Fiction Literary Analysis Research
Fiction Literary Analysis Research
For this assignment, you will continue to develop your analysis skills and examine one
of the short stories we have read using the literary techniques (such as plot, character,
tone, etc) we have discussed in class and in the text. Your goal for this paper is to
see what scholars have said/are saying about these texts in modern times. Do you
agree or disagree with them? Why? Why not? You are engaging in scholarly
conversation here.
Requirements:
Thesis driven argumentative research.
3 sources minimum. (textbook does not count as one of the two sources).
4 full pages- 6 pages. (4 is the minimum. 3 ½ pages does not meet the
requirement)
MLA style.
Peer reviewed Scholarly sources required. (websites and review do not count)
Work Cited page (does not count towards the total page count)
Students must use 3rd person language, not 1st (I, My, Me).
Must have quotes.
Quotes must be set up and cited correctly.
Tutoring verification required.
More options:
Students can also focus on the types of conflicts we have been learning about as the
foundation for your paper. By approaching your paper through conflict, main
ideas/arguments can begin to formulate.
You can focus on the historical events and beliefs of the period in which it was written
(historical and/or sociological aspects of the work), or psychoanalysis of the characters
(psychology), etc.
Elements such as the work’s characters or conflict or symbolism or theme, or perhaps
two or more related literary elements [such as the interrelated elements of conflict
development and theme, or symbolism’s contribution to the creation of theme(s) must
be included. Look at the way literary devices are used that draw us to the idea that “A
Rose for Emily” can be looked at as a political reading. You will need to use quotes from
the text and scholarly sources to defend your argument.
You need to also include information about plot devices and how that contributes to how
you are approaching your analysis. In other words, you are defending the way you see
these readings with sources and showing the reader why your argument is valid.
Like your poetry paper but with outside research. It is an analysis from a perspective of
your choosing. Not a personal analysis.