Financial Environment Chapter 1 Introduction
Financial Environment Chapter 1 Introduction
Learning Outcomes
1. Explain the significance of the financial environment and how this environment influences the
decisions of business managers and individuals.
2. Distinguish between financial markets and financial institutions.
Preview
Since the book deals with the financial environment (financial institutions and financial instruments such
as marketable securities) we will undertake in this introductory chapter to provide an overview of the
structure and functioning of the financial system where businesses and individual investors operate. As
such, in this chapter we will provide an overview of the financial markets and institutions that mobilize
funds from the savers to the borrowers. We will highlight the changes in the financial landscape and
briefly preview the key features of the major financial assets. Since business and individual investors
expect a certain return from any financial or business investment, we will preview the concepts of time
value of money, holding period returns and expected returns.
Businesses raise and use investment funds from the financial system (the stock, bond or money market),
funds which have been saved by individuals. In turn these investments in capital equipment, in research
and development, in new products and new markets, etc. provide growth prospects for the companies and
income and capital gains prospects to the individuals that have invested in these companies by buying their
stock or debt securities. Here we will preview the major objectives of business and provide the basic
theoretical explanations of why different profit potentials exist in different sectors of the economy.
The Financial System
It doesn’t take much to convince anyone that the financial sector (or system) is vital for the smooth
functioning of the economy since it helps money to be channeled efficiently from savers (or surplus units)
to prospective borrowers (or deficit units). In this way, the financial system makes it easier (1) for firms to
obtain financing for profitable investments opportunities (investments in new technology, capital
equipment, or for acquisition of other companies), and (2) for individuals to borrow against future income
(e.g., to pay for university, to buy a house or car, etc). This fundamental intermediation function of the
financial system is presented graphically in Figure 1.1.
Financial
Markets
Financial
Intermediaries
Without financial markets and institutions, borrowers would have to borrow directly from savers. In such a
case it is easy to imagine that not much borrowing would take place since it would be very difficult for
people in need to borrow to find other people able and willing to lend the same amounts and with exactly
the same terms (time, interest rate, collateral, etc). In other words, we need to have “a double coincidence
of wants”. Therefore, we can easily conclude that a well-functioning financial system is necessary for a
well-functioning economy. A schematic structure of the financial system is provided in Figure 1.2.
Central Bank
Financial Institutions
(Make available
financial instruments)
Financial Markets
(where financial instruments are
bought and sold)
Financial Instruments
(monetary claims like stocks, bonds, or loans)
Money
Changes in the Financial Services Industry
The financial services industry has undergone, and continues to undergo, dramatic changes in makeup and
operations, facilitated by deregulation, globalization and the revolution in information technology. The
traditional industry boundaries (banking, insurance, investments, brokerage, etc) are increasingly getting
blurry and the financial services industry of today has little resemblance to the makeup and operations of
the industry of 50 or even 25 years ago.
The development of financial supermarkets, chiefly through mergers and acquisitions, which engage in all
aspects of the broader financial sector, has replaced to a large extent the specialized firms that because of
regulation their operations were restricted within their national boundaries or even within their narrower
industry boundaries. Today, there are large financial groups that engage in the full spectrum of activities
including retail, wholesale and investment banking, insurance, brokerage, fund/asset management,
currency and derivatives trading, real estate, etc.
Of course, some firms have decided not to be all things to all people. These are the “boutique”, specialty
operators which seek to provide unique, specialized financial products and services.
Beyond this blurring of industry boundaries, the advances in information technology continue at an
accelerated pace and is certain to continue (as it has so far) to affect and shape how the markets will be
organized and operate in the future. The developments in the computerized trading systems are bound to
introduce numerous additional changes in markets around the world. The development of new,
sophisticated products (so called “financially engineered” products) and new markets will also be
facilitated by more experience and know-how and technological advancements. Direct trading across the
globe 24 hours a day is just one such development.
The financial crisis of 2007-2009 has brought to the surface a number of weaknesses and gaps in the
supervisory function and prudent management of risks by banks and other financial firms (even of central
banks). Since these gaps have been blamed to have caused the financial crisis and the significant economic
downturn around the world, it is certain that the bank regulators and the legislators will introduce
appropriate amendments to the current regulatory regime.
Financial Institutions
Financial institutions are firms that provide access to financial markets, both to savers who want to place
their savings in financial instruments and to borrowers who want to borrow from banks or issue debt
securities. Among other services, financial institutions allow individuals to earn a return on their money
while at the same time avoid (or at least reduce) risk. Financial institutions are called financial
intermediaries (businesses that connect savers with borrowers) since they serve as middlemen between
individuals, firms, and financial markets.
We provide below a brief explanation of the various financial institutions that constitute the major players
and make up the structure of a financial system. Their primary function is to provide financial
intermediation.
Financial intermediation or indirect finance is the process of obtaining funds or investing funds through
third-party institutions like banks and mutual funds. In the US, the most common method of raising funds
for businesses is indirect finance rather than direct finance.
1. Depository institutions (banks, co-operatives, savings & loan associations). Their main liabilities are
deposits (sources of funds), and their main assets are loans.
2. Insurance companies. They collect premiums (regular payments) from policy-holders, and pay
compensation to policy-holders if certain events occur (e.g., death, fire, theft). They invest the
premiums in securities and real estate, and these are their main assets.
3. Pension funds. They accept contributions from current workers and make payments to retired
workers. Like insurance companies, pension funds invest the contributions in securities and real estate,
and these form their main assets.
4. Securities firms (provide businesses and individuals with access to financial markets):
a. Investment banks: sell new securities for companies. Unlike regular banks, they don't accept
deposits, or make loans.
b. Brokers: buy/sell existing (already issued) securities on behalf of individuals.
c. Mutual fund companies: pool the money of individuals, who buy shares in the fund, and
invest that money in stocks, bonds, and/or other assets.
5. Finance companies. Like banks, they use people's savings to make loans to businesses and
households, but instead of holding deposits, they raise the cash to make these loans by selling bonds
and commercial paper. They tend to specialize in certain types of loans, e.g., automobile or mortgage
loans.
In its simplest form, money is a medium of exchange. It is that universally accepted unit of account for
exchanging goods and services between economic agents (individuals and firms). It has been documented
that during World War II prisoners of war used cigarettes as the unit of account for exchanging goods
amongst them. Money can also be used as a means of deferred payment and as a store of value.
Many transactions (especially for small denominations) are paid with cash, but increasingly most
transactions in modern societies (especially for larger denominations) are paid with checks drawn on bank
accounts, or with credit cards (which combine features of the drawing privileges on a bank account and
credit facilities, albeit temporary, from a financial institution). Money is important to the performance of
an economy, and therefore it is important to be able to identify exactly what money is and to measure how
much of it is in the economy at each time. Economists consider two measures of money: the narrow form
or definition of money (which satisfies mostly the transactions demand for money) and the broader form of
money which incorporates the other two motives for holding money as well.
Definitions of Money
Narrow Money Supply (M1): This includes currency in circulation (coins and paper currency classified
as legal tender), demand deposits (or checking accounts at commercial banks), NOW accounts (which
stands for Negotiable Order of Withdrawal) because these are used as checking accounts, and traveler’s
checks. All these components have a common characteristic: they can readily be transformed into liquid
form for transactions purposes, and are easily accepted as a form of payment.
Broad Money Supply (M2): The components of M 2 are less liquid than M1 but satisfy many of the
attributes of money (store of value, measure of deferred payment, etc). It includes all the components of
M1 plus savings accounts, time deposits, and certificates of deposits (CDs), as well money market mutual
funds which have check-drawing privileges.
First, it is important to understand that money and credit are different concepts. Money is a specific,
measurable magnitude (quantity) such as M1 or M 2; credit, on the other hand, is the capacity to borrow
money from a financial institution under certain conditions.
Credit and money, however, are related. The amount of money circulating in the economy limits the
availability and terms of credit extended by financial institutions and private corporations. Conversely, the
broader banking system through its ability to extent credit (to loan out the part of the surplus liquidity that
banks hold for the saving public in the form of demand deposits) facilitates the expansion of the money
supply through the money multiplier process.
The banking system is comprised of the commercial banks and the central bank. Banks play the role of the
middle man (the intermediary) between the surplus units in the economy (those units whose incomes
exceed their expenditures and deposit their savings with a financial institution in return for the interest
rate), and the deficit households which require financing and borrow at the lending rate, to bridge the gap
between their incomes and their expenditures, or the business units which require financing to invest in
order to expand their productive capacity in the future.
Essentially, the central bank controls the money supply (M1 and M2) through its power to manage the
monetary base (currency in circulation held by the public, plus currency in banks’ vaults, plus bank
reserves deposited with the central bank). The principal mechanism central banks use to change the
monetary base is open-market operations, the buying and selling of government securities (treasury bills
and bonds). Recall that these securities are IOUs sold by the government to finance government deficits
(expenditures in excess of tax revenues). Individuals, firms and banks buy these securities to earn interest.
Financial panics and loss of confidence in the financial system are to be avoided like the worst epidemic!
Central banks, acting as lenders of last resort, may help to avoid panics by providing the necessary
liquidity. This will normally mean a temporary rise in the money supply, which the Central Bank will
subsequently try to bring back to ‘normal’. In other words, central banks stand ready to lend to any bank
that might temporarily be in trouble, and thus prevent a domino-like loss of confidence in the banking
system. If the trouble at a bank is of a more severe nature, caused by reckless management, a central bank
may use its rules regarding capital adequacy ratios (the required minimum value of a bank’s capital
relative to its outstanding loans and investments).
If a bank’s capital adequacy ratio is low (below 9% by international standards, known as the Basle rules),
the bank has to quickly find new funding to recapitalise itself, and this is usually done by asking the
existing shareholders to supply this capital reserves so that depositors’ money is safeguarded. This is the
situation that Greek and Cypriot banks are facing following the “hair cut” of the Greek Government bond
holdings. They need massive amounts of recapitalisation in order to bring their capital adequacy ratios up
to the required level.
There are, of course, situations where the bank may be in serious trouble and may go bankrupt (such as
occurred in the Barings Bank scandal in the 1990s or the Northern Rock Bank in 2007 in the UK). The
crisis in the USA subprime loans market had shocked the US financial system for much of 2007 and 2008.
In fact, the debt problem in the US had spread to the UK, the EU and all over the World in a “globalized
financial system”.
The financial crisis of 2007-2009 hit the world at about the same time (due to globalization and the free
movement of financial capital). So it became clear early on that the policy measure had to be taken in a
coordinated fashion. For example, on 8 October 2008, the seven major central banks of the world made in
a synchronized fashion the largest reduction in interest rates in history. Because of the existence of an
efficient network of international financial markets, interest rates have converges to very similar rates
around the world.
In the remainder of this book, we will examine more fully many of the sub-classes of financial assets.
Table 1.1 presents the 30-year historical annual returns (the HPR) of three asset classes in the United
States (stocks, bonds, and Treasury bills) and compares them with the annual inflation rate.
Table 1.1: Annual Returns of U.S. Stocks, Bonds, Treasury Bills, and Inflation (1980-2010)
Common Stocks 10-year Treasury 3-month Treasury Inflation
Year (S&P500) (%) Bonds* (%) Bills* (%) (%)
1980 32.4 -3.95 11.5 12.5
1981 -4.9 1.86 14 8.9
1982 21.4 40.36 10.7 3.8
1983 22.5 0.65 8.6 3.8
1984 6.3 15.48 9.6 3.9
1985 32.2 30.97 7.5 3.8
1986 18.5 24.53 6 1.1
1987 5.2 -2.71 5.8 4.4
1988 16.8 9.67 6.7 4.4
1989 31.5 18.11 8.1 4.6
1990 3.2 6.18 7.5 6.1
1991 30.6 19.3 5.4 3.1
1992 7.7 8.05 3.5 2.9
1993 10.0 18.24 3 2.7
1994 1.3 -7.77 4.3 2.7
1995 37.4 31.67 5.5 2.5
1996 23.1 -0.93 5 3.3
1997 33.4 15.08 5.1 1.7
1998 28.6 13.52 4.8 1.6
1999 21.0 -8.74 4.7 2.7
2000 -9.1 20.11 5.9 3.4
2001 -11.9 4.56 3.5 1.6
2002 -22.1 17.17 1.6 2.4
2003 28.7 2.06 1 1.9
2004 10.9 7.7 1.4 3.3
2005 4.9 3.05 3.1 3.4
2006 15.8 1.85 4.7 2.5
2007 3.5 9.8 4.4 4.1
2008 -36.6 20.1 1.48 0.1
2009 25.9 -11.12 0.16 2.7
2010 14.9 8.56 0.13 3.6
100-Year Average Returns
Ave 1899-1999 12.0 4.97 4.15 3.31
50-Year Average Returns
Ave 1931-1980 11.7 3.0
Ave 1961-2010 11.3 7.5 5.3 4.2
10-Year Average Returns
Ave. 1961-1970 9.1 1.5 4.4 3.0
Ave. 1971-1980 10.3 4.2 6.8 8.1
Ave. 1981-1990 15.3 12.5 8.5 4.5
Ave. 1991-2000 18.4 10.9 4.7 2.7
Ave. 2001-2010 7.4 6.4 2.1 2.6
*The Treasury bill rate is a 3-month rate and the Treasury bond is the constant maturity 10-year bond.
Source: Council of Economic Advisers, Economic Report of the President, February 2011.
In Figure 1.3 we present the graph of the average ten-year holding period returns for these three asset
classes and the 10-year average inflation rate.
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
1961-1970 1971-1980 1981-1990 1991-2000 2001-2010
Variability of Returns
Notice that as expected, and as we will explain in many chapters in this book, the long-term return of
stocks is consistently above all the other asset classes. We have shown in Table 1.1 that over the long-term
the return from the stock market (as measured in the US by the S&P 500) has averaged around 10% to
12% annually over the last 100 years. But in any one year, it is not certain that the return will be 10% or
12%. You will have, of course, realized from Example 1.1 as well as have observed from Table 1.1 that on
an annual basis, the annual HPR of stocks varies significantly, ranging from large positive returns to large
negative returns. The return has varied from as high as 53.8% to as low as -43.4%, One of the worst was in
2008 when the return was -36.6%! Actually, in any given year, the chance of having a down-market is one-
in-four.
This is clearly seen in Figure 1.4, which shows the annual returns of stocks from 1980 to 2010. We will
come to consider this variability as a measure of risk for holding stocks. We briefly refer to risk in the
following sections, but more extensively we deal with the concept and measurement of risk in Chapter 4.
1975
1979
1997
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1977
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
We can also get a different picture of the variability of returns by looking at the distribution of annual
returns of US common stocks for the period of 1926 to 2010. These annual returns are shown in Table 1.2.
Table 1.2: Distribution of Annual Returns of U.S. Common Stocks (1926-2010)
2006
2004 2009
2000 2007 1988 2003 1997
1990 2005 1986 1999 1995
1981 1994 1979 1998 1991
1977 1993 1972 1996 1989
1969 1992 1971 1983 1985
1962 1987 1968 1982 1980
1953 1984 1965 1976 1975
1946 1978 1964 1967 1955
2001 1940 1970 1959 1963 1950
1973 1939 1960 1952 1961 1945
2002 1966 1934 1956 1949 1951 1938 1958
2008 1974 1957 1932 1948 1944 1943 1936 1935 1954
1931 1937 1930 1941 1929 1947 1926 1942 1927 1928 1933
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Does this distribution resemble anything you are familiar with? What about the bell-shaped normal
distribution? We will come to see that over time investment returns tend to mirror a normal distribution.As
mentioned above, we will discuss the distribution of returns (or variability of returns) as a measure of risk
in Chapter 4.
Determination of the Market Interest Rate
The level of the interest rate is established in the money and capital markets by the forces of supply and
demand as shown in Figure 1.5, just like in the market for any good. In this case, the “good” in question is
money and its “price” is the interest rate, which represents the cost of money. Thus, at any moment in
time, the interest rate is determined by comparing the supply of funds (savings, or money supply)
available to be invested, with the demand for funds for borrowing by the individuals and businesses to
finance spending and investments (capital spending by businesses). The equilibrium level of interest (i*) is
determined at the point where the demand for money ( i.e., borrowing) is equal to the supply of funds (i.e.,
savings) as shown in Figure 1.5.
i*
M* Quantity of Money
Of course, in real life we don’t have price stability (and no certainty!). On the contrary, we usually expect
a certain rate of increase of prices over time (the inflation rate). In such a setting, the modern investor, who
is well aware of the eroding effects of inflation on the purchasing power of savings (or future
consumption), will require a higher rate of return to compensate for it. Thus, if the investor expects an
inflation rate of 2% during the period of investment in the above example, he/she will require a rate of
return by 6% (a 2% higher than the “risk-free” rate of 4%).
Furthermore, if the future payments from the investment are not certain, the investor (who by nature is
averse to risk and uncertainty) will demand a return that exceeds the rate of interest (the pure value of
money) plus the inflation rate. This uncertainty of the future stream of income or payments from an
investment is what we call investment risk, and the extra amount of compensation over and above the
interest rate required by the investor is known as risk premium. We elaborate on the concept of risk
premium and the expected rate of return below (and again in Chapter 4).
Let’s use some hypothetical dividend returns as shown in column 2 of Table 1.3 to understand the
expected value concept. In column 3 we assume that the investor is able (at least in a subjective manner) to
assign probabilities to each dividend outcome. Notice that the numbers of the third column add up to 1.0.
The expected values of all dividend income streams over the five years are presented in the last column of
Table 1.3.
Adding these weighted values in column 3 would give us the overall expected value of the dividend
income flows over the 5-year period:
This is the basic interest rate, assuming no inflation and no uncertainty about future flows (that is, before
considering any specific risk for the investment). This is the pure time value of money: the exchange rate
(price) between current goods and future goods. This is the return investors demand for foregoing the
immediate use of their money.
Two factors influence this exchange price: one subjective and one objective. The subjective factor is the
time preference of individuals for the consumption of current income. The objective factor is the set of
investment opportunities available in the economy, as determined by the long-run real growth prospects of
the economy (see Footnote 1). When an economy is growing rapidly, there are more and better
opportunities to invest funds and experience positive rates of return; hence the required rate of return is
higher. Therefore, there is a positive relationship between the real growth potential of the economy and the
RFR.
1
Note that inverting the Fisher equation and solving to find i (the nominal interest rate) we get the following equation:
i 1 r 1 1
where i = nominal RFR
r = real RFR
π = inflation rate
Scenario 1: Consider an investor who requires a nominal rate of return without any risk of 5% (expressed
as 0.05) and the anticipated rate of inflation is 3% (expressed as 0.03). As mentioned above, a common
practice is to use a “rule of thumb” method whereby we simply subtract the inflation rate from the nominal
rate to get the real RFR (5% - 3% = 2%). To get an exact value, we use the Fisher equation, which gives us
a value of 0.0194 ( r 1 0.05 1 1.94 ). In other words, the real RFR is approximately 2% (as we
1 0.03
found by the rule of thumb method). Thus, the real RFR of 2% applies to any investment as the minimum
required rate of return to provide the investor with a 5% nominal return (before adjusting for inflation), but
after any risk considerations (the risk premium).
Scenario 2: Consider now an investor who requires a real risk-free rate of return of 2% and as in Scenario
1 the anticipated rate of inflation is 3%. Using the formula in Footnote 2 we find that the nominal RFR is
0.0506 (or 5%), which is the minimum required rate of return to provide the investor with a 2% real return
(after adjusting for inflation).
Risk Premium
We defined a risk-free investment as one for which the investor is certain of its outcome, that is, of the
amount and timing of the expected return, E(R). Though some investments may exhibit returns that meet
or approach this pattern, the typical investment (financial investment, business venture, real estate asset)
does not. Neither the amount of the return nor the timing of receiving the return is known with certainty.
The higher the uncertainty level, the higher the return over the RFR required by investors to be
compensated for. This difference of the required rate of return over the nominal RFR is the risk premium.
We summarize the components of required return in Figure 1.6.
The risk premium will be different for different investments. For example for a short-term government
bond (such as Treasury bills) the risk premium is close to zero and this return approaches our definition of
the nominal RFR (the real rate of return plus expected inflation). For an investor considering to invest in a
certain portfolio, he/she would presumably require a return that incorporates a risk premium over the RFR
of a few percentage points.
Like the real rate of return and the anticipated inflation rate, the risk premium is not constant, but rather
changes over time as economic and business conditions change causing the level of uncertainty to change.
Real Risk-Free
Rate of Return
+ Common to all
Total Investments
Required Anticipated Inflation
Return
+
Specific to each
Risk Premium Investment
Sources of Risk and Uncertainty
The major sources of uncertainty which determine the risk premium are the following:
Business risk
This is the uncertainty of income flows caused by the nature of the firm’s business.
Financial risk
This is the uncertainty related to the methods and ability of the firm to finance its investments. Debt
financing (loans, bonds, debentures, etc) increases a firm’s leverage ratio and thus the cost of financing
expansion.
Liquidity risk
This is the uncertainty relating to how easy and at what price is possible to dispose of an asset (in the
secondary market).
These risk premia (or determinants) can be considered as an investment’s fundamental risk because they
are the intrinsic factors that should affect an investment’s standard deviation (σ) of returns over time. The
standard deviation, as you recall, is a measure of the investment’s risk.
___________ ___________
Study Questions
Multiple Choice Questions
2. You borrow money. Your cost (expressed as % per year) is commonly referred to as the
A) inflation rate.
B) interest rate.
C) exchange rate.
D) aggregate price level.
3. The primary function of banks and other financial institutions is:
A) sound investment.
B) financial intermediation.
C) anticipation of market trends.
D) facilitation of mergers.
5. Financial intermediaries
A) act as middlemen between those with excess funds and those that need to borrow funds.
B) play an important role in the money supply process.
C) enhance the efficiency of the economic system.
D) of the above.
E) (A) and (C) only.
6. Commercial banks are different from non-bank businesses because their assets and their liabilities
are:
A) not liquid.
B) mostly financial.
C) only in real estate.
D) owned by the government.
E) regulated.
9. Firms that specialize in helping companies raise capital by selling securities are called
A) commercial banks
B) investment banks
C) savings banks
D) credit unions
E) all of the above.
12. Markets in which funds are channeled from the surplus units (those who have excess funds) to the
deficit units (those who have a shortage of funds) are called
A) commodity markets.
B) financial markets.
C) derivative markets.
D) real estate markets.
17. The securities that represent debt of governments or companies and pay periodic interest to
investors as well as promise to repay the loan are:.
A) mortgages
B) common stocks
C) bonds
D) commercial paper
E) none of the above
20. Commercial banks, credit unions, and savings and loan associations that accept deposits that can be
withdrawn with a check or a debit card:
A) create money in concert with the FED.
B) print U.S. currency.
C) directly buy and sell stocks.
D) are called thrift institutions.
E) invest all deposits in mortgage loans.
2. Describe in each of the following situations the concept, institution or instrument involved:
a. Channeling funds from savers to borrowers.
b. Market participants are price takers.
c. Issuing loans for business investments or housing by individuals.
d. Supervision of the banks that they follow prudent banking practices.
e. The discount rate that banks pay to borrow from the Central banks influences the market interest
rates.
3. Describe briefly the role of the following institution in the intermediation process:
a. Depository institutions.
b. Insurance companies.
c. Pension funds.
d. Securities firms
e. Finance companies.
4. Discuss the recent developments in the financial system and indicate what are the major financial
innovations over the last 25 years.
5. Critically discuss the role and responsibilities of the financial system in the recent financial crisis and
the severe economic recession.
6. Discuss the role of the following global change drivers on the financial system and on the field of
investments: globalization, liberalization, financial engineering, securitization, ICT revolution,
7. Discuss the following ongoing trends as they relate to the field financial environment:
globalization, financial engineering, securitization, and computer networks
8. Identify and explain the various sources of uncertainty which affect the level of risk of various
investments.
9. You bought 10,000 shares of Bank of Cyprus (BOCY) at the beginning of 2011 at €2.50 each share.
The Bank distributed dividends during the year of 20 cents per share. The share price ended the year at
60 cents. What is the holding period return for the year?
10. An investor requires a nominal rate of return of 12% over the next year, and expects the inflation rate
to be 4%. Using the Fisher equation, calculate the real required rate of return.