No Nama Jabatan Peran Tanggal Input KKP Print

1 Lian Pemeriksa Pertama Anggota Tim 8/9/2023 0:00:00

2 Togap Pemeriksa Pertama Anggota Tim 8/9/2023 0:00:00 Ok
3 Fakhry Pemeriksa Pertama Anggota Tim 8/9/2023 0:00:00
4 Laily Pemeriksa Pertama Anggota Tim 8/9/2023 0:00:00
5 Fery Irfan
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (EVM multiple inputs)

K. D. Goepel Version 11.10.2017 Free web based AHP software on: http://bpmsg.com
Only input data in the light green fields and worksheets!
n= 4 Number of criteria (2 to 10) Scale: 1 AHP 1-9

N= 5 Number of Participants (1 to 20) a: 0.1 Consensus: 97.4%

p= 0 selected Participant (0=consol.) 2 7 Consolidated

Objective Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022

Author KELOMPOK 5
Date 7-Jun-23 Thresh: 1E-07 Iterations: 6 EVM check: 8.5E-09

Table Criterion Comment Weights

1 Tahap Perencanaan 7.1%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemili 10.8%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontra 60.0%
4 Pembayaran dan Pe 22.0%
5 0.0%
6 0.0%
7 0.0%
8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Result Eigenvalue lambda: 4.138

Consistency Ratio 0.37 GCI: 0.18 CR: 5.0%
Pertanggungjaw
dan Persiapan

aban Kegiatan
Perencanaan

Pelaksanaan

Pelaksanaan

Pembayaran
Barang/Jasa

Barang/Jasa
Kontrak dan
Penyerahan
Barang dan
Pengadaan

Pemilihan

Matrix normalized
Penyedia

principal
Tahap

Jasa

dan

Tahap Eigenvector
Perencanaan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
dan
Persiapan 1 3/7 1/6 3/8 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.12%
Pelaksanaan
Pengadaan
Pemilihan
Barang dan
Penyedia
2 2 3/8 1/6 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.85%
Jasa
Pelaksanaan
Barang/Jasa
Kontrak dan
Pembayaran
Penyerahan
3 6 1/8 6 1/8 3 5/9 0 0 0 0 0 0 60.00%
dan
Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungj 4 2 7/9 3 2/7 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.03%
awaban
Kegiatan 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%

7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%

8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%

9
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%

10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%

by K. Goepel 683982860.xlsx-Summary
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

Rk
4
3
1
2

by K. Goepel 683982860.xlsx-Summary
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 1

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 5%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 12%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 60%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 23%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 1 1 Lian a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PePelaksanaan Kontrak B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan PPertanggungjawaban A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6

683982860.xlsx-In1
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 2

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 7%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 13%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 55%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 25%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 2 1 Togap a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In2
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 3

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 13%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 7%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 55%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 25%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 3 1 Fakhry a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In3
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 4

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 5%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 12%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 60%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 23%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 4 1 Laily a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In4
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 5

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 6%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 10%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 69%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 15%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 5 1 Fery Irfan a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban B 2 ### #VALUE! 0.50
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan B 7 ### #VALUE! 0.14
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban B 3 ### #VALUE! 0.33
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In5
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 6

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 9%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 41%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 28%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 22%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 6 1 12/30/1899 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak B 6 ### #VALUE! 0.17
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan A 2 ### #VALUE! 2.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In6
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 7

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 28%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 43%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 8%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 21%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 7 1 12/30/1899 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak B 2 ### #VALUE! 0.50
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan A 6 ### #VALUE! 6.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan A 8 ### #VALUE! 8.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In7
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 8

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 19%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 47%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 12%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 22%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 8 1 12/30/1899 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak B 4 ### #VALUE! 0.25
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan A 2 ### #VALUE! 2.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In8
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 9

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 34%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 34%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 9%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 22%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 9 1 12/30/1899 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak A 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan A 6 ### #VALUE! 6.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan A 6 ### #VALUE! 6.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In9
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 10

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 46%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 24%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 9%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 21%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 10 1 12/30/1899 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In10
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 11

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 36%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 36%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 7%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 21%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 11 1 12/30/1899 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak A 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan A 8 ### #VALUE! 8.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan A 8 ### #VALUE! 8.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In11
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 12

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 10%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 34%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 34%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 23%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 12 1 12/30/1899 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan B 5 ### #VALUE! 0.20
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan A 1 ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In12
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 13

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 46%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 24%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 9%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 21%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 13 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak A 3 ### #VALUE! 3.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan A 7 ### #VALUE! 7.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan A 5 ### #VALUE! 5.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In13
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 14

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 25%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 25%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 25%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 25%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 14 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In14
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 15

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 25%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 25%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 25%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 25%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 15 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In15
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 16

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 25%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 25%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 25%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 25%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 16 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In16
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 17

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 25%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 25%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 25%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 25%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 17 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In17
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 18

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 25%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 25%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 25%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 25%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 18 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In18
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 19

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 25%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 25%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 25%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 25%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 19 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In19
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 4 Input 20

Objective: Pemeriksaan Kepatuhan Belanja Barang/Jasa dan Modal TA 2022
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of each
pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Tahap Perencanaan dan Per 25%
2 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Peny 25%
3 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan Pe 25%
4 Pembayaran dan Pertanggun 25%
5
6
7
8
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the
10 question section ("+" in row 66)

Participant 20 1 a: 0.1 CR: ### 1

Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
Pelaksanaan Pemilihan
12 1 2 Tahap Perencanaan dan PerPelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
Penyedia Barang/Jasa
13 1 3 dan Penyerahan
Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
14 1 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 1 8 Pelaksanaan Kontrak ### #VALUE! 1.00
23 2 3 Pelaksanaan Pemilihan PenPembayaran
dan Penyerahan
dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
24 2 4 Barang/Jasa
Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 2 8 Pembayaran dan ### #VALUE! 1.00
34 3 4 Pelaksanaan Kontrak dan P Pertanggungjawaban ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 5 Kegiatan ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 3 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 5 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 4 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 6 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 5 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 7 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 6 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 7 8 ### #VALUE! 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another

5 Strong Importance Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over another

Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance is
7 demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

683982860.xlsx-In20
http://bpmsg.com AHP 08/09/2023
Multiple Input Sheet
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
bpmsg.com Multiple Input Summary Sheet

5 = k number of participants
Consolidated = Weighted geometric mean off participants 4 = n number of criteria

C Consolidated 1 Participant 1 1 Lian

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 0.4217 0.1634 0.3615 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1/5 1/7 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 2.3714 0.1634 0.3333 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 1 1/7 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 6.1185 6.1185 3.554 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 7 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 2.7663 3 0.2814 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 3 1/3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

2 Participant 2 1 Togap 3 Participant 3 1 Fakhry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1/3 1/5 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1/5 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 3 1 1/5 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1/3 1 1/5 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 5 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 3 3 1/3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 3 1/3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

4 Participant 4 1 Laily 5 Participant 5 1 Fery Irfan

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1/5 1/7 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1/3 1/7 1/2 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 5 1 1/7 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 1/7 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 7 7 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 7 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 3 3 1/3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 3 1/7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

6 Participant 6 1 12/30/1899 7 Participant 7 1 12/30/1899

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1/6 1/5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1/2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 6 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 5 1/2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1/6 1/8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

8 Participant 8 1 12/30/1899 9 Participant 9 1 12/30/1899

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1/4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1/2 1/5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1/6 1/6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

10 Participant 10 1 12/30/1899 11 Participant 11 1 12/30/1899

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 3 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1/3 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1/7 1/5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1/8 1/8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

24 of 26 683982860.xlsx-multInp
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (10x10 Matrix) 4
Power Method (Dominant Eigenvalue)
Iterations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 12
1 1.00 0.42 0.16 0.36 - - - - - - 0.19 0.49
2 2.37 1.00 0.16 0.33 - - - - - - 0.39 0.75
3 6.12 6.12 1.00 3.55 - - - - - - 1.68 4.14
4 2.77 3.00 0.28 1.00 - - - - - - 0.70 1.52
5 - - - - 1.00 - - - - - 0.10 0.00
6 - - - - - 1.00 - - - - 0.10 0.00
7 - - - - - - 1.00 - - - 0.10 0.00
8 - - - - - - - 1.00 - - 0.10 0.00
9 - - - - - - - - 1.00 - 0.10 0.00
10 - - - - - - - - - 1.00 0.10 0.00
Sum (col) 12.2563 10.5402 1.60825 5.24882 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scaling
0.12 0.12
0.23 0.18
1.00 1.00
0.42 0.37
0.06 0.00
0.06 0.00
0.06 0.00
0.06 0.00
0.06 0.00
0.06 0.00
2.12 1.67
Normalization
0.08 0.04 0.10 0.07 - - - - - - 0.0546 0.071216
0.19 0.09 0.10 0.06 - - - - - - 0.1085 0.1084845
0.50 0.58 0.62 0.68 - - - - - - 0.4709 0.5999805
0.23 0.28 0.17 0.19 - - - - - - 0.1977 0.220319
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0280 1.2911E-09
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0280 1.2911E-09
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0280 1.2911E-09
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0280 1.2911E-09
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0280 1.2911E-09
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0280 1.2911E-09
Eigenvalue: 4.137626
Check 8.5E-09 err: 1.0E-07 3.5296E-16
4.13763 Iterations: 6.0E+00 2.694E-18
4.13763 check: 8.508E-09 6.2911E-18
4.13763 2.1553E-16
I*I 4.13763 2.9982E-17
4.13763 1.6411E-17
4.13763 1.6411E-17
4.13763 1.6411E-17
4.13763 1.6411E-17
4.13763 1.6411E-17
4.13763 1.6411E-17

-3.1376 0.42 0.16 0.36 - - - - - -

2.37 -3.1376
6.12
0.16
6.12 -3.1376
0.33
3.55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Co
A-I*I 2.77 3.00 0.28 -3.14 - - - - - - nv
- - - - -3.14 - - - - - er
- - - - - -3.14 - - - - ge
- - - - - - -3.14 - - - nc
- - - - - - - -3.1376 - -
- - - - - - - - -3.1376 -
e
- - - - - - - - - -3.1376
1E-05
(A-I*I)x 1.6E-08 1.6E-08 1.6E-08 1.6E-08 1.6E-08 1.6E-08 1.6E-08 1.6E-08 1.6E-08 1.6E-08 1E-12

1
Itera
tions
http://bpmsg.com

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial

3.0 Singapore License.
(You need to give credit to the author)
To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/sg/
or send a letter to Creative Commons,
171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.

Author: Klaus D. Goepel

http://bpmsg.com
Revisions
Date Comment
3/5/2012 1st draft based on AHPcalc vers 27.8.11 (single input);
allows input from max. 7 participants

11.12.2012 Algorithm of Power Method to solve Eigenvalue was modified

released (new sheet 8x8) resulting in much higher accuracy. By
default 12 iterations
08.02.2013
released final tests
2/19/2013 corrected formatting problem of weights in summary sheet
5/7/2013 Introduced weights for individual participants (weighted
geometric mean) in sheet multInp
Extend to 20 participants
12/24/2013 For the 3 most inconsistent judgments the ideal judgment
resulting in lowest inconsistency is displayed
5/9/2014 Change of check for convergence of power method
7/26/2014 corrected wrong ref in multInp (Matrix13)
4/9/2015 changed name of consol. Matrix from MatrixC to m_p0
CHOOSE in Summary sheet now p_sel+1 and m_p0 included
(IF cond removed)
changed the min of 3 to 2 criteria
6/7/2015 correction for 2 criteria: sheet 10x10 Cell M41 limit to 12
CGI in summary sheet to "n/a" for n=2, text (2 - 10)
5/4/2016 Corrected display of the selected scale in the summary sheet

5/4/2016 Corrected AHP consensus indicator (H gamma max)