Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Trends in Analytical Chemistry
• Description p.1
• Audience p.2
• Impact Factor p.2
• Abstracting and Indexing p.2
• Editorial Board p.2
• Guide for Authors p.6
ISSN: 0165-9936
DESCRIPTION
.
The articles in TrAC are concise, critical overviews of new developments in analytical chemistry,
which are aimed at helping analytical chemists and other users of analytical techniques.
These critical reviews comprise excellent, up-to-date, timely coverage of topics of interest in
analytical chemistry, such as: analytical instrumentation, biomedical analysis, biomolecular analysis,
biosensors, chemical analysis, chemometrics, clinical chemistry, drug discovery, environmental
analysis and monitoring, food analysis, forensic science, laboratory automation, materials science,
metabolomics, pesticide-residue analysis, pharmaceutical analysis, proteomics, surface science, and
water analysis and monitoring.
General issues contain critical review articles. Special Issues provide comprehensive updates with
critical review articles on particularly topical fields of interest in analytical chemistry.
Please note that all articles published in the journal are by invitation of one of the Editors. If you wish
to submit a review to TrAC and have not been invited by one of the Editors, please first submit a
short proposal using the standard review proposal template directly to the Journal Editorial Office,
[email protected].
When submitting a Proposal, please indicate which of the listed Contributing Editor(s) of TrAC you feel
is best suited to review your proposal (please list a maximum of 3 in order of preference). Authors
will then be required to select the same Editor that approved the proposal when completing their
final submission.
Only once you have received approval from a Contributing Editor that your proposal has been accepted
should you submit your paper to the journal. All reviews should be submitted via Editorial Manager
and will be subject to the normal peer review process.
If you wish to submit a proposal for a Special Issue, please submit first a short proposal using the
standard Special Issue template directly to the journal ([email protected]) and include the listed
Contributing Editor(s) of TrAC you feel is best suited to support your proposal.
PLEASE NOTE: TrAC will not accept any submissions that have not had either an approved
proposal or invitation to submit from an Editor.
Benefits to authors
Please see our Guide for Authors for information on article submission. If you require any further
information or help, please visit our Support Center.
AUDIENCE
.
All scientists, managers and students who are interested in keeping up-to-date with the latest
developments and applications of analytical techniques.
IMPACT FACTOR
.
Analytical Abstracts
Mass Spectrometry Bulletin
Metals Abstracts
Science Citation Index
World Aluminum Abstracts
BIOSIS Citation Index
Chemical Abstracts
Current Contents - Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences
Engineering Index
FSTA (Food Science and Technology Abstracts)
INSPEC
Biological Abstracts
Chemical Engineering and Biochemical Abstracts (CEBA)
Chemistry Citation Index
Current Biotechnology
Current Chemical Reactions
Current Index to Statistics
Embase
Environmental Abstracts
Embase
GeoRef
Index to Scientific Reviews
Science Citation Index Expanded
Journal Citation Reports - Science Edition
Reaction Citation Index
BIOSIS Previews
BIOSIS Reviews Reports and Meetings
Scopus
Research Alert
Chromatography Abstracts
EDITORIAL BOARD
.
Editor-in-Chief
Janusz Pawliszyn, University of Waterloo, Department of Chemistry, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Sampling; Sample preparation; Separation techniques; Extraction techniques; Detection in
Separations; Hyphenation of separation techniques; Microextraction technologies; SPME;
Chromatography; Electrophoretic techniques, Mass spectrometry
Contributing Editors
Damià Barceló, Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research, Barcelona, Spain
INTRODUCTION
TrAC has an interdisciplinary readership, which includes scientists in industry, academia and service
laboratories. Its aim is to publish concise reviews covering the latest advances in analytical chemistry.
Recent trends and developments, problems (and their solutions), and the limitations and the potential
of the topic under discussion are all within the scope. Reviews should interpret rather than be
comprehensive. They should not be unfairly biased towards the work of any particular laboratories.
They should be written so that the non-specialist understands the principles and the applications of the
topic. Consequently, articles should be broadly based and practically oriented. The use of specialized
terms should be kept to a minimum, and explained fully in the text or in a glossary when used. All
reviews will be subject to peer review and should be submitted through the Elsevier Editorial System
(https://www.editorialmanager.com/TRAC). However, it is now mandatory that prospective authors
discuss the proposed subject and scope of their review with one of TrAC's Contributing Editors before
submission via a new proposal form. Please see below under "Additional Information" for further
details.
Reviews should comprise about 4000 words and include about four figures and tables. References
should be limited to about 50 and should include other reviews and recent articles that readers can
use to pursue their interest in the topic. Primary research papers describing the results of the authors'
research work are not within the scope of TrAC. Please note: TrAC is a review journal and most articles
published in the Journal are by invitation of one of the Contributing Editors.
Additional information
TrAC reserves the right to edit, shorten or decline publication of all submitted articles. Authors will
be consulted regarding major alterations to the text before printing. Galley proofs will be supplied
to the authors of review articles, but no alterations other than the correction of errors can be made
at the proof stage.
Please note that most articles published in the journal are by invitation of one of the Editors. If you wish
to submit a review to TrAC and have not been invited by one of the Editors, please submit first a short
proposal using the standard review proposal template directly to [email protected].
Please indicate which of the listed Contributing Editor(s) of TrAC you feel is best suited to review
your proposal (please list a maximum of 3 in order of preference). All reviews should be submitted
via the Elsevier Editorial Manager System and will be subject to the normal peer review process.
If you wish to submit a proposal for a Special Issue, please submit first a short proposal using the
standard Special Issue template directly to the journal ([email protected]) and include the
listed Contributing Editor(s) of TrAC you feel is best suited to support your proposal.
PLEASE NOTE: TrAC will not accept any submissions that have not had either an approved
proposal or invitation to submit from an Editor.
Submission checklist
You can use this list to carry out a final check of your submission before you send it to the journal for
review. Please check the relevant section in this Guide for Authors for more details.
One author has been designated as the corresponding author with contact details:
• E-mail address
• Full postal address
During submission to Editorial Manager, you can choose to release your manuscript publicly as a
preprint on the preprint server SSRN once it enters peer-review with the journal. Your choice will have
no effect on the editorial process or outcome with the journal. Please note that the corresponding
author is expected to seek approval from all co-authors before agreeing to release the manuscript
publicly on SSRN.
You will be notified via email when your preprint is posted online and a Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
is assigned. Your preprint will remain globally available free to read whether the journal accepts or
rejects your manuscript.
For more information about posting to SSRN, please consult the SSRN Terms of Use and FAQs.
Definitions
Sex generally refers to a set of biological attributes that are associated with physical and physiological
features (e.g., chromosomal genotype, hormonal levels, internal and external anatomy). A binary sex
categorization (male/female) is usually designated at birth ("sex assigned at birth"), most often based
solely on the visible external anatomy of a newborn. Gender generally refers to socially constructed
roles, behaviors, and identities of women, men and gender-diverse people that occur in a historical
and cultural context and may vary across societies and over time. Gender influences how people view
themselves and each other, how they behave and interact and how power is distributed in society. Sex
and gender are often incorrectly portrayed as binary (female/male or woman/man) and unchanging
whereas these constructs actually exist along a spectrum and include additional sex categorizations
and gender identities such as people who are intersex/have differences of sex development (DSD) or
identify as non-binary. Moreover, the terms "sex" and "gender" can be ambiguous—thus it is important
for authors to define the manner in which they are used. In addition to this definition guidance and
the SAGER guidelines, the resources on this page offer further insight around sex and gender in
research studies.
Author contributions
For transparency, we encourage authors to submit an author statement file outlining their individual
contributions to the paper using the relevant CRediT roles: Conceptualization; Data curation;
Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources;
Software; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Roles/Writing - original draft; Writing - review &
editing. Authorship statements should be formatted with the names of authors first and CRediT role(s)
following. More details and an example.
Changes to authorship
Authors are expected to consider carefully the list and order of authors before submitting their
manuscript and provide the definitive list of authors at the time of the original submission. Any
addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the authorship list should be made only
before the manuscript has been accepted and only if approved by the journal Editor. To request such
a change, the Editor must receive the following from the corresponding author: (a) the reason
Subscribers may reproduce tables of contents or prepare lists of articles including abstracts for internal
circulation within their institutions. Permission of the Publisher is required for resale or distribution
outside the institution and for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations. If
excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the author(s) must obtain written permission
from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article. Elsevier has preprinted forms for
use by authors in these cases.
For gold open access articles: Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a
'License Agreement' (more information). Permitted third party reuse of gold open access articles is
determined by the author's choice of user license.
Author rights
As an author you (or your employer or institution) have certain rights to reuse your work. More
information.
Elsevier supports responsible sharing
Find out how you can share your research published in Elsevier journals.
Role of the funding source
You are requested to identify who provided financial support for the conduct of the research and/or
preparation of the article and to briefly describe the role of the sponsor(s), if any, in study design; in
the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to
submit the article for publication. If the funding source(s) had no such involvement, it is recommended
to state this.
This requirement applies to any original work described and to the preparation of the article being
submitted, and not to previously published papers to which reference is made in the article.
Open access
Please visit our Open Access page for more information.
Elsevier Researcher Academy
Researcher Academy is a free e-learning platform designed to support early and mid-career
researchers throughout their research journey. The "Learn" environment at Researcher Academy
offers several interactive modules, webinars, downloadable guides and resources to guide you through
the process of writing for research and going through peer review. Feel free to use these free resources
to improve your submission and navigate the publication process with ease.
PREPARATION
Please note that manuscripts must be submitted in Microsoft Word format. LaTeX or other
formats are not acceptable.
Queries
For questions about the editorial process (including the status of manuscripts under review) or for
technical support on submissions, please visit our Support Center.
Peer review
This journal operates a single anonymized review process. All contributions will be initially assessed by
the editor for suitability for the journal. Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of
two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The Editor is responsible
for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. The Editor's decision is final. Editors
are not involved in decisions about papers which they have written themselves or have been written
by family members or colleagues or which relate to products or services in which the editor has an
interest. Any such submission is subject to all of the journal's usual procedures, with peer review
handled independently of the relevant editor and their research groups. More information on types
of peer review.
Use of word processing software
It is important that the file be saved in the native format of the word processor used. The text
should be in single-column format. Keep the layout of the text as simple as possible. Most formatting
codes will be removed and replaced on processing the article. In particular, do not use the word
processor's options to justify text or to hyphenate words. However, do use bold face, italics, subscripts,
superscripts etc. When preparing tables, if you are using a table grid, use only one grid for each
individual table and not a grid for each row. If no grid is used, use tabs, not spaces, to align columns.
The electronic text should be prepared in a way very similar to that of conventional manuscripts (see
also the Guide to Publishing with Elsevier). Note that source files of figures, tables and text graphics
will be required whether or not you embed your figures in the text. See also the section on Electronic
artwork.
To avoid unnecessary errors you are strongly advised to use the 'spell-check' and 'grammar-check'
functions of your word processor.
Article structure
Subdivision - numbered sections
Divide your article into clearly defined and numbered sections. Subsections should be numbered
1.1 (then 1.1.1, 1.1.2, ...), 1.2, etc. (the abstract is not included in section numbering). Use this
numbering also for internal cross-referencing: do not just refer to 'the text'. Any subsection may be
given a brief heading. Each heading should appear on its own separate line.
Introduction
State the objectives of the review and provide an adequate background, avoiding a detailed literature
survey or a summary of the results.
Discussion
This should explore the significance of the topic of the review
Highlights should be submitted in a separate editable file in the online submission system. Please
use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including
spaces, per bullet point).
Abstract
A concise, factual abstract is required. The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the review,
the principal points of discussion and major conclusions. An abstract is often presented separately
from the article, so it must be able to stand alone. For this reason, references should be avoided,
but, if essential, they must be cited in full, without reference to the reference list. Also, non-standard
or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided, but, if essential, they must be defined at their first
mention in the abstract itself.
Keywords
Immediately after the abstract, provide a maximum of 10 keywords, using British spelling and avoiding
general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid, for example, "and", "of"). Be sparing with
abbreviations: only abbreviations firmly established in the field may be eligible. These keywords will
be used for indexing purposes.
Abbreviations
Define abbreviations that are not standard in this field an alphabetical list to be placed immediately
after the keywords on the first page of the article. Abbreviations in the abstract must be defined at
their first mention there. Ensure consistency of abbreviations throughout the article.
Acknowledgements
Collate acknowledgements in a separate section at the end of the article before the references, so
do not include them on the title page, as a footnote to the title or otherwise. List those individuals
who provided help in preparing the review (e.g., providing financial support, language help, writing
assistance or proof reading the article, etc.).
Formatting of funding sources
List funding sources in this standard way to facilitate compliance to funder's requirements:
It is not necessary to include detailed descriptions on the program or type of grants and awards. When
funding is from a block grant or other resources available to a university, college, or other research
institution, submit the name of the institute or organization that provided the funding.
If no funding has been provided for the research, it is recommended to include the following sentence:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or
not-for-profit sectors.
Math formulae
Please submit math equations as editable text and not as images. Present simple formulae in
line with normal text where possible and use the solidus (/) instead of a horizontal line for small
fractional terms, e.g., X/Y. In principle, variables are to be presented in italics. Powers of e are often
more conveniently denoted by exp. Number consecutively any equations that have to be displayed
separately from the text (if referred to explicitly in the text).
Footnotes
Footnotes should be used sparingly. Number them consecutively throughout the article. Many word
processors can build footnotes into the text, and this feature may be used. Otherwise, please indicate
the position of footnotes in the text and list the footnotes themselves separately at the end of the
article. Do not include footnotes in the Reference list.
Artwork
Electronic artwork
General points
• Make sure you use uniform lettering and sizing of your original artwork.
• Embed the used fonts if the application provides that option.
• Aim to use the following fonts in your illustrations: Arial, Courier, Times New Roman, Symbol, or
use fonts that look similar.
• Number the illustrations according to their sequence in the text.
• Use a logical naming convention for your artwork files.
• Provide captions to illustrations separately.
• Size the illustrations close to the desired dimensions of the published version.
• Submit each illustration as a separate file.
• Ensure that color images are accessible to all, including those with impaired color vision.
A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it as a permanent link to any electronic article.
An example of a citation using DOI for an article not yet in an issue is: VanDecar J.C., Russo R.M.,
James D.E., Ambeh W.B., Franke M. (2003). Aseismic continuation of the Lesser Antilles slab beneath
northeastern Venezuela. Journal of Geophysical Research, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000884.
Please note the format of such citations should be in the same style as all other references in the paper.
Web references
As a minimum, the full URL should be given and the date when the reference was last accessed. Any
further information, if known (DOI, author names, dates, reference to a source publication, etc.),
should also be given. Web references can be listed separately (e.g., after the reference list) under a
different heading if desired, or can be included in the reference list.
Data references
This journal encourages you to cite underlying or relevant datasets in your manuscript by citing them
in your text and including a data reference in your Reference List. Data references should include the
following elements: author name(s), dataset title, data repository, version (where available), year,
and global persistent identifier. Add [dataset] immediately before the reference so we can properly
identify it as a data reference. The [dataset] identifier will not appear in your published article.
Below are a number of ways in which you can associate data with your article or make a statement
about the availability of your data when submitting your manuscript. When sharing data in one of
these ways, you are expected to cite the data in your manuscript and reference list. Please refer to the
"References" section for more information about data citation. For more information on depositing,
sharing and using research data and other relevant research materials, visit the research data page.
MethodsX
You have the option of converting relevant protocols and methods into one or multiple MethodsX
articles, a new kind of article that describes the details of customized research methods. Many
researchers spend a significant amount of time on developing methods to fit their specific needs or
setting, but often without getting credit for this part of their work. MethodsX, an open access journal,
now publishes this information in order to make it searchable, peer reviewed, citable and reproducible.
Authors are encouraged to submit their MethodsX article as an additional item directly alongside the
revised version of their manuscript. If your research article is accepted, your methods article will
automatically be transferred over to MethodsX where it will be editorially reviewed. Please note an
open access fee is payable for publication in MethodsX. Full details can be found on the MethodsX
website. Please use the methods template or protocol template to prepare your MethodsX article.
Appeals Policy
You as an author may appeal an editorial decision within 30 days of receipt of the decision to decline
a manuscript for publication, please email us at [email protected] summarizing the scientific
basis on which you wish you appeal and including the manuscript number in the subject line of your
email. The basis for an appeal must be set forth clearly and fully in writing by the corresponding
author. The handing editor and, as needed, editorial team will consider your appeal and respond to
you once they have done so. Please note that when your paper is under appeal at TrAC, we regard
it as being under active consideration, so please let us know immediately if you decide to submit to
another journal instead. The editor's decision may be appealed only if the decision to decline involved
a serious mistake, and not merely a judgment call that could have gone either way. Only one appeal
is permitted per manuscript, and decisions on appeals are final. New submissions take precedence
for the editors over appeals.
AFTER ACCEPTANCE
Proofs
One set of page proofs (as PDF files) will be sent by e-mail to the corresponding author (if we do not
have an e-mail address then paper proofs will be sent by post) or a link will be provided in the e-
mail so that authors can download the files themselves. To ensure a fast publication process of the
article, we kindly ask authors to provide us with their proof corrections within two days. Elsevier now
provides authors with PDF proofs which can be annotated; for this you will need to download the free
Adobe Reader, version 9 (or higher). Instructions on how to annotate PDF files will accompany the
proofs (also given online). The exact system requirements are given at the Adobe site.
If you do not wish to use the PDF annotations function, you may list the corrections (including replies
to the Query Form) and return them to Elsevier in an e-mail. Please list your corrections quoting line
number. If, for any reason, this is not possible, then mark the corrections and any other comments
(including replies to the Query Form) on a printout of your proof and scan the pages and return via e-
mail. Please use this proof only for checking the typesetting, editing, completeness and correctness
of the text, tables and figures. Significant changes to the article as accepted for publication will only
AUTHOR INQUIRIES
Visit the Elsevier Support Center to find the answers you need. Here you will find everything from
Frequently Asked Questions to ways to get in touch.
You can also check the status of your submitted article or find out when your accepted article will
be published.
© Copyright 2018 Elsevier | https://www.elsevier.com