Answers To 7 FAQs About FMEA, FMECA, and FMEDA
Answers To 7 FAQs About FMEA, FMECA, and FMEDA
FMEDA
Updated: Sep 26, 2022
Component or system failure is an occurrence dreaded by engineers, product designers, and consumers.
Chances are, several engineers and industrial firms discover potential failure late in product/system
development or launch. The impact can be devastating, and there have been numerous stories about product
recalls extended system downtimes, and increased project costs.
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Failure Modes Effects and Diagnostic Analysis (FMEDA), and
Failure Modes Effects and Critical Analysis (FMECA analysis) are systematic methods used to analyze
potential failures in systems. Although these methodologies are known to improve the quality, reliability, and
safety of a product or system, few questions remain unanswered about these risk identification approaches.
This article presents answers to 7 common questions you might be asking about FMEA, FMECA, and FMEDA.
What is FMEA?
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis is an inductive or bottom-up risk analysis technique. In simple terms, it
involves considering failures of individual components or processes one by one to determine their effect on the
overall systems.
FMEA was first widely used by the defense industries in the 1940s to reduce the sources of variation and
failures in munitions production. Since then, it has grown to become one of the most used approaches for risk
identification. It is a vital tool in the chemical, petrochemical, manufacturing, transportation, and defense
industries.
Although FMEA was one of the first systematic approaches to risk assessment, it has developed enhanced
capability and suit several other applications. Two common extensions of FMEA are FMECA and FMEDA.
What is FMECA?
Like the FMEA, Failure Modes Effects and Critical Analysis is a bottom-up approach to risk assessment.
However, in addition to the risk assessment and failure analysis done using an FMEA tool, Failure Modes
Effects, and Critical Analysis enables you to rank the identified failure modes in order of importance or
severity.
This rank is described using a criticality (C) or risk priority number (RPN). Failure Modes Effects and Critical
Analysis tools find applications in military and space applications. It played a significant role in some NASA
programs like Voyager and Galileo. It allowed NASA’s reliability engineers to indicate the failure modes that
were more likely to influence their spacecraft in a safe and reliable operation.
Read more about FMECA in this insight.
What is FMEDA?
Failure Modes Effects and Diagnostics Analysis is a further extension of FMEA and was first used in
electronics in the early 1980s. You will typically find it in use for more complex systems, such as a group of
processes or devices that perform a complex function.
In addition to the prediction of failure rates in FMEA, FMEDA provides two additional pieces of information:
1. The failure rates and distribution of failure modes of a target system
2. The probability of a system detecting internal failure using an online diagnostics technique
What is the process for FMEA, and how is it similar to FMECA and
FMEDA?
Since FMECA and FMEDA are just extensions of FMEA, these all share the same basic concept-FMEA which
is a starting point for both FMECA and FMEDA. So, let’s start by discussing the FMEA solution process:
1. Identify all the individual components that make up your design, system, or process. This step
typically involves breaking down your entire system and understanding the role of each element.
2. Deduce all the possible ways that each of the components can potentially fail and analyze the
failure modes’ effect at a local and system level.
3. Rank each potential failure effect based on the risk criteria of your choosing. Two standard
methods used to quantify risk levels are Risk Priority Number (RPN) and Criticality (C). While
the RPN method involves measuring risk on a 1 -1000 scale, the criticality method is based on
probability values.
4. After quantifying and ranking the risk level, define a plan of action to detect, minimize,
eliminate, or mitigate these risk levels.
5. Finally, review and revise the risk levels until you are sure that the countermeasures will reduce
the risks.