SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS

Policy Manual

SUBJECT: Student Code of Conduct

NUMBER: 3:4

A. PURPOSE
To establish the expectations of student conduct, the process for determining when there is a
violation of the conduct code, and the appeals process available when a violation is found.

B. DEFINITIONS
1. Advisor: A person of the student’s choosing who has agreed to advise a student throughout
the student conduct process. The advisor may be a faculty member, staff member, student,
attorney, family member, or anyone else. The advisor is limited to advising the student
directly, and is not permitted to speak to anyone else, or participate directly, in any hearing.
Students should choose an advisor who is available to attend any scheduled meetings or
hearings because advisor availability is not considered in scheduling meetings or hearings.
2. Appellate Board: Any person or persons authorized by the institutional president to
consider an appeal from the chair’s determination that a respondent has or has not violated
the Student Code or from the conduct sanctions imposed by the Student Conduct Officer.
3. Board Policy: The written policies of the South Dakota Board of Regents contained in the
policy manual.
4. Chair: The Student Conduct Officer or the senior student affairs officer who:
4.1. Is a member of the Student Conduct Panel;
4.2. Is responsible for the proper operation of the hearing; and
4.3. Has sole discretion to determine whether a Respondent has violated the Student Code,
and if so, to impose appropriate sanctions.
5. Complainant: An individual who was allegedly injured by an alleged violation of the
Student Code by a respondent.
6. Day: Monday through Friday, except for holidays and other times when the Institution’s
administrative offices are closed.
7. Faculty Member: Any person hired by the institution to conduct classroom or other
academic activities.
8. FERPA: the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, as amended.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 1 of 30
 9. Human Rights Violations: Violence, Harassment, Stalking, Discrimination, and Retaliation
under this Student Code not constituting Sexual Harassment as defined by section 2.4.6
below.
10. Institution: Black Hills State University, Dakota State University, Northern State
University, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, South Dakota State
University, and University of South Dakota.
11. Institutional Official: Any person employed by the institution, performing assigned
administrative or professional responsibilities.
12. Institutional Premises: All land, buildings, facilities, and other property in the possession
of, or owned, used, or controlled by, the Institution, including adjacent streets and
sidewalks.
13. Member of the Institutional Community: Any person who is a student, faculty member,
institutional official, any person employed by the institution, a volunteer, or guest. A
person’s status in a particular situation shall be determined by the senior student affairs
officer.
14. Notice: Notice required by this Student Code shall be provided in writing via email to the
student’s official institutional email account. Notice is deemed received the Day after it is
sent by email.
15. Organization: Any student group that has been granted institutional registration or
recognition.
16. Policy: The written regulations of the institution as found in, but not limited to, this Student
Code, the Residence Life Handbook, the Graduate and Undergraduate Catalogs, and other
official publications.
17. Reasonable Person: A reasonable person under similar circumstances and with similar
identities as the complainant.
18. Respondent: A student or organization that is alleged to have violated the Student Code.
19. Senior Student Affairs Officer: That institutional official exercising primary authority
over institutional student affairs programs and operations, or designee.
20. Student: All persons taking courses from the institution, both full-time and part-time,
enrolled in undergraduate, graduate, professional or special topic courses, whether credit-
bearing or not.
21. Student Code: The Student Code of Conduct contained in this Board Policy 3:4.
22. Student Conduct Panel: The panel that hears formal hearings.
22.1. This panel can take the following forms:
22.1.1. Option 1 – only the Student Conduct Officer;
22.1.2. Option 2 – the Student Conduct Officer and any institutional employee or
employees or independent contractor authorized by the senior student affairs
officer to determine whether a student has violated the Student Code and to
recommend imposition of conduct sanctions;

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 2 of 30
 22.2. For matters involving allegations of academic misconduct, the student conduct panel
must include at least one faculty member or academic administrator appointed by the
Provost in the form described in Option 2 above.
23. Student Conduct Officer: Any institutional official authorized by the Senior Student
Affairs Officer to:
23.1. Informally resolve an allegation by determining the facts and, if a violation is found,
imposing a conduct sanction without the assistance of a Student Conduct Panel;
OR
23.2. Serve as chair of the Student Conduct Panel;
23.3. Receive and consider the findings and recommendations of a Student Conduct Panel;
and
23.4. Determine whether a respondent has violated the Student Code, and if so, to impose
appropriate sanctions.

C. POLICY
1. Introduction
The Board of Regents and its institutions are committed to creating and maintaining a
productive living-and-learning community that fosters the intellectual, personal, cultural,
and ethical development of its students. Self-discipline and respect for the rights and
privileges of others are essential to the educational process and to good citizenship.
1.1. Purpose of the Student Code of Conduct
The purpose of the Student Code is to educate students about their civic and social
responsibilities as members of the institutional community. The primary focus of the
student conduct process is on educational and corrective outcomes; however, conduct
sanctions such as suspension or expulsion from an Institution may be necessary to
uphold community standards and to protect the campus community. Extensive,
organized, serious, or repeated violations of this Student Code are taken into account
when determining conduct sanctions.
1.2. Standards of Behavior
Attendance at an institution is optional and voluntary. When students enroll at an
institution, they voluntarily accept obligations of performance and behavior that are
consistent with the institution’s lawful mission, processes, and functions. In general,
these obligations are considered much higher than the obligations imposed by civil
and criminal law for all citizens.
By enrolling at an institution, students voluntarily accept responsibility for
compliance with all Board of Regents and Institutional Policies, including but not
limited to this Student Code.
1.3. Authority of an Institution over its Students and Organizations

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 3 of 30
 1.3.1. Student conduct proceedings may be initiated in response to conduct prohibited
by the Student Code:
1.3.1.1. That occurs on institutional premises
1.3.1.2. That occurs at events official sponsored by an institution
1.3.1.3. That arises out of membership in the Institutional community: or
1.3.1.4. That occurs elsewhere and that adversely affects an Institution, any
Organizations, members or the Institutional community, or the pursuit of
their lawful objectives.
1.3.2. Notwithstanding this Student Code, an institution reserves the right to take
necessary and appropriate action to protect the safety and well-being of the
campus community. The institution also reserves the right to extend any
deadline contained in this Student Code for good cause with written notice to
the parties of the delay and the reason for the delay.
1.3.3. For purposes of the Student Code, the default authority over the student for
student conduct purposes will be determined as follows:
1.3.3.1. For alleged misconduct that occurs on institutional premises, the
institution where the alleged misconduct occurred;
1.3.3.2. For alleged misconduct that occurs at events officially sponsored by an
institution, the institution that sponsored the event;
1.3.3.3. For alleged misconduct that occurs elsewhere and that adversely affects
an institution, the institution adversely affected;
1.3.3.4. For alleged instances of Academic Misconduct, the institution that offered
the course.
1.3.4. For instances where multiple Institutions have a reasonable claim to authority
over the student for student conduct purposes, the Senior Student Affairs
Officer at the institutions with a reasonable claim to authority shall determine
the appropriate institution to proceed with the Student conduct process. The
decision should consider the location of the alleged incident, complainant,
respondent, witnesses, and the practicality of conducting the student conduct
process at the different Institutions having a reasonable claim to authority. If
the Senior Student Affairs Officers cannot agree, the System Director of
Student Affairs will make a final decision.
1.3.5. Where students are also employees, they may be subject to concurrent authority.
Student conduct proceedings under this Student Code may be initiated
irrespective of any action taken by an institutional employer. However, when
the student employee has been subject to conduct proceedings as an employee,
the findings that resulted from such proceedings will be considered in the
student conduct process as long as the standard used in such proceedings was
preponderance of the evidence or higher.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 4 of 30
 1.4. Alcohol Amnesty
This section aims to remove the barriers that may prevent any student from seeking
emergency medical attention by providing an opportunity for the institution to
intervene in a caring and non-punitive manner. The goal is to reduce the potential risk
of alcohol-related injuries or deaths, and increase the likelihood that students will seek
medical attention in crisis situations.
1.4.1. A student who seeks emergency medical attention (or who has emergency
medical attention sought on his/her behalf) for alcohol-related consumption,
will not be sanctioned for violating alcohol consumption prohibitions found in
the Student Code related to that incident, as long as the student completes the
following requirements:
• Participates in an initial meeting with the Senior Student Affairs Officer;
and
• Completes all recommendations from the Senior Student Affairs Officer;
and
• Submits proof of completion of all recommendations, within the time frame
designated by the Senior Student Affairs Officer at the initial meeting.
1.4.2. A bystander student who has engaged in alcohol consumption and who seeks
emergency medical attention for someone else or tries to actively engage in
assistance for someone else for that person’s alcohol-related consumption, will
not be sanctioned for violating alcohol consumption prohibitions found in the
Student Code related to his/her own consumption but will be invited to meet
with the Senior Student Affairs Officer.
1.4.3. The institution will not pursue any disciplinary action related to any alcohol or
drug consumption against any student who has been sexually assaulted or
sexually harassed, for his/her use of alcohol or drugs at the time of the sexual
assault or sexual harassment.
1.4.4. Subsections C.1.4.1 and C.1.4.2 of this section will only apply to a student who
seeks emergency medical attention before police or institutional employees or
agents take any official action or intervention related to the alcohol
consumption.
1.4.5. Alcohol amnesty does not preclude disciplinary action regarding other
violations of the Student Code.
1.4.6. Alcohol amnesty only applies to the institution’s student conduct process. It
does not apply to any criminal, civil or other legal consequence for violations
under federal, state or local law.
1.4.7. Alcohol amnesty is not designed to protect or shield those students who
repeatedly violate the Student Code. The Senior Student Affairs Officer may
assess each situation on a case-by-case basis, denying the safeguards of alcohol
amnesty if serious or repeated incidents prompt a higher degree of concern or
response, which may include disciplinary action under this Student Code.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 5 of 30
 1.5. Relationship Between the Student Conduct Process and the Criminal Law Process
1.5.1. The student conduct process is independent of any criminal or civil process.
Therefore, a student alleged to have engaged in conduct that would be a
violation of this Student Code (whether such conduct could also be a violation
of criminal or civil law) may face student disciplinary action regardless of any
criminal or civil process or their outcomes.
1.5.2. When the alleged misconduct includes allegations of Human Rights Violations,
the disciplinary process will not be delayed except when law enforcement
requests a delay to conduct the fact-finding portion of its investigation.
1.5.3. Determinations made or conduct sanctions imposed under this Student Code
shall not be subject to change because criminal charges arising out of the same
facts giving rise to violation of this Student Code were dismissed, reduced, or
resolved in favor of, or against, the criminal law defendant.
1.5.4. When a student is charged by federal, state, or local authorities with a violation
of law, the Institution will not request or agree to special consideration for that
student because of his or her status as a student.
1.5.5. If the alleged violation of law also gives rise to student disciplinary action under
this Student Code, the institution may advise off-campus authorities of the
existence of the Student Code and of how such matters are typically handled
under the Student Code.
1.5.6. The institution will attempt to cooperate with law enforcement and other
agencies in the enforcement of criminal law and in the conditions imposed by
criminal courts for the rehabilitation of Student violators provided that the
conditions do not conflict with any conduct sanctions imposed as a result of the
student conduct process, this Student Code, or Institutional Policies.
1.5.7. Where the student has been found guilty in a court of law or has declined to
contest such charges, although not actually admitting guilt (e.g., “no contest”
or “nolo contendere”), the alleged facts that formed the basis of the criminal
charges shall be deemed established for purposes of any student conduct
process.
1.5.8. Individual students and other members of the institutional community, acting
in their personal capacities, remain free to interact with governmental
representatives as they deem appropriate.
1.5.9. When an employee of the institution knows that a felony was committed and
that knowledge is not privileged, such employee shall report the known facts
and circumstances to law enforcement officials who have jurisdiction over the
matter.
1.6. Interpretation and Revision
1.6.1. No provision of this Student Code shall be interpreted to deprive students of
rights guaranteed them under state or federal law.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 6 of 30
 1.6.2. Institutions must ensure that institutional interests do not interfere with the
impartiality of the student conduct process.
1.6.3. Any question of interpretation regarding the Student Code shall be referred to
the Senior Student Affairs Officer for final determination.
1.6.4. The Student Code should be reviewed periodically under the direction of the
Senior Student Affairs Officers.
1.6.4.1. If the review leads to a recommendation that Board Policy be modified,
that recommendation and its supporting rationale shall be provided to the
institutional presidents and, if approved, forwarded to the Executive
Director.
1.7. Institutions may choose to adopt institutional policies that are consistent with this
Student Code.
2. Prohibited Conduct
The following list describes actions that detract from the effectiveness of an institution’s
productive living-and-learning community. Any student found to have engaged, attempted
to engage, or allowed or assisted another in engaging, in the following prohibited conduct
is subject to the student conduct process and conduct sanctions outlined in this Student
Code. In instances where prohibited conduct contained in this policy is defined differently
in another Board Policy or Institutional Policy, the definition contained in this policy shall
be used to address prohibited conduct by a student.
2.1. Acts of Academic Misconduct or Dishonesty
Honesty and integrity are core values at all institutions. Faculty members and students
are jointly responsible for maintaining academic standards and integrity in
institutional courses. In addition to any conduct sanctions imposed under this Student
Code, academic consequences for academic misconduct may be imposed by the
faculty member, including issuing a failing grade in the course. Any grade issued by
the faculty member, whether as a result of academic misconduct or not, constitutes an
academic evaluation and is not a conduct sanction imposed under this Student Code.
All faculty members should report incidents of Academic Misconduct to the Student
Conduct Officer.
2.1.1. Engaging in acts of Academic Misconduct, which means Cheating or
Plagiarism.
2.1.1.1. Cheating includes, but is not limited to, the following:
• Using any unauthorized assistance in, or having unauthorized
materials while, taking quizzes, tests, examinations or other
assignments, including copying from another’s quiz, test,
examination, or other assignment or allowing another to copy from
one’s own quiz, test, examination, or other assignment;
• Using sources beyond those authorized by the instructor in writing
papers, preparing reports, solving problems, or carrying out other
assignments;

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 7 of 30
 • Acquiring, without permission, tests or other academic material
belonging to the instructor or another member of the institutional
faculty or staff;
• Engaging in any behavior prohibited by the instructor in the course
syllabus or in class discussion;
• Falsifying or misrepresenting data or results from a laboratory or
experiment; or
• Engaging in other behavior that a reasonable person would consider
to be cheating.
2.1.1.2. Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to, the following:
• Using, by paraphrase or direct quotation, the published or unpublished
work of another person without full and clear acknowledgment;
• Using materials prepared by another person or agency engaged in the
selling of term papers or other academic materials without prior
authorization by the instructor; or
• Engaging in other behavior that a reasonable person would consider
plagiarism.
2.1.2. Engaging in other conduct that a reasonable person would consider dishonesty
relating to academic achievement, research results or academically related
public service.
2.1.3. Furnishing false information or false representations to any institutional
official, instructor, or office. Submission of false information or withholding
information at the time of admission or readmission may make an individual
ineligible for admission to, or continuation at, an Institution.
2.1.4. Forging, fabricating, altering, misrepresenting, or misusing any document,
record, or identification, including misrepresentations of degrees awarded or
honors received.
2.1.5. Tampering with the election of any organization.
2.1.6. Claiming to represent, or act on behalf of, the institution when not authorized
to do so.
2.2. Disruption, Obstruction, or Interference with Institutional Activities
2.2.1. Disrupting or obstructing institutional activities.
2.2.2. Classroom disruption, which is behavior that a reasonable person would view
as significantly or repeatedly interfering with the instructor’s ability to teach the
class or the ability of other students to benefit from the instructional program.
2.2.3. Failure to comply with directions of institutional, law enforcement, fire
department, public safety contractors, or other government officials acting in
performance of their duties and/or failure to identify oneself to these persons
when requested to do so.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 8 of 30
 2.2.4. Obstruction of the free flow of pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
2.2.5. Abuse of the student conduct process, which includes, but is not limited to, any
of the following:
• Falsifying, distorting, or misrepresenting information provided;
• Making false allegations;
• Attempting to discourage an individual’s proper participation in, or use of,
the Student conduct process;
• Harassment (verbal or physical) or intimidation of any person participating
in the Student conduct process;
• Failure to comply with any conduct sanctions imposed pursuant to this
Student Code.
2.3. Misuse of Institutional Resources or Property, or Personal Property of Others
2.3.1. Tampering with fire and life safety equipment including, without limitation, fire
alarms, sprinkler systems, first aid equipment, and laboratory safety apparatus.
2.3.2. Unauthorized taking of, damage to, or possession of property belonging to the
Institution, another member of the institutional community, or another person.
2.3.3. Unauthorized possession, duplication, or use of keys, access cards, or access
codes to any institutional premises.
2.3.4. Unauthorized entry into, or use of, institutional premises.
2.3.5. Unauthorized possession, entry into, or use of institutional equipment, software
systems, or information.
2.3.6. Possession of firearms, stun guns, tasers, BB guns, switchblade knives, fixed-
blade knives with a blade length of five (5) inches or greater, or any item that
is designed or used to injure or harm another person, fireworks, explosives, or
dangerous chemicals on institutional premises or at institutional events, except
as explicitly permitted by a Board Policy or an Institutional Policy;
2.3.7. Unauthorized use or abuse of technology, including, but not limited to:
• Unauthorized entry into a file or program to use, copy, read, delete, or
change the contents, or for any other purpose;
• Unauthorized transfer of a file;
• Unauthorized use of another individual’s identification or account;
• Use of technology to interfere with the work of another student, faculty
member, or institutional official;
• Use of an Institution’s technology to engage in Harassment.
• Use of technology to engage in unlawful activities, including those
involving uses that infringe intellectual property rights;

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 9 of 30
 • Use of technology to interfere with normal operation of an institution’s
technology or other system;
• Making, acquiring, or using unauthorized copies of computer files, violating
terms of applicable software license agreements, or using the Institution’s
technology network or system to download files in violation of copyright
laws;
• Attempting to circumvent data protection schemes or tampering with
security;
• Violating institutional or board computer use or internet policies.
2.4. Threat of Harm or Actual Harm to a Person’s Physical or Mental Health or Safety
2.4.1. Violence, which includes, but is not limited to, using or threatening to use
physical force on or towards another person without that person’s permission,
except in reasonable self-defense. The use of physical force includes both using
one’s own body parts as well as using other items.
2.4.2. Brandishing, pointing, or using a knife, gun, or other weapon towards another
person, except in reasonable self-defense.
2.4.3. Restraining or transporting another person without that person’s permission.
2.4.4. Making bomb threats.
2.4.5. Harassment, which includes, but is not limited to: Conduct towards another
person that is so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively
denies the individual’s ability to participate in or to realize the intended benefits
of an Institutional activity or resource; and
2.4.6. Sexual Harassment, which is conduct on the basis of sex that satisfies one or
more of the following:
2.4.6.1. An employee of an institutional conditioning the provision of education
benefits on participation in unwelcome sexual conduct (i.e., quid pro quo);
or
2.4.6.2. Unwelcome conduct that a reasonable person would determine is so
severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a
person equal access to the institution’s education program or activity; or
2.4.6.3. Sexual assault (as defined in the Clery Act), dating violence, domestic
violence, or stalking as defined in the Violence Against Women Act
(VAWA), the definitions of which are set forth in BOR Policy 1:17.1.

2.4.7. Stalking, which is engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person

that would cause a reasonable person to fear for the person’s safety or the safety
of others, or suffer substantial emotional distress.
2.4.7.1. “Course of conduct” means two or more acts, including, but not limited
to, acts in which the stalker directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 10 of 30
 any action, method, device or means, follows, monitors, observes,
surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about a person, or interferes
with a person’s property.
2.4.7.2. “Substantial emotional distress” means significant mental suffering or
anguish that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other
professional treatment or counseling
2.4.8. Hazing, which includes, but is not limited to, an act that, as an explicit or
implicit condition for initiation to, admission into, affiliation with, or as a
condition for continued membership in a group or an organization:
• Is likely to, or would be perceived by a reasonable person as likely to,
endanger the physical health of an individual or cause psychological
discomfort or distress through treatment that a reasonable person would
consider to be humiliating, intimidating, or demeaning;
• Destroys or removes public or private property;
• Involves the consumption of alcohol or other substances to excess; or
• Violates any Board Policy or Institutional Policy.
2.4.8.1. The express or implied permission of the individual being hazed does not
make the behavior acceptable. It is also a violation of this provision to
solicit, aid, or attempt to aid another person in planning or committing
Hazing.
2.4.8.2. Voyeurism includes, but is not limited to, any use of electronic or other
devices to make an audio, video, or photographic record of another person
without that person’s prior knowledge and without that person’s prior
authorization when such a recording is likely to cause that person or a
Reasonable Person injury or distress, or involves that person’s intimate parts
or sexual conduct involving that person.
2.4.8.3. Invasion of Privacy occurs when:
• An individual views another person, without that person’s prior
knowledge and permission, under circumstances in which the other
person has a reasonable expectation of privacy; or
• An individual uses an audio recording device to record another person,
without that person’s prior knowledge and permission, under
circumstances in which the other person has a reasonable expectation of
privacy.
2.5. Discrimination and Retaliation
2.5.1. Discrimination is excluding from, or treating another person differently than
others in, institutional activities on the basis of sex, race, color, creed, religion,
national origin, ancestry, gender, gender identity, transgender, sexual
orientation, age, disability, genetic information, or veteran status. However,
social fraternities and sororities that are exempt from taxation under federal law

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 11 of 30
 may maintain single-sex membership practices without violating
antidiscrimination policies, as recognized by 20 U.S.C. 1681(a)(6), and the
enforcement of such single-sex membership practices by students does not
violate this provision.
2.5.2. Retaliation is conduct that would make a reasonable person feel intimidated, or
that interferes with, threatens, coerces, or otherwise discriminates against any
individual because that individual reports or files a complaint alleging a
violation of law, Board Policy, or Institutional Policy, or participates in any
process in which the individual has a right to participate.
2.6. Housing and Living Groups
Violations of any rules imposed by institutional housing or living groups are also
violations of this Student Code.
2.7. Use and Misuse of Substances
2.7.1. The unauthorized manufacture, sale, possession, use, or consumption of
alcohol, marijuana (including cannabis used or possessed for medical
purposes), or controlled substances by students.
2.7.2. However, possession, use, or distribution of alcohol, marijuana, or controlled
substances is permitted on premises controlled by the Board of Regents when:
2.7.2.1. Needed in conjunction with approved research activities;
2.7.2.2. Alcohol is possessed, used, or distributed in a lawful manner inside a
designated residence hall facility occupied exclusively by upper-division
and/or non-traditional students who are at least twenty-one (21) years of
age;
2.7.2.3. Alcohol is possessed, used, or distributed in a lawful manner on premises
controlled by the Board of Regents that have been designated by the
Institution’s president as places where such possession, use, and
distribution may be permitted, subject to such conditions as the
Institution’s president may also prescribe, provided that a notice of such
designation and conditions have been filed previously with the executive
director of the Board of Regents; or
2.7.2.4. The possession, use, or distribution of the controlled substance is
prescribed by a licensed health care professional authorized to prescribe
such substances. For purposes of this section, a prescription does not include
a written certification for use of medical marijuana, pursuant to SDCL 34-
20G-1(23). Students who use medical marijuana pursuant to a validly issued
written certification when not on property controlled by the Board may
subsequently report to class or participate in activities as long as such use
does not cause impairment or disrupt academic or campus activities.
2.7.2.5. Alcohol is possessed, used, or distributed in a manner that is expressly
approved by a Board Policy.
2.7.3. The unauthorized possession of any drug paraphernalia.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 12 of 30
 2.8. Violation of Policy or Laws
2.8.1. Violation of published Board of Regents or Institutional Policies, rules, or
regulations.
2.8.2. Violation of federal, state, or local law.
2.9. RESERVED

2.10. Conduct by Organizations

2.10.1. Organizations that, formally or informally through repeated practice, initiate,
encourage, support, or tolerate conduct by members, associates, or invitees that
violates the provisions of this Student Code shall be subject to conduct
sanctions.
2.10.2. The privileges of official recognition by an institution may be extended to
organizations, including those that maintain residences for their members, only
if such organizations agree to adopt and to enforce policies that, at minimum:
2.10.2.1. Prohibit the manufacture, possession, use, dispensing, or provisions of
alcoholic beverages at organizational functions or in the organizational
residence by persons under the age of 21 (or the legal age of use and
possession in the applicable jurisdiction);
2.10.2.2. Prohibit the manufacture, possession, use, or dispensing of marijuana
(including cannabis used or possessed for medical purposes) or
unauthorized controlled substances at organizational functions or in the
organizational residence;
2.10.2.3. Prohibit the expenditure of organizational funds on alcoholic beverages,
marijuana (including cannabis used or possessed for medical purposes), or
controlled substances;
2.10.2.4. Prohibit the informal collection of monies from members, associates, or
invitees to be spent on alcoholic beverages, marijuana (including cannabis
used or possessed for medical purposes), or controlled substances;
2.10.2.5. Prohibit the possession, use, or distribution of alcohol, marijuana
(including cannabis used or possessed for medical purposes), or controlled
substances on premises controlled by the Board of Regents, except as
explicitly permitted by Section C.2.6.2 of this Student Code;
2.10.2.6. Establish conduct policies and sanctions regarding violations by
individual members no less stringent than those set forth under Board
Policies, except that limited use of alcoholic beverages is permissible as
set out above; and
2.10.2.7. Require that a report be filed with the Senior Student Affairs Officer each
semester identifying all actions taken pursuant to the student conduct
policies required in this Student Code;

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 13 of 30
 2.11. Institutions may impose additional or more restrictive conditions on official
recognition.
2.12. Organizations are also subject to the Board of Regents’ antidiscrimination policies set
forth in Board Policy 1:18. However, social fraternities and sororities that are exempt
from taxation under federal law may maintain single-sex membership practices
without violating antidiscrimination policies, as recognized by 20 U.S.C. 1681(a)(6).
3. Student Conduct Process
3.1. Allegations of Sexual Harassment
3.1.1. Allegations of sexual harassment against a student shall be addressed
exclusively through BOR Policy 1:17.
3.2. Allegations other than Sexual Harassment
3.2.1. All allegations other than sexual harassment against a student shall be addressed
as set forth herein. Allegations of misconduct may be reported against any
student by anyone. Allegations shall be directed to the Student Conduct Officer
in the Office of the Dean of Students. The reporting party will disclose the facts
that form the basis for the allegation, the identities of any other witnesses, and
any other relevant information regarding the alleged misconduct.
3.2.1.1. Allegations of Academic Misconduct will be reported to the Student
Conduct Officer but are initially addressed through Board Policy 2:33.
3.2.1.2. Allegations of Human Rights Violations shall follow the process outlined in
Board Policy 1:18.
3.2.1.2.1. The investigator assigned must not have any actual or reasonably
perceived conflicts of interest and biases for or against any party
involved in the initial complaint. If the institution determines that an
actual or reasonably perceived conflict of interest does exist, another
individual must lead the investigation on behalf of the institution.
3.2.1.2.2. The investigator assigned must be trained to analyze and document
the available evidence to support reliable decisions, objectively
evaluate the credibility of parties and witnesses, synthesize all
available evidence, including both evidence that tends to suggest a
violation and evidence that tends to suggest no violation, and take
into account the unique and complex circumstances of each case.
3.2.1.2.3. The investigator assigned should avoid using any investigative
techniques or approaches that apply sex stereotypes or
generalizations.
3.2.1.2.4. Each party should be provided written notice in advance of any
interview or hearing with sufficient time to prepare for meaningful
participation.
3.2.1.2.5. The investigation should result in a written report summarizing the
relevant evidence that tends to suggest a violation and evidence that
tends to suggest no violation.
Student Code of Conduct 3:4
Page 14 of 30
 3.2.1.2.6. The investigator assigned must make findings of fact and
conclusions as to whether the facts support a Human Rights
violation.
3.2.2. The Student Conduct Officer shall make an initial determination whether the
allegations, if true, would violate the Student Code. If the Student Conduct
Officer determines that the allegations, if true, would violate the Student Code,
the Student Conduct Officer shall conduct a pre-investigation inquiry to
determine whether the allegations are credible. This process may include
speaking with witnesses and reviewing any documentation.
3.2.2.1. The Student Conduct Officer must not have any actual or reasonably
perceived conflicts of interest and biases for or against any party involved
in the initial complaint. If the institution determines that an actual or
reasonably perceived conflict of interest does exist, another individual
must lead the investigation on behalf of the institution.
3.2.2.2. As to off-campus conduct, the Student Conduct Officer shall determine
whether the incident adversely affects the institution, any organizations,
members of the institutional community, or the pursuit of their lawful
objectives.
3.2.2.3. Allegations of Academic Misconduct that are not informally resolved
pursuant to Board Policy 2:33 will enter the student conduct process here.
3.2.2.4. Allegations of Human Rights Violations that are not informally resolved
pursuant to Board Policy 1:18 will enter the student conduct process here.
3.2.3. If the Student Conduct Officer determines that either (i) the allegations, if true,
would not violate the Student Code or (ii) that the allegations are not credible,
then the Student Conduct Officer should inform the complainant of this
determination and inform the complainant that the allegations may be re-
submitted should additional information become available.
3.2.4. If the Student Conduct Officer determines that the allegations, if true, would
violate the Student Code and determines that the allegations are credible and
will be investigated, the Student Conduct Officer shall provide written notice
to the respondent within fifteen (15) days of receiving the report of alleged
misconduct or notification from the Faculty Member of the need to address
alleged Academic Misconduct through the Student Code.
3.2.5. The written notice to the respondent must include the following:
• The alleged behavior that would be a violation of the Student Code;
• The date and location of the alleged behavior;
• The section(s) of the Student Code alleged to have been violated;
• The name of the complainant;

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 15 of 30
 • A time to meet with the Student Conduct Officer to provide the respondent
with the opportunity to give his/her account of the incident leading to the
allegation of misconduct;
• Information about the right to have an advisor present throughout the
student conduct process;
• Information about both the informal and formal resolution processes;
• A time for a hearing to occur no earlier than ten (10), and no later than
twenty (20), days after this written notice is deemed received to address any
alleged violations that are not informally resolved;
o The minimum time limit may be waived by the respondent.
o The maximum time limit may be extended at the discretion of the Student
Conduct Officer.
3.2.6. At the time that the written notice to the respondent is sent, a written notice
shall also be sent to the complainant containing information about the right to
have an advisor present throughout the student conduct process, information
about both the informal and formal resolution processes, and the time for the
hearing to address any alleged violations that are not informally resolved.
3.2.7. The Student Conduct Officer will conduct an investigation of the allegations,
which may include speaking with witnesses and reviewing any documentation.
Only in instances where the Student Conduct Officer determines that there is
sufficient evidence to establish that the respondent violated the Student Code
by a preponderance of the evidence will the allegations proceed to informal or
formal resolution.
3.2.7.1. For matters involving Human Rights Violations where an investigation
was conducted pursuant to Board Policy 1:18, no additional investigation
is required.
3.2.7.2. If the Student Conduct Officer determines that there is insufficient
evidence to establish that the respondent violated the Student Code by a
preponderance of the evidence, the Student Conduct Officer will inform
both parties of this fact and will cancel the hearing. This notification
should also inform that parties that the investigation may be re-opened
should additional information become available.
3.3. Interim Measures
In certain circumstances, the Senior Student Affairs Officer, or a designee, may impose
interim measures that go into effect immediately, prior to a hearing before a Student
Conduct Panel, and remain in effect until no longer needed.
3.3.1. Interim measures are intended to protect the interests of both the complainant
and the respondent prior to a hearing. Interim measures may include, but are
not limited to, no-contact directives, residence modifications, academic
modifications and support, institutional work schedule modifications, interim
residence suspension, or interim suspension. Interim measures that restrict the

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 16 of 30
 ability of either party to discuss the investigation should be avoided, as they
may inhibit the ability of either party to obtain and present evidence or
otherwise to defend their interests. Written notice of interim measures shall be
provided to the party to whom the interim measures are directed.
3.3.1.1. In circumstances involving allegations of stalking, interim measures must
be provided upon the request of a complainant if such measures are
reasonably available.
3.3.1.2. In fairly assessing the need for a party to receive interim measures, the
Senior Student Affairs Officer, or a designee, may not rely on fixed rules
or operating assumptions that favor one party over another, nor make such
measures available only to one party.
3.3.1.3. Interim measures should be individualized and appropriate based on the
information gathered by the institution, making every effort to avoid
depriving any student of his/her education.
3.3.1.4. The interim measures needed by each student may change over time, and
the Senior Student Affairs Officer, or a designee, should communicate
with each student throughout the student conduct process to ensure that
any interim measures are necessary and effective based on each student’s
evolving needs.
3.3.2. Interim suspension may be imposed only for one or more of the following
purposes:
3.3.2.1. To ensure the safety and well-being of members of the institutional
community or preservation of institutional property or other property
located on premises controlled by the institution;
3.3.2.2. To ensure a student’s own physical or emotional safety and well-being; or
3.3.2.3. To ensure the normal operations of the institution where a student poses
an ongoing threat of disruption or, or interference with, the normal
operations of the institution.
3.3.3. During the interim suspension, the student may be denied access to residence
facilities, the campus (including classes), and all other institutional activities or
privileges.
3.3.4. A student placed on interim suspension shall be given written notice of interim
measures, which shall include:
3.3.4.1. The reasons for the interim suspension;
3.3.4.2. The parameters of the interim suspension; and
3.3.4.3. Information concerning the right to appeal the interim suspension.
3.3.5. Interim Suspension Appeal Process
3.3.5.1. The student must submit a written request for a meeting to the Senior
Student Affairs Officer.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 17 of 30
 3.3.5.2. The Senior Student Affairs Officer will schedule a meeting with the
student as soon as practical and no later than three (3) days after receiving
the written request. At this meeting, the student is provided the opportunity
to raise any objections to the interim suspension or to request alternative
interim measures.
3.3.5.3. The Senior Student Affairs Officer has sole discretion regarding interim
measures.
3.4. Informal Resolution
3.4.1. The Student Conduct Officer may speak separately and individually with the
complainant and the respondent to determine whether the alleged misconduct
can be resolved through informal resolution.
3.4.1.1. In matters involving allegations of Human Rights violations, informal
resolution may not take the form of having the complainant and the
respondent be in the same room at the same time, unless both parties agree
in writing.
3.4.1.2. In matters involving allegations of Human Rights violations, the Student
Conduct Officer should consider whether the informal resolution is
equitable and will end the misconduct, prevent its recurrence, and address
its effects.
3.4.2. Informal resolution may be reached where:
3.4.2.1. The parties involved mutually agree to a full resolution of the alleged
misconduct that is acceptable to the Student Conduct Officer.
3.4.2.1.1. This must be documented in writing and signed by the complainant,
respondent, and Student Conduct Officer.
3.4.2.2. The respondent waives a formal hearing by admitting to the misconduct
and accepting the proposed conduct sanctions.
3.4.2.2.1. This must be documented in writing and signed by the respondent
and the Student Conduct Officer.
3.4.2.2.2. This type of informal resolution is not available in matters involving
allegations of Human Rights violations.
3.4.3. Partial informal resolution may be reached where the respondent admits to the
misconduct but does not accept the proposed conduct sanctions. When this
occurs, the process moves to formal resolution with the hearing being limited
to the question of appropriate conduct sanctions.
3.4.3.1. This must be documented in writing and signed by the respondent and the
Student Conduct Officer.
3.4.3.2. In matters involving allegations of Human Rights violations, the
complainant must also agree in writing to this partial informal resolution.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 18 of 30
 3.4.4. Informal resolution shall be final and the parties who agreed in writing to
informal resolution waive any right to appeal otherwise available under Board
Policy 3:4.
3.4.5. The Student Conduct Officer’s involvement in attempting to informally resolve
the allegation of misconduct does not impact the Student Conduct Officer’s
ability to later serve as the Student Conduct Panel or a member thereof in the
formal resolution process.
3.4.6. Informal resolution may be reached at any time before the Chair issues any
findings, conclusions, and, when a violation is found, conduct sanctions it
determines to be appropriate through the Formal Resolution process.
3.4.6.1. If an informal resolution is reached, the Student Conduct Officer shall
prepare written findings and conclusions, and any sanctions resulting from
a violation during the informal resolution process. If the complaint
included more than one allegation of misconduct, each allegation must
have a separate decision.
3.5. Formal Resolution
3.5.1. If the alleged misconduct is not fully resolved through informal resolution, any
unresolved matter proceeds to a hearing.
3.5.2. The composition of the Student Conduct Panel shall be determined as follows:
3.5.2.1. For matters where the Student Conduct Officer serves as Chair of the
Student Conduct Panel, the Student Conduct Officer shall have sole
discretion regarding whether the Student Conduct Panel includes:
3.5.2.1.1. Option 1 – only the Student Conduct Officer; or
3.5.2.1.2. Option 2 – the Student Conduct Officer and any institutional
employee or employees or independent contractor authorized by the
Senior Student Affairs Officer to determine whether a student has
violated the Student Code and to recommend imposition of conduct
sanctions,
3.5.2.2. For matters involving allegations of Academic Misconduct, the Student
Conduct Panel must include at least one faculty member or academic
administrator appointed by the Provost in the form described in Option 2
above.
3.5.2.3. Both the Complainant and the respondent will be provided notice of the
identity of the member(s) of the Student Conduct Panel. Both parties may
request in writing (and must include supporting information) that (i) the
Student Conduct Panel include additional members (Option 2), and/or (ii)
a Student Conduct Panel member be replaced due to an actual or
reasonably perceived conflict of interest. Such requests must be
submitted, in writing to the Senior Student Affairs Officer no later than
twenty-four (24) hours after the notice is provided to the party. The Senior
Student Affairs Officer shall make a final decision as to these requests and
will provide notice to both parties of the decision.
Student Code of Conduct 3:4
Page 19 of 30
 3.5.3. Hearings shall be conducted by a Student Conduct Panel according to the
following guidelines:
3.5.3.1. Hearings shall be conducted in private. Witnesses other than the
complainant and the respondent may only be present during the hearing
while presenting their information.
3.5.3.2. The Chair shall have sole discretion and final decision-making authority
over the following:
• Whether an individual’s conduct interferes with the hearing and
requires that individual’s removal;
• Whether written information, materials, documents, and statements
submitted are relevant and will be accepted for consideration by the
Student Conduct Panel;
• All questions about the interpretation of the student conduct process;
and
• Whether to have separate or joint hearings when a hearing would
involve more than one respondent;
3.5.4. Neither the complainant nor the respondent are required to attend or participate
in the hearing, and such decision will have no bearing on the question of
whether the respondent violated the Student Code.
3.5.5. The respondent has no obligation to provide any information, materials,
documents, or witnesses, or answer any questions and is presumed to not have
violated the Student Code. The burden is on the Institution to gather sufficient
evidence to reach a fair, impartial determination as to whether the alleged
violation of the Student Code occurred.
3.5.6. If the complainant or respondent wants the Student Conduct Panel to review
any materials or documents or wants to present any witnesses at the hearing,
such materials and documents and/or witness lists must be submitted to the
Chair by the following deadlines in order to be considered:
• In matters alleging Human Rights violations, all materials and documents
and/or witness lists must be submitted at least seventy-two (72) hours before
the hearing. Additionally, a copy of the final report prepared by the EEO
Coordinator will be provided to the complainant, respondent, and the
Student Conduct Panel members.
• For all other matters, all materials and documents and/or witness lists must
be submitted at least twenty-four (24) hours before the hearing.
The Chair will promptly provide the other party and the Student Conduct Panel
members a copy of any materials, documents, and witness lists submitted.
3.5.7. The complainant and the respondent have the right to be assisted by an advisor
of their choice, at their own expense. Ordinarily, no more than two advisors for
each student shall be permitted. The advisor is limited to advising the student

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 20 of 30
 directly, and is not permitted to speak to anyone else, or participate directly, in
any hearing.
3.5.8. The Student Conduct Officer shall record the audio of the hearing.
3.5.9. Generally, the hearing will be conducted in the following order:
3.5.9.1. The Chair will ask each individual present at the hearing to identify
him/herself by providing his/her name and role at the hearing (e.g.,
complainant, respondent, member of the Student Conduct Panel, etc.).
3.5.9.2. The Chair will remind the respondent:
• Of the materials that the Student Conduct Panel received prior to the
hearing;
• Of the right to have an advisor present;
• Of the right to refuse to speak as a witness against him/herself;
• That the refusal to speak as a witness against him/herself will have no
bearing on the question of whether the respondent violated the Student
Code;
• Of the alleged behavior that would be a violation of the Student Code;
and
• Of the section(s) of the Student Code alleged to have been violated.
3.5.9.3. The Chair will provide the complainant with the opportunity to engage in
the hearing. If the complainant agrees to engage, then:
3.5.9.3.1. The Chair will provide the complainant the opportunity to provide
any additional relevant factual details that were not previously
provided. The complainant may choose to do so or may decline and
maintain the right to not provide information, materials, documents,
or answer questions. The complainant may decline but still present
witnesses.
3.5.9.3.2. The Chair will ask the complainant to present any witnesses, who
will be brought to the hearing one at a time, and ask questions of the
witness.
3.5.9.3.3. The Student Conduct Panel will then ask questions of the witness.
3.5.9.3.4. The Chair will ask the respondent for any questions for the witness.
The Respondent will provide the Chair any questions in writing.
3.5.9.3.5. The Chair will ask the witness any questions provided by the
respondent that the Chair determines to be relevant.
3.5.9.3.6. The Chair will ask the complainant to present the next witness. The
process described above shall repeat for each witness until the
complainant has presented all of its witnesses.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 21 of 30
 3.5.9.4. The Chair will provide the respondent the opportunity to engage in the
hearing. If the respondent agrees to engage, then:
3.5.9.4.1. The Chair will provide the respondent the opportunity to provide
any additional relevant factual details that were not previously
provided. The respondent may choose to do so or may decline and
maintain the right to not provide information, materials, documents,
or answer questions. The respondent may decline but still present
witnesses.
3.5.9.4.2. The Chair will ask the respondent to present any witnesses, who will
be brought to the hearing one at a time, and ask questions of the
witness.
3.5.9.4.3. The Student Conduct Panel will then ask questions of the witness.
3.5.9.4.4. The Chair will ask the complainant for any questions for the witness.
The complainant will provide the Chair any questions in writing.
3.5.9.4.5. The Chair will ask the witness any questions provided by the
complainant that the Chair determines to be relevant.
3.5.9.4.6. The Chair will ask the respondent to present the next witness. The
process described above shall repeat for each witness until the
respondent has presented all of its witnesses.
3.5.9.5. The Student Conduct Panel may ask the complainant and/or the
Respondent whether s/he agrees to answer questions. The Student
Conduct Panel may then ask questions of either or both parties who agree
to answer questions.
3.5.9.6. The Student Conduct Panel will meet in a closed session to discuss and
make its recommendation, which closed session shall not be audio
recorded.
3.5.10. The Student Conduct Panel shall review all information and materials presented
to it and shall decide by majority vote whether the respondent violated the
Student Code by a preponderance of the evidence (i.e., more likely than not).
Decision-making techniques or approaches that apply sex stereotypes or
generalizations should be avoided so that the hearing process proceeds
objectively and impartially.
3.5.11. The Student Conduct Panel shall prepare written findings to support its
determination. If multiple allegations of misconduct exist, a decision should be
reached separately for each allegation. These written findings shall include:
• Concise statements of each factual finding;
• Brief explanations of whether and why the factual findings support a
conclusion that the conduct either violated or did not violate the Student
Code;
o These must address each factual element that must be satisfied to
establish that conduct has violated the Student Code.
Student Code of Conduct 3:4
Page 22 of 30
 • Any initial, interim, or final decisions by the institution; and
• If a violation is found, recommendations of appropriate conduct sanctions
and supporting rationale for the conduct sanctions.
3.5.12. The Student Conduct Panel shall forward its written findings to the Chair. The
Chair has sole discretion to adopt or reject any portion of the written findings.
3.5.12.1. If any portion of the written findings are rejected, the Chair shall issue new
written findings it determines to be appropriate for such portion(s), and
will provide the Student Conduct Panel with an explanation for its
decision.
3.5.12.2. The Chair shall determine the effective date of any conduct sanctions
imposed, which effective date should be on or after the exhaustion of the
appeal as a matter of right. However, interim measures may remain in
place, or be instituted, until the effective date of any conduct sanctions.
3.5.13. The Chair’s written findings and information about appeal rights, shall be
provided to the respondent. When FERPA allows, the complainant will receive
the permitted information simultaneously. See Section C.3.5.1 below for more
information.
3.5.13.1. In matters involving allegations of Academic Misconduct, the Chair’s
written findings shall also be provided to the faculty member.
3.5.13.2. In matters involving allegations of Human Rights violations, the
complainant must also be provided information about appeal rights.
3.5.14. The audio record of the hearing shall be the property of the institution and shall
be maintained by the Student Conduct Officer. No other person may record the
hearing.
3.5.14.1. The audio record and its contents shall be confidential and may only be
used for purposes of any appeals. Any person who discloses the contents
of the audio record to parties not involved in the appeal shall be subject to
conduct sanction.
3.5.14.2. In the event of an appeal, the respondent shall be given access to the audio
record for purposes of preparing an appeal. When the alleged misconduct
involves allegations of Human Rights violations, the complainant shall be
given access to the audio record for purposes of preparing an appeal.
Access shall be provided at such places and times as the Senior Student
Affairs Officer may direct
3.5.14.3. Except as required by law, the institution shall not be required to change
the form in which the record is maintained.
3.6. Sanctions
3.6.1. Individual Conduct Sanctions
3.6.1.1. In each case in which the Chair determines that a respondent has violated
the Student Code, the Chair shall determine and impose appropriate

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 23 of 30
 conduct sanction(s). Where a violation of Board Policy is established, and
where a conduct sanction is mandated under Board Policy, that conduct
sanction shall be imposed.
3.6.1.1.1. Conduct sanction decisions must be made for the purpose of
deciding how best to enforce the Student Code and should reflect a
proportionate response to the violation.
3.6.1.1.2. In matters involving Human Rights Violations, the Chair should
consider whether the sanctions are equitable and will end the
misconduct, prevent its recurrence, and address its effects.
3.6.1.1.3. In matters involving Human Rights violations, the Chair should
consider the impact of separating the respondent from his/her
education before imposing a conduct sanction of suspension or
expulsion.
3.6.1.2. In matters involving allegations of Academic Misconduct that are
informally resolved pursuant to Board Policy 2:33, the Student Conduct
Officer will receive the information from the faculty member and shall
determine and impose appropriate conduct sanction(s).
3.6.1.3. Complainants shall be informed in writing and at the same time as the
respondent of any outcome and conduct sanctions imposed in the
following circumstances:
3.6.1.3.1. When the conduct sanction involves remedial action that directly
relates to the complainant (e.g., a directive requiring the respondent
to not have contact with the complainant)
3.6.1.3.2. Where the allegations against the respondent would also constitute
a crime of violence or non-forcible sex offense as defined by
FERPA; or
3.6.1.3.3. Where the allegations against the respondent would also constitute
Human Rights violations. In this circumstance, the rationale for the
result must also be included.
3.6.1.3.4. Where the institution finds that a hostile environment exists, the
Institution shall also inform the complainant of other steps the
institution has taken to eliminate the hostile environment.
3.6.1.4. FERPA allows institutions to disclose the final results of a conduct
proceeding when the Chair determines that the respondent violated the
Student Code and that violation falls within the definition of a crime of
violence or a non-forcible sex offense as defined by FERPA. For purposes
of this subsection, “final results” means the name of the respondent, the
violation committed, and any conduct sanction(s) imposed by the
institution.
3.6.1.5. FERPA allows institutions to inform the parents or legal guardians of a
respondent younger than twenty-one (21) years of age that the respondent

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 24 of 30
 has violated Institutional Policies concerning the use or possession of
alcohol or controlled substances.
3.6.1.6. The following conduct sanctions may be imposed upon any respondent
found to have violated the Student Code. More than one of the conduct
sanctions listed below may be imposed for any single violation.
Imposition of a conduct sanction may be delayed or suspended on such
conditions as the Student Conduct Officer may prescribe.
• Warning – A statement to the respondent that the respondent has
violated the Student Code of Conduct.
• Probation – Probation is for a designated period of time and includes
the probability of more severe conduct sanctions if the respondent is
later found to have engaged in any additional violation(s) the Student
Code during the probationary period.
• Loss of Privileges – Denial of specified privileges for a designated
period of time. The privileges of continued participation in
Institutional activities, access to Institutional facilities or residences
may be conditioned upon participation in or completion of educational
programming at the student’s expense.
• Fines – Monetary payments.
• Restitution – Compensation for loss, damage, or injury. This may take
the form of appropriate service, money, or material replacement.
• Educational Sanction – work assignments, essays, service to the
Institution, community service, workshops, or other related
educational activities.
• Residence Suspension – Separation of the respondent from the
Institution’s residence facilities for a definite period of time, after
which the respondent is eligible to return. Conditions for return to the
residence facilities may be specified.
• Residence Expulsion – Permanent separation of the respondent from
the institution’s residence facilities. A sanction of residence expulsion
will take the form of residence suspension pending completion of the
appeals process.
• Suspension – Separation of the respondent from the institution for a
definite period of time, after which the respondent is eligible to return.
Conditions for return may be specified. A respondent who has been
suspended from one Institution may not enroll at another institution
until the period of suspension has ended.
• Expulsion – Permanent separation of the respondent from the
Institution. A respondent who has been expelled from one institution
may not enroll at another institution. A sanction of expulsion will take
the form of suspension pending completion of the appeals process.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 25 of 30
 • Withholding Degree – the institution may withhold awarding a degree
otherwise earned until the completion of the student conduct process
or the completion of all conduct sanctions imposed.
• Revoking Admission and/or Degree – the institution may revoke
admission to, or a degree awarded from, the institution for violation
of Institutional standards for obtaining admission or the degree, or for
other serious violations of the Student Code committed by the
respondent prior to graduation.
3.6.1.7. Conduct sanctions shall not be made part of the respondent’s permanent
academic record, but shall become part of the respondent’s conduct
record. The respondent’s conduct record containing conduct sanctions
other than suspension, expulsion, revoking admission and/or a degree, or
withholding a degree, will be expunged seven (7) years after the date of
the original finding of a violation of the Student Code. The respondent’s
conduct record containing any of the four conduct sanctions above shall
be maintained permanently. Where restitution is required of a respondent,
the institution reserves the right to disclose all portions of the conduct file
as may be necessary to obtain a judgment in a court of competent
jurisdiction. Such files shall be preserved at least until all necessary
compensation has been obtained.
3.6.1.8. Students enrolled in one institution shall be held accountable for their
conduct while visiting or enrolled at other institutions. Students may be
required, as a condition of continued enrollment, reenrollment, or transfer
or admission to another institution, to appear at the institution where the
alleged misconduct took place, at their own expense, for a conduct hearing
and to answer allegations based on their conduct while at that institution.
3.6.1.8.1. Any conduct sanction imposed by one institution shall be effective
at all other institutions. A respondent suspended at one institution
shall not be able to enroll at another institution until the period of
suspension has ended. A respondent who has been expelled from
one Institution may not enroll at another institution.
3.6.1.8.2. When a respondent is brought forward on allegations of misconduct
by another institution, any conduct sanction issued after a finding of
a violation shall be determined by the institution that brought
forward the allegations of misconduct. Suspension or expulsion
may only be imposed after first consulting with the Senior Student
Affairs Officer from the institution where the respondent is enrolled.
3.6.2. Organizational Conduct Sanctions
3.6.2.1. The following conduct sanctions may be imposed upon organizations:
• Those conduct sanctions listed above in Section C.3.5.1.
3.7. Appeals
3.7.1. Appeal as a Matter of Right
Student Code of Conduct 3:4
Page 26 of 30
 3.7.1.1. The respondent may appeal a decision reached by the Chair. In matters
involving allegations of Human Rights violations, the complainant may
also appeal a decision reached by the Chair. The appeal must be in writing
and must be submitted to the Senior Student Affairs Officer no later than
five (5) days after notice of the Chair’s decision is deemed received.
3.7.1.2. The written appeal must cite at least one (1) of the following reasons for
review and must include supporting arguments and documentation as to
why an appeal should be granted on those grounds.
3.7.1.2.1. The original hearing was conducted unfairly to the point that it
substantially and materially affected the outcome;
3.7.1.2.2. Using the facts found by the Chair, the conclusion regarding
whether there was a violation(s) of the Student Code was incorrect;
3.7.1.2.3. The conduct sanction(s) imposed were not appropriate for the
violation of the student Code that the respondent was found to have
committed; and/or
3.7.1.2.4. New information that was unavailable at the time of the hearing has
been discovered and could substantially and materially affect the
outcome.
3.7.1.3. An appeal shall be limited to a review of:
• The verbatim record of the initial hearing;
• Supporting documents submitted as part of the initial hearing; and
• Supporting documents submitted in support of the appeal reason(s)
3.7.1.4. The Senior Student Affairs Officer will provide the other party a copy of
the appeal and a reasonable amount of time to submit any materials to be
considered.
3.7.1.5. The Senior Student Affairs Officer will provide the Appellate Board with
the materials submitted. The Appellate Board will review the materials
submitted and provide a written recommendation to the Senior Student
Affairs Officer as soon as practicable. The Senior Student Affairs Officer
has sole discretion to adopt or reject the recommendation.
3.7.1.5.1. In instances where the respondent appeals a decision reached by the
Chair, sanctions or conditions may not be increased, introduced for
the first time, or extended.
3.7.1.5.2. If the recommendation is rejected, the Senior Student Affairs Officer
will provide the Appellate Board with a written explanation for
his/her decision.
3.7.1.5.3. The Senior Student Affairs Officer shall determine the effective date
of any conduct sanctions imposed. The effective date of any
conduct sanctions shall not be delayed pending any further appeals.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 27 of 30
 3.7.1.6. The Senior Student Affair Officer’s written decision shall be provided to
the parties, along with the Appellate Board’s recommendation and, if
rejected, the Senior Student Affairs Officer’s written explanation.
3.7.1.6.1. The Senior Student Affairs Officer may return the matter to the
hearing panel for reconsideration or to the Title IX/EEO
Coordinator for additional investigation, in light of the written
decision.
3.7.2. Appeal to the President of the Institution
3.7.2.1. The respondent may appeal a decision reached by the Senior Student
Affairs Officer. In matters involving allegations of Human Rights
violations, the complainant may also appeal a decision reached by the
Senior Student Affairs Officer.
3.7.2.2. The appeal must be in writing and must be submitted to the President’s
Office no later than five (5) days after notice of the Senior Student Affairs
Officer’s decision is deemed received.
3.7.2.3. The written appeal must cite at least one (1) of the following reasons for
review and must include supporting arguments and documentation as to
why an appeal should be granted on those grounds.
3.7.2.3.1. The original hearing was conducted unfairly to the point that it
substantially and materially affected the outcome;
3.7.2.3.2. Using the facts found by the Chair, the conclusion regarding
whether there was a violation(s) of the Student Code was incorrect;
3.7.2.3.3. The conduct sanction(s) imposed were not appropriate for the
violation of the student Code that the respondent was found to have
committed; and/or
3.7.2.3.4. New information that was unavailable at the time of the hearing has
been discovered and could substantially and materially affect the
outcome.
3.7.2.4. The President has sole and complete discretion as to whether to agree to
review an appeal, including what materials to consider. However, the
President will not consider any reasons for review that were not previously
raised in the appeal to the Appellate Board.
3.7.2.5. If the President agrees to review an appeal, the President will provide the
other party/parties a copy of the appeal and a reasonable amount of time
to submit any materials to be considered.
3.7.2.6. The President will provide a written decision to the parties, and to the
Senior Student Affairs Officer. The decision may be a substantive one, or
may merely indicate that the President has declined to review the appeal.
3.7.2.6.1. The President may return the matter to the Senior Student Affairs
Officer or hearing panel for reconsideration, or to the Title IX/EEO

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 28 of 30
 Coordinator for additional investigation, in light of the written
decision.
3.7.3. Appeal to the Board of Regents
3.7.3.1. After exercising and exhausting all appeals available at the institutional
level, the respondent may appeal a decision reached by the President. In
matters involving allegations of Human Rights violations, the complainant
may also appeal a decision reached by the President after exercising and
exhausting all appeals available at the Institutional level.
3.7.3.2. The appeal must be in writing and must be submitted to the Executive
Director of the Board of Regents no later than thirty (30) days after notice
of the President’s decision is deemed received. The appeal must include
the following:
• Supporting arguments and documentation;
• All documentation provided by the institution, including, at a
minimum, the President’s decision, the Senior Student Affairs
Officer’s decision, and the Chair’s decision.
3.7.3.3. Written appeals that fail to include supporting arguments and documents,
and the documentation provided by the institution will be rejected.
3.7.3.4. An appeal submitted to the Executive Director that is not covered by
subsection e) below may be considered by the Executive Director. In these
instances, the Executive Director has sole and complete discretion as to
whether to agree to review an appeal, including what materials to consider.
3.7.3.4.1. If the Executive Director agrees to review an appeal, the Executive
Director will provide the other party a copy of the appeal and a
reasonable amount of time to submit any materials to be considered.
3.7.3.4.2. The Executive Director will provide a written decision to the parties,
and to the President.
3.7.3.4.3. The Executive Director may return the matter to the President,
Senior Student Affairs Officer, or hearing panel for reconsideration
or to the Title IX/EEO Coordinator for additional investigation, in
light of the written decision.
3.7.3.5. An appeal submitted to the Executive Director must be considered by the
Board of Regents where a student has been expelled or suspended based
upon alleged violations of Board Policy 3:4; or a disciplinary action
allegedly deprived the student of a right or privilege protected by a specific
term or provision of Board Policy or state or federal constitution, law, or
regulation.
3.7.3.5.1. The Executive Director will have fifteen (15) working days within
which to attempt, at his or her discretion, a resolution through
informal means.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 29 of 30
 3.7.3.5.2. If no informal resolution has been effected within the fifteen (15)
working days, the Executive Director will refer the matter to a
hearing examiner for reconsideration pursuant to SDCL § 1-26
using the contested case proceedings. At the conclusion of the
contested case proceedings, the hearing examiner will provide a
recommendation to the Executive Director for the disposition of the
matter by the Board.
3.7.3.5.2.1. Contested case proceedings may be conducted under
protective orders entered pursuant to SDCL §§ 1-26-19 and 15-
6-26(c).
3.7.3.5.2.2. The Board may return the matter to the President, Senior
Student Affairs Officer, or hearing panel for reconsideration or
to the Title IX/EEO Coordinator for additional investigation,
in light of the written decision.

FORMS / APPENDICES:
None

SOURCE:
BOR February 1969; RR, 12:06, 1977; BOR 1980; BOR April 1987; BOR June 1990; BOR
December 1994; BOR October 1996; BOR December 1999; BOR March 2006; BOR December
2006; BOR August 2009; BOR August 2011; BOR December 2013; BOR June 2014; BOR August
2015; BOR May 2016; BOR August 2016; BOR December 2017; BOR December 2018; September
2019 (Clerical); BOR August 2020; BOR June 2021.

Student Code of Conduct 3:4

Page 30 of 30