Roles and Function in Directing
Roles and Function in Directing
A systematic application of conflict management was initiated in the 19th century and Great
Britain is known to be the home of collective bargaining. The need for this arose due to
industrial conflicts leading to trade union movements.
The words like 'Labour Court', Associations, Councils, Tradc Unions etc. are known to be
concerned for collective bargaining procedures for conflict resolution.
Hospital workers 'Union and Nurses' Union are also involved many times in conflict
management process. Sometimes a collective approach is seen where the Union and Association
come to an agreement for achieving a common goal of the team or profession.
The conflict management should always aim for bringing improvement to the organisation
through solving the grievances of individuals working in and for the organisation.
CATEGORIES OF CONFLICT
2. Interpersonal Conflict is seen when two or more people do not agree on issues or the
best way to manage a specific problem.
Example
A staff member wants to take care of patients on a specific team. Staff might not like
their assignments and interpersonal conflicts might occur;
Assignments may be heavier for the person who has been floated. This individual might
confront the person making the assignment, causing more conflicts;
A patient becomes non-compliant with her treatment and resists the physician's orders;
Some staff members want to work twelve hour shifts and single parents or staff with
young children want eight hour shifts;
Pre-scheduling to be off on holidays has created anger between employees who have
seniority and those who made their request months in advance;
A nurse and a doctor disagree on giving specific medications to a patient with end- stage
liver disease.
3. Organizational Conflict
CONFLICT PROCESS
The first step in the conflict process is the presence of conditions that create opportunities for
conflict to develop. These cause or create opportunities for organizational conflict to rise.
These three conditions causes conflict:
A. Communication
Different words connotations, jargon insufficient exchange of information and noise in
communication channel are all antecedent conditions to conflict.
Too much communication as well as too little communication can lay the foundation for
conflict.
B. Structure
Include variables such as size, degree of specialization in the tasks assigned to group
members, jurisdictional clarity, members/ goal compatibility, leadership styles, reward
systems and the degree of dependence between groups.
The size and specialization act as forces to stimulate conflict.
The larger the group and the more specialized its activities, the greater the likelihood of
conflict
The potential for conflicts tends to be greatest when group members are younger and
when turnover is high.
C. Personal Variables
Certain personality types- for example individuals who are highly authoritarian and
dogmatic- lead to potential conflict.
Difference in value systems - Value differences are the best explanations of diverse
issues such as prejudice disagreements over one’s contribution to the group and rewards
one deserves.
Example:
A may be aware that B and A are in serious disagreements but it may not make A tense or
nations and it may have no effect whatsoever on A’s affection towards B” It is the felt level ,
when individuals become emotionally involved that parties experience anxiety , tension or
hostility. Stage2 is the place in the process where the parties decide what the conflict is about
and emotions plays a major role in shaping perception.
Perceived Conflict
This is the stage at which members become aware of a problem.
Incompatibility of needs is perceived and tension begins as the parties begin to worry
about what will happen.
Sometimes conflict may be perceived when latent conditions are not in existence in the
system. Such a situation arises when one party perceives the other to be likely to thwart
or frustrate his/her goal.
Felt Conflict
“Emotional involvement in a conflict creating anxiety tenseness, frustration and hostility
is known as felt conflict.”
It is that stage when the conflict is not only perceived but actually felt and cognized.
Parties to the conflict feel that they have some conflict among themselves.
Parties become emotionally involved and begin to focus on differences of opinion and
opposing interest – sharpening perceived conflict.
Internal tensions and frustration begin to crystallized around specific, define issues and
people begin to build and emotional commitment to their position.
Stage 3. Intentions
Intentions intervene among people’s perceptions and emotions and overt behaviors.
These intentions are decisions to act in a given way.
Intentions are separated out as a distinct stage because you have to infer the other’s intent
to know how to respond to that other’s behavior.
A lot of conflicts are escalated merely by one party attributing the wrong intentions to
the other party.
Stage 4: Behavior
This stage is where conflicts become visible.
The behavior stage includes the statements, actions, and reactions made by the
conflicting parties.
These conflict behaviors are usually overt attempts to implement each party’s intentions,
but they have a stimulus quality that is separate from intentions.
As a result of miscalculations or unskilled enactments, overt behaviors sometimes
deviate from original intentions.
This stage is a dynamic process of interaction.
Ex: you make a demand on me; I respond by arguing; you threaten me; I threaten you
back; and so on
Conflict intensities escalate as they move upward along the continuum until they become
highly destructive.
Ex: Strikes, riots, and wars
Stage 5: Outcomes
The action–reaction interplay among the conflicting parties results in consequences.
May be:
Functional - in that the conflict results in an improvement in the group’s
performance
Dysfunctional - in that it hinders group performance.
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
Nurse Managers, department heads, Charge Nurses, and Team Leaders have to develop
managerial actions and structures to minimize conflicts, and they must handle conflicts in a
constructive manner and with a positive attitude, using effective communication and listening
skills.
WIN-LOSE
Win-lose scenarios often times involve groups and intragroup conflicts.
When the group votes on an issue and majority rules there is a winner and a loser.
This can erode the cohesiveness of a group and may diminish the group leader's
authority.
Another scenario could involve a nurse who has 30 years of seniority and wants a
specific holiday off and another new employee also requested the same holiday off.
The senior nurse refuses to give in and wants to win this argument.
LOSE-LOSE
Lose-lose scenarios involve losses to both parties.
This is often is the case when a union arbitrator in union contract negotiations gives
something to both parties and yet neither party gets what it wants.
WIN-WIN
Win-win scenarios involve collaboration: all groups or parties work together to meet
the goals and objectives of all involved.
Group consensus is reached after careful investigation of the situation, specified
needs of the group are understood by all, and a workable solution is reached.
In this type of win-win scenario there is no voting or other traditional dispute
measurement: only the true group consensus counts.
Everyone involved usually feels good about the outcome.
This is seen when Nurse Managers and Nursing Supervisor work together to staff a
unit that is constantly needing help to cover their close observation or 1:1 patients
while meeting their own unit needs.