Exercise 3.
1: Calibration and Performance Verification
Measurement P1000-1 P1000-2 P1000-3 P1000-4 Value Frequency 1 Frequency 2
1 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.98 0.90 0 0
2 0.96 0.94 0.97 0.98 0.91 0 0
3 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0 0
4 0.98 0.98 0.97 0.98 0.93 0 0
5 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.94 0 1
6 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.95 0 0
7 0.99 0.98 0.99 1.01 0.96 1 0
8 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.97 1 0
9 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 5 7
10 0.98 0.99 0.96 0.98 0.99 3 2
11 1.00 0 0
12 1.01 0 0
13 1.02 0 0
14 1.03 0 0
15 1.04 0 0
16 1.05 0 0
17 1.06 0 0
18 1.07 0 0
19 1.08 0 0
20 1.09 0 0
mean = 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99
variance = 0.0001 0.0002 0.0001 0.0001
std dev = 0.0089 0.0133 0.0081 0.0090
Frequency 3 Frequency 4
0 0 frequency
0 0
8
0 0
0 0 7
0 0
0 0 6
1 0
5
4 0
Axis Title
4 5 4
1 4 Fit the graph of your performance in this space!
0 0 3
0 1
2
0 0
0 0 1
0 0
0 0 0
0.90 0.91 0.92 0.93 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.0
0 0
0 0 values (grams)
0 0
0 0 Frequency 1 Frequency 2 Frequency 3 Frequency 4
Conclusion: While we varried in values, our values remained precise (staying close to
estimated 1.00 g). These values reflect both the accuracy and percision of our group'
measurements. Both our variance and standard deviations remained low which furte
our group's accuracy and percision in the exercises.
y
mance in this space!
1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09
rams)
quency 3 Frequency 4
mained precise (staying close to the
racy and percision of our group's
ations remained low which furtehr proves