Subject - Verb Inversion Rules
Subject - Verb Inversion Rules
In statement it is usual for the verb to follow the subject, but sometimes this word order is reversed.
We can refer to this as inversion. There are two main types of inversion:
• when the auxiliary comes before the subject and the rest of the verb
phrase follows the subject (inversion is usually necessary)
I had never seen so many people in one room. (= normal word order)
Never had I seen so many people in one room. (= inversion)
• Time relationships
We use inversion:
1) after ‘negative’ adverbs which emphasize a time relation at the beginning of a sentence:
No sooner had I put the phone down than it rung again. Hardly / Scarcely / Barely had I got my breath
back when it was time to go again. Seldom do we have goods returned to us because they are faulty.
Not until he apologies will I speak to him again Not since I was little have I had so much fun. Not for one
minute do I imagine they’ll come back. Not once was she at home when I phoned.
Only after several weeks did she begin to recover. Only later did she realize what had happened. Only
then did he remember he hadn’t got his keys. Only when I’ve finished this will I be able to think about
anything else. Only in the last few days has the truth started to emerge. Only by keeping a signal-fire
burning did the woman manage to alert her rescuers. Only later didn’t she realize that she’d been given
the wrong change. Only once did I go to the opera the whole time I was in Italy. Only by chance had
Jameson discovered where the birds were nesting. Only in this way was she able to complete the report by the deadline.
Note!
Only after, only by, only if, only when, not until/till when placed at the
beginning of the sentence for emphasis, require the inversion of the subject
and the auxiliary verb in the main clause:
Only after all her guests had left did she wash the dishes. Only by standing on a chair could he reach the
shelf. Not till the last guest had left were we able to relax. Not until I saw him did I remember we had
met before. Not until did I see him I remembered we had met before.
• Frequency
We also use inversion after ‘negative’ adverbs at the beginning of a sentence to emphasize:
1. frequency:
Never have I been so taken aback. Rarely do they fail to get away for a holiday. Seldom is that pop group
out of the news. Hardly ever did he wear a suit.
• General emphasis
We often use inversion for general emphasis with phrases that use only:
Only by patience and hard work will we find a solution. Only in this way do we stand any chance of
success.
At no time would he admit that his team played badly. In no way should this be regarded as an end of
the matter. On no account are you to repeat this to anyone. Under no circumstances can we accept the
offer.
We use inversion when the adverb modifies the verb, and not when it modifies the noun:
Rarely seen during the day, the badger is a famously shy animal. (= inversion)
Hardly anyone knows about it. (= no inversion)
Inversion in conditions
• Conditional type 1
In formal contexts we can omit if or other conditional words and start the sentence with should:
Should you change your mind, please let me know.
• Conditional type 2
We use be to in a fairly formal way to express conditions. It suggests that the speaker has no influence
over whether the condition will be fulfilled or not. Are to, am to and is to suggest the condition may be
fulfilled. Were to (or, informally, was to) emphasizes that the condition is very unlikely.
Using the conditional if- clause is one way to express such conditions; however, we can omit if or other
conditional words and start the sentence with were (but this is not possible with are):
Were we to take on more staff, how could we afford to pay them? Were the vote to go against me, I’d
resign. Were he to agree, he’d probably become the next coach. Were you a brighter fellow, you’d have
gone along with the scheme.
• Conditional type 3
We use an Unreal Past Perfect in the if-clause when we are thinking about how
things might have been different. In the conditional sentence we can omit if or
other conditional words and start with Had:
Had I believed her for one moment, I wouldn’t have refused to help. Had you told me earlier, I
would/could/might have done something about it.
Were you to have stopped and considered, you’d have seen the error of your ways.
The main ways of introducing result clauses in formal English are: so…(that),
such…(that), to such a degree … We can use so + adjective at the beginning
of a clause to give special emphasis to the adjective:
So disgusted were they be the bad language (that) they walked out.
We can use such + be at the beginning of a clause to emphasize the extent
or degree of something:
We use inversion after neither or nor when these words begin a clause to introduce
a negative addition to a previous negative clause or sentence:
For some time after the explosion Jack couldn’t hear, and neither could he see. The council never wanted
the new supermarket to be built, not did local residents.
Inversion with come
We can put first , next, now and then in front position with the verb come to introduce
a new event, when the subject follows the verb. But if a comma (or an intonation break
in speech) is used after first (etc.) the verb follows the subject. For example:
At first there was silence. Then came a voice that I knew. (not Then a voice came …)
At first there was silence. Then, a voice come that I knew.
In conversation we use Here comes + noun and There goes + noun, with inversion
of verb and subject, to talk about things and people moving towards or away from
the speaker:
Here comes the bus. There goes Nigel Salter, the footballer.
Here comes… is also used to say that something is going to happen soon,
and There goes… is used when to talk about things (particularly money) being
lost and to say that something (such as a phone or door bell) is ringing:
Here comes lunch. My bike’s been stolen! There goes L100! There goes the phone. Can you answer it?
We can put the verb before the subject when we use adverbs expressing
direction of movement, such as along, away, back, down, in, off, out, up with verbs such as come, fly, go.
This pattern is found
particularly in narrative, to mark a change in events:
The door opened and in came the doctor. (less formally …and the doctor came in) As soon as I let go of
the string, up went the balloon, high into the sky.
In formal written language we commonly use inversion after as and than in comparisons:
The cake was excellent, as was the coffee. (or …as the coffee was.)
I believed, as did my colleagues, that the plan would work.
(or …as my colleagues did…)
Research shows that parents watch more television than do their children.
(or …than their children do.)
Notice that we don’t invert subject and verb after as or than when the subject is a pronoun:
We now know a lot more about the Universe than we did ten years ago.
(not …than did we ten years ago.)
All the food had been prepared and the table had been laid as well.
Not only bad all the food been prepared but also the table had been laid.
As soon as he was promoted, he started behaving arrogantly.
He had no idea that the treasure had been hidden in his garden.
Little did he know that the treasure had been hidden in his garden.
They finished painting and then they moved into their new house.
Only after they had finished painting did they move into their new house.
If I were you, I would accept his offer.
Were I you, I would accept his offer.