Module 3 On Typefaces
Module 3 On Typefaces
Categories of Type in
Selection
CATEGORIES OF TYPE
Identifying and organizing more than 550 years
of typography and myriad typefaces is a challenging task (not without
debate among typophiles) that has been taken on by many
throughout the years, including
• Francis Thibaudeau
French typographer and creator of the first well-established
system for classifying typefaces, the Thibaudeau classification. He
devised his system while developing the catalogues for the Renault &
Marcou and G. Peignot & Fils foundries in the early 20th century
CATEGORIES OF TYPE
Identifying and organizing more than 550 years
of typography and myriad typefaces is a challenging task (not
without debate among typophiles) that has been taken on by many
throughout the years, including
• Maximilien Vox
was a French writer, cartoonist, illustrator, publisher,
journalist, critic art theorist and historian of the French letter and
typography. He devised Vox-ATypI classification and makes it
possible to classify typefaces into general classes in 1954
CATEGORIES OF TYPE
Identifying and organizing more than 550 years
of typography and myriad typefaces is a challenging task (not
without debate among typophiles) that has been taken on by
many throughout the years, including
• Alexander Lawson
Anatomy of a Typeface is a book on typefaces written
by him. In 1990 Lawson arranges the typefaces by
classification
CATEGORIES OF TYPE
Identifying and organizing more than 550 years
of typography and myriad typefaces is a challenging task (not
without debate among typophiles) that has been taken on by
many throughout the years, including
• Robert Bringhurst
a Canadian poet, typographer and author. He wrote The
Elements of Typographic Style in 1992, a reference book of
typefaces, glyphs and the visual and geometric arrangement of
type
CATEGORIES OF TYPE
Identifying and organizing more than 550 years
of typography and myriad typefaces is a challenging task (not
without debate among typophiles) that has been taken on by
many throughout the years, including
• Catherine Dixon.
is a designer, writer and teacher. As a designer she works
mostly with text-based projects, including typographic covers for
the award-winning ‘Great Ideas’ series for Penguin Books
CATEGORIES OF TYPE
19th Century
Classification began, by printers seeking to note lineage and classify
typefaces during a period marked by many new styles. Various
classification systems exist, each with organizational methods based on
factors such as historical development, formal attributes, and intended
use. These methods are points of departure, not perfect plans. Many
typefaces fit easily in categories; others overlap in multiple ways or escape
classification entirely. Regardless of the system (and the limitations of
each), cataloging typefaces is a valuable exercise. Classification shapes
context and provides descriptive terms, which aids general identification
and selection.
CATEGORIES OF TYPE
There are five basic classifications of typefaces: serif, sans serif, script,
monospaced, and display.
Serif and Sans Serif typefaces are used for either body copy or headlines
(including titles, logos, etc.)
Monospaced typefaces are generally used for displaying code, though they
can also be used for body and headline copy, and were originally used on
typewriters.
CATEGORIES OF TYPE
The oldest typefaces were called BLACKLETTER and date back to the 1400s.
These early typefaces were reminiscent of handwritten calligraphy.
The New York Times logo is a classic, ubiquitous example of blackletter type,
as are many other popular newspaper titles.
CATEGORIES OF TYPE
After blackletter came the first Serif Typefaces. Serifs include slight projections that finish off
the strokes of their letterforms (called serifs, where the style gets its name). Emerging in the
1500s, the first serifs were Old Style serifs. This style includes Garamond and Goudy Old
Style.
The successors to the Old Style serifs were called Transitional serifs, which made their first
appearance in the 1700s. These typefaces had high stroke contrast and were more upright
than their Old Style predecessors.
The natural evolution of the trends present in Transitional serif typefaces became known as
the Modern serifs during the 1800s. These Modern serifs include fonts like Didot and Bodoni.
They have extreme contrast between strokes and no brackets on their serifs.
CATEGORIES OF TYPE
Formal traits and historical development shape the fundamental
typeface categories:
Selection
Considerations
Typeface quality depends on character construction and
how well the forms work together.
• Next, carefully map the text. Note its quantity and variety, or types of text,
then order it by importance.
• A project with limited types of text needs less typeface range than one with
multiple variables. For example, books are textually rich, with many options
such as body text, headings, captions, footers, and folios.
• When thinking about typefaces, begin with the text largest in quantity, most
often body text.
Conversely, fitting faces of mediocre merit work if typeset well. There
are few absolutes. Like much in typography, flexible principles guide
the process for choosing and combining typefaces.
• An ideal choice is a face designed for extended reading at small sizes in either
serif or sans serif. In contrast, posters often contain minimal text, such as
titles, dates, and brief descriptions.
• Think first of the text and its typesetting needs, then make appropriate
choices.
.
SELECTION CONSIDERATION
• Typefaces suited to one might not suit another. Expect the unexpected in
digital realms. Be flexible and responsive. Digital formats know no bound.
Optical styles
maintain typeface legibility and elegance at all
sizes when used as planned
SELECTION CONSIDERATION
• For many projects, one font isn’t enough to create visual interest
and establish the information hierarchy. And when you have
multiple typefaces, you want to be sure that they work well
together.
• The more effective combinations usually rely on typographic
principles. These principles are not scientific, rigid, or fail-safe; all
of them can be broken, but they should all be understood.
SELECTION CONSIDERATION
• Keep it simple- usually
“Never use more than three typefaces on a page” is not an
unassailable truth; rather, it’s a modernist principle that’s best
applied in editorial design.
• Vive la difference
Typeface combinations that are too similar can look like a mistake—as
if you’d been experimenting with different fonts and had forgotten to
clean up after yourself.
SELECTION CONSIDERATION
• It’s a family affair
This may sound like a contradiction of the second technique, but another
avenue to harmonious type combos is to stick with a single typeface family. Just
be sure to choose a typeface family that comes in a variety of weights, styles,
and widths
• Go for Contrast
For editorial design, typeface combinations based on contrast are better
equipped to clearly establish hierarchy. Using contrasting typefaces makes it
clear which paragraphs are headings and subheads and which are body copy It’s
also clear that you want to draw your reader’s attention first to the heads.
SELECTION CONSIDERATION
• From the same table
When combining typefaces, a little insider knowledge can go a long way. Try
combining typefaces from the same designer. Some typefaces, like Museo and
Museo Sans or Stone Serif and Stone Sans, were designed specifically for such a
purpose, but even those that were not designed specifically as complements
will likely have a similar aesthetic when they’re from the same hand.
• Historical accuracy
Another approach, appropriate for one-of-a-kind jobs, is to choose a
typeface that is historically appropriate for the subject matter.
SELECTION CONSIDERATION
• Combine characteristics
If you intend to mix typefaces in the same paragraph, for a run-in head or for
emphasis, make them both the same x-height—that is, the height of the letter x
in the face (see Figure 14). If the x-heights differ markedly, it will be jarring to
your readers as their eyes run into the bumps of higher x-heights. If you’re
creating some sort of word play by mixing typefaces in the same word, you’ll
need to adjust sizes to match the cap height and switch to optical kerning, since
there won’t be any kerning metrics for combined letter pairs
SELECTION CONSIDERATION
• Mix it up
What these guiding principles for mixing typefaces don’t take into account is the
wild card of all good design: intuition. Just as an experienced chef can combine
the most unlikely ingredients to great effect, so an experienced typographer can
toss together unlikely type combinations that defy logic.
Selecting font is not just about choosing a letter shape. It is also about
understanding how fonts differ and what limitations they have.
EXAMPLE
In this example, changes in point
size and weight create variation
and emphasis. The contrast is
simple and effective with just one
typeface— Helvetica.
Confident type settings convey
the Knoll brand.
In Combination
Examine letterform anatomy. Compare
and contrast features. Seek the typefaces
of one designer they often have a similar
approach and style.
Contrast is key.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2TqSuh3gTI
https://www.toptal.com/designers/typography/typeface-classification
END OF MODULE