Development of A Method For Calculating A Anaerobi
Development of A Method For Calculating A Anaerobi
D Y Suslov
Department of heat and gas supply and ventilation, Belgorod State Technological
University named after V.G. Shukhov, Kostyukov St., 46, Belgorod, 308012, Russia
E-mail: [email protected]
1. Introduction
Recently, biogas stations and biomethane plants have been introduced in the agro-industrial sector, the
main task of which is the production of a renewable energy source - biomethane [1-4]. In addition,
organic waste from various industries is utilized and biological fertilizers are obtained. Utilization of
organic matter occurs in digesters due to the active vital activity of microorganisms that digest pro-
teins, fats and carbohydrates. To provide a comfortable environment for reproduction and life, micro-
organisms need to maintain a uniform temperature level and distribution of bacteria throughout the
biomass. For this, various mixing systems are used, while in biogas plants the mechanical method is
most widely used [5-7]. However, during the operation of mechanical mixers, intensive mixing of the
biomass occurs only in the horizontal plane in the area of movement of the mixer blades. And in the
upper parts of the digester, little intensive mixing of the biomass is observed [8, 9].
The solution to these problems is possible through the use of bubble-type mixing systems [10, 11].
Recently, much attention has been paid to the bubbling method of mixing biomass, which, in contrast
to the mechanical method, does not require the installation of rotating units and elements [12-15]. It is
known that rotating assemblies are the most fragile element in the operation of mechanisms.
During the operation of bubbling mixing systems, an upward gas flow is formed, which carries
away the biomass. This leads to the circulation of biomass from the lower part of the digester to the
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
ICES 2020 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1089 (2021) 012034 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1089/1/012034
upper part, as a result of which intensive and effective mixing of the entire volume of the digester oc-
curs.
However, at present the process of obtaining biogas in digesters with a bubbling-type mixing sys-
tem is poorly studied.
The purpose of this work is to develop a method for calculating the design and technological pa-
rameters of the digester equipped with heating and bubbling mixing systems.
a b
Figure 1. Digester with a bubble-type mixing system: a – the location of the bubbling pipeline in
the digester; b – location of the heat exchanger - coil on the digester wall.
To determine the yield of biogas during anaerobic fermentation in a mesophilic temperature re-
gime, the dependence of Chen and Hashimoto is used [16]. Chen and Hashimoto's model most fully
describes the biogas production process depending on the most important parameters of the anaerobic
fermentation process.
To determine the design and technological parameters of heating and mixing systems, dependen-
cies describing hydrodynamic [17] and heat exchange processes are used.
2
ICES 2020 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1089 (2021) 012034 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1089/1/012034
Figure 2. Algorithm of the methodology for calculating the design and tech-
nological parameters of the digester with bubbling mixing.
Consider the methodology for calculating the "direct" problem. In this case, the initial data are var-
iable and constant factors.
Variable factors include: daily volume of the initial substrate (manure yield from the farm), vs.s, м3;
moisture content of biomass in digester W,%; temperature of biomass in digester T, K; hydraulic re-
tention time (duration of the fermentation process) τ, days.
Constant factors include:
moisture content of the original substrate Ws, %;
density of the dry part of the substrate d, kg / m3;
ash content of the dry part of the substrate A,%;
gas velocity in the bubble pipe υbp, m/s;
gas flow rate from the holes of the bubble pipe υhol, m/sec;
gas consumption for mixing Qg,, m3 / min;
biogas pressure above biomass in the digester р0, Pa;
the density of the bubbling gas ρg, kg / m3;
kinematic viscosity of biogas γg, m2 / s;
coolant speed ωh, m/sec.
W v (1 W ) d , (1)
3
ICES 2020 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1089 (2021) 012034 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1089/1/012034
vs vs.s (5)
The volume of water added to the digester to achieve optimum moisture content can be deter-
mined by the formula:
W Ws
vv ms ( ), (6)
100 W
where ms – substrate weight, kg.
m 0 1 T 2 T 2 , (7)
B0 S K
V (1 ), (8)
μm 1 K
where:
B0 is the limiting biogas yield from a unit of volatile solids of a given composition with an infinite du-
ration of the process, m3 / kg;
K is the kinetic parameter.
The total biogas yield of the digester is determined by the expression, m3 / kg VS:
Vtot V v (9)
4
ICES 2020 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1089 (2021) 012034 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1089/1/012034
Further, the biogas production process is optimized with the introduction of variable parameters.
At the same time, such values of the variable factors are determined at which the biogas yield will be
maximum.
5
ICES 2020 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1089 (2021) 012034 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1089/1/012034
2 D M2 Lc
2
l c1 , (17)
Lc H M
2 2
where:
DM is the diameter of the digester, m;
HM - digester height, m.
Distance between axes of adjacent coil turns, m:
H M lc1 (18)
h
Lc
R h 2 R22
lbp R1 h 2 R12 R2 h 2 R22 h 2 ln 2 , (21)
hh R1 h 2 R12
where:
R1 - radius of the largest turn of the bubble pipe, m;
R2 - radius of the smallest turn of the bubble pipe, m;
hh - horizontal step between the axes of adjacent turns, m.
Horizontal step between the axes of adjacent turns, m:
R1 R2
hh , (22)
nt .bp
where Hbp – height of the bubble pipe made in the form of a spiral, m.
6
ICES 2020 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1089 (2021) 012034 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1089/1/012034
l bp
n hol , (24)
hhol
4 Qg
d hol , (25)
n hol υ hol
where υhol – gas velocity from the holes of the bubble pipe, m/s.
ρ g hol
2
рhol (26)
2
One of the main tasks in determining the required pressure is to determine the pressure loss in the
bubbling pipeline.
Taking into account the design of the bubbling pipeline made in the form of a vertical spiral in the
form of a cone, the pressure loss is determined from the equation, Pa:
l 1 2 Sbp Sbp e
s
рbp 1 e e 4 (1 e )
bp
dbp 3 s s Sw s
(27)
bp 5 dbp
0.275
rt av 2
) 0,0175 sl 0.45 4 nt .bp
.bp g bp
f( ,
hol Re 2 rt av dbp 2
.bp
where:
λ is the coefficient of friction;
υ – flow rate at the beginning of the pipeline, m/s; υe – flow velocity at the end of the pipeline, m/s;
Sbp – pipeline cross-sectional area, m2;
Sw – is the area of the pipeline walls, m2;
δsl – angle of smooth rotation, ̊;
rt.bpav – average radius of the turns of the bubbling pipeline, m;
ψ – is a coefficient that takes into account the mutual influence of smooth turns.
Then, the adequacy of the results obtained is checked and the final values are displayed.
The "Inverse" task is similar to the method for calculating the direct problem, but the design pa-
rameters of the digester are not calculated.
4. Conclusion
A method for calculating the structural and technological parameters of a digester of an original design
equipped with a heating system and a bubbling mixing system has been developed. The technique con-
7
ICES 2020 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1089 (2021) 012034 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1089/1/012034
tains direct and inverse tasks. The direct task is to determine the parameters of the digester in order to
obtain the maximum yield of biogas from a certain volume of the initial substrate. The inverse task is
to determine the biogas yield with known parameters of the digester and biomass.
The technique makes it possible to determine the physical and chemical properties of the biomass,
the geometrical parameters of the digester, the volume of biogas produced, the design parameters of
the digester heating system, the design and technological parameters of the bubbling mixing system.
The developed methodology was used to design and calculate a biogas station with a total volume
of digesters of 600 m3. The biogas station processes 40 m3 / day of organic waste from the pig breed-
ing complex and meat processing plant, and produces 1600 m3 of biogas per day.
5. Acknowledgments
The study was carried out in the framework of the scholarship of the President of the Russian Federa-
tion SP-180.2019.1.
References
[1] Sokolov A V, Belyaeva N M 2011 E`ffektivnost` vnedreniya biogazovy`kh ustanovok v
sel`skokhozyajstvenny`kh organizacziyakh Kostromskoj oblasti Razvitie APK [The
effectiveness of the introduction of biogas plants in agricultural organizations of the
Kostroma region Development of the agro-industrial complex] Regional'naya ekonomika:
teoriya i praktika 43(226) 38-41 [In Russian].
[2] Scarlat N, Dallemand J-F and Fahl F 2018 Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe
Renewable Energy 129(A) 457-72
[3] Chinnici G, Selvaggi R, D’Amico M and Pecorino B 2018 Assessment of the potential energy
supply and biomethane from the anaerobic digestion of agro-food feedstocks in Sicily
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82(1) 6-13
[4] Siegmeier T, Blumenstein B and Moller D 2015 Farm biogas production in organic agriculture:
System implications Agricultural Systems 139 196-209
[5] Karim K, Hoffmann R, Klasson K T and Al-Dahhan M H 2005 Anaerobic digestion of animal
waste: Effect of mixing Water Research 39 3597-606
[6] Jegede A O, Zeeman G and Bruning H 2019 Effect of Mixing Regimes on Cow Manure
Digestion in Impeller Mixed, Unmixed and Chinese Dome Digesters Energies 12(13) 2540
[7] Kalia A K, Singh S P 2001 Effect of Mixing Digested Slurry on the Rate of Biogas Production
from Dairy Manure in Batch Fermenter Energy Sources 23 711-5
[8] Suslov D Yu and Temnikov D O 2016 Komp'yuternoe modelirovanie peremeshivaniya
substrata v biogazovyh ustanovkah [Computer simulation of substrate mixing in biogas
plants] Vestnik BGTU im V. G. Shukhova [Bulletin of BSTU named after V G Shukhov]
4 153-6 [In Russian].
[9] Bergamo U, Viccione G, Coppola S, Landi A, Meda A and Gualtieri C 2020 Analysis of
anaerobic digester mixing: comparison of long shafted paddle mixing vs gas mixing. Water
Science and Technology 81(7) 1406-19
[10] Onychin E M, Medyakov A A, Kamenskih A D and Anisimov P N 2012 E`ksperimental`ny`e
issledovaniya malogo bioreaktora s sistemoj barbotazhnogo peremeshivaniya i
kataliticheskogo obogreva [An experimental research of the small bioreactor with the bubble
mixing system and catalytic heating] Nauchny`j zhurnal KubGAU 78(04) 1-14 [In Russian]
[11] Kuschev L A, Suslov D Yu and Alifanova A I 2017 Computer modeling movement of
biomass in the bioreactors with bubbling mixing IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environ.
Sci. 52 012025
[12] Wu B 2010 CFD simulation of gas and non-Newtonian fluid two-phase flow in anaerobic
digesters Water research 44 3861-74
[13] Wu B 2014 CFD simulation of gas mixing in anaerobic digesters Computers and Electronics in
Agriculture 109 278-86
8
ICES 2020 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1089 (2021) 012034 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1089/1/012034
[14] Dapelo D and Bridgeman J 2016 Mixing optimization of gas-mixed anaerobic digestion using
CFD European Biosolids and Organic Resources Conf. (Edinburgh)
[15] Dapelo D 2016 Gas mixing in anaerobic digestion: PhD thesis (Birmingham: University of
Birmingham)
[16] Hashimoto A G 1982 Methane from Cattle Waste: Effects of Temperature Hydraulic Retention
Time and Influent Substrate Concentration on Kinetic Parameter Biotechnology and
Bioengineering 24 2039-52
[17] Dakhno A V, Smirnov Yu P, Mashkov A V and Potapenko O V 2018 To an assessment of size
of diffusive losses of coolant through a rubber camera – cover Chemical Bulletin 1(1) 18-26.