0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views

Taleextra

The document discusses the equivalence between quantum and classical statistical mechanics by examining mappings between the Schrodinger equation, path integrals, transfer matrices, and classical statistical models like the 1D Ising model. It shows how discrete classical models can be derived from the quantum description by slicing the path integral or Hamiltonian into small time steps. Conversely, the quantum description can be recovered from the classical statistical models by taking the appropriate continuous limit and identifying the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the transfer matrix with the energies and wavefunctions.

Uploaded by

Ilja Meijer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views

Taleextra

The document discusses the equivalence between quantum and classical statistical mechanics by examining mappings between the Schrodinger equation, path integrals, transfer matrices, and classical statistical models like the 1D Ising model. It shows how discrete classical models can be derived from the quantum description by slicing the path integral or Hamiltonian into small time steps. Conversely, the quantum description can be recovered from the classical statistical models by taking the appropriate continuous limit and identifying the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the transfer matrix with the energies and wavefunctions.

Uploaded by

Ilja Meijer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Tale exta: Classically quantum

Schödinger equation
1d classical statistics
Continuous: Landau Hamiltonian
Discrete: 1d Ising model
Find equivalence in two ways
Path integral
Transfer matrices
To illustrate what theory is
Schrödinger equation

Wave function: |ψi (ψ(x))


Obeys evolution equation:
i~ ∂ψ
∂t = Ĥψ
Stationary solutions: energy levels
En ψn = Ĥψn
Today’s concern: single variable x
p̂ 2
Hamiltonian: Ĥ = 2m + U(x̂)
Kinetic and potential energy
Hamiltonian in x-representation: (p̂→ − ~∂x )
~2 ∂ 2
Ĥ = − 2m ∂x 2 + U(x)

Singe-variable Schrödinger equation


 2 2 
~ ∂
En ψn (x) = − 2m ∂x 2 + U(x) ψn (x)
(Quantum) statistics

Consider a system (quantum or classical)


that can be in a set of states.
Energies of the states: En
The sys is in thermal equilibrium
Probability to be in the state n: pn ∝ exp(−En /kB T ).

Partition function: ultimate answer


P
Z= n exp(−En /kB T )

Free energy: F = −kB T ln Z , Average energy:


hE i = −∂(ln Z )/∂((kB T )−1 )
Average = derivative with respect to conjugated force for
∂F
varaible x add E = −fx x. hxi = ∂fx
.
1d Ising model

ultimately discretized!
nodes labelled by i, two ”spin
directions”σi = ±1
”Magnetic field”: −Hσ
Interaction between ”spins”:
per bond −Jσσ 0
Consider 1d lattice
Partition function:
(β =P 1/kB T , h = βH, K = βJ)
Z = {σi } exp (−βHeff ) =
P  P P 
{σi } exp K <ij> σi σj + h i σi

A 1922 phd exercise


Landau Hamiltonian
continuous in space (y ) and variable(x, magnetization)
Coarse-graining of discrete models
→ x(y )
Two parts
Free energy density as function
of localR magnetization
βF = dy Ũ(x(y ))
Gradient term:
energy fine for inhomogenuity
 2
βF = dy K2 dy dx
R

Common application: 2nd order phase transition

Landau Hamiltonian
  2 
K dx
+ 2t x 2 + ux 4
R
βF = dy 2 dy

t > 0 symmetric solution x = 0 p


t < 0 symmetry breaking x = ± −t/u
From Q to C: slicing

p̂ 2
one-particle Hamiltonian: Ĥ = + U(x).
2m

Partition function: Z = Tr exp −β Ĥ
Let’s slice it into small pieces:
Mesh in ”Imaginary time”: 0 < τi < β~, τi+1 − τi = dτ .
→:Z =      
Tr{exp −Ĥdτ /~ · exp −Ĥdτ /~ · exp −Ĥdτ /~ · . . . }
 
Slice operator: exp Ĥdτ /~ → W (x, x 0 )
A kind of discrete Schrodinder equation:
ψi+1 (x) = W (x, x 0 )ψi (x 0 ) dx 0
R
 
in the limit dτ → 0: exp −Ĥdτ /~ → 1 − Ĥdτ /~;
 
~ ∂2
−~ ∂ψ(x)
∂τ = − 2m ∂x 2 + U(x) ψ(x)
Use of slicing?

OperatorR multiplication = extra integration:


ÂB̂ → dx1 A(x, x1 )B(x1 , x 0 )
RQ
Thus: Z = i dxi δ(x0 − xN )
W (xN , xN−1 ) . . . W (xi , xi−1 ) . . . W (x1 , x0 ).
Approximate commutation of
 tiny slices:
 H = H1 + 
H2 ;
dτ dτ dτ

exp − ~ (H1 + H2 ) ≈ exp − ~ Ĥ1 · exp − ~ Ĥ2
Let’s see what we have: W (x, x 0 ) = W1 (x, x 0 )W2 (x 0 );
W2 (x) = exp(−U(x)dτ /~)
0
 2   
exp −i p(x−x )
R dp p dτ
W1 (x, x 0 ) = 2π~ exp − 2m ~ ~
 0 2
q
= exp − m(x−x 2~dτ
) m~
2πdτ .
Path integral
It is now    
RQ Q m(xi −xi−1 )2 U(xi−1 )dτ
Z= i dxi δ(x 0 − x N ) i exp − 2~dτ exp − ~

smooth x: (xi − xi−1 )2 /dτ →ẋ 2 dτ


Taking limit dτ → 0

Path integral representation


R β~ n 2 o
S mẋ
RQ 
Z= τ dxτ exp − ~ ; S = 0
dτ 2 + U(x(τ ))

we sum up over closed paths


each path: a configuration of classical 1d field
From C to Q: 1d lattice model

Take a rather general model


variable x(can be discrete) defined in N nodes
Energy per node: En (x): weight W2 (x)
Energy per bond: Eb (x, x 0 ): weight W1 (x, x).
Partition function:
dxi W1 (xN , xN−1 )W2 (xN−1 ) . . . W1 (xi+1 , xi )W2 (xi ) . . . W2 (x1 , x0 ).
R Q
Z = i

Suppose we’ve integrated till node i obtaining ψi (xi ).


R
On next step: ψi+1 (xi+1 ) = dxi W1 (xi+1 , xi )W2 (xi )ψ(xi )
Consider eigenvalue equation:k numbers eigenvalues
W (k) ψk (x) = dx 0 W1 (x, x 0 )W2 (x 0 )ψk (x 0 )
R

Partition function is given by the eigenvalues


Eigenvalues <=> eigenenergies
(k) N
P
Periodic boundary conditions: Z = k (W )
In the limit N → ∞:

P.f. given by the highest eigenvalue


ln Z /N = ln W (0)

Compare with Q:
e −βEk
P
Finite temperature: Z = k
Limit T → 0 ln Z = −E0 β
(if) we can make continuous limit (y -cont.coordinate)
W1 (x, x 0 ) →
 exp(−A(x − x 0 )2 ); 
Z = exp (−E β))
RL   2
dx
E = 0 dy A dy + U(x(y ))

Full analogy
Example C → Q: Ising model in external field

Let’s symmetrize
p eigenvalue equation: p
W (k) ψk (x) = W2 (x) dx 0 W1 (x, x 0 ) W2 (x 0 )ψk (x 0 )
R

For Ising: x = σ = ±, W2 = exp(σh),W2 = exp(K σσ 0 )


Eigenvalue equation:

e −K
   K +h  
ψ+ e ψ+
W =
ψ− e −K e K −h ψ−

p
Eigenvalues: W0 , W1 = e K cosh h ± e 2K sinh2 h + e −2K .
Eigenfunctions: easy to find
Averages in general 1d model

Very quantum!
Average in one node: hf (xi )i?
dxf (x)ψ02 (x)
R
Through ”ground state” wf. ψ0 (x): hf (xi )i =
Correlation in two nodes separated by N bounds: hhf (xi )f (xi+N )ii.

From ”ground” to excited”:


N
W (k)
X 
hhf (xi )f (xi+N )ii = |fk0 |2
W (0)

dxψk∗ (x)f (x)ψ0 (x).


R
Matrix elements: fk0 =
Correlation length ξ: corr ' exp(−N/ξ) at N → ∞
ξ = 1/ ln(W (0) /W (1) )
Is defined by the first excited state
Correlations in Ising model

Apply these reasonings to 1d Ising model


Have solution, can look at correlations of magnetization:
corr (N) ≡ hhσi σi+N ii
Only two states: single exponent:corr ' exp(−N/ξ)
Correlation
 length: √ 
−1 cosh h+ sinh2 h+e −4K
ξ = ln √
cosh h− 2
sinh h+e−4K

Some limits:
Low temperatures (K  1), h = 0:
ξ = e 2K exponentially long.
Low temperatures, but e −2K  h  1
ξ = h−1 .
Qubit physics

Some dimensionless units, ~ = 1


Two - well potential : (  U)
U(x) = U(x 2 − 1)2 + x
Strong barrier: U  1/m
w.f. Localized in each well p
oscillator spectrum with ω0 ' 8U/m.
In fact: quantum tunneling
 between
 the barriers
8 U
with amplitude ∆ ' exp − 3 ω0
2 × 2 Hamiltonian:
 
 ∆
Hqubit =
∆ −

Enegies: E± = 2 + ∆2
Delocalized at  = 0, || ' ∆
Localized at ||  ∆
Translating it into 1d
This maps into
 a Landau Hamiltonian 
2
m ∂x
βF = dy 2 ∂y + U(x 2 − 1)2 + x
R

What does the qubit maps into?


Two wells =
two degenerate magnetizations, domains
Quantum tunneling = domain wall
Thickness: ' ω0−1
Q. amplitude - exp. small Boltzmann weight
 - m.f. lifting the degeneracy
√ 
Free energy βF = ln E− = ln 2 + ∆ 2
Magnetization: hxi = √ 
2 +∆2
Correlation length: √
ξ = (E+ − E− )−1 = 2/ 2 + ∆2
Two limits:
ξ = 2||−1 and ξ = 2∆−1 .

You might also like