Fracture
Fracture
CHAPTER THREE
INTRODUCTION
Types of Failure :
- Simple fracture :-
Ductile fracture
Brittle fracture
- Fatigue Failure
- Creep
1. Simple Fracture :
Simple fracture can be defined as is the separation of a body into two or
more pieces in response to an imposed stress that is static (i.e., constant or
slowly changing with time). The applied stress may be tensile,
compressive, shear, or torsional .
Ductile Fracture :
Ductile fracture surfaces will have their own distinctive features on both
macroscopic and microscopic levels. Figure (3.1) shows schematic
representations for two characteristic macroscopic fracture profiles. The
configuration shown in Figure (3.1a) is found for extremely soft metals,
such as pure gold and lead at room temperature, and other metals,
polymers, and inorganic glasses at elevated temperatures. These highly
ductile materials neck down to a point fracture, showing virtually 100%
reduction in area.
The most common type of tensile fracture profile for ductile metals is that
represented in Figure 3.1b, where fracture is preceded by only a moderate
amount of necking. The fracture process normally occurs in several stages
(Figure 3.2). First, after necking begins, small cavities, or micro voids,
form in the interior of the cross section, as indicated in Figure (3.2b). Next,
as deformation continues, these micro voids enlarge, come together, and
coalesce to form an elliptical crack, which has its long axis perpendicular
to the stress direction. The crack continues to grow in a direction parallel
to its major axis by this micro void coalescence process (Figure 3.2c).
Finally, fracture ensues by the rapid propagation of a crack around the
outer perimeter of the neck (Figure 3.2d), by shear deformation at an angle
of about °45 with the tensile axis—this is the angle at which the shear
stress is a maximum. Sometimes a fracture having this characteristic
surface contour is termed a cup-and-cone fracture because one of the
mating surfaces is in the form of a cup, the other like a cone. In this type of
fractured specimen (Figure 3.3a), the central interior region of the surface
has an irregular and fibrous appearance, which is indicative of plastic
deformation.
Figure(3.3): (a) Cup-and-cone fracture in aluminum. (b) Brittle fracture in a mild steel.
A ductile fracture surface has a dull, fibrous appearance and often resembles a ―
cup and cone ― configuration .
Brittle Fracture :
Brittle fracture takes place without any appreciable deformation, and by
rapid crack propagation. The direction of crack motion is very nearly
perpendicular to the direction of the applied tensile stress and yields a
relatively flat fracture surface, as indicated in Figure (3.1c.).
3.4b.
In some alloys, crack propagation is along grain boundaries (Figure 3.5a);
this fracture is termed intergranular. Figure 3.5b is a scanning electron
Stress Concentration
The measured fracture strengths for most brittle materials are significantly
lower than those predicted by theoretical calculations based on atomic
bonding energies.
This discrepancy is explained by the presence of very small, microscopic
flaws or cracks that always exist under normal conditions at the surface
and within the interior of a body of material. These flaws are a detriment
to the fracture strength because an applied stress may be amplified or
concentrated at the tip, the magnitude of this amplification depending on
crack orientation and geometry. This phenomenon is demonstrated in
Figure 3.6, a stress profile across a cross section containing an internal
crack. As indicated by this profile, the magnitude of this localized stress
diminishes with distance away from the crack tip. At positions far
removed, the stress is just the nominal stress or the applied load divided by
the specimen cross-sectional area (perpendicular to this load). Due to their
ability to amplify an applied stress in their locale, these flaws are
sometimes called stress raisers.
Figure(3.6) : (a) The geometry of surface and internal cracks. (b) Schematic stress profile
along the line X–X in (a), demonstrating stress amplification at crack tip positions.
where
: is the magnitude of the nominal applied tensile stress,
𝜌t : is the radius of curvature of the crack tip (Figure 3.6a),
and a : represents the length of a surface crack, or half of the length of an internal
crack.
Sometimes the ratio is denoted as the stress concentration factor (Kt )
Where:
E = modulus of elasticity
All brittle materials contain a population of small cracks and flaws that
have a variety of sizes, geometries, and orientations. When the magnitude
of a tensile stress at the tip of one of these flaws exceeds the value of this
critical stress, a crack forms and then propagates, which results in fracture.
Ductile-to-Brittle Transition:
Figure(3.7): Temperature
dependence of the Charpy V-
notch impact energy
(curve A) and percent shear
fracture (curve B)
for an A283 steel.
From figure (3.8) , may be noted that low-strength FCC metals (some
aluminum and copper alloys) and most HCP metals do not experience a
ductile-to-brittle transition (corresponding to the upper curve of Figure
3.8), and retain high impact energies (i.e., remain ductile) with decreasing
temperature. For high-strength materials (e.g., high-strength steels and
titanium alloys), the impact energy is also relatively insensitive to
temperature (the lower curve of Figure 3.8); however, these materials are
also very brittle, as reflected by their low impact energy values. And, of
course, the characteristic ductile-to-brittle transition is represented by the
middle curve of Figure 3.8. As noted, this behavior is typically found in
low-strength steels that have the BCC crystal structure.
For these low-strength steels, the transition temperature is sensitive to both
alloy composition and microstructure. For example, decreasing the
average grain size results in a lowering of the transition temperature.
Hence, refining the grain size both strengthens and toughens steels. In
contrast, increasing the carbon content, while increasing the strength of
steels, also raises the CVN transition of steels, as indicated in Figure 3.9.
CYCLIC STRESSES
The applied stress may be axial (tension-compression), flexural (bending),
or torsional (twisting) in nature. In general, three different fluctuating
stress–time modes are possible.
One is represented schematically by a regular and sinusoidal time
dependence in Figure 3.10 a, wherein the amplitude is symmetrical about a
mean zero stress level, for example, alternating from a maximum tensile
stress ( max) to a minimum compressive stress ( min) of equal magnitude;
this is referred to as a reversed stress cycle.
Computation of
range of stress for
cyclic loading
Computation of
stress amplitude for
cyclic loading
Finally, the stress ratio( R) is just the ratio of minimum and maximum stress
amplitudes:
Computation of
stress ratio
By convention, tensile stresses are positive and compressive stresses are negative.
For example, for the reversed stress cycle, the value of R is ( -1) .
Figure 3.11 Schematic diagram of fatigue-testing apparatus for making rotating bending
tests.
Two distinct types of S–N behavior are observed, which are represented
schematically in Figure 3.11. As these plots indicate, the higher the
magnitude of the stress, the smaller the number of cycles the material is
capable of sustaining before failure. For some ferrous (iron base) and
titanium alloys, the S–N curve (Figure 3.11) becomes horizontal at higher
N values; or there is a limiting stress level, called the fatigue limit (also
sometimes the endurance limit), below which fatigue failure will not
occur.
This fatigue limit represents the largest value of fluctuating stress that
will not cause failure for essentially an infinite number of cycles.
For many steels, fatigue limits range between 35% and 60% of the tensile
strength. Most nonferrous alloys (e.g., aluminum, copper, magnesium) do
not have a fatigue limit, in that the S–N curve continues its downward
trend at increasingly greater N values (Figure 3.12). Thus, fatigue will
ultimately occur regardless of the magnitude of the stress. For these
materials, the fatigue response is specified as fatigue strength, which is
defined as the stress level at which failure will occur for some specified
number of cycles (e.g., 107cycles). The determination of fatigue strength
is also demonstrated in Figure 3.12.
Another important parameter that characterizes a material’s fatigue
behavior is fatigue life It is the number of cycles to cause failure at a
specified stress level, as taken from the S–N plot (Figure 3.12).
Figure(3.12): Stress amplitude (S) versus logarithm of the number of cycles to fatigue
failure (N) a material that does not display a fatigue limit.
stress concentration;
(2) crack propagation, during which this crack advances incrementally
with each stress cycle; and
(3) final failure, which occurs very rapidly once the advancing crack has
reached a critical size. Cracks associated with fatigue failure almost
always initiate (or nucleate) on the surface of a component at some point
of stress concentration.
Crack nucleation sites include surface scratches, sharp fillets, keyways,
threads, dents, and the like. In addition, cyclic loading can produce
microscopic surface discontinuities resulting from dislocation slip steps
that may also act as stress raisers, and therefore as crack initiation sites.
The region of a fracture surface that formed during the crack propagation
step may be characterized by two types of markings termed beach marks
and striations.
Both of these features indicate the position of the crack tip at some point in
time and appear as concentric ridges that expand away from the crack
initiation site(s), frequently in a circular or semicircular pattern. Beach
marks are of macroscopic dimensions (Figure 3.13), and may be observed
with the unaided eye. These markings are found for components that
experienced interruptions during the crack propagation stage—for
example, a machine that operated only during normal work-shift hours.
Each beach mark band represents a period of time over which crack
growth occurred.
Figure(3.13):Fracture surface of a
rotating steel shaft that experienced
fatigue failure.
Beachmark ridges are visible in the
photograph.
Often the cause of failure may be deduced after examination of the failure
surfaces. The presence of beach marks and/or striations on a fracture
surface confirms that the cause of failure was fatigue. Nevertheless, the
absence of either or both does not exclude fatigue as the cause of failure.
We can recognize the beach mark and rapid fracture area from figure (3.14)
Rapid failure may be either ductile or brittle; evidence of plastic deformation will
be present for ductile, and absent for brittle, failure. This region of failure may be
noted in Figure 3.15.
Fatigue (3.15):
failure surface. A crack
formed at the top edge.
The smooth region also
near the top corresponds
to the area over which the
crack propagated slowly.
Rapid failure occurred
over the area having a
dull and fibrous texture
(the largest area).
Mean Stress
The dependence of fatigue life on stress amplitude is represented on the S–
N plot. Such data are taken for a constant mean stress m, often for the
reversed cycle situation ( m = 0 ). Mean stress, however, will also affect
fatigue life; this influence may be represented by a series of S–N curves,
each measured at a different as depicted schematically in Figure 3.16 As
may be noted, increasing the mean stress level leads to a decrease in
fatigue life.
Figure 3.16: Demonstration of the influence of mean stress on S–N fatigue behavior.
Surface Effects
For many common loading situations, the maximum stress within a
component or structure occurs at its surface. Consequently, most cracks
leading to fatigue failure originate at surface positions, specifically at
stress amplification sites. Therefore, it has been observed that fatigue life
is especially sensitive to the condition and configuration of the component
surface. Numerous factors influence fatigue resistance, the proper
management of which will lead to an improvement in fatigue life. These
include design criteria as well as various surface treatments.
Design Factors
The design of a component can have a significant influence on its fatigue
characteristics. Any notch or geometrical discontinuity can act as a stress
raiser and fatigue crack initiation site; these design features include
grooves, holes, keyways, threads, and so on. The sharper the discontinuity
(i.e., the smaller the radius of curvature), the more severe the stress
concentration. The probability of fatigue failure may be reduced by
avoiding (when possible) these structural irregularities, or by making
design modifications whereby sudden contour changes leading to sharp
corners are eliminated—for example, calling for rounded fillets with large
radii of curvature at the point where there is a change in diameter for a
rotating shaft (Figure 3.17).
Figure(3.17): Demonstration of how design can reduce stress amplification. (a) Poor
design: sharp corner. (b) Good design: fatigue lifetime improved by incorporating rounded
fillet into a rotating shaft at the point where there is a change in diameter.
Surface Treatments
During machining operations, small scratches and grooves are invariably
introduced into the work piece surface by cutting tool action. These
surface markings can limit the fatigue life. It has been observed that
improving the surface finish by polishing will enhance fatigue life
significantly.
One of the most effective methods of increasing fatigue performance is by
imposing residual compressive stresses within a thin outer surface layer.
Thus, a surface tensile stress of external origin will be partially nullified
and reduced in magnitude by the residual compressive stress. The net
effect is that the likelihood of crack formation and therefore of fatigue
failure is reduced.
Residual compressive stresses are commonly introduced into ductile
metals mechanically by localized plastic deformation within the outer
surface region. Commercially, this is often accomplished by a process
termed shot peening. Small, hard particles (shot) having diameters within
the range of 0.1 to 1.0 mm are projected at high velocities onto the surface
to be treated. The resulting deformation induces compressive stresses to a
depth of between one-quarter and one-half of the shot diameter. The
influence of shot peening on the fatigue behavior of steel is demonstrated
schematically in Figure 3.18.
Figure 3.18: Schematic S–N fatigue curves for normal and shot-peened steel.
Figure 3.19: Photomicrograph showing both core (bottom) and carburized outer case (top)
regions of a casehardened steel. The case is harder as attested by the smaller micro
hardness indentation.
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
Environmental factors may also affect the fatigue behavior of materials. A
few brief comments will be given relative to two types of environment-
assisted fatigue failure: thermal fatigue and corrosion fatigue.
Corrosion Fatigue :
3. Creep Failure:
The term ― Creep Fracture‖ may be defined as the fracture , which
take place due to excessive creeping of materials under steady
loading .
It is always exhibited in metals like iron, nickel , copper ,and their
alloys at higher temperatures, but some metals like zinc , tin , lead
and their alloys also creep at room temperature.
Materials are often placed in service at elevated temperatures and
exposed to static mechanical stresses (e.g., turbine rotors in jet
engines and steam generators that experience centrifugal stresses,
and high-pressure steam lines). Deformation under such
circumstances is termed creep. Defined as the time-dependent and
permanent deformation of materials when subjected to a
constant load or stress, creep is normally an undesirable
phenomenon and is often the limiting factor in the lifetime of a
part.
It is observed in all materials types; for metals it becomes important
only for temperatures greater than about 0.4Tm (Tm= absolute melting
temperature).
Creep Testing :
Figure (3.21) : Typical creep curve of strain versus time at constant stress and constant
elevated temperature.
Possibly the most important parameter from a creep test is the slope
of the secondary portion of the creep curve( Ԑ/ t in Figure 3.21); this
is often called the minimum or steady-state creep rate ( )It is the
engineering design parameter that is considered for long-life
applications, such as a nuclear power plant component that is
scheduled to operate for several decades, and when failure or too
much strain are not options. On the other hand, for many relatively
short-life creep situations (e.g., turbine blades in military aircraft and
rocket motor nozzles), time to rupture, or the rupture lifetime , is the
dominant design consideration; it is also indicated in Figure 8.28. Of
course, for its determination, creep tests must be conducted to the
point of failure; these are termed creep rupture tests. Thus, a
knowledge of these creep characteristics of a material allows the
design engineer to ascertain its suitability for a specific application.
Mechanisms of Creep :
Different mechanisms are responsible for creep in different materials and
The need often arises for engineering creep data that are impractical to
collect from normal laboratory tests. This is especially true for prolonged
exposures (on the order of years). One solution to this problem involves
performing creep and/or creep rupture tests at temperatures in excess of
those required, for shorter time periods, and at a comparable stress level,
and then making a suitable extrapolation to the in-service condition. A
commonly used extrapolation procedure employs the Larson–Miller
parameter, defined as
where C is a constant (usually on the order of 20), for T in Kelvin and the
rupture lifetime in hours. The rupture lifetime of a given material
measured at some specific stress level will vary with temperature such that
this parameter remains constant.
Or, the data may be plotted as the logarithm of stress versus the Larson–
Miller parameter, as shown in Figure (3.24). Utilization of this technique
is demonstrated in the following design example.
- Stainless steel
- Refractory metals ( containing elements of high melting point like
Nb, Mo, W , Ta .
- Super alloys (Co, Ni based )
- In addition, advanced processing techniques have been utilized; one
such technique is directional solidification, which produces either
highly elongated grains or single-crystal components (Figure 2.25).