Disadvantages of Audit Programme
Disadvantages of Audit Programme
The disadvantages that may be experienced by conducting audit as per Predetermined audit programme
are;
1. The audit staff may find the work mechanical, and fail to notice unusual features (if any) in the
organization.
2. The audit staff may not develop any innovative techniques in audit. Initiatives on the part of the staff
may not be encouraged in the per-determined audit programmes.
3. The audit staff will be more interested to complete the work in time rather than to maintain any
standard in the work.
4. Staff cannot take their own decisions and they are compelled to comply with the audit programme.
5. The audit programme may not be revised from time to time even after errors noticed during the
audit.
6. During the course of audit, new areas to be verified may come to the notice of the audit staff Unless
the audit programme is revised, such areas may escape from auditing.
In the case of recurring audits, some working paper files may be classified as permanent audit files
which are updated currently with information of continuing importance to succeeding audit, as distinct
from current audit files which contain information relating primarily to the audit of a single period.
• Information concerning the legal and organizational structure of the entity. In the case of a
company, this includes the Memorandum and Articles of Association. In the case of a statutory
corporation, this includes the Act and Regulations under which the corporation functions.
• Extracts or copies of important legal documents, agreements and minutes relevant to the audit.
• A record of the study and the evaluation of the internal controls related to the accounting
system. This might be in the form of narrative descriptions,questionnaires or flow charts, or some
combination thereof.
2. Extracts of important matters in the minutes of Board Meetings and General Meetings as
relevant to audit.
5. A record of the nature, timing and extent of auditing procedures performed, and the results of
such procedures.
6. Evidence that the work performed by assistants was supervised and reviewed.
7. Copies of communication with other auditors, experts and other third parties.
9. Conclusions reached by the auditor concerning significant aspects of the audit, including the
manner in which exceptions and unusual matters, if any, disclosed by the auditor’s procedures were
resolved or treated.
10. Copies of the financial information being reported on and the related audit reports.