Blast Load Analysis
Blast Load Analysis
ABSTRACT
This paper investigates effects of blast loads on high rise structures due to
increasing terrorist attacks. Blast loads cause huge damage to the structure and
decrease the strength and durability of structure. A bomb explosion can cause internal
and external damage to the structure. Due to this damage from such extreme load
conditions, efforts have been made to improve methods of structural analysis and
design to resist the blast loads. Blast loads are sudden impact dynamic loads that are
needed to calculate like a seismic load and wind loads. This study helps to understand
the behavior of G+10 RCC structure, subjected to blast load. Structure designed in
sap2000 software by nonlinear time history analysis.
Keywords: blast loading, high rise structure, impact dynamic loads, and nonlinear
time history analysis.
Cite this Article: Boyina sita Rama Krishna and Jinka Chandra Sekhar, Blast Load
Analysis and Effect on High Rise Structures, International Journal of Civil
Engineering and Technology, 9(6), 2018, pp. 340–347.
http://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJCIET?Volume=9&Issue=6
1. INTRODUCTION
Blasts releases of energy and hot gases very fast in an in milliseconds into the surrounding
atmosphere. This explosion caused by the Chemicals (TNT), two chemicals mixing in a high
temperature. During blast the hot gases that are generated occupy the space surroundings.
Blast load was uniformly distributed load increasing of standoff distance load also decreases.
Blasts can be exemplified as physical blast, chemical blast, and nuclear blast. Above the
ground surface blast are mainly three different types like air blast, surface blast and high
altitude blast. The rapid releasing of energy caused by the wave form of a pressure in the
surrounding space spread as shock front. Due to the blast, accumulations of hot gases take
place. The wave reproduces the speed and sound. 3000 o c-4000oc temperature in surrounding
region. The absolute maximum pressure over and above the atmospheric pressure take place
at the shock wave is known as maximum or peak value of over pressure. Following the shock
wave, reduce to around one-half the maximum overpressure and carry through approximately
even at the canter of explosion. The phase in which pressure due to explosion generated to the
atmospheric pressures is known as positive phase. After some time, the overpressure in the
shock front decrease to value less than that of medium is known as negative phase. The
dynamic loads on the structures subjected to blast load can be estimated. We should be
notifying the structure cannot be protected completely from explosion. The study of this paper
is limited for only surface blast. The impact dynamic loads on the structure forces to this type
of blast loads are estimated.
2. METHODOLOGY
This nonlinear forces displacement, acceleration, velocity characteristic in individual frame
elements modelled in a sap2000 software. Blast wave depends upon two factors explosion
size and weight of TNT and the standoff distance between where the blast is occurring at
ground surface. Consider the building will be affected on the blast loads by some weight (kg)
of TNT at a certain standoff distance. For dynamic analysis of structure, the blast load effect
will be based on loading and time history that is applying to the structure members as short
term loading (transient loading). The pack magnitude, total impale on each joint, durations are
in between pressure-time history calculations will be taken Table-1 given IS 4991-1968. The
method used to calculate blast presser on front face of each and every joint as a grid design. In
a front face of building each and every beam –column joint is varying triangular forces are
acting. The blast load distributed in X-direction. Front faces of building total 55 beam-column
joints are presented. Fig.2 has shown the typical blast load.
4. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
This load is given in put to the SAP2000 software as time history function. The time history
analysis is carried out by considering nonlinearity and response up to 10 seconds can be
drawn. After analyzing following results appeared for the joint of frame. Some damage
caused by this load in a near beam column joints. Fig. 4: plot function of displacement vs.
time for joint 6. Fig. 5: plot function of velocity vs. time for joint 6. Fig. 6: plot function of
acceleration vs. time for joint 6. Fig. 7: plot function of displacement vs. time for joint 1678.
Fig. 8: plot function of velocity vs. time for joint 1678. Fig. 9: plot function of acceleration vs.
time for joint 1678.
There are no walls in drag structures, stress will be developed in shells. The response
(story displacement and story drift) of the drag structure at the respect distance. Fig 10:
maximum story displacement at critical distance 30m. Fig 11: maximum story drift at critical
distance 30m.
5. CONCLUSION
The Present study of this paper a G+10 RCC building is analyzed for blast load for 100kg
TNT placed at a distance of 30m from the point of explosion. Blast load in each point was
calculated from IS 4991-1968 and nonlinear time history is carried out of finite element
analysis software SAP2000. After nonlinear dynamic analysis structure subjected to blast
load, following conclusion were drawn.
1. Variation of displacement is non uniform along the height of building and earth
earthquake and wind (building is not behaving as cantilever structure under blast
load).
2. Minimum standoff distance performance level of structure is reached to collapse.
Much load will be acting on the near beam column joints.
3. G+10 RCC frame structure designed for normal load case performance responsibly
well, without catastrophic collapse, when subjected to blast is equivalent to
100kgTNT at a standoff distance 30m.
4. The performance level of structure joints critical when it close to the blast (slab 1
joints are caused some effect of blast explosion). Hinges are developed in all
beams and columns.
5. For a supreme structure (police headquarters, commercial complex malls,
assembles, parliaments etc.), blast load analysis need to kept view on terrorist
activities in today’s scenario.
REFERENCES
[1] Jayashree.S.M, Rakul Bharatwaj.R. And Helen Santhi, “Dynamic response of space
framed structures subjected to blast load”, International journal of civil and structural
engineering (IJCSE), 4(4), 2013.
[2] Quazi. K. and Varma, M.B. “Effect of Blast on G+4RCC Frame Structure” International
journal of emerging technology and advanced engineering (IJETAE), 4(11), 2014.
[3] Payoshi. M., Savita. L, and Chitra.V. “Effect of blast loading on reinforced concrete
structures”, International journal of scientific & engineering research (IJSER), 5(12),
2014.
[4] Osman Shallan, atef Eraky, Tharwat Sakr. And Shimaa Emad, “Response of Building
Structures to Blast Effect”, International journal of engineering and innovative technology
(IJEIT), 4(2), 2014.
[5] Jiji Madonna, Vijaya G S. and Krishnakumar K L, “Analysis of High rise RCC building
subjected to blast load”, International research journal of engineering and technology
(IRJET) ,3(8),2016.
[6] Patil vijay, Bhilare.L.S. And Patil.G.R, “Effect of Blast Loads on Soft Story Buildings”,
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication
(IJRITCC), 4(10), 2016.
[7] Naveen kumar. K., Prasad. B.K.R. and Amarnath. K, “Response of high rise structure
subjected to blast loads” International Journal of Science Engineering and Technology
Research (IJSETR), 5(7), 2016.
[8] IS: 4991-1968 “criteria for blast resistant design of structures above ground”, (1968).
[9] TM 5-1300, structures to resist the effects of accidental explosion, US army, US, (1990).
[10] Anil k chopra “Dynamic of structures”, 3rd edition (2007).
[11] C. Sashidhar and M. Nalini, Analysis and Design of The Underground Structure To Resist
Blast Loads From Conventional Weapons. International Journal of Civil Engineering and
Technology, 8(3), 2017, pp. 185–192.
[12] Eldo Simon and Dr. M. Sirajuddin, Parametric Study of Stand-Off Distance on a Bridge
Under Blast Loading. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and
Technology, 8(2), 2017, pp 01–07.