BIO Science Writing
BIO Science Writing
The HNBR/EPDM rubbers were mixed in HAAKE internal mixer at 100°C, 60 rpm for 5
minutes and transferred to a two-roll open mill for mixing the curing agents. The various
compositions of their specimens of 2mm thickness were cured at 160°C (sulfur-cured) and
170°C (peroxide-cured) using a hydraulic press. The specimens were then analyzed after pre-
conditioning at room temperature for 24 hours to obtain a precise view on their performance
properties.
The rheometric studies reveal that, in both curing systems, the optimum cure time increases
with decrease in the HNBR content. But the scorch time increases, and crosslinking density
decreases for sulfur-cured blends and vice-versa for peroxide-cured blends. Perhaps, we
found that the peroxide-cured blends need more time to reach optimum cure. However, both
rubbers exhibit better cure mechanisms with peroxide-cured systems and thus showing
improved cure compatibility.
Equilibrium swelling of the blends in chlorobenzene and cyclohexane showed that the
uncured content of HNBR is lesser than EPDM in any curing system. The amount of uncured
material is more in sulfur-cured systems and thus confirming our previous understanding.
The peroxide-cured blends exhibited better efficiency in crosslinking the EPDM phase and
sulfur for HNBR phase due to their dissimilar polarities.
The tensile strength (TS) and elongation at break (EB) for peroxide-cured systems were
lower since they have shorter chain length between two crosslinking points. However, with
an increase in HNBR content they showed better TS and EB in both curing systems. The
hardness and 50% modulus on peroxide-cured systems decreases with increasing the HNBR
proportion and opposite for sulfur-cured blends. Blends with higher HNBR content showed
poor retention of tensile strength after aging at 150°C for 72 hours irrespective of the
curatives used. However, peroxide-cured blends show better retention in tensile strength than
sulfur-cured blends.
Also, the two different glass transition temperature peaks from the dynamic mechanical
analysis (DMA) at around -10°C and -50°C further confirmed the presence of two distinct
rubber phases. In addition, the phase-separated images of the uncured HNBR/EPDM blends
were observed from the micrographs corroborating their limited compatibility.
We would like to thank LANXESS Deutschland GmbH and Shandong Science and
Technology Program for Universities (J12LA14) for their support.
References
1. A. D. Arup Kumar Ghosh, Dipak Kumar Basu, Effect of
Bis(diisopropyl)thiophosphoryl Disulfide on the Covulcanization of Styrene–
Butadiene Rubber and Ethylene–Propylene–Diene (Monomer) Blends. Journal of
Applied Polymer Science, 1231-1242 (2003).
2. R. Guo, A. G. Talma, R. N. Datta, W. K. Dierkes, J. W. M. Noordermeer, Novel
Surface Modification of Sulfur by Plasma Polymerization and its Application in
Dissimilar Rubber-Rubber Blends. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing 30,
679-695 (2010).
3. R. Guo, A. G. Talma, R. N. Datta, W. K. Dierkes, J. W. M. Noordermeer, A Phase
Blending Study on Rubber Blends Based on the Solubility Preference of Curatives.
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 294, 635-642 (2009).
4. A. Choudhury, A. K. Bhowmick, C. Ong, M. Soddemann, Influence of molecular
parameters on thermal, mechanical, and dynamic mechanical properties of
hydrogenated nitrile rubber and its nanocomposites. Polymer Engineering & Science
50, 1389-1399 (2010).
5. P. K. Das, A. Ganguly, M. Banerji, Electron-beam curing of hydrogenated
acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 97, 648-651
(2005).
6. Z. Z. Xinyan Shi, Lingyan Jia, Qi Li, Weina Bi, HNBR/EPDM blends:
Covulcanization and compatibility. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 3054-3060
(2013).