TC 001 - Module 3 Issues On Human Development Tasks GC
TC 001 - Module 3 Issues On Human Development Tasks GC
LEARNING OUTCOMES
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1 | Page
ENGAGE
s
EXPLORE
1.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
2.
2 | Page
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
EXPLAIN
1. Nature vs Nurture
A significant issue in developmental psychology is the relationship between the
innateness of an attribute (whether it is part of our nature) and the environmental effects
on that attribute (whether it is influenced by our environment, or nurture). This is often
referred to as the nature vs. nurture debate, or nativism vs. empiricism.
• A nativist (“nature”) account of development would argue that the processes in
question are innate and influenced by an organism’s genes. Natural human
behavior is seen as the result of already-present biological factors, such as genetic
code.
• An empiricist (“nurture”) perspective would argue that these processes are
acquired through interaction with the environment. Nurtured human behavior is
seen as the result of environmental interaction, which can provoke changes in brain
structure and chemistry. For example, situations of extreme stress can cause
problems like depression.
The nature vs. nurture debate seeks to understand how our personalities and traits are
produced by our genetic makeup and biological factors, and how they are shaped by
our environment, including our parents, peers, and culture. For instance, why do
biological children sometimes act like their parents? Is it because of genetic similarity, or
the result of the early childhood environment and what children learn from their parents?
3 | Page
Today, developmental psychologists rarely take such polarized positions (either/or) with
regard to most aspects of development; instead, they investigate the relationship
between innate and environmental influences (both/and). Developmental psychologists
will often use the biopsychosocial model to frame their research: this model states that
biological, psychological, and social (socio-economical, socio-environmental, and
cultural) factors all play a significant role in human development.
We are all born with specific genetic traits inherited from our parents, such as eye color,
height, and certain personality traits. Beyond our basic genotype, however, there is a
deep interaction between our genes and our environment: our unique experiences in
our environment influence whether and how particular traits are expressed, and at the
same time, our genes influence how we interact with our environment (Diamond, 2009;
Lobo, 2008). There is a reciprocal interaction between nature and nurture as they both
shape who we become, but the debate continues as to the relative contributions of
each.
Heritability refers to the origin of differences among people; it is a concept in biology that
describes how much of the variation of a trait in a population is due to genetic
differences in that population. Individual development, even of highly heritable traits
such as eye color, depends not only on heritability but on a range of environmental
factors, such as the other genes present in the organism and the temperature and
oxygen levels during development. Environmental inputs can affect the expression of
genes, a relationship called gene-environment interaction. Genes and the environment
work together, communicating back and forth to create traits.
Some concrete behavioral traits are dependent upon one’s environment, home, or
culture, such as the language one speaks, the religion one practices, and the political
party one supports. However, some traits which reflect underlying talents and
temperaments—such as how proficient at a language, how religious, or how liberal or
conservative—can be partially heritable.
This chart illustrates three patterns one might see when studying the influence of genes
and environment on individual traits. Each of these traits is measured and compared
between monozygotic (identical) twins, biological siblings who are not twins, and
adopted siblings who are not genetically related. Trait A shows a high sibling correlation
but little heritability (illustrating the importance of environment). Trait B shows a high
heritability, since the correlation of the trait rises sharply with the degree of genetic
similarity. Trait C shows low heritability as well as low correlation generally, suggesting that
the degree to which individuals display trait C has little to do with either genes or
predictable environmental factors.
2. Continuity vs Discontinuity
Think about how children become adults. Is there a predictable pattern they follow
regarding thought and language and social development? Do children go through
gradual changes or are they abrupt changes?
4 | Page
Normative development is typically viewed as a continual and cumulative process. The
continuity view says that change is gradual. Children become more skillful in thinking,
talking or acting much the same way as they get taller.
The discontinuity view sees development as more abrupt-a succession of changes that
produce different behaviors in different age-specific life periods called stages. Biological
changes provide the potential for these changes.
We often hear people talking about children going through “stages” in life (i.e.
“sensorimotor stage.”). These are called developmental stages-periods of life initiated by
distinct transitions in physical or psychological functioning.
Psychologists of the discontinuity view believe that people go through the same stages,
in the same order, but not necessarily at the same rate.
3. Stability vs Change
Stability implies personality traits present during infancy endure throughout the lifespan.
In contrast, change theorists argue that personalities are modified by interactions with
family, experiences at school, and acculturation.
This capacity for change is called plasticity. For example, Rutter (1981) discovered than
somber babies living in understaffed orphanages often become cheerful and
affectionate when placed in socially stimulating adoptive homes.
5 | Page
ELABORATE
Rubrics
6 | Page
EVALUATE
DIRECTIONS: In this, you will be asked to answer different sets of questions which is a
combination of different types of objective examination (multiple choices, identification,
short response, true or false or alike, and so on.)
Note that in this part you are encouraged to remember the topic/s discussed.
This will be provided on the platform identified in the syllabus and course guide.
REFERENCES
References
The Child and Adolescent Development Learners and Learning Principles
Brenda B. Corpuz,PhD
Ma. Rita D. Lucas, PhD
Heidi Grace L. Borabo, PhD
Paz I. Lucido, PhD
PREPARED BY:
7 | Page