Scribd
Upload
82 views1 page

Defense-Grading-Sheet - DESIGN 9

The document is an oral examination grading sheet for a thesis research writing in an Architecture Department. It contains criteria for evaluating a student's title, introduction, literature review, framework, methodology, and oral presentation. The evaluator assigns equivalent points and a grade for each criteria and provides an overall recommendation on approving the preliminary results and allowing the study to move to the final stage.

Uploaded by

Reyah Maddara
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
82 views1 page

Defense-Grading-Sheet - DESIGN 9

The document is an oral examination grading sheet for a thesis research writing in an Architecture Department. It contains criteria for evaluating a student's title, introduction, literature review, framework, methodology, and oral presentation. The evaluator assigns equivalent points and a grade for each criteria and provides an overall recommendation on approving the preliminary results and allowing the study to move to the final stage.

Uploaded by

Reyah Maddara
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT

ORAL EXAMINATION GRADING SHEET


ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9 – THESIS RESEARCH WRITING
S.Y. 2023-2024

NAME OF STUDENTS

TITLE OF THESIS

DATE OF DEFENSE NAME OF EVALUATOR

EQUIVALENT
CRITERIA OF EVALUATION GRADE
POINTS
I. TITLE – The proposed title is appropriate for the research.
II. INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the study is proper.
B. The study's significance is well explained.
C. The objective aims and strategies are how the research questions and project
concept are interpreted.
III. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE - The review includes appropriate information on
past studies related to the one being proposed.
IV. FRAMEWORK – Clearly illustrates the structure of the research plan
III. METHODOLOGY - The procedures provided appear to have a good chance of
achieving the study's aims.
IV. ORAL PRESENTATION
A. Mastery of the study
B. The researchers offered well-prepared visuals to aid in the study's discussion.
C. Overall researcher’s professionalism in presenting the project.
TOTAL

Please check the appropriate box:


____ I hereby recommend the approval of the preliminary results of the proposal for the final stage.
____ I hereby recommend the approval of the results with minor revisions. (Revisions will be reflected on the final paper)
____ I hereby recommend the approval of the results with major revisions. (Revisions will be reflected on the final paper)
____ I do not recommend the approval of the results and the study will not move on to the next stage.

GRADE EQUIVALENT
P 70-100
F >70

______________________________ ________________
Signature over Printed Name
Examination Committee
Adviser Mentor Panel Member

You might also like