Scribd
Upload
30 views8 pages

STAR Results

The document describes the results of a study analyzing the growth performance of different sugarcane varieties under different tillage systems. It found that tillage system 2 significantly increased plant height, number of internodes, and length of internode compared to the other tillage systems. Variety 3 performed best overall based on these growth measures.

Uploaded by

Cristyflor Escordial
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
30 views8 pages

STAR Results

The document describes the results of a study analyzing the growth performance of different sugarcane varieties under different tillage systems. It found that tillage system 2 significantly increased plant height, number of internodes, and length of internode compared to the other tillage systems. Variety 3 performed best overall based on these growth measures.

Uploaded by

Cristyflor Escordial
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

STAR Results

1. To determine which sugarcane varieties will give the highest growth performance
applied with different tillage systems.
2. To determine which tillage system will significantly influence the growth of different
sugarcane varieties.
3. To determine the interaction effect between different sugarcane varieties and tillage
systems.

1.The Plant Height (cm).

2. Total number of Productive Tillers.

3.The Diameter of Stalk (cm).

4.Total number of Internodes.

5.The length of internode (cm).


Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research (STAR)
Mon Mar 28 11:21:56 2022

Analysis of Variance
Split Plot in Randomized Complete Block Design

=================================================
ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: PH..240.DAP.
=================================================

Summary Information
-------------------------------------
FACTOR NO. OF LEVELS LEVELS
-------------------------------------
MP 2 1, 2
SP 3 1, 2, 3
Block 4 1, 2, 3, 4
-------------------------------------
Number of Observations Read and Used: 24

Descriptive Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
Variable N_Obs Min Max Mean StdDev
----------------------------------------------------------
PH..240.DAP. 24 594.25 659.90 623.26 17.15
----------------------------------------------------------

Test for Homogeneity of Variances


-------------------------------------------
Method DF Chisq Value Pr(>Chisq)
-------------------------------------------
Bartlett 5 10.93 0.0527
-------------------------------------------

Test for Normality


-------------------------------------------------------
Variable Method W Value Pr(< W)
-------------------------------------------------------
PH..240.DAP._resid Shapiro-Wilk 0.9631 0.5035
-------------------------------------------------------

ANOVA TABLE
Response Variable: PH..240.DAP.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Block 3 1243.9096 414.6365 1.40 0.3950
MP 1 935.5011 935.5011 3.15 0.1739
Error(a) 3 890.3819 296.7940
SP 2 1340.6679 670.3340 4.85 0.0286
MP:SP 2 697.2912 348.6456 2.52 0.1218
Error(b) 12 1658.5093 138.2091
Total 23 6766.2610
-----------------------------------------------------------
Summary Statistics
-------------------------------------
CV(a)% CV(b)% PH..240.DAP. Mean
-------------------------------------
2.76 1.89 623.26
-------------------------------------

Table of Means
SP 1 2 3
MP
1 613.7025 619.4100 617.9525
2 612.0950 633.9100 642.5200

Pairwise Mean Comparison of SP

Least Significant Difference (LSD) Test

Alpha 0.05
Error Degrees of Freedom 12
Error Mean Square 138.2091
Critical Value 2.1788
Test Statistics 12.8073

Summary of the Result:


---------------------------
SP means N group
---------------------------
1 612.90 8 b
2 626.66 8 a
3 630.24 8 a
---------------------------
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

=================================================
ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: SD..240.DAP.
=================================================

Summary Information
-------------------------------------
FACTOR NO. OF LEVELS LEVELS
-------------------------------------
MP 2 1, 2
SP 3 1, 2, 3
Block 4 1, 2, 3, 4
-------------------------------------
Number of Observations Read and Used: 24

Descriptive Statistics
----------------------------------------------------
Variable N_Obs Min Max Mean StdDev
----------------------------------------------------
SD..240.DAP. 24 6.12 7.13 6.68 0.2890
----------------------------------------------------
Test for Homogeneity of Variances
-------------------------------------------
Method DF Chisq Value Pr(>Chisq)
-------------------------------------------
Bartlett 5 3.37 0.6424
-------------------------------------------

Test for Normality


-------------------------------------------------------
Variable Method W Value Pr(< W)
-------------------------------------------------------
SD..240.DAP._resid Shapiro-Wilk 0.9469 0.2323
-------------------------------------------------------

ANOVA TABLE
Response Variable: SD..240.DAP.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Block 3 0.5813 0.1938 0.98 0.5066
MP 1 0.0005 0.0005 0.00 0.9629
Error(a) 3 0.5935 0.1978
SP 2 0.0245 0.0123 0.27 0.7687
MP:SP 2 0.1740 0.0870 1.91 0.1908
Error(b) 12 0.5473 0.0456
Total 23 1.9212
-----------------------------------------------------------

Summary Statistics
-------------------------------------
CV(a)% CV(b)% SD..240.DAP. Mean
-------------------------------------
6.66 3.20 6.68
-------------------------------------

Table of Means
SP 1 2 3
MP
1 6.7250 6.5875 6.7300
2 6.6800 6.8025 6.5325

==================================================
ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: NOI..240.DAP.
==================================================

Summary Information
-------------------------------------
FACTOR NO. OF LEVELS LEVELS
-------------------------------------
MP 2 1, 2
SP 3 1, 2, 3
Block 4 1, 2, 3, 4
-------------------------------------
Number of Observations Read and Used: 24
Descriptive Statistics
--------------------------------------------------------
Variable N_Obs Min Max Mean StdDev
--------------------------------------------------------
NOI..240.DAP. 24 15.16 16.95 15.82 0.4555
--------------------------------------------------------

Test for Homogeneity of Variances


-------------------------------------------
Method DF Chisq Value Pr(>Chisq)
-------------------------------------------
Bartlett 5 6.61 0.2514
-------------------------------------------

Test for Normality


--------------------------------------------------------
Variable Method W Value Pr(< W)
--------------------------------------------------------
NOI..240.DAP._resid Shapiro-Wilk 0.9857 0.9742
--------------------------------------------------------

ANOVA TABLE
Response Variable: NOI..240.DAP.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Block 3 0.4101 0.1367 0.14 0.9300
MP 1 0.0683 0.0683 0.07 0.8089
Error(a) 3 2.9383 0.9794
SP 2 0.4726 0.2363 4.17 0.0423
MP:SP 2 0.2028 0.1014 1.79 0.2091
Error(b) 12 0.6806 0.0567
Total 23 4.7726
-----------------------------------------------------------

Summary Statistics
--------------------------------------
CV(a)% CV(b)% NOI..240.DAP. Mean
--------------------------------------
6.26 1.51 15.82
--------------------------------------

Table of Means
SP 1 2 3
MP
1 15.7950 15.8225 15.9900
2 15.4500 15.9250 15.9125

Pairwise Mean Comparison of SP

Least Significant Difference (LSD) Test

Alpha 0.05
Error Degrees of Freedom 12
Error Mean Square 0.0567
Critical Value 2.1788
Test Statistics 0.2594
Summary of the Result:
--------------------------
SP means N group
--------------------------
1 15.62 8 b
2 15.87 8 ab
3 15.95 8 a
--------------------------
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

===================================================
ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: LOI..240.DAP..
===================================================

Summary Information
-------------------------------------
FACTOR NO. OF LEVELS LEVELS
-------------------------------------
MP 2 1, 2
SP 3 1, 2, 3
Block 4 1, 2, 3, 4
-------------------------------------
Number of Observations Read and Used: 24

Descriptive Statistics
---------------------------------------------------------
Variable N_Obs Min Max Mean StdDev
---------------------------------------------------------
LOI..240.DAP.. 24 15.98 17.30 16.64 0.4008
---------------------------------------------------------

Test for Homogeneity of Variances


-------------------------------------------
Method DF Chisq Value Pr(>Chisq)
-------------------------------------------
Bartlett 5 3.82 0.5749
-------------------------------------------

Test for Normality


---------------------------------------------------------
Variable Method W Value Pr(< W)
---------------------------------------------------------
LOI..240.DAP.._resid Shapiro-Wilk 0.9614 0.4675
---------------------------------------------------------

ANOVA TABLE
Response Variable: LOI..240.DAP..
-----------------------------------------------------------
Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Block 3 2.3354 0.7785 8.53 0.0559
MP 1 0.0913 0.0913 1.00 0.3910
Error(a) 3 0.2738 0.0913
SP 2 0.2125 0.1062 1.67 0.2289
MP:SP 2 0.0197 0.0098 0.15 0.8584
Error(b) 12 0.7627 0.0636
Total 23 3.6954
-----------------------------------------------------------
Summary Statistics
---------------------------------------
CV(a)% CV(b)% LOI..240.DAP.. Mean
---------------------------------------
1.82 1.52 16.64
---------------------------------------

Table of Means
SP 1 2 3
MP
1 16.6200 16.6875 16.4125
2 16.6825 16.7950 16.6125

==================================================
ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: NOT..120.DAP.
==================================================

Summary Information
-------------------------------------
FACTOR NO. OF LEVELS LEVELS
-------------------------------------
MP 2 1, 2
SP 3 1, 2, 3
Block 4 1, 2, 3, 4
-------------------------------------
Number of Observations Read and Used: 24

Descriptive Statistics
-----------------------------------------------------
Variable N_Obs Min Max Mean StdDev
-----------------------------------------------------
NOT..120.DAP. 24 6.40 7.60 6.98 0.3864
-----------------------------------------------------

Test for Homogeneity of Variances


-------------------------------------------
Method DF Chisq Value Pr(>Chisq)
-------------------------------------------
Bartlett 5 7.02 0.2195
-------------------------------------------

Test for Normality


--------------------------------------------------------
Variable Method W Value Pr(< W)
--------------------------------------------------------
NOT..120.DAP._resid Shapiro-Wilk 0.9810 0.9131
--------------------------------------------------------
ANOVA TABLE
Response Variable: NOT..120.DAP.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Block 3 0.8500 0.2833 3.62 0.1595
MP 1 0.0817 0.0817 1.04 0.3824
Error(a) 3 0.2350 0.0783
SP 2 0.2158 0.1079 0.70 0.5158
MP:SP 2 0.2008 0.1004 0.65 0.5388
Error(b) 12 1.8500 0.1542
Total 23 3.4333
-----------------------------------------------------------

Summary Statistics
--------------------------------------
CV(a)% CV(b)% NOT..120.DAP. Mean
--------------------------------------
4.01 5.62 6.98
--------------------------------------

Table of Means
SP 1 2 3
MP
1 6.950 7.300 6.875
2 6.950 6.925 6.900

You might also like