Business Research Methods

Due Date:

Wordcount:
2,981
Student name:

Student ID:

1
Table of Contents
TITLE.............................................................................................................................................. 3

RESEARCH AIMS.............................................................................................................................3

JUSTIFICATION............................................................................................................................... 3

QUESTION...................................................................................................................................... 4

OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................................................... 4

LITERATURE REVIEW......................................................................................................................4

Considerations........................................................................................................................... 5

Issues......................................................................................................................................... 6

Project Managers.......................................................................................................................7

Knowledge and Learning............................................................................................................8

Human, Organisational, and Social Activity...............................................................................9

METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................................. 9

REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................12

2
TITLE
An Analytical Structure for Shifting Project Management Process

RESEARCH AIMS
This research will notice the condition of information in project management and expand the
core of information in this field. It will suggest an analytical, incorporative project management
structure (Mathur et al., 2014). The narrative structure gives a strategy to project management
established on containing the complicatedness presented by individuals, as components of the
project management structure, with the help of a technique of analysis. This research should give
valuable lessons for those intellectuals and practitioners eager to improve their project
management information and permit benefiting structures (Dunmade et al., 2018). New project
management hypothetical structure that highlights an empirical analysis is formulated.
The explanations demonstrate that when project management and project function are extensive,
the problems related to project management are similarly heightening (Alsudiri et al., 2013).
Increased ratios of project downfalls are widespread. The financial significances of very
downfalls are substantial, and this information indicates an additional requirement for project
management analysis in the context of institutions' heightened practice of projects. The
researcher's attention and vitality have directed him to expand the project management program
with the help of the research (Zwikael, 2016). This task recommends an additional analysis of
project management to participate in the profession's state of information and method. There is a
requirement to create a direction forward that can participate in project management concepts
and processes (Ozguler, 2016). There is similarly a requirement to broaden on the three refined
project management extents of time, quality specification, and cost to guarantee the capture of
the valid complicatedness that occurs in a project. The aim is to participate in the state of
information and process in project management by formulating an academic and empirical
mechanism.

JUSTIFICATION
Several suggestions, which enable to concentrate the way of this research, arise from this initial
analysis of the project management publications

3
  Project management techniques are maybe inadequately competent to capture
complicatedness, containing people relevant problems arising from the project's
atmospheres additional
 There is substantial information that project downfalls are stubbornly great over the
period, and their organizational effect is substantial (Oberlender, 2014).
 A substantial percentage of project management studies is not underpinned adequately by
hypothesis.
These facts provide a justification and an introductory aspect for the researcher to analyze the
likelihood of generating a project management structure that can apprehend project relevant
complicatedness and is generously fixed in concept (Bibarsov et al., 2017).

QUESTION
 Is it feasible to generate an analytical, incorporative theoretical project management
structure?
 Is it possible to enhance project management concepts and processes?

OBJECTIVES
 To examine feasible gaps and sectors of attention in project management
 To examine the function of analysis in a project management structure.
 To specify the main elements of a project management structure.
 Assess an incorporative project management structure for academic and empirical
practice.

LITERATURE REVIEW
Since the recent significance of project management looks to be defined by increased project
downfall ratios, enticing expensive overruns, an examination of the problems in this sector was
crucial (Burke, 2013). Thus, a broad extent of literature was consulted containing practitioner
literature related to project management trained crews to demonstrate widespread problems in
project management, containing the dignity of individuals (Robson, 2002). Understandings were
brought out in words of the major classifications of problems experienced in project
management, which again notify an applicable research methodology for this task and the sectors

4
of examination crucial to produce recent data that can be utilized to advance information in
project management (Ferrada et al., 2016). An image of complicatedness arose, with individuals
being a significant rider for the maximum of this complicatedness. The multidimensional essence
of project management arises, and projects' increasingly subjective essence (Abyad, 2018). A
piecemeal strategy was indicated, with several project management types of research being
concentrated on insufficient, particular characteristics of project management, at the time of
striving to demonstrate the effectiveness of interventions in these particular sectors hardly,
without seizing an incorporated strategy, where every main element of projects is contemplated.
Introductory studies demonstrated that procedural attention could play this research role (Galvan
et al., 2015). Finally, an analysis of procedures supposing literature was accomplished as it is
revealed that procedures thinking is adequate for requests in project management as projects and
procedures are navigated.

Considerations
Project management research is regarded as a bunch of people navigated training that enables the
completion of a project with a finding (Pereira et al., 2013). Furthermore, a project is
constructed, intentional human training, in alignment, is present with the suggestion of an
intentional network. The analysis of project management is striving to change aspects from a
reductionist description, which is proposed as being extremely slightly concentrated. With the
help of training in scheduling and planning, project management is recognizable, beginning with
main projects like the Manhattan Project and comparable relatively huge ranking projects like
the space program in the U.S. (Brewer & Dittman, 2018). Projects have occurred for millennia,
and project management as a management method is a moderately current improvement. It has
its origins in positivist attention emanating from the functional study, along with the dominant
prototypes seizing a practical, deterministic strategy. This inescapably directs to a reductionist
strategy to project management, probably being incapable of apprehending the complicatedness
submitted by individuals (Jugdev & Mathur, 2012). Projects are multidimensional elements in
which economic, political, public, and ethical extents can be specified, and these extents
probably conclude in efforts that probably, or probably not, confrontation with one another
(Gomes, & Romão, 2016). A direction forward that entirely contemplates the complicatedness of
projects and enables the inclusion of individuals as active elements of a project management

5
structure probably be essential. An analysis of problems in project management will be begun,
which will enable to notify the ways to be seized for data compilation.

Issues
Project management has constantly been sure that difficult systems strategies for planning,
scheduling, resource allocation, and supervision are navigated by economic prototypes and
engineering prototypes (Todorović et al., 2015). Project managers have commonly discerned
projects as certainly interpreted elements straight and deterministic, where practical
determinations generate highly trustworthy outcomes. Nonetheless, the researcher's knowledge
and information from the literature fact for a circumstance where, as individuals are critical to
the method of project's regulating, a deterministic strategy is not inclined to give the desired
outcomes (Silverman, 2010). The justification for this is that individuals are indeterministic
elements, identical to devices on an output chain, for instance (Wang et al., 2014). The identical
effort pertained by numerous individuals will be inclined to generate various results. This study
implies that a method of analysis is crucial to ascertain the effect of several efforts happening in
a project environment. This suggestion will be examined in additional detail. An extent of
difficulties is specified when pertaining deterministic project management processes to non-
deterministic like organizational transformation (Colin & Vanhoucke, 2015). Such as top-to-
down projects established on hierarchical, practical prototypes yet, dominate, also prevailing
implied to irrational, human, and social, contexts (Punch, 2005). The refined understanding is
that the project patron accomplishes a few main activities to end the project at the time of
indicating that a hands-off strategy should again pursue, along with the circumstances of
elucidating the productions and operating the project existing shifted to the project manager,
direct to a disconnect among the strategic purposes of the institution and the project productions.
Project management is a problematic and vibrant complex of connections. In a continual
condition of development, a mechanistic strategy cannot apprehend this phase of
complicatedness (Schwalbe, 2015). This is in discrepancy with outcomes that the practice of
typical project management methodologies boosts the likelihoods of project achievement,
slightly about period and parameters of cost.
While understanding project management theories in specific public division institutions are
moderately great, this is not entirely capitalized on because of different components like old

6
evidence systems (McClory et al., 2017). This indication benefits the requirement of an
analytical approach that enables consecutive completion.

The practice of project management processes can give a traditional language and can arise in
adequate issuance of reserves to enhance across-the-board organizational potential (Galli, 2017).
While creation and adaptability are anticipated extents of a project, the heightened requirement
for expanding efficiency and dependability establishes a contradictional condition, commonly
highly conditional on the project subject. A person should not strive to settle the contradiction;
however, instead strive to comprehend the connections among its elements and handle their
provisions (Mustaro & Rossi, 2013). To completely comprehend the multidimensional project
essence, an analytical strategy could benefit, enabling highlighting its complicatedness. The
contextual project management doctrines essence is a difference between private and public
institutions in terms of the materiality of these doctrines. They indicate that public division
institutions are liable to several more limitations than private division institutions (O'Connor, &
Laporte, 2012). This outcome is a requirement to assess the appropriateness of materiality of
project management doctrines formulated in the private division projects to public division
projects—the distinctions among project management processes and their increasingly abrupt
and contextual essence (Fisher, 2010). Thus, an analytical strategy could be suitable, as it will
benefit the method of inferring the extensively crucial elements of the particular context of the
projects.

Project Managers
Individuals and methods must emphasize project managers and company managers (Jo et al.,
2018). A no-blame community that sets individuals first is crucial. The project managers should
unexpect the fulfillment of a specific stage of the project before assessing its dignity. However,
instead, they require a continuous method of monitoring and assessing the project (Sanjuan &
Froese, 2013). The proficiency of project managers to deal with problems beyond the precisely
specialized problems of project management, like cultural elements, is discerned as crucial
(Denscombe, 2011). They must be reconceptualized beyond attaching to the 3 refined extents of
time, quality specification, and budget as contemplated by methods like PMBOK (Abdou et al.,
2016).

7
Furthermore, project managers must maintain a broad extent of different abilities like problem-
solving, communication, leadership, etc. At the same time, inferring that leadership and problem-
solving are extensively crucial (Hall, 2012). The significance of leadership and project managers'
soft skills through their specialized abilities or personality qualities. Project managers are
similarly unseen as retaining to mandate in the identical directions as their board during project
operation.
The specialized knowledge of several project managers has directed to an expansion in emphasis
on jobs and quantifiable outcomes instead of on the soft skills elements essential in modification
management and projects generated for (Mohammed et al., 2019). Alignment and incorporation
of project management are discerned as feasible and similarly eligible to accomplish a project-
established project management prototype. The essence of the project management function is, a
few decades later it has early arisen, yet ambiguous, with research, in several issues, project
managers are settling at the limit among a specialized function of any sort that was their central
function and an administrative function essential for operating projects (San Cristóbal et al.,
2018). They reveal it is hard to specify themselves with one of these areas. For a few, this is a
circumstance that survives for their whole professional existence—the importance of retaining a
project manager that is not a specialized expert. However, a manager is discerned as a significant
component to project achievement.
The main purposes of the project manager are to tutor the decision-making method on the extent
of project-associated problems (Mathur et al., 2013). The project manager cannot sort judgments
without the share of each related stakeholder, and numerous phases of interest must be spent on
strategic determination making as obstructed to different (Bell, 2011). Once formulated,
judgments must be conveyed to others immediately and transparently.

Knowledge and Learning

Project crews must retain a permit to a broad core of information, occurring or recently
developed if they are to be achieved (Lyapina et al., 2017). A few aspects of analysis are
important to successfully transmit the effects of any project. The method of developing project
similar information is problematic and happens when evidence and indications from additional
individuals are accessed, apprehended, method, and expanded to the applicable stakeholder's
implicit understanding (Uikey, & Suman, 2012). Information and project management help one
another to accomplish profitable objectives. Tacit knowledge attained with the help of projects is

8
hard to develop and apprehend, exemplifying the requirement for helpful communication
(Edkins et al., 2013). Learning from projects is examined additionally with varied decisions as to
the amount of learning is conceivable with the help of subsequent projects while recommending
the likelihood that very learning is feasible with the help of the practice of related structures
(Goedknegt, 2012). The practice of social media for tasks understood in project management,
however, regardless of a great extent of approval amid the respondents, lags to deal with any
empirical extents of the efficacy and effect of such a workout, via connections are existing
prepared between the lessons learned prototype and the broader organizational procedure.
The main elements of learning in projects appear to be associated with displaying interest and
knowledge. Similarly, confusion while accomplishing stuff handling difficulties will result in
learning (Runera, 2014). Traditional mixed-in project management learning can be a helpful
means of increasing the growth of project managers, while not ignoring that comprehending the
essence of project management probably head to an inaccurate understanding of safety that
projects will come to be simpler to organize (Bondarenko et al., 2018). The complicatedness is
not existing reduced from projects with the help of traditional learning, and however, instead, the
project managers are adequately furnished to handle them. The practice of problematic, cross-
functional projects that imitate actual life projects is discerned as helpful to the workout of
forthcoming project managers as obstructed to a morally educational strategy.

Human, Organisational, and Social Activity

Project management is a mortal, complicated, unreasonable, chaotic activity. Thus an intense
look at this sector, leaving beyond mechanistic methods and training, is inclined to be imposed
(Turner, 2016). Creating a vibrant image here is important that is a mechanistic, deterministic
understanding is uncertain about generating reasonable outcomes as robots and human is two
different things. Their responses cannot be handily foreseen on a provided input. Thus, it is
proposed that a consecutive method of analysis is required, which is context conditional, to
verify the effect of every human activity in its subject. Several projects retain, as asserted
purposes, specialized creation (Sanchez et al., 2019).
Nonetheless, it is essential for the specialized creation transmitted by projects to be supported by
organizational creation. Also, the organization will be influenced by the projects that it transmits.
There are obvious benefits to noticing from a leadership viewpoint at projects, where network
understanding, processing, knowledge, and organizational dynamics perform crucial functions.

9
METHODOLOGY
It is seen as relatively significant that project stakeholders retain adequate understanding and
knowledge of project management strategies when utilizing them (Navas et al., 2015).
Regardless of progress and continual development in project management, a few writers specify
that the requirement for reasonable methodologies for handling it is pertinent. These reasonable
methodologies are known as holistic, indifferent with formal strategies. In specific topics, the
methods recommended by a few writers are concentrated entirely on very slightly scoped
methods, such as analysis prototypes that do not contemplate the human extent of the project
adequately (Blaxter et al., 2011). Firms frequently medium financial resources into project
management methods instead, such as the communication ability of managers. The additional
ambush in the organizational category is a vast interest in project management networks, i.e., not
also aligned to an organizational method that benefits project management as a means of
functioning (Demirkesen & Ozorhon, 2017). The systematic structure adoption for project
management is inadequate for beneficial communication because it is similarly obvious that
there is frequently an absence of obligation towards very systematic devices. Formal, targeted
communication is crucial for withstanding stakeholder opposition, for instance, all over the
project.
Recent project management methodologies were constructed to function at the manufacturing
interval, where the additional structured and insufficient capacity of training happened
(Abushova et al., 2016). These methods provided a huge core of information about project
problems, not extended to fulfill project management requirements in the interval of
complicated, information navigated institutions. While methodologies like PMBOK (Project
Management Body of Knowledge) can be of a few insufficient practice, they lag in navigating
information-operated projects to achievement (Mesquida & Mas, 2014). Regardless of this,
PMBOK is discerned as the universal criterion for project management in a few sections. A
significant trait of a project, i.e., it is contemplated to be different, which indicates that there is
no likelihood to discover prepared treatments for any provided project builds suspicion in
projects (Calderón et al., 2017). Thus, it is unavoidable that variations from the actual project
strategies will happen. The process indicates that traditional methods to handle variations are
hardly utilized because of the absence of period. The different chances to obtain something
performed and to obtain it accurately just a period it is accomplished is thus relatively

10
demanding and innately hard to regulate. The constraints of formal project management methods
are exemplified by the increased ratio of project downfalls and a requirement to comprehend that
projects give themselves reasonable to a strategy that motivates equifinality fulfilling the
identical result through various logical signifies through the layout of adjustable project networks
(Obradović et al., 2018). The significance of the usefulness of utilizing specific techniques in
particular projects such as procurement methods. The contextualization essential to apprehend
project complicatedness is formal project management methodologies for controlling costs,
period, and limited results for problematic projects. The subject's complications must be created
into project management processes, presently over-dependent on additional mechanistic,
process-trained strategies. The option of reasonable project delivery methods also can retain a
considerable effect on the achievement of the project (Alias et al., 2012). The project
management methodologies and procedures arise as the sectors of attention in project
management and will thus be examined at the time of the data compilation cycle.

11
REFERENCES
Abdou, S. M., Yong, K., & Othman, M. (2016). Project complexity influence on project
management performance–The Malaysian perspective. In MATEC Web of
Conferences (Vol. 66, p. 00065). EDP Sciences.

Abushova, E., Burova, E., & Suloeva, S. (2016). Strategic analysis in telecommunication project
management system. In the Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation
Networks and Systems (pp. 76-84). Springer, Cham.

Abyad, A. (2018). Project management, motivation theories, and process management. Middle
East Journal of Business, 13(4), 18-22.

Alias, Z., Ahmad, Z., & Idris, M. F. M. (2012). Project management towards best
practice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 108-120.

Alsudiri, T., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Eldabi, T. (2013). Alignment of the large project management
process to business strategy: A review and conceptual framework. Journal of Enterprise
Information Management.

Bell, J. (2011) Doing Your Research Project, 5th edition, Open University Press

Bibarsov, K. R., Khokholova, G. I., & Okladnikova, D. R. (2017). Conceptual basics and
mechanism of innovation project management.

Blaxter, L., C. Hughes and M. Tight (2011) How to Research, 4th edition, Open University Press

Bondarenko, S., Lagodienko, V., Sedikova, I., & Kalaman, O. (2018). Application of project
analysis software in project management in the pre-investment phase. Journal of
Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(13), 676-684.

Brewer, J. L., & Dittman, K. C. (2018). Methods of I.T. project management. Purdue University
Press.

Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques. John Wiley & Sons.

12
Calderón, A., Ruiz, M., & O'Connor, R. V. (2017, September). Coverage of ISO/IEC 29110 project
management process of basic profile by a serious game. In European Conference on
Software Process Improvement (pp. 111-122). Springer, Cham.

Colin, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2015). Developing a framework for statistical process control
approaches in project management. International Journal of Project
Management, 33(6), 1289-1300.

Demirkesen, S., & Ozorhon, B. (2017). Impact of integration management on construction

project management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8),
1639-1654.

Denscombe, M. (2011) The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research projects, 4th
edition, Open University Press

Dunmade, I., Udo, M., Akintayo, T., Oyedepo, S., & Okokpujie, I. P. (2018, September). Lifecycle
impact assessment of an engineering project management process–an SLCA approach.
In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering (Vol. 413, No. 1, p. 012061).
IOP Publishing.

Edkins, A., Geraldi, J., Morris, P., & Smith, A. (2013). Exploring the front-end of project
management. Engineering project organization journal, 3(2), 71-85.

Ferrada, X., Núñez, D., Neyem, A., Serpell, A., & Sepúlveda, M. (2016). A lessons-learned system
for construction project management: a preliminary application. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 226, 302-309.

Fisher, C. (2010) Researching and Writing a Dissertation: an essential guide for business
students, 3rd edition, FT Prentice Hall

Galli, B. J. (2017). Risk management in project environments: Reflection of the standard

process. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 5(2).

13
Galvan, S., Mora, M., O'Connor, R. V., Acosta, F., & Alvarez, F. (2015). Compliance analysis of
agile methodologies with the ISO/IEC 29110 project management process. Procedia
Computer Science, 64, 188-195.

Goedknegt, D. (2012). Sustainability in project management; a case study at University of

Applied Sciences Utrecht. PM World Journal, I (IV).

Gomes, J., & Romão, M. (2016). Improving project success: A case study using benefits and
project management. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 489-497.

Hall, N. G. (2012). Project management: Recent developments and research

opportunities. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 21(2), 129-143.

Jo, S. H., Lee, E. B., & Pyo, K. Y. (2018). Integrating a procurement management process into
critical chain project management (CCPM): A case-study on oil and gas projects, the
piping process. Sustainability, 10(6), 1817.

Jugdev, K., & Mathur, G. (2012). Classifying project management resources by complexity and
leverage. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.

Lyapina, I., Stroeva, O., Vlasova, M., Konobeeva, O., & Konobeeva, E. (2017). Approaches to the
organization of project management in Russia. In Integration and Clustering for
Sustainable Economic Growth (pp. 91-99). Springer, Cham.

Mathur, G., Jugdev, K., & Fung, T. S. (2013). Project management assets and project
management performance outcomes: Exploratory factor analysis. Management
Research Review.

Mathur, G., Jugdev, K., & Fung, T. S. (2014). The relationship between project management
process characteristics and performance outcomes. Management Research Review.

McClory, S., Read, M., & Labib, A. (2017). Conceptualizing the lessons-learned process in project
management: Towards a triple-loop learning framework. International Journal of Project
Management, 35(7), 1322-1335.

14
Mesquida, A. L., & Mas, A. (2014). A project management improvement program according to
ISO/IEC 29110 and PMBOK®. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 26(9), 846-854.

Mohammed, H. J., Al-Jubori, I. A. M., & Kasim, M. M. (2019, August). Evaluating project
management criteria using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. In AIP Conference
Proceedings (Vol. 2138, No. 1, p. 040018). AIP Publishing LLC.

Mustaro, P., & Rossi, R. (2013, July). Project management principles applied in academic
research projects. In Proceedings of the Informing Science and Information Technology
Education Conference. Informing Science Institute.

Navas, H. V., Tenera, A. M., & Machado, V. A. C. (2015). Integrating TRIZ in project management
processes: an ARIZ contribution. Procedia Engineering, 131, 224-231.

Oberlender, G. D. (2014). Project management for engineering and construction. McGraw-Hill

Education.

Obradović, V., Todorović, M., & Bushuyev, S. (2018, September). Sustainability and agility in
project management: contradictory or complementary?. In Conference on Computer
Science and Information Technologies (pp. 522-532). Springer, Cham.

O'Connor, R. V., & Laporte, C. Y. (2012, June). Software project management in very small
entities with ISO/IEC 29110. In European Conference on Software Process
Improvement (pp. 330-341). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Ozguler, I. S. (2016). Increase the projects' success rate through developing multi-cultural
project management processes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, 236-242.

Pereira, A. M., Gonçalves, R. Q., Von Wangenheim, C. G., & Buglione, L. (2013). Comparison of
open-source tools for project management. International Journal of Software
Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 23(02), 189-209.

Punch, K.F. (2005) Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches,
2nd edition, Sage

15
Robson, C. (2002) 2nd Ed Real World Research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-
researchers, Oxford

Runera, M. N. Z. (2014). Performance Analysis On Knowledge Management System on Project

Management. International Journal of New Practices in Management and
Engineering, 3(02), 08-13.

San Cristóbal, J. R., Carral, L., Diaz, E., Fraguela, J. A., & Iglesias, G. (2018). Complexity and
project management: A general overview. Complexity, 2018.

Sanchez, F., Micaelli, J. P., Bonjour, E., & Monticolo, D. (2019). A Step for Improving the
Transition Between Traditional Project Management to Agile Project Management Using
a Project Management Maturity Model. The Journal of Modern Project
Management, 7(1).

Sanjuan, A. G., & Froese, T. (2013). The application of project management standards and
success factors to the development of a project management assessment
tool. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 74, 91-100.

Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.

Silverman, D. Ed. (2010) Doing Qualitative Research: Theory, method, and practice, 3rd edition,
Sage.

Todorović, M. L., Petrović, D. Č., Mihić, M. M., Obradović, V. L., & Bushuyev, S. D. (2015). Project
success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project
management. International journal of project management, 33(4), 772-783.

Turner, R. (2016). Gower handbook of project management. Routledge.

Uikey, N., & Suman, U. (2012, September). An empirical study to design an effective agile
project management framework. In Proceedings of the CUBE International Information
Technology Conference (pp. 385-390).

Wang, N., Wei, K., & Sun, H. (2014). Whole life project management approach to
sustainability. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(2), 246-255.

16
Zwikael, O. (2016). International journal of project management special issue on "project
benefits management".

17