured framework for expressing the communication requirements of images
where image data and related data needs to be closely associated.
To simplify the Information Object Class definitions, the Attributes of each Information Object Class are partitioned with similar Attributes
being grouped together. These groupings of Attributes are specified as independent modules and may be reused by other Composite
Information Object Classes.
PS3.3 defines a model of the Real World along with the corresponding Information Model that is reflected in the Information Object
Definitions. Future editions of this Standard may extend this set of Information Objects to support new functionality.
To represent an occurrence of a real-world entity, an Information Object Instance is created, which includes values for the Attributes
of the Information Object Class. The Attribute values of this Information Object Instance may change over time to accurately reflect
the changing state of the entity that it represents. This is accomplished by performing different basic operations upon the Information
Object Instance to render a specific set of services defined as a Service Class. These Service Classes are defined in PS3.4 of the
Standard.
PS3.4 of the DICOM Standard defines the characteristics shared by all Service Classes, and how a Conformance Statement to an
individual Service Class is structured. It contains a number of normative annexes that describe individual Service Classes in detail.
PS3.4 defines the operations performed upon the Information Objects defined in PS3.3. PS3.7 defines the Commands and protocols
for using the Commands to accomplish the operations and notifications described in PS3.4.
- Standard -
Page 26 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
PS3.5 addresses the encoding rules necessary to construct a Data Stream to be conveyed in a Message as specified in PS3.7 of
the DICOM Standard. This Data Stream is produced from the collection of Data Elements making up the Data Set.
PS3.5 also defines the semantics of a number of generic functions that are common to many Information Objects. PS3.5 defines the
encoding rules for international character sets used within DICOM.
• its name,
• whether it is retired.
• its unique value, which is numeric with multiple components separated by decimal points and limited to 64 characters,
• its name,
• its type, either Information Object Class, definition of encoding for data transfer, or certain well known Information Object Instances,
PS3.7 specifies:
• the operations and notifications (DIMSE Services) made available to Service Classes defined in PS3.4,
• rules to establish and terminate associations provided by the communications support specified in PS3.8, and the impact on out-
standing transactions,
The communication services specified in PS3.8 are a proper subset of the services offered by the OSI Presentation Service (ISO
8822) and of the OSI Association Control Service Element (ACSE) (ISO 8649). They are referred to as the Upper Layer Service,
which allows peer applications to establish associations, transfer messages and terminate associations.
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 27
This definition of the Upper Layer Service specifies the use of the DICOM Upper Layer Protocol in conjunction with TCP/IP transport
protocols.
The TCP/IP communication protocol specified by PS3.8 is a general purpose communication protocol not specific to the DICOM
Standard. Figure 5-1 shows this protocol stack.
6.10 PS3.10 Media Storage and File Format for Media Interchange
PS3.10 of the DICOM Standard specifies a general model for the storage of medical imaging information on removable media (see
Figure 6.10-1). The purpose of this Part is to provide a framework allowing the interchange of various types of medical images and
related information on a broad range of physical storage media.
Note
See Figure 5-1 for understanding how the media interchange model relates to the network model.
PS3.10 specifies:
• a layered model for the storage of medical images and related information on storage media. This model introduces the concept
of media storage application profiles, which specify application specific subsets of the DICOM Standard to which a media storage
implementation may claim conformance. Such a conformance applies only to the writing, reading and updating of the content of
storage media.
• a secure DICOM file format supporting the encapsulation of a DICOM file format in a cryptographic envelope;
• a DICOM file service providing independence from the underlying media format and physical media.
• the method for naming a DICOM file within a specific file system.
- Standard -
Page 28 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
Medical Images
and related information
Media Interchange
BOUNDARY:
DICOM Basic File Service
Security Layer
(Optional)
<FILE>
<FIELD>
...
...
<FIELD>
</FILE>
• The name of the Application Profile, or the list of Application Profiles grouped in a related class
• The definition of the media storage Service Class with the device roles for the Application Profile and associated options
• Specification of the Information Object Classes and associated Information Objects supported and the encoding to be used for the
data transfer
• Security parameters that select the cryptographic techniques to be used with secure media storage Application Profiles
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 29
The structure of DICOM and the design of the Application Profile mechanism is such that extension to additional Information Object
Classes and the new exchange media is straightforward.
Note
Figure 6.11-1 shows how individual aspects of an Application profile map to the various parts of the DICOM Standard.
PS3.3
PS3.4
PS3.5
Data Structure and
Transfer Syntax Semantics
PS3.10
Media Storage and File
File Format, Directory Format for Data Interchange
PS3.12
Media Formats and Physical
Medium Format, Physical Medium Media for Data Interchange
PS3.15
6.12 PS3.12: Storage Functions and Media Formats For Data Interchange
PS3.12 of the DICOM Standard facilitates the interchange of information between applications in medical environments by specifying:
• A structure for describing the relationship between the media storage model and a specific physical media and media format.
The chosen display function is based on human visual perception. Human eye contrast sensitivity is distinctly non-linear within the
luminance range of display devices. This Standard uses Barten's model of the human visual system.
- Standard -
Page 30 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
TLS and ISCL. Security protocols may use security techniques like public keys and "smart cards". Data encryption can use various
standardized data encryption schemes.
This Part does not address issues of security policies. The Standard only provides mechanisms that can be used to implement security
policies with regard to the interchange of DICOM objects. It is the local administrator's responsibility to establish appropriate security
policies.
Requests that retrieve data specify the media type (format) of the response body. Requests that store data specify the media type of
the request body.
The HTTP requests as defined within this Standard are sufficient for the HTTP server to act as a DICOM SCU (Service Class User)
to retrieve or store the requested objects from an appropriate DICOM SCP (Service Class Provider) using baseline DICOM function-
ality as defined in PS3.4 and PS3.7, which is to say that the HTTP server can act as a proxy for the DICOM SCP.
API (Socket)
API (Plug)
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 31
PS3.20 constitutes an implementation guide for CDA, and is harmonized with the approach to standardized templates for CDA imple-
mentation guides developed by HL7. It also provides Business Names for data elements that link data in user terminology, e.g., col-
lected by a report authoring application, to specific CDA encoded elements.
As an implementation guide for imaging reports, particular attention is given to the use and reference of data collected in imaging
procedures as explicit evidence within reports. This data includes images, waveforms, measurements, annotations, and other analytic
results managed as DICOM SOP Instances. Specifically, this Part includes a specification for transformation into CDA documents of
DICOM Structured Report instances that represent imaging reports.
- Standard -
Page 32 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
- Standard -
DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview Page 33
Conformance to the DICOM Standard is through specified SOP Classes using DIMSE messages (see PS3.4), Web Services (see
PS3.18), media interchange (see Annex I “Media Storage Service Class (Normative)” in PS3.4 and PS3.10), or the hosted application
API (see PS3.19). Additional conformance claims may be made to Profiles (see PS3.11 and PS3.15). Once such a unit of conformance
is specified in the Standard, all changes thereto are forward and backward compatible (except in rare cases where the original spe-
cification was non-interoperable, or conflicted with another standard). Conformance requirements and conformance claims are
therefore referenced to the name and/or identifier of the feature, and never referenced to an edition of the Standard. Generally, the
only appropriate reference to a particular edition of the Standard is to identify a retired feature (see Section 1.4.2 Continuous Main-
tenance).
The following citation form is preferred for general references to the Standard, without specification of date of edition, when specific
conformance requirements are not invoked:
NEMA PS3 / ISO 12052, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Standard, National Electrical Manufacturers
Association, Rosslyn, VA, USA (available free at http://www.dicomstandard.org/)
The requirements of this section do not override the requirement to provide a DICOM Conformance Statement as described in PS3.2.
The following forms are preferred for references to units of conformance to the Standard when they are made outside the context of
a DICOM Conformance Statement (e.g., in customer requirements):
• “… conformant to the DICOM <name> SOP Class for network exchange [as a Service Class <User | Provider>], as specified in
DICOM PS3.4: Service Class Specifications.”
• “… conformant to the DICOM <name> SOP Class for media exchange [as a File Set <Creator | Updater | Reader>], as specified
in DICOM PS3.4: Service Class Specifications.”
• “… conformant to the DICOM <name> Web Service [as <an Origin-server | a User-agent>] [for the <name> SOP Class], as specified
in DICOM PS3.18: Web Services.”
• “… conformant to DICOM Application Hosting [as a <Hosting System | Hosted Application>] for the <name> SOP Class, as specified
in DICOM PS3.19: Application Hosting.”
• “… conformant to the DICOM <identifier> Application Profile [as a File Set <Creator | Updater | Reader>] [for the <name> SOP
Class], as specified in DICOM PS3.11: Media Storage Application Profiles.”
• “… conformant to the DICOM <name> Profile, as specified in DICOM PS3.15: Security and System Management Profiles.”
Note
1. Some Application Profiles and Web Services may fully specify the information objects exchanged, while others may
require explicit specification of SOP Classes in the references.
2. Examples:
• “The modality shall be conformant to the DICOM CT Image Storage and MR Image Storage SOP Classes for network
exchange as a Service Class User, as specified in DICOM PS3.4: Service Class Specifications.”
• “The workstation shall be conformant to the DICOM STD-XA1K-DVD Application Profile as a File Set Reader, as
specified in DICOM PS3.11: Media Storage Application Profiles.”
• “The PACS shall be conformant to the DICOM WADO-RS and STOW-RS Web Services as an Origin-server for the
SOP Classes listed in Table X, as specified in DICOM PS3.18: Web Services.”
- Standard -
Page 34 DICOM PS3.1 2023d - Introduction and Overview
3. Such references are not permitted in lieu of a Conformance Statement for a product. For example, a product that reads
or creates DICOM interchange media is required to have a Conformance Statement (as described in PS3.2) that enu-
merates the Media Application Profiles it implements. A statement in some other format, or a document that describes
that a product supports recording of files of a particular SOP Class defined in PS3.4, is not sufficient as an alternative
to a Conformance Statement.
Reference may be made to other features of the Standard, but these shall not be construed as DICOM conformance requirements
(although they may be conformance requirements for non-DICOM implementation guides or regulations). Following are some examples:
• “… SOP Instances in accordance with the <name> Information Object Definition, as specified in DICOM PS3.3: Information Object
Definitions.”
• “… Structured Reporting SOP Instances using DICOM Template ID <number and name>, as specified in DICOM PS3.16: Content
Mapping Resource.”
• “… HL7 CDA instances using Template ID <identifier and name>, as specified in DICOM PS3.20: Imaging Reports using HL7
Clinical Document Architecture.”
• “… using the <name> Transfer Syntax, as specified in DICOM PS3.5: Data Structure and Semantics.”
Note
For example, products producing or receiving SR documents must conform to a SOP Class, such as Enhanced SR; such
products may also cite use of Template ID 5200 Echocardiography Procedure Report, but that is not a formal DICOM Con-
formance assertion. However, a non-DICOM implementation guide, such as the IHE Echocardiography Workflow Profile,
may require use of that Template, and an implementation may describe its use of specific Templates in its Conformance
Statement.
Since changes to the Standard shall not be cited prior to adoption as Final Text, and since after adoption they are formally part of the
Standard, there should be no citations to supplements or correction items for the purpose of describing conformance. Reference to
such change documents may be made for describing the historical development of the DICOM Standard.
- Standard -