Stora Enso - ERM
Stora Enso - ERM
Question Plotting of risks in the heat map (in the template excel file)
1.
Impact Calculation –
Probable Impact
Risk Impact Score
(in Million USD)
Risk 1: Data hacking 1.7 to 1.9 2
Risk 2: Use of old
technology 3.1 to 3.4 Mn 4
Risk 3: Declining sales 4.5 to 4.7 Mn 5
Risk 4: New regulations 2.4 to 2.6 Mn 3
Risk 5: Consumer
preferring biodegradable
plastic packaging 0.6 to 0.8 Mn 1
Impact Scale
1 0- 0.9Mn
2 1.0 - 1.9 Mn
3 2.0 - 2.9 Mn
4 3.0 - 3.9 Mn
5
4.0 Mn and above
Likelihood Calculation –
Likelihood – Impact Table & Heat Map –
Risk 3
5
Risk 2
4
IMPACT
Risk 4
3
Risk 1
2
Risk 5
1
1 2 3 4 5
LIKELIHOOD
Question 2. Calculation of risk scores
Risk Register –
Question 3. Prioritisation of the risks and justification why the risk is important
PRIORITY
RISK JUSTIFICATION
LEVEL
Declining sales is not affordable situation for any company as it affect
P1 Declining sales
the business immediately.
Use of old technology will create excess loss of raw material and it leads
P2 Use of old technology to increase in Cost for production, which affect the companies profit
adversely.
P3 New regulations New Regulation can affect the day to day transections.
P4 Data hacking Data hacking can impact the business function immediately.
Consumer preferring Consumer is king and their preferring of biodegradable plastic
P5 biodegradable plastic packaging is impact severly but chances of loss of customer due to
packaging preference is low.
Question 4. 1 aggravating factors for each risk -the forest produce industry creating an impact
on their revenue generation