0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views30 pages

D4 - Metstat 2.4 - Pengujian Hipotesis (Part 2)

This document discusses hypothesis testing for differences between two population means and proportions with independent samples, as well as hypothesis testing for differences in paired samples. It provides examples and outlines the procedures and test statistics used for two-tailed, upper tail, and lower tail hypothesis tests in each case.

Uploaded by

212212782
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views30 pages

D4 - Metstat 2.4 - Pengujian Hipotesis (Part 2)

This document discusses hypothesis testing for differences between two population means and proportions with independent samples, as well as hypothesis testing for differences in paired samples. It provides examples and outlines the procedures and test statistics used for two-tailed, upper tail, and lower tail hypothesis tests in each case.

Uploaded by

212212782
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 30

PERTEMUAN 4

PENGUJIAN HIPOTESIS (part 2)

Mata Kuliah : Metode Statistika 2


Politeknik Statistika STIS
OUTLINE
Prosedur Pengujian Hipotesis untuk:
n Beda 2 rata-rata pada sampel independen

n Beda 2 rata-rata pada sampel dependen


(data berpasangan)
n Beda 2 proporsi

n Rasio 2 varians
Hypothesis Tests for the Difference
Between Two Means

n Testing Hypothesis about μ1 – μ2

n Use the same situations discussed already:


n Standard deviations known or unknown
n Sample sizes ³ 30 or not ³ 30
Hypothesis Tests for
Two Population Proportions
Two Population Means, Independent Samples

Lower tail test: Upper tail test: Two-tailed test:

H0: μ1 ³ μ2 H0: μ1 ≤ μ2 H0: μ1 = μ2


HA: μ1 < μ2 HA: μ1 > μ2 HA: μ1 ≠ μ2
i.e., i.e., i.e.,
H0: μ1 – μ2 ³ 0 H0: μ1 – μ2 ≤ 0 H0: μ1 – μ2 = 0
HA: μ1 – μ2 < 0 HA: μ1 – μ2 > 0 HA: μ1 – μ2 ≠ 0
Hypothesis tests for μ1 – μ2

Population means, independent samples

σ1 and σ2 known Use a z test statistic

Use s to estimate unknown


σ1 and σ2 unknown, σ , approximate with a z
n1 and n2 ³ 30 test statistic

σ1 and σ2 unknown, Use s to estimate unknown


n1 or n2 < 30 σ , use a t test statistic
σ1 and σ2 known

Population means,
independent The test statistic for
samples μ1 – μ2 is:

σ1 and σ2 known * z=
( x 1 )
- x 2 - ( μ1 - μ2 )
2 2
σ1 and σ2 unknown, σ σ2
n1 and n2 ³ 30
1
+
n1 n2
σ1 and σ2 unknown,
n1 or n2 < 30
σ1 and σ2 unknown, large samples

Population means,
independent The test statistic for
samples μ1 – μ2 is:

σ1 and σ2 known
z=
( x 1 )
- x 2 - ( μ1 - μ2 )
σ1 and σ2 unknown,
n1 and n2 ³ 30
* s
+
1
2
s2
2

n1 n2
σ1 and σ2 unknown,
n1 or n2 < 30
σ1 and σ2 unknown, small samples
*Assuming equal variances
Population means,
independent The test statistic for μ1 – μ2 is:
samples

t=
( x 1 )
- x 2 - ( μ1 - μ 2 )
σ1 and σ2 known
1 1
sp +
σ1 and σ2 unknown, n1 n 2
n1 and n2 ³ 30
Where ta/2 or ta has (n1 + n2 – 2) d.f.,
σ1 and σ2 unknown,
n1 or n2 < 30
* and

sp =
(n1 - 1)s12 + (n2 - 1)s22
n1 + n2 - 2
σ1 and σ2 unknown, small samples
*Assuming different variances
Population means,
independent The test statistic for μ1 – μ2 is:
samples

t=
( x 1 )
- x 2 - ( μ1 - μ 2 )
σ1 and σ2 known 2 2
s s
1
+ 2

σ1 and σ2 unknown, n1 n 2
n1 and n2 ³ 30
Where ta/2 or ta has d.f.,

*
2 2
s
(1 s
+ 2 )2
σ1 and σ2 unknown, n1 n2
n1 or n2 < 30 v=
[(s
2
1 n ) /(n - 1)]+ [(s
1
2
1
2
2 )
2
n2 /(n2 - 1) ]
Hypothesis tests for μ1 – μ2
Two Population Means, Independent Samples
Lower tail test: Upper tail test: Two-tailed test:
H0: μ1 – μ2 ³ 0 H0: μ1 – μ2 ≤ 0 H0: μ1 – μ2 = 0
HA: μ1 – μ2 < 0 HA: μ1 – μ2 > 0 HA: μ1 – μ2 ≠ 0

a a a/2 a/2

-za za -za/2 za/2


Reject H0 if z < -za Reject H0 if z > za Reject H0 if z < -za/2
or z > za/2
Pooled sp t Test: Example
You’re a financial analyst for a brokerage firm. Is there a
difference in dividend yield between stocks listed on the
NYSE & NASDAQ? You collect the following data:
NYSE NASDAQ
Number 21 25
Sample mean 3.27 2.53
Sample std dev 1.30 1.16

Assuming equal variances, is


there a difference in average
yield (a = 0.05)?
Solution
Reject H0 Reject H0
H0: μ1 - μ2 = 0 i.e. (μ1 = μ2)
HA: μ1 - μ2 ≠ 0 i.e. (μ1 ≠ μ2)
a = 0.05 .025 .025

df = 21 + 25 - 2 = 44 -2.0154 0 2.0154 t
Critical Values: t = ± 2.0154
2.040
Test Statistic: Decision:
3.27 - 2.53 Reject H0 at a = 0.05
t= = 2.040
1 1
1.2256 + Conclusion:
21 25 There is evidence of a
difference in means.
Calculating the Test Statistic
The test statistic is:

t=
(x 1 )
- x 2 - (μ1 - μ 2 ) (3.27 - 2.53) - 0
= = 2.040
1 1 1 1
sp + 1.2256 +
n1 n 2 21 25

sp =
(n1 - 1)s12 + (n2 - 1)s22 =
(21 - 1)1.30 2 + (25 - 1)1.16 2 = 1.2256
n1 + n2 - 2 21 + 25 - 2
Hypothesis Testing for
Paired Samples

The test statistic for d is


Paired
samples
d - μd
t=
sd
n
n is the
number n
of pairs
in the
Where ta/2 has n - 1 d.f. å i
(d - d) 2

paired and sd is: sd = i=1


sample n -1
Hypothesis Testing for
Paired Samples
(continued)
Paired Samples
Lower tail test: Upper tail test: Two-tailed test:

H0: μd ³ 0 H0: μd ≤ 0 H0: μd = 0


HA: μd < 0 HA: μd > 0 HA: μd ≠ 0

a a a/2 a/2

-ta ta -ta/2 ta/2


Reject H0 if t < -ta Reject H0 if t > ta Reject H0 if t < -ta/2
or t > ta/2
Where t has n - 1 d.f.
Paired Samples Example
n Assume you send your salespeople to a “customer
service” training workshop. Is the training effective?
You collect the following data:

Number of Complaints: (2) - (1) S di


Salesperson Before (1) After (2) Difference, di d = n
C.B. 6 4 - 2
T.F. 20 6 -14
= -4.2
M.H. 3 2 - 1
R.K.
M.O.
0
4
0
0
0
- 4 sd =
å i
(d - d) 2

-21 n -1
= 5.67
Paired Samples: Solution
§ Has the training made a difference in the number of
complaints (at the 0.01 level)?
Reject Reject
H0: μd = 0
HA: μd ¹ 0
a/2 a/2

a = .01 d = - 4.2 - 4.604 4.604


- 1.66
Critical Value = ± 4.604
d.f. = n - 1 = 4 Decision: Do not reject H0
(t stat is not in the reject region)
Test Statistic:
Conclusion: There is not a
d - μd - 4.2 - 0
t= = = -1.66 significant change in the
sd / n 5.67/ 5 number of complaints.
Hypothesis Tests for
Two Population Proportions

Population proportions

Lower tail test: Upper tail test: Two-tailed test:

H0: p1 ³ p2 H0: p1 ≤ p2 H0: p1 = p2


HA: p1 < p2 HA: p1 > p2 HA: p1 ≠ p2
i.e., i.e., i.e.,
H0: p1 – p2 ³ 0 H0: p1 – p2 ≤ 0 H0: p1 – p2 = 0
HA: p1 – p2 < 0 HA: p1 – p2 > 0 HA: p1 – p2 ≠ 0
Two Population Proportions
Since we begin by assuming the null
hypothesis is true, we assume p1 = p2
Population
and pool the two 𝑝̂ estimates
proportions
The pooled estimate for the
overall proportion is:

n1 pˆ 1 + n 2 pˆ 2 x1 + x 2
pˆ = =
n1 + n 2 n1 + n 2
where x1 and x2 are the numbers from
samples 1 and 2 with the characteristic of interest
Two Population Proportions
(continued)

Population The test statistic for


proportions p1 – p2 is:

z=
( pˆ1 - pˆ 2 ) - ( p1 - p2 )
æ1 1ö
pˆ (1 - pˆ ) çç + ÷÷
è n1 n2 ø
Hypothesis Tests for
Two Population Proportions
Population proportions
Lower tail test: Upper tail test: Two-tailed test:
H0: p1 – p2 ³ 0 H0: p1 – p2 ≤ 0 H0: p1 – p2 = 0
HA: p1 – p2 < 0 HA: p1 – p2 > 0 HA: p1 – p2 ≠ 0

a a a/2 a/2

-za za -za/2 za/2


Reject H0 if z < -za Reject H0 if z > za Reject H0 if z < -za/2
or z > za/2
Example:
Two population Proportions

Is there a significant difference between the


proportion of men and the proportion of
women who will vote Yes on Proposition A?

n In a random sample, 36 of 72 men and 31 of


50 women indicated they would vote Yes

n Test at the .05 level of significance


Example:
Two population Proportions
(continued)
n The hypothesis test is:
H0: p1 – p2 = 0 (the two proportions are equal)
HA: p1 – p2 ≠ 0 (there is a significant difference between proportions)

n The sample proportions are:


n Men: 𝑝̂! = 36/72 = .50
n Women: 𝑝̂" = 31/50 = .62

§ The pooled estimate for the overall proportion is:


x1 + x 2 36 + 31 67
pˆ = = = = .549
n1 + n 2 72 + 50 122
Example:
Two population Proportions
(continued)
Reject H0 Reject H0
The test statistic for p1 – p2 is:
.025 .025
z=
( pˆ1 - pˆ 2 ) - ( p1 - p 2 )
æ1 1 ö
pˆ (1 - pˆ )çç + ÷÷ -1.96 1.96
è n1 n 2 ø -1.31
=
( .50 - .62) - ( 0) = - 1.31
æ 1
.549 (1 - .549) ç + ÷
1 ö Decision: Do not reject H0
è 72 50 ø
Conclusion: There is not
significant evidence of a
Critical Values = ±1.96
For a = .05 difference in proportions
who will vote yes between
men and women.
Hypothesis Tests for
Two Population Variances
Hypothesis Tests for Variances

H0: σ12 – σ22 = 0


Two tailed test
* Tests for Two
HA: σ12 – σ22 ≠ 0 Population Variances

H0: σ12 – σ22 ³ 0 Lower tail test


HA: σ12 – σ22 < 0 F test statistic
H0: σ12 – σ22 ≤ 0 Upper tail test
HA: σ12 – σ22 > 0
F Test for Difference in Two
Population Variances
Hypothesis Tests for Variances
The F test statistic is:
2
s Tests for Two
F= 1
2
Population Variances
s 2

s12 = Variance of Sample 1


* F test statistic
n1 - 1 = numerator degrees of freedom

s22 = Variance of Sample 2


n2 - 1 = denominator degrees of freedom
Finding the Critical Value
H 0 : σ1 2 – σ2 2 = 0
H 0 : σ1 2 – σ2 2 ≤ 0 H A : σ1 2 – σ2 2 ≠ 0
H A : σ1 2 – σ2 2 > 0

a a/2
a/2
0 F 0 F
Do not Reject H0 Do not Reject H0
reject H0 Fa reject H0 Fa/2
n rejection region n rejection region for
for a one-tail test a two-tailed test is
(upper tail test) is
s12 s 2
s12 F = 2 > Fa / 2 or F = 12 < F1-a / 2
F = 2 > Fa s2 s2
s2
F Test: An Example

You are a financial analyst for a brokerage firm. You


want to compare dividend yields between stocks listed
on the NYSE & NASDAQ. You collect the following data:
NYSE NASDAQ
Number 21 25
Mean 3.27 2.53
Std dev 1.30 1.16

Is there a difference in the


variances between the NYSE &
NASDAQ at the a = 0.1 level?
F Test: Example Solution
n Form the hypothesis test:
H0: σ21 – σ22 = 0 (there is no difference between variances)
HA: σ21 – σ22 ≠ 0 (there is a difference between variances)

n Find the F critical value for a = .1:


n Numerator:

n df1 = n1 – 1 = 21 – 1 = 20
n Denominator:

n df2 = n2 – 1 = 25 – 1 = 24
F.95, 20, 24 = 0,48 or F.05, 20, 24 = 2.03
F Test: Example Solution
(continued)

n The test statistic is: H 0 : σ1 2 – σ2 2 = 0


H A : σ1 2 – σ2 2 ≠ 0
s12 1.30 2
F= 2 = 2
= 1.256
s2 1.16
a/2 = .05

0
nConclusion : do not reject H0 Do not Reject H0
reject H0 Fa/2 =2.03
n There is no evidence of a

difference in variances at a = .1

You might also like