Chapter 11 - PS Stability 23 07 11 Notes
Chapter 11 - PS Stability 23 07 11 Notes
Swing Equation
Dynamic
It concerns with small disturbance lasting for a long
time with the inclusion of automatic control devices.
Transient
It deals with the effects of large, sudden disturbances
e.g. the occurrence of fault, the sudden outage of a
line or the sudden application or removal of loads.
The stability problem is same in nature.
Ia
ZS
E
V 0
E
V
Z = R + jX,
for a pure reactance, Z=jX and = 0.
Ia
increases
Machine delivers electrical
At some value of , Pe = Pm
power
Pm Pe
At maximum power:
Frequency Operation,
Power
Changes Planning
Swings
Switching
Surges
Power swing
– a few cycles: transient stability program
Frequency changes
– a few minutes to one hour
First-swing stability
Based on a reasonably simple generator model
without representation of control systems.
Multiswing stability
Extend over a longer study period and therefore must
consider the effects of generator control systems
which affect the machine performance during the
extended time period.
E∠ V∠0º REVIEW:
Zs∠ Synchronous machine connected
to an infinite bus
S3 = 3VI*a
Swing equation
The equation that describes the above
relative motion.
Stability
If after the oscillatory period, the rotor locks
back into synchronous speed, the generator
will maintain its stability---
E
Zs = Ra+jXs
r Ear
jXarIa
m Fs Esr Ia
V
jXlIa E V Load
RaIa
Ia
At steady state operation, neglecting losses
Tm = Te Te – electromagnetic torque
Tm – driving mech. torque
During disturbance,
Tm > Te or Tm < Te
Rotor acceleration,
In terms of power,
where
in degree;
power in per unit
The m/c is modeled with a
E’ Vg V
ZL constant voltage E’ behind the
direct axis transient reactance –
X’d
Vg is eliminated by converting
the Y-connected impedances to
E’ V an equivalent :
I yy112 I2
1 2
2
1
yy110 y
y2 20
0 0
The equivalent circuit with internal voltage at node 1
and the infinite bus at node 2
E’ V
I1 yy12
12 I2
2
1
yy10
10 y
y20
20
ZS and ZL are predominantly
E’ Vg V
inductive; hence, if ZL
resistances are neglected,
then
11 = 12 = 90º; ZS
2
1
The simplest form of power flow yy10
10 y
y20
20
equation
Steady-state stability limit, = /2
beyond which, the m/c will
accelerate causing loss of
synchronism with infinite bus bar.
Ia
Neglecting saliency, voltage E’
E’ Vg behind the reactance X’d:
E’ = Vg + j X’dIa
Recall Chapter 3:
P = 3|V||Ia|cos
|Ia|cos = ab + de
= Iqcos + Idsin
P = 3|V|(Iqcos + Idsin )
|E| = |V|cos + XdId
= |V|cos + Xd|Ia|sin( + )
|V|sin = XqIq
= Xq|Ia|cos( + )
= Xq|Ia|(cos cos - Idsin sin )
E’q
4.032
δ(k) = 110.01
Assumptions:
- the disturbances causing the changes disappear. The
system is free and stability is assured if the system returns
to its original state.
ZS
When: δ = δ0 + δ
When Ps is negative:
One root will be in the right-half s-plane The response is exponentially
increasing and stability is
lost.
When Ps is positive:
Two roots will be in the j-ω axis The motion will be oscillatory and
undamped. The system is
marginally stable with a natural
frequency of oscillation of:
;
Underdamped:
;
Swing Equations
The current:
Pm=Pe
The rotor must swing past point b The rotor angle would oscillate back
until an equal amount of energy is and forth between 0 and max at its
given up by the rotor masses. The natural frequency until new steady
energy given up by the rotor as it state establishes at point ‘b’ due to
decelerates back to synchronous damping.
speed is
The equal angle criterion is
used to determine the
maximum additional power
Pm, which can be applied to
maintain the stability.
But,
where, 1 =( - max)
Example 11.4
The machine delivers a real power of 0.6 pu, at 0.8 power
factor lagging to the infinite busbar. The infinite busbar is
1.0pu. Determine:
a) The maximum power input that can be applied without
loss of synchronism
b) Repeat a) with zero initial power input. Assume the
generator internal voltage remains constant at the value
computed in a)
From eg 11.2:
obtained from
iterative technique
increases
Assumption:
- Pm = constant
F
A circuit is stable if its impulse response h(t) is bounded ( i.e h(t) converges to
a finite value) as t ∞
Since the transfer function H(s) is the Laplace transform of the impulse
response of h(t):
j