460 Sources
460 Sources
Integrating SC IT: Systems are complex/ Companies may think it is not cost effective to implement some of the systems / Implementing ERP systems (Internal
processes have to be converted/ Follow some industry conventions)
No single standard has emerged as yet Therefore, companies need to decide: the priorities in implementation? +invest in first?
Implementation issues: Companies must first install ERP so that data is available/ However companies can start installing DSS before/in-parallel with ERP as data
is already available in legacy systems (DSS projects take much lesser time/ DSS projects have a higher ROI)
Single Vendor: Purchase ERP and SC DSS as a total solution from one vendor
Best of Breed: Purchase the best-fit solution in each category from a different vendor,/ System better fits each function in the company./ More complex and takes
longer to implement/ Provides greater long-term flexibility./ Better overall solutions to the company’s problems.
Proprietary Systems Development: Makes sense for extremely large companies/ Already existing expert IT departments and systems that already serve the
company well. /Latest technologies provide easier business oriented development and integration(May be a push back towards more internal or software
integrator development)
Two distinct chains in organizations:
1) SC the flow of physical products from suppliers through manufacturing and distribution all the way to retail outlets and customers 2)development
chainnew product introduction and involves product architecture, make/buy decisions, earlier supplier involvement, strategic partnering, supplier footprint
and supply contracts.
Key Characteristics of SC: Demand uncertainty and variability, in particular, the bullwhip effect/ Economies of scale in production and transportation/ Lead time,
in particular due to globalization
Key Characteristics of Development Chain
Technology clock speed: Speed by which technology changes in a particular industry
Make/Buy decisions: Decisions on what to make internally and what to buy from outside suppliers
Product structure: Level of modularity or integrality in a product/ Modular product (assembled from a variety of modules/ each module may have several
options/ Bulk of manufacturing can be completed before the selection of modules and assembly into the final product takes place)
Interaction between the Two Chains
Fisher’s concept of Innovative and Functional Products 1)Functional products characterized by: slow technology clock speed, low product variety, and typically
low profit margins 2)Innovative products characterized by: fast technology clock speed and short product life cycle, high product variety, relatively high margins.
What Is the Appropriate SC Strategy and Product Design Strategy for Each Product Type?
Each requires a different SC strategy/ Development chain has to deal with the differing level of demand uncertainty
Design for Logistics(DFL): Product and process design that help to control logistics costs and increase service levels (Economic packaging and transportation/
Concurrent and parallel processing/ Standardization)
Economic Transportation and Storage 1)Design products so that they can be efficiently packed and stored 2)Design packaging so that products can be
consolidated at cross docking points 3)Design products to efficiently utilize retail space
Final Packaging (Delay until as late as possible/ Repackaging at the cross-docking point is common for many products)
Concurrent/Parallel Processing (Objective is to minimize lead times/ Achieved by redesigning products so that several manufacturing steps can take place in
parallel/ Modularity/Decoupling is key to implementation/ Enables different inventory levels for different parts)
Traditional Manufacturing (Set schedules as early as possible/ Use large lot sizes to make efficient use of equipment and minimize costs/ Large centralized
facilities take advantage of economies of scale)
Standardization (aggregate demand information is more reliable)
Modular Product: Can be made by appropriately combining the different modules/ It entails providing customers a number of options for each module
Modular Process: Each product undergo a discrete set of operations making it possible to store inventory in semi-finished form/ Products differ from each other
in terms of the subset of operations that are performed on them
Semiconductor wafer fabrication is modular since the type of chip produced depends on the unique set of operations performed
Oil refining is not modular since it is continuous and inventory storage of semi-finished product is difficult
Modular products are not always made from modular processes (Bio-tech and pharmaceutical industries make modular products but use non-modular
processes; many products are made by varying the mix of a small number of ingredients)
Swaminathan’s Four Approaches to Standardization
Part standardization: 1)Common parts used across many products. 2)Common parts reduce: inventories due to risk pooling costs due to economies of scale 3)
Excessive part commonality can reduce product differentiation 4) May be necessary to redesign product lines or families to achieve commonality
Process standardization: 1)Standardize as much of the process as possible for different products 2)Customizing the products as late as possible 3)Decisions about
specific product to be manufactured is delayed until after manufacturing is under way (Starts by making a generic or family product/ Differentiate later into a
specific end-product) 4)Postponement or delayed product differentiation
Delayed Differentiation (May be necessary to redesign products specifically for delayed differentiation/ May be necessary to resequence the manufacturing
process to take advantage of process standardization)
Resequencing (modify the order of product manufacturing steps/ resequenced operations result in the differentiation of specific items are postponed as much
as possible) Postponement
Product Standardization Downward Substitution (Produce only a subset of products (because producing each one incurs high setup cost)/ Guide customers
to existing products/ Substitute products with higher feature set for those with lower feature set/ Which products to offer, how much to keep, how to optimally
substitute ?)
Procurement Standardization Consider a large semiconductor manufacturer (The wafer fabrication facility produces highly customized integrated circuits/
Processing equipment that manufactures these wafers are very expensive with long lead time and are made to order/ Although there is a degree of variety at the
final product level, each wafer has to undergo a common set of operations/ The firm reduces risk of investing in the wrong equipment by pooling demand across
a variety of products)
<Selecting the Standardization Strategy>
l If process and product are modular, process standardization will help to maximize effective forecast accuracy and minimize inventory costs.
l If the product is modular, but the process is not, it is not possible to delay differentiation. However, part standardization is likely to be effective.
l If the process is modular but the product is not, procurement standardization may decrease equipment expenses.
l If neither the process nor the product is modular, some benefits may still result from focusing on product standardization.
Important Considerations: Strategies designed to deal with demand uncertainty and/or inaccurate forecasts/ Changes suggested in the strategies may be too
expensive to implement (Redesign related costs should be incurred at the beginning of the product life cycle/ Benefits cannot be quantified in many cases:
increased flexibility, more efficient customer service, decreased market response times)
Resequencing causes: level of inventory in many cases to go down/ per unit value of inventory being held will be higher
Tariffs and duties are lower for semi-finished or non-configured goods than for final products: Completing the manufacturing process in a local distribution
center may help to lower costs associated with tariffs and duties.
Pull-based systems typically reduction in SC lead times, inventory levels, and system costs/ making it easier to manage system resources
- Not always practical to implement a pull-based system throughout the entire SC: Lead times may be too long/ May be necessary to have economies of scale in
production or transportation.
- Standardization strategies can combine push and pull systems: Portion of the SC prior to product differentiation is typically a push-based SC/ Portion of the SC
starting from the time of differentiation is a pull-based SC.
Supplier Integration into New Product Development: (Traditionally suppliers have been selected after design of product or components/ However, firms often
realize tremendous benefits from involving suppliers in the design process. - Benefits include (a decline in purchased material costs/ an increase in purchased
material quality/ a decline in development time and cost/ an increase in final product technology levels. )
The Spectrum of Supplier Integration (No single “appropriate level” of supplier integration)
None (Supplier is not involved in design./ Materials/subassemblies supplied as per customer specifications/design)
White box (Informal level of integration/ Buyer “consults” with the supplier informally when designing products and specifications/ No formal collaboration)
Grey box (Formal supplier integration/ Collaborative teams between buyer’s and supplier’s engineers/ Joint development)
Black box (Buyer gives the supplier a set of interface requirements/ Supplier independently designs and develops the required component)
Keys to Supplier Integration #Making the relationship a success: Select suppliers and build relationships with them/ Align objectives with selected suppliers
Suppliers selection: 1)Capability to participate in the design process/ 2)Willingness to participate in the design process/ 3)Ability to reach agreements on
intellectual property and confidentiality issues./ 4)Ability to commit sufficient personnel and time to the process./ 5)Co-locating personnel if appropriate /
6) Sufficient resources to commit to the supplier integration process.
Mass Customization
Evolved from the two prevailing manufacturing paradigms of the 20th century (Craft production and mass production.)
Mass production: efficient production of a large quantity of a small variety of goods/ High priority on automating and measuring tasks/ Mechanistic
organizations with rigid controls
Craft production: involves highly skilled and flexible workers/ Often craftsmen/ Organic organizations which are flexible and changing
Absence of Trade-Offs
Two types meant inherent trade-offs 1)Low-cost, low-variety strategy may be appropriate for some products 2)a higher-cost, higher-variety, more adaptable
strategy was more effective
Development of mass customization implies it is not always necessary to make this trade-off
Mass customization (delivery of a wide variety of customized goods or services quickly and efficiently at low cost/ captures many of the advantages of both
the mass production and craft production systems/ not appropriate for all products/ gives firms important competitive advantages/ helps to drive new business
models)
Making Mass Customization Work a)Highly skilled and autonomous workers, processes, and modular units b)Managers can coordinate and reconfigure these
modules to meet specific customer requests and demands
Key Attributes
Instantaneous (Modules and processes must be linked together very quickly/ Allows rapid response to various customer demands.)
Costless (Linkages must add little if any cost to the processes/ Allows mass customization to be a low-cost alternative.)
Seamless (Linkages and individual modules should be invisible to the customer)
Frictionless (Networks or collections of modules must be formed with little overhead. /Communication must work instantly)
Mass Customization and SCM
- Many of the advanced SCM approaches and techniques essential if mass customization is to be successfully implemented
- IT critical for effective SCM is also critical for coordinating different modules
- Concepts like strategic partnerships and supplier integration essential for the success of mass customization.
- Postponement can play a key role in implementing mass customization