0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

Reversion & Acceptance

This document discusses clauses from the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution and the history of constitutional changes in Australia since Federation in 1901. It argues that: 1) The original colonies agreed to unite as independent states under the Commonwealth of Australia in an "indissoluble" union. 2) Beginning in the 1970s, changes were made through legislation and court rulings that transformed the Commonwealth into the Australian Government and weakened the power of the original states. 3) These changes amounted to an unconstitutional seizure of power by deceiving the Australian people about their rights and responsibilities under the original Constitution.

Uploaded by

g
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

Reversion & Acceptance

This document discusses clauses from the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution and the history of constitutional changes in Australia since Federation in 1901. It argues that: 1) The original colonies agreed to unite as independent states under the Commonwealth of Australia in an "indissoluble" union. 2) Beginning in the 1970s, changes were made through legislation and court rulings that transformed the Commonwealth into the Australian Government and weakened the power of the original states. 3) These changes amounted to an unconstitutional seizure of power by deceiving the Australian people about their rights and responsibilities under the original Constitution.

Uploaded by

g
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Reversion

Relevant clauses from the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution

Preamble
Whereas the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania, humbly relying on
the blessing of Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown of
the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and under the Constitution hereby established:

2. The provisions of this Act referring to the Queen shall extend to Her Majesty’s heirs and successors in the
sovereignty of the United Kingdom.

Definitions
6. “The Commonwealth” shall mean the Commonwealth of Australia as established under this Act.
“The States” shall mean such of the colonies of New South Wales, New Zealand, Queensland, Tasmania,
Victoria, Western Australia, and South Australia, including the northern territory of South Australia, as for the time
being are parts of the Commonwealth, and such colonies or territories as may be admitted into or established by the
Commonwealth as States; and may be admitted into or established by the Commonwealth as States; and each of such
parts of the Commonwealth shall be called “a State”.
“Original States” shall mean such States as are parts of the Commonwealth at its establishment.

So 4 major points to hold:


1. The people in 1900 united in an indissoluble Federal Commonwealth
a. Indissoluble meaning it can NOT be dissolved, but will exist forever
2. The people were OF the Original States – which are the colonies that became States at the establishment of the
Commonwealth.
3. Those Original States ONLY exist because the colonies were ADMITTED INTO the Commonwealth.
a. So the Commonwealth admissions created the States from the colonies.
4. The people OF those Original States are the signatories (through their elected representatives) to the contract
IN the Commonwealth of Australia and so
a. The Original States must still exist
b. For the States to drop out of the Constitution would require the permission of the people
c. Those States would then revert back to colonies
d. And would thus be answerable back to the Queen personally as the colonial Head of State.
Big time Catch 22 for them

The term “common wealth” is biblical – Ezekiel 22:29


1. Common refers to the land, the earth
2. The people were formed from the dry earth
3. Common people = the people of the land
4. Law of the Land = common law
5. Common wealth = the wealth of the people of the land

So the Commonwealth of Australia is the people of the land of Australia. Hence all assets created by those people in
the Commonwealth are assets OF the people.

The Constitution is essentially the Articles of Incorporation.

The common people,


o abiding in specific colonies,
 agree to unite in a Common wealth corporation,
o for the purpose of united trade and commerce
 under 1 set of laws
o held to the law of the land – common law

Hence, the Commonwealth of Australia is a common law company with a common law contract and a common law
Constitution.
Page 1 of 6
Each of those people then:
 held 1 share in the Common wealth
Which is:
 inheritable

Note the difference between the terms ‘heir’ and ‘successor’.


An ‘heir’ is one who has been given an inheritance, but they have not yet received that inheritance – it is still just an
offer.
A ‘successor’ is one who has been given an inheritance, and has accepted it.

With regard the monarchy, a perfect example is the situation of the Queen’s uncle Edward VIII, who inherited the role
from his father George V, but did not go through with the coronation, instead abdicating. So he was an heir but not a
successor.
The Queen’s father George VI was the next heir in line, accepted the role and became the successor to the throne,
followed on his death by Elizabeth II.

We, as heirs to the Commonwealth are in that exact same situation.


We are heirs but not successors until we accept the role.

---------------------------------------------------------------

In biblical terms the life of man is 70.


The Constitution was Proclaimed & Gazetted 1st January 1901.
1966: Decimal currency was introduced into Australia through a private agreement between the Premiers of each
State.
1967: the use of International Military Postcodes were introduced into Australia
1973:
 Whitlam created the Australian Government as a body of the Executive of the Commonwealth.
 Whitlam created the title the Queen of Australia, as the “patron” of the Australian Government
 The High Court have stated that no judicial authority can be attached to anything using the term “Australia”,
as all constitutional authority lies with the Commonwealth of Australia.
 The Australian Government enacted the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973, which expanded the
international ocean boundaries around the shoreline, both inward and outward.
 This act also created a new ‘exclusive economic zone’ operating in the map expansion.

The United Nations is a body that holds no land whatsoever. Therefore all its dealings are held to Admiralty law – the
law of the high seas.
The expansion of this exclusive economic zone into international waters, brought UN-bound admiralty law into play.
Admiralty law does not deal in living men or women – it is solely about commercial contracts.
Things in personam v things in rem.
Cargo.

So an admiralty case is often against a ‘ship’ (a thing in rem) with the acceptance that the captain (a thing in
personam) can speak for the ship.

Do not be mislead – admiralty also exists under common law – but this brought in UN Admiralty law – which is NOT
under common law, but is independent to the UN.

The Original States protested the constitutional validity of this act and it went to the High Court, who approved it.
That should not be meant that the High Court acted treasonously, because a decision depends on what is asked. All
the Original States then entered into a Constitutional Offshore Agreement with the Commonwealth, changed their
State Constitutions and assumed the titles of NSW, VIC, QLS, SA, WA, TAS.

From the Federal election of 1974 on, the people voted to elect an Australian Government NOT a Commonwealth of
Australia Parliament.

So the Commonwealth of Australia is from then on referred to as the Australian Government.

Page 2 of 6
The Original States were now referred to under new titles also, so creating new States.

Now it is important to note this Constitutional fact:


1. The Parliament is vested with the authority to make laws THROUGH the clauses of the Constitution
2. The Executive (government) is vested with the authority to action those laws – they can NOT make laws.
3. The Judiciary are vested with the authority to examine disputes IN those laws – they can NOT make laws,
BUT they can dispute the constitutional validity of a law.

One of the other things Whitlam did in 1973, was amend ALL Cth Acts by removing the term Commonwealth and
replacing it with the term Australia or Australian Government.

The Australian Government then brought all the relevant acts together and created their version of the Constitution.
the 1901 Constitution is approx. 24 pages – the Constitution of the Aus Govt is over 100 pages.

The States essentially did the same with their new State Constitutions.

BUT:
Just as the Constitution of the people of the Commonwealth is alive and well, the Constitutions of the Original States
must exist to support those bodies as well.

----------------------------------------------------------

So – Given that man had reached his age of 70, and no-one was apparently stepping up to accept their ‘heirship’ role
as one of the people of the Commonwealth, it appears Whitlam and co were able to activate the C’est Que Vie act
1660.

This act was created after the Great Fire of London, when so many people died and so much property was lost. And
given that international sea trade was the primary trading route, when a sailor was shipwrecked, it might take him
years to get back to home, so his estate would be placed in administration until 7 years had passed. At that time, the
estate would be divided among the heirs, or would go back to him IF he had turned up.

Because it appears no-one was claiming their Constitutional role, and were trading under false titles, all estates were
taken into C’est Que Vie administration.

This is a massive deception as proven by the fact that it could have been resolved by simply advising all the people of
their constitutional responsibilities and the amount of time that the gradual evolution of the takeover took, from 1966
at least until the Corporations Act 2001 specifically.

Administrations run under Leiber Code rules – which include registration, postcodes and etc. because the
administration is a UN body and so held to foreign laws – not domestic.

The Australian Government is that administration and refers to itself in its own documentation as a ‘foreign
government of political subdivisions.’

-------------------------------------------------------------

Because the Constitution is a single contract and all and any enactment must have a ‘Head of Power’ from a
constitutional clause – the people were not required to deal individually with government on many occasions.

However, the Australian Government has absolutely no constitutional authority and no ‘Head of Power’ to provide the
same, so it requires all individual and specific contracts to be in place to provide the enforcement it then uses.

So the people are constantly now expected to register every trade qualification, purchase, legal necessity, personal
issue, health matter, financial activity and etc – so they are all held to contractual obligations when a dispute arises.

This is where a living man or woman’s Private Law comes into play.

Page 3 of 6
You are born with free will – you might hold a domestic jurisdiction as your national law, but you have the private
right to enter into foreign contracts where you wish.

A man or woman born in Australia has


 the offer of the law of the land in the common law.
 the offer of the constitutional contract in common law
 the offer of moving to another country and living in their domestic law, which may be a foreign jurisdiction to
your home one
 the offer of contracting in their jurisdiction

Where a dispute arises and your domestic jurisdiction conflicts with theirs, then it is called a ‘conflict of laws’ and
unless those 2 countries have an agreement – a dispute cannot be resolved.

So the UN stepped in here and has taken over every country with an administrative body operating in its admiralty
jurisdiction.

This then means the system of trade operates as follows:


A man or woman born in Australia has
 the offer of the law of the land in the common law.
 the offer of the constitutional contract in common law
 the offer of trading in the exclusive economic zone of the Aust Govt in foreign UN-bound admiralty law

That man or woman accepts the offer to trade in the Aust Govt exclusive economic zone and ALL resulting contracts
are admiralty contracts, wherein it is deemed the man or woman has voluntarily agree to give up their domestic
common law rights for the purpose of that individual contract.

That is done specifically through the use of


 the legal Name (which is not the name given by the parents at birth, but a patented compilation of the
Christian name and a surname – a thing enforced by the Kings starting in the early centuries for persona
identification).
 The postcode
 The new State title, ie NSW, VIC, etc
 The use of decimal currency

A dispute arises, the resolution for the dispute stays internal to the Aust Govt as the contract is in their foreign
jurisdiction and you have agreed to that. Your domestic jurisdiction has no effect or a voice in that system. And you
agreed to it.

So, you have not identified yourself as one of the people of the Original State.
You have not accepted your inheritance of a share of the Commonwealth of Australia to define that you are a
Commonwealth National.
You are trading outside your domestic jurisdiction.
You are using foreign residency / commercial identifications
You are using foreign currency.
You may hold an Australian Citizenship agreement

And you then wonder where your common law and constitutional protections are and why the courts right up to and
including the High Court can’t help you.

-----------------------------------------------------

But it can be corrected with 2 methods.

I offer abbreviated thought processes only, it is entirely up to you to play with these methods and make them
your own. I can not do this for you.

1. Accept your inheritance and become a successor.

Page 4 of 6
Put together a document stating –
 Who you are – one of the people of the Original State of ….. (remember full words – no abbreviations)
 You accept the role of being an heir to the Commonwealth of Australia by virtue of being born on the land of
Australia after 1901.
 You renounce any assumed or presumed title as an Australian Citizen, a title that was never disclosed to you
was not of the Commonwealth jurisdiction.
 You swear a Constitutional oath of fealty to the Constitutional Monarch, Elizabeth II, by the Grace of God of
the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen,
Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith
 Include the Schedule Oath or Affirmation – your choice – as documented in the Constitution.

Place a copy of the Constitutional Seal of the Commonwealth of Australia at the top of the document

I would then go to either 3 J.P’s or a Notary Public, READ the document to them, get it stamped, sealed and
witnessed.

Reading this establishes through them – YOU, the living man or woman, have accepted this inheritance and YOU are
now a successor IN the Commonwealth.

Sign that in front of those witnesses and include your living details but remember – do NOT use the State abbreviation
– use the whole words, do not use the postcode. If necessary, write Big Bend near Little Bend to identify your area.

Send a registered copy of that witnessed, sealed document to the necessary persona as follows:
 To the holder of the Office of the …….. of the Commonwealth of Australia

Why “holder of the office”? Because if you address it to a name, then that person can quit the job and your paperwork
can be hidden and/or ignored.

You will NOT find anyone holding Commonwealth offices – but they are there and we simply write to them using
whatever relevant address you find.

Mail – NOT email.


Register and pay for a receipt of acknowledgement that the doc arrived. If you don’t get it, then the Post Office must
follow up to get acknowledgement.

2. Accept your inheritance, become a successor and cancel all registrations & agreements with the Australian
Government by claiming your estate and reverting the Interest in the Estate back to the Commonwealth.

This is a much longer process, but it is a vital consideration. Again I can not do this for you, there are no forms that
work – but the document must come from you willingly.

 Get a copy of your Form of Information of Live Birth – the document your parents filled out – from which
govt created the Birth Certificate
 Get a copy of the Birth Certificate.
 Establish who you are – as above.
 Accept your role as above.
 Declare that you are providing the Commonwealth with the INTEREST in your Estate (which the Aust Govt
is claiming now) and you authorize the Commonwealth to gather ALL interest that has been generated by the
Birth Certificate, restore it to the Form of Information of Live Birth, and use the Interest to benefit the
shareholders in the Commonwealth ONLY.
 State that the Australian Government acted as administrators over your Estate without your permission and
you rescind any and all contracts, assumed or presumed powers of attorney, etc – past, current and future -
that they use to support their claim in administration.
 Establish the Commonwealth you are providing this to – as per the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution
Act [Ch. 12] [83 & 84 Vict.]
 Include a copy of the Constitutonal Seal as further establishment.
 Establish the constitutional Monarch – as above.

Page 5 of 6
 Claim the role of the holder of the Office of the Executor of the Estate of (your name as documented on the
Form of Live Birth)
 Include a copy of the 2 birth docs and write at the top of each – Accepted for Honour
 Write on the back of each – Payable to the Treasury of the Commonwealth of Australia.

As above:

You will NOT find anyone holding Commonwealth offices – but they are there and we simply write to them using
whatever relevant address you find.

Mail – NOT email.


Register and pay for a receipt of acknowledgement that the doc arrived. If you don’t get it, then the Post Office must
follow up to get acknowledgement.

Mail to EVERY office you think is relevant.

We included the Queen, the Pope, the Secretary-General of the UN, the Mayor of London, as well as all the relevant
office in Australia in our mailing. Overkill possibly – but then we had no idea where it should go.

Do this BEFORE a legal matter looms and you will have recourse to YOUR courts.

Do this AFTER a legal decision has been made and it can be difficult, because the decision holds precedence.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Many people ask me how they operate after doing this – do they get licences and etc?

Given you have asked that all future agreements be “given” back to the Cth, we have to assume that is what happens.

But start asking why you have to have an Aust Govt agreement.
Keep a copy of your JP doc and provide it with every expected contract.
Demand that they honour YOUR right of Private Law decision and that you have chosen the domestic jurisdiction on
which THEY also operate.

Because the fast is this:

Although the Aust Govt and its subsidiary contracted privatized bodies operate in this deception of the ‘exclusive
economic zone’ – they are ALSO STILL answerable to the common law / constitutional law jurisdiction of the
Commonwealth. You have to know how to get them into it – but it still operates alive and well.

Page 6 of 6

You might also like