Project Management - C722
Project Management - C722
Advantages Disadvantages
Central focus is the project Requires cooperation and coordination between
departments and PMs
PMs have access to a large pool of SMEs SMEs are not in daily contact with others for sharing
of information
Project team members have less anxiety Decision Makers are not always clearly identified
about the future
Example: Using profitability model when the organization is focused on market share
growth would not be appropriate.
CAPABLE Uses factors that are relevant to the organization
You would not expect one model to cover all dimensions of a project
Example: For organizations with a long-term value perspective, the net present value
model provides a rigorous evaluation of a project’s future cash flow
FLEXIBLE The model should provide accurate measures across a reasonable range of
conditions
Example: The model would allow for changing conditions where the cost of a new
government regulation must be factored into the analysis
EASY TO USE Provide results in a responsible amount of time
Results should be easily understood by decision makers
Example: A model that requires hiring a consultant to run and interpret may not be
cost effective
COMPARABLE The model should be usable across a range of projects such that the outcomes of the
model can be used to compare projects
Example: Using a profitability model for one project and a qualitative scoring model
for another would not allow the decision maker to analyze the projects together
Models are representations of reality. One downside is that models are singular in their vision of reality,
models can ignore other aspects of a future project.
It is important to select the correct project method to budget limited resources. Project checklists can
include hundreds of items with many participants.
Comparative Checklists for Project Selection
Project selection models fall into two categories:
• Non-Numeric
o Also known as Non-Financial models since they focus on selection criteria not limited to
numeric performance measures
o Does not make these methods less accurate or valuable
o Incorporates the flexibility necessary to develop criteria that aligns to strategic goals
o Examples include:
▪ Competitive Necessity
• Still requires a formal project proposal however approval is based on if
the project will ensure viability of the company in a competitive market
▪ Operating Necessity
• Evaluates projects based on whether it will ensure ongoing operations
with the understanding that not executing the project will cease
operations
▪ Sacred Cow
• Suggested by powerful stakeholders
• Created to satisfy the expectations of the leader with little regard for
the project’s viability or contribution to strategic or operational needs
▪ Checklist Model
• Uses a series of questions to evaluate each potential project with the
same set of questions
• Answers are compared to determine to approve or deny a project
• Numeric
o Uses financial and other quantitative measures to decide
▪ Numeric models are not limited to a stole measure
o Can be grouped into two categories:
▪ Profit/Profitability Based
• Uses an aspect of measuring the financial returns of the project relative
to the cost
▪ Scoring Models
• Integrates multiple criteria in analyzing project proposals
o Span from basic to including weights on each criterion
o Numeric only when weights are assigned
Scoring Models for Project Selection
Criteria can be quantitative or qualitative, but the answer must use a scale (1 to 10).
Weighted Factor Scoring Model is a popular approach in which each criterion has a separate weight
based on priority. Ratings of each criterion are multiplied by the criteria weight to calculate the total of
each project.
Weighted Project Score = (score) * weight
Financial Concepts for Project Selection
Opportunity Costs is money that’s used for one purpose is no longer available for another.
Time Value of Money suggests money is worth more to the organization now versus the future. Money
in possession today is worth more than money in the future.
The Payback Period
The first Financial Selection mode is the Payback Period which is the amount of time required to earn
back the cost of doing the project.
To calculate, you need to know the cost of the project and the amount of revenue the project will
generate in future periods.
Payback Period (Months) = Estimated Project Costs / Monthly Return
Does not consider additional returns that a project might generate or the consideration of the time
value of money. The payback period is typically underestimated.
Internal Rate of Return
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) revaluates potential projects as if they were financial investments and
calculates the rate of return for a project. This approach recognizes the time value of money by
capturing both the duration of the investment return and the return rate.
The Time Value of Money and the Selection of a Project
Net Present Value (NPV) is a financial measure of the total future benefits of a project, minus the cost of
the project. If future benefits are greater than the cost, NPV is positive.
NPV considers the time value of money by discounting future benefits.
NPV considers future net cash flows so to evaluate a project, you need to know the costs (outflows) and
benefits (inflows) for the entire working life of the project outcome.
NPV = Cash Flown / (1+r)n – Initial Investment
Cash Flow = Sum of money spent or earned on a project for a given period of time
n = Number of time periods
r = Discount rate
NPV involves calculating the cash flows for each period of the project, discounting them to present
value, and subtracting the initial investment from the sum of the discounted cash flows.
The number of periods equals how many months or years the project will last.
Discount rate is the company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) or how much money it needs to
make to justify the cost of operating and includes things like interest rate and payments.
Positive NPV means the project may be profitable and worth pursuing. Negative NPV means the project
is not profitable. Zero means the investment is neither profitable nor costly.