2015 - 1 Gold in The Context of Portfolio Diversification
2015 - 1 Gold in The Context of Portfolio Diversification
Classic
This article originates from In Gold We Trust report 2015, which can be downloaded at
https://ingoldwetrust.report/reports-archive/in-gold-we-trust-2015/?lang=en
The In Gold We Trust report 2020 will be published on May 27, 2020.
Ronald-Peter Stöferle
& Mark J. Valek
“In GOLD we TRUST” 2015 - Extended Version
Incrementum AG
In Gold we Trust 2015 – Extended Version
June 25th, 2015
“In no national economy which has advanced beyond the first stages
of development are there any commodities, the saleability of which is
so little restricted in such a number of respects—personally,
quantitatively, spatially, and temporally—as the precious metals.”
Carl Menger 1
“The wise man plans ahead.” As we have done in our previous studies, we want to analyze the
Friedrich von Schiller advantages of gold in the context of portfolio diversification. Due
to its unique characteristics, we are firmly convinced that gold –
especially in the current environment – is an important portfolio
component. Below we once more summarize the major advantages:
„Most investors are primarily Below we take a brief look at the annual performance of the gold price
oriented toward return, how much since the beginning of the new monetary era, i.e., since the end of the
they can make and pay little Bretton Woods system. The annualized growth rate since 1971
attention to risk, how much they amounts to 8.1%.
can lose.“
Seth Klarman
1
See: “On the Origins of Money”, Carl Menger
2
We have already discussed the portfolio characteristics of gold in great detail in our
previous gold reports, see “The extraordinary portfolio characteristics of gold” - Gold
Report 2013, “Gold as a stabilizing portfolio component” - Gold Report 2012, as well as
“Gold as a Portfolio Hedge” - Gold Report 2011
3
See: “Gold: a commodity like no other”, World Gold Council
4
See: “Gold: hedging against tail risk”, World Gold Council
5
See: “The impact of inflation and deflation on the case for gold”, Oxford Economics
127%
72%
66%
49%
37%
31%
30%
25%
24%
23%
22%
22%
20%
19%
18%
17%
17%
14%
14%
10%
7%
7%
6%
5%
3%
3%
1%
-2%
-2%
-2%
-2%
-4%
-5%
-5%
-6%
-10%
-11%
-15%
-17%
-19%
-21%
-25%
2013 -28%
1981 -32%
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2014
Sources: Federal Reserve St. Louis, Incrementum AG
1669
1 80 0
1561
1 60 0
1410
1289
1228
1 40 0
1208
1 20 0
974
867
1 00 0
701
8 00
608
604
6 00
458
447
446
436
417
412
387
385
384
383
382
378
367
364
363
362
360
344
333
317
316
310
294
280
278
271
4 00
194
164
160
148
125
2 00
98
58
41
“Risk is not about what happens Numerous studies prove that adding gold lowers the volatility of a
but what could happen and what portfolio and hence improves statistical portfolio characteristics.
the consequences could be. This is also shown in the following chart. The annual performances of
Russian Roulette is statistically a the S&P 500 are sorted from left (weakest year) to right (strongest year)
6:1 winner…until you lose.” and contrasted with the respective performance of gold. One can see
Prof. Dave Collum that during the S&P's six worst performance years, gold clearly
outperformed not only on a relative, but also on an absolute basis. This
confirms its usefulness as a portfolio hedge. On the other hand, it
can also be seen that rally phases in the US stock market are
usually not a positive environment for the gold price. From this
perspective, it is plausible that the continuation of gold's bull
market should coincide with the end of, resp. a pause in the stock
market rally.
“Only a desperate gambler stakes The fact that gold is an excellent “event hedge” can be discerned in the
everything on a single throw of the following chart. It compares the performance of different asset classes
dice.” during the weakest 20% of trading days in the S&P 500. Only gold and
Friedrich von Schiller other precious metals exhibit a positive performance during these crash
periods.
“It is a case of better having However, correlations are never immutable, which can be seen in the
insurance and not needing it, following table. It shows how strongly the correlations between gold and
than one day realizing that one other important asset classes have fluctuated in previous years. Thus
needs it but doesn’t have it.” the correlation between EUR/USD and gold stood between 0.10 (nigh
Acting-man.com insignificant) and 0.5. Against stocks, gold partly exhibited negative and
partly positive correlation. Only its correlation with silver appears stable,
having fluctuated between 0.74 and 0.90.
crises since the beginning of the 1970s shows that such crises on
average result in a 13% rise in the price. However, it should be
noted here that such “geopolitical premiums” tend to be fleeting
affairs (often with the obvious exception of the region directly
affected). Only if an event actually clearly influences the monetary and
economic backdrop are such premiums sustainable (an example of
this would be the WTC attack, which likely contributed to the Fed
subsequently adopting a looser monetary policy stance than it would
have done otherwise). In this sense, financial market crises are more
likely to exert a lasting effect on gold prices, as they always provoke
an opening of the monetary spigots. If a geopolitical crisis takes place
when a gold bull market is already underway, it may affect the size of
the rally (the Iranian revolution/hostage crisis and the Soviet invasion
of Afghanistan are pertinent examples). However, in these cases it is
hard to prove the actual cause-effect relationship. In a gold bear
market, price spikes due to geopolitical events more often than
not create selling opportunities.
7
See: “Liquidity”, Howard Marks, Oaktree Memo
8
See GFMS Gold Survey 2015
9
See: “Annual gold trade reaches $ 22 trillion”, Frik Els, Mining.com
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Gold US Treasuries JGB's US Agencies German UK Gilts
Bunds
Sources: German finance agency, Japanese MOF, SIFMA, Thomson Reuters GFMS, UK
DMO, WGC
“Despite the generally It is difficult to make a generally valid statement as to the optimal
dismissive posture towards gold size of the gold allocation a portfolio should contain, as this
among global economists and depends on individual preferences, risk tolerance, time horizon
monetary authorities, and its and the economic backdrop. In order to get an idea, one could use
unpopularity among the great central banks as a model. Despite gold's official “demonetization”, the
majority of large capital bulk of strategic currency reserves continues to be held in the form of
allocators in the West, global gold. They serve as the ultimate insurance against risks in an
central banks continue to buy, increasingly virtual financial world, and oddly enough, it appears
re-patriate, and hoard it, which that in recent years, not Western central banks, but primarily
suggests the potential for future Western private investors have reduced their gold holdings.
use in a currency devaluation.“
Paul Brodsky Most recently, Germany's Bundesbank has pointed to the value,
characteristics and usefulness of gold. In a presentation by the
Bundesbank's board, the central functions of gold were summarized as
follows 11:
► Diversification
► Universal acceptance
► Robustness against shocks (country and currency risks)
► Confidence building
► Timeless classic in its function as a medium of exchange and
store of value
► We consider gold on the basis of monetary policy reasons as
part of Germany's currency reserves
Conclusion:
"Predicting rain doesn't count - Apart from these highly relevant portfolio characteristics, gold also has
building the ark does." a qualitative characteristic as an investment asset that differentiates it
Warren Buffett from most other assets. Gold is a debt-free asset and therefore in
contrast to bonds – but also bank deposits – is free from any inherent
counterparty risk. Gold is pure property. The paper market by
contrast is based on countless promises by a variety of
counterparties. The attractiveness of a liquid asset without
counterparty risk is valued less highly in periods of (perceived) security.
Once concerns over potential default risks increase (deflationary
environment), this characteristic of gold will once again be valued more
highly.
10
Daily turnover is calculated as daily average volume divided by total outstanding
value. In the case of gold, total outstanding is calculated using private and public bullion
holdings
11
See: Board presentation, Deutsche Bundesbank 2013
Rising rates = declining gold To come back to the initial statement, at first glance the
price? Fact or myth? assumption appears to make sense intuitively. As the level of
interest rates in an economy rise, investments producing a yield will
gain in attractiveness for many investors. By contrast, investment
assets such as gold or commodities that do not produce a steady return
become less attractive, so the argument goes.
However, one should not forget that interest rate levels are not
determined by market forces in the paper money era and therefore
are no longer a phenomenon of the market economy. The free
formation of interest rates, which would occur in a free market, is
hampered by the policies of central banks, as well as the extension of
circulation credit. 12
16 7
12 6
8 5
4 4
0 3
12 According to Mises, circulation credit consists of loans that are not backed by savings
13 Since the introduction of the target corridor, we have used the upper limit (0.25%) in
our calculations used in the charts and tables of this chapter.
Although the Federal Funds rate and gold prices exhibit a clear
Tightening cycles can also be a
negative correlation, some periods can be observed during which
positive environment for gold
the relationship collapses. In the tightening phase between February
1972 and August 1974, the Fed Funds rate doubled from 5% to 10%,
and gold rose from USD 48 to USD 155. From January 1977 to April
1980, gold rallied from USD 132 to USD 520, and especially between
June 2004 and August 2007, the US base rate was raised from 1% to
5.25%, while gold rallied from USD 395 to USD 715.
50%
195% 319% 70%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
-10%
-20%
-30%
-40%
Feb. 1 972 - Jan. 1 977 - Jul. 1 980 - Feb. 1 983 - Feb. 1 987 - Jan. 1 994 - Apr. 1 999 - Jun. 2004 -
Aug. 1 974 Apr. 1 980 Jul. 1 981 Aug. 1 984 Mrz. 19 89 Apr. 1 995 Nov. 20 00 Jul. 2 007
What are the reasons for the relationship breaking down in some time
periods?
Conclusion:
Three of the largest upward gold Although statistically, there clearly exists a negative correlation
moves occurred in rising rate between the effective Federal Funds rate and gold, we advise
environments caution. From a historical perspective, the correlation could be
observed in several interest rate cycles. Nevertheless, the initially
mentioned assumption that a rising level of interest rates is necessarily
reflected by a falling gold price, appears dubious. Three of the largest
gold rallies of the post 1971 era occurred in rising nominal rate
environments.
14
As we have discussed in our book, we don't regard any of the currently existing paper
currencies as money, but as state-issued circulation media. These are “(...) according to
Ludwig von Mises bank notes that take the place of money, are however not fully
covered by money with respect to their maturity and liquidity” See: “Oesterreichische
Schule fuer Anleger” Taghizadegan, Stoeferle, Valek, p. 36, 69 („Austrian School for
Investors“)
► Euro at 57.8%
► Yen at 13.6%
► British pound at 11.9%
► Canadian dollar at 9.1%
► Swedish kroner at 4.2%
► Swiss franc at 3.6%
US-Dollar-Index (USDX)
160
140
120
100
80
USDX
60
15
See to this also our remarks in „In Gold we Trust 2013“, p. 16-18
16
To this end the geometric mean of the currency basket is calculated.
65
7,5
75
7,0
85
6,5
95
6,0
105
115 5,5
USDX
125 5,0
Gold (ln)
135
4,5
145
4,0
The inverse correlation between the USDX and gold can be clearly
discerned in the table above. In addition, it turns out that the USDX and
gold are not only negatively correlated in general (correlation
coefficient: -0.63 17), but also that this inverse correlation is especially
pronounced in times of USDX bull or bear markets.
Interesting asymmetry: gold rises Especially noteworthy – and hardly ever mentioned in public
much more when dollar declines, discourse – is the seemingly obvious asymmetry: Thus the gold
than it falls when the dollar is price rises more than twice as much when the dollar is declining than it
rallying falls when the dollar is rallying. The WGC study moreover shows that
the correlation between gold and stocks, as well as commodities, is
lower in times of a rising dollar. This is, in our opinion, important
information in a portfolio construction context.
17
A value of -1 symbolizes perfect negative correlation, while a value of +1 signals
perfect positive correlation
18
See: „Gold Investor: Risk management and capital preservation, Volume 8“, World
Gold Council
Conclusion:
The consensus opinion appears to be that a strong US dollar
automatically leads to lower gold prices. This thesis can be
buttressed with empirical data. However, our analysis shows that this
relationship is clearly asymmetrical: the damage a strong dollar inflicts
on the gold price is far weaker than the wind a weak dollar blows into
gold's sails.
19
See: “Das goldene Erbe des US-Dollar”, Prof. Dr. Thorsten Polleit (“The golden
heritage of the US dollar”)
20
See: „Gold Investor: Risk management and capital preservation“, Volume 8, World
Gold Council
“Amazingly, people are paying The chart below shows real interest rates 21 and the gold price. It can
Switzerland to warehouse their clearly be seen that negative real interest rates have prevailed in the
money for 10 years…That makes 1970s, as well as since 2002, creating a positive environment for gold.
gold a high-yielder, because it
Real interest rates vs. the gold price since 1971
yields zero.”
Jeff Gundlach 2000
10
1600
1200
4
Gold
800
1
-2 400
-5 0
1700 -2
1500 0
1300 2
1100 4
900 6
700 8
The following table shows the average monthly gold price performance
in times of low, moderate and high real interest rate levels. In addition,
it shows the trend in a context of rising and/or falling real interest rates.
The best environment for the gold price (+1.5% per month) is when
real interest rates are low and declining.
21
Federal funds rate minus CPI
Conclusion:
A long term negative gold price trend would have to go hand in
hand with rising, resp. consistently positive real interest rates.
Due to the levels of debt that have been amassed by developed nation
governments, companies and households, we regard this as scarcely
imaginable. Central banks have long become prisoners of the
policy of over-indebtedness.
Stocks
“The funny thing is there is a The bull market in stocks began in March 2009. In the course of the
disconnect between what above-mentioned asset price inflation and the disinflationary
investors are saying and what environment, stocks have evidently been among the greatest
they are doing. No one thinks all beneficiaries of the zero interest rate policy. Last year we wrote: “The
the problems the global current “lowflation” environment that still prevails, which is
financial crisis revealed have characterized by low price inflation and growth figures that largely
been healed. But when you have remain below expectations, has turned out to be a Land of
an equity rally like you've seen Cockaigne for stock market investors.” As the disinflationary
for the past four or five years, environment continued to persist, stocks were among the best
then everybody has had to performing asset classes over the past 12 months.
participate to some extent.
What you've had are fully However, the fact that the stock market has advanced to an alarming
invested bears.” extent is evident in numerous indicators and comparisons. Thus, the
Gerard Minack share of margin debt relative to market capitalization is by now at a far
higher level than at the peak of the dotcom bubble. 22
22
See: “IMF tells regulators to brace for global ‘liquidity shock’”, Ambrose Evans-
Pritchard, The Telegraph
40
1929: 33x
30
1901: 25x 1966: 24x
20
10 2015: 27x
Average: 16.6x
0
1881 1889 1897 1906 1914 1922 1931 1939 1947 1956 1964 1972 1981 1989 1997 2006 2014
Shiller PE
Sources: Prof. Robert Shiller, Incrementum AG
“Ultimately, investors will need An analysis of the four historic peaks in the Shiller P/E ratio to date and
to choose where to place their the subsequent performance of the US stock market should dampen
faith – in history books or in the optimism of investors who are currently bullish on stocks. Investors
crystal balls.” have made no money in the decades following these peaks, and
Jordan Eliseo suffered drawdowns up to a maximum of 81%. 23
23
See: „Dire Straits: Money for Nothing – Debt for Free“, Jordan Eliseo
140%
149% 127%
120%
100%
Average: 68%
80%
60%
40%
20%
Q4 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
1950
US Stock Market as % of US GDP
Sources: Federal Reserve St. Louis, Incrementum AG
“My fear is that because interest Tobin's Q ratio (the ratio of market capitalization to book values)
rates are suppressed, therefore of US stocks is at an extreme level as well. The metric is calculated
earnings are inflated. So when by dividing the enterprise value of a company (market capitalization
rates go up … the hall of mirrors plus liabilities) by the replacement costs of its assets 24.
is shattered and we look at each
other and see what actually is Since 1900 the ratio's median has stood at approx. 0.7x. Since 2009
real rather than what the Fed (0.56x) a significant increase in Tobin's Q can be observed. In the
wants us to believe.” meantime, it has risen to 1.12x, the second highest peak in history. By
James Grant now the ratio is two standard deviations above its mean. The further it
rises, the more likely it becomes that there will be a major price
correction or even an economic collapse. 25
24
See “Tobin's Q”, Wikipedia
25
See “Oesterreichische Schule fuer Anleger”, Taghizadegan, Stoeferle, Valek, p. 263-
264 (an English version will become available later this year)
15
13
11
10000
9
5
1000
3
-1
-3 100
1971 1977 1983 1989 1995 2001 2007 2013
CPI Dow Jones Index
A look at the Dow/Gold ratio over the long term shows that gold is
relatively undervalued compared to stocks. With a value of slightly
over 15x the ratio is currently well above the long term median of 6x. In
1932 the ratio stood at 2x, at the end of the last bull market in 1980 it
stood at 1.3x. We expect that in the course of the current secular bull
market, levels near 2x can be attained again. The current trend in the
ratio reminds us – not least due to the pronounced disinflation
backdrop – of the mid-cycle correction from 1974 to 1976.
10
Median: 6.1x
1
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Dow/Gold-Ratio
Conclusion:
US stocks: mean reversion US stocks are trading at extremely generous valuations in
only appears to be a question comparison to historical levels. A reversion to the mean appears to
of time be only a question of time. In our assessment the performance of stocks
currently represents one of the largest opportunity costs for holders of
gold. The conviction that one might be missing out on even greater
gains tends to rise in concert with a stock market advance, and these
26
See: „Ausblick 2015“, Wellenreiter-Invest study, Robert Rethfeld und Alexander
Hirsekorn („2015 Outlook“)
About us
He studied business administration and finance in the USA and at the Vienna University
of Economics and Business Administration, and also gained work experience at the
trading desk of a bank during his studies. Upon graduation he joined the research
department of Erste Group, where in 2007 he published his first In Gold We Trust report.
Over the years, the In Gold We Trust report has become one of the benchmark
publications on gold, money, and inflation.
Since 2013 he has held the position as reader at scholarium in Vienna, and he also speaks
at Wiener Börse Akademie (i.e. the Vienna Stock Exchange Academy). In 2014, he co-
authored the international bestseller “Austrian School for Investors”, and in 2019 “The
Zero Interest Trap”. Moreover, he is an advisor for Tudor Gold Corp. (TUD), a significant
explorer in British Columbia’s Golden Triangle, and a member of the advisory board of
Affinity Metals (AFF).
While working full-time, Mark studied business administration at the Vienna University
of Business Administration and has continuously worked in financial markets and asset
management since 1999. Prior to the establishment of Incrementum AG, he was with
Raiffeisen Capital Management for ten years, most recently as fund manager in the area
of inflation protection and alternative investments. He gained entrepreneurial experience
as co-founder of philoro Edelmetalle GmbH.
Since 2013 he has held the position as reader at scholarium in Vienna, and he also speaks
at Wiener Börse Akademie (i.e. the Vienna Stock Exchange Academy). In 2014, he co-
authored the book “Austrian School for Investors”.
Incrementum AG
We are very concerned about the economic developments in recent years, especially with
respect to the global rise in debt and extreme monetary measures taken by central banks.
We are reluctant to believe that the basis of today’s economy, i.e. the uncovered credit
money system, is sustainable. This means that particularly when it comes to investments,
acting parties should look beyond the horizon of the current monetary system. Our clients
appreciate the unbiased illustration and communication of our publications. Our goal is
to offer solid and innovative investment solutions that do justice to the
opportunities and risks of today’s prevalent complex and fragile
environment.
Contact
Incrementum AG
Im Alten Riet 102
9494 – Schaan/Liechtenstein
www.incrementum.li
www.ingoldwetrust.li
Email: [email protected]
Disclaimer
This publication is for information purposes only, and represents neither investment
advice, nor an investment analysis or an invitation to buy or sell financial instruments.
Specifically, the document does not serve as a substitute for individual investment or
other advice. The statements contained in this publication are based on the knowledge as
of the time of preparation and are subject to change at any time without further notice.
The authors have exercised the greatest possible care in the selection of the information
sources employed, however, they do not accept any responsibility (and neither does
Incrementum AG) for the correctness, completeness or timeliness of the information,
respectively the information sources, made available, as well as any liabilities or damages,
irrespective of their nature, that may result there from (including consequential or
indirect damages, loss of prospective profits or the accuracy of prepared forecasts).
Copyright: 2020 Incrementum AG. All rights reserved