EAI Proceedings Proposal
EAI Proceedings Proposal
In order for us to make an informed evaluation of your proposal, we ask you to complete this
proceedings proposal form. Conferences applying for publication in one of our series must have an
international Program Committee, a coherent set of topics of international relevance, and at least
three reviewers per paper.
1.3. Name and email address of the conference contact for the discussion of the proposal:
1.4. Estimated number of participants at the conference and their expected geographical
distribution: Please also give the numbers and the geographical distribution of participants attending
the past two events, if applicable.
1.6. If the following information is not available on the website, kindly supply it here:
1.6.1. Number in the conference series (for example, the third event in the series):
1.7. If you are aiming to start first year conference please state your motivation for this. How do
you intend to attract a good number of high-quality submissions?
2. Proceedings Information
2.1. Publication history of previous proceedings and links to the proceedings, if available.
2.2. Estimated number of pages in the proceedings (where a page contains some 400 words):
2.3. Expected number of accepted full papers (6+ pages of around 400 words each) and accepted
short papers (4-6 pages of around 400 words each). Full papers must compose at least 50% of the
proceedings:
2.4. Desired publication date: Would you like to have the proceedings ready in time for the
event?
2.7. Please indicate any supplementary material or data you plan to include: (e.g., software,
online files, dedicated website, solutions manual, etc.)
3. Reviewing
Documentation of the review process is needed. Please note that we might require copies of the
review reports upon submission of the final manuscript.
3.1.2. How many qualified submissions do you expect to receive? Please also give the submission
figures for the last two years, if applicable.
3.1.3. Please give an estimate of the planned acceptance rate. Please also give the acceptance rates
of the last two years, if applicable.
3.1.5. What is the average number of reviewers assigned to a paper for your proceedings? (There
should be a minimum of three reviewers per paper.)
3.1.6. What is the average number of papers assigned to each reviewer for your conference
proceedings?
3.2. Please list names and affiliations of reviewers and specify whether they are conference
program committee members or external reviewers:
3.3. Please give details of the reviewing schedule: submission date, acceptance notification,
deadline for final papers
3.4. Are you planning to carry out a plagiarism check and if so, which tools will you use?