Republic of the Philippines

BICOL STATE COLLEGE OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY

Peñafrancia Ave., Naga City, Camarines Sur 4400

TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT: S&R MEMBERSHIP SHOPPING MALL

ROXAS AVENUE NAGA CITY

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements in

Principles of Transportation Engineering

ABENGOZA, Monica Amor

AVANCEÑA, Arnel M.
BRIOSO, Bryan Hermoso E.
DEMESA, Chien Henry P.
ENRIQUEZ, Japheth
MARABE, Roan Mae L.
PADO, Christian Louis
REYES, Kent M.
SALES, Marc Brian
TOLOSA, Marian Rafaela
VILLASEÑOR, Ian B.

MAY 2023
CONTENTS

I. Introduction

1.1. Background

1.2. Scope of the Study

II. The Study Area

2.1. Site Location

2.2. Accessibility

2.3. Impact Area

III. Data Collection

3.1. Preliminary Surveys

3.2. Current Site and Road Condition

3.3. Travel Time and Delay Studies

IV. Baseline Traffic

4.1. Identification of Critical Movement

4.2. Base Traffic

V. Trip Generation

5.1. Background

5.2. Trip Produced and Attracted by the Development

5.3. Traffic Assignment

VI. Estimation of Future Traffic

6.1. Background
 6.2. Future Traffic Without Development

6.3. Future Traffic With Development

VII. Analysis of Traffic

7.1. Background

7.2. Road Capacity Analysis

7.3. Parking Requirements

VIII. Recommendations

8.1. Traffic Engineering and Management

8.2. Public Transport and Facilities

8.3 Pedestrian Facilities

8.4. Internal Circulation

8.5 Parking

Appendices
I. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Roxas Avenue is one of the busiest streets in Naga City, Camarines Sur with high

population density and commercial activity. This area has a lot of surrounding mall

establishments resulting in heavy traffic congestion, especially during peak hours. In

relation to this, another big establishment is yet to rise in the said area. The S&R

Membership Shopping Mall construction in Naga City, Camarines Sur is a landmark

project that aims to bring modern shopping and business facilities to the region. It is

slated to be a multi-level shopping center that will feature various stores, restaurants,

and entertainment facilities. The mall has a floor area of 9,977.18871 sq.m.

Once completed, the mall is expected to provide a boost to the local economy

by creating job opportunities and attracting more visitors to the area, thus may have a

significant impact on the traffic flow and patterns in the surrounding area. The influx of

vehicles coming to and from the mall can result in increased traffic congestion,

especially during peak hours. This increase in traffic congestion can result in longer

travel times, delays, and other related issues such as road accidents. Additionally, the

increased traffic volume around the mall can lead to a higher demand for efficient and

safe parking facilities in the area which can contribute to further congestion and traffic

issues. Furthermore, the mall's location near major roads and intersections can

compound traffic problems in the area.

1.2 Scope of the Study

The study looked into the impact of the future development on traffic

generation. The development of the S&R Membership Shopping Mall in Roxas Avenue,

Naga City is the subject of this research. This study includes an assessment of the

present traffic conditions in the study area, traffic generation projections, impact

assessments of the predicted traffic generation, and recommendations for integrating

the proposed interventions into the local transportation system.

II. STUDY AREA

2.1 Location

The project is located along Roxas Avenue in Naga City. It is adjacent to other

commercial buildings along the diversion road, such as the WINWIN Mall, ALDP Mall,

Robinsons Place Naga City, and Yashano Mall.

Figure 1: Location of the Development

2.2 Accessibility

The proposed commercial development is accessible to numerous

establishments via different modes of transportations: PUJs, taxis, vans, motorcycles,

buses etc. The main access to the project site is through Roxas Avenue which is a

two-way road with 2 lanes each. Mostly private vehicles such as private cars and

motorcycles, and public transport such as PUJs, tricycles and Buses passed through the

said road section. Different commercial establishments are also available around the

area. There are also malls, hotels & government offices nearby.
2.3 Impact Area

According to the ITE 2010, the study area of a development such as a shopping

center larger than 9,290 sq.m., and any development that generates more than 500

vehicular trips during peak hours, should include all signalized intersections and, if

applicable, expressway entry/exit ramps within 3.2 km of the site's property line, and all

major unsignalized access (streets and driveways) within 1.6 km of the site. Since the

area of the development is 19,008 sqm, the entire city of Naga is being studied for this

development. Naga City covers a land area of 8,448 square hectares.

Figure 2: Map of the Study Area

III. DATA COLLECTION

3.1 Preliminary Surveys

The researchers visited the site in Roxas Avenue, Naga City and asked for

permission from the Project Manager to get a copy of plans such as but not limited to

the site development plan, ground floor plan, parking lot plan, and elevations , to be

used in the said study. The researchers, upon approval, started with the gathering of

information and traffic count in the area. A survey is used to assess the acceptability of

the S&R Membership Shopping building; specifically, its effect on the community and

traffic flow near its vicinity.

Table 1.1: Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of Gender

Gender Frequency Percentage

Male 154 49.4%
Female 146 46.8%
Prefer Not to Say 12 3.8%
Total 312 100%

Based on Table 1.1, out of the 312 respondents, 154 (49.4%) are identified as

males, 146(46.8%) of the respondents are females, and 12 (3.8%) respondents prefer not

to disclose their gender.

Majority of the respondents are males with 2.6% difference. Since the survey used

a non-random – convenience where the respondents of the study were selected based
on their availability, the gender of the respondents would not greatly affect the entire

survey.

Table 1.2: Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of Address

Address Frequency Percentage

Outside Naga City 142 45.5%
Inside Naga City 170 54.5%
Total 312 100%

Based on Table 1.2, out of the 312 respondents, 142 (45.5%) are residing outside

Naga City, and 170(54.5%) of the respondents are from Naga City.

Majority of the respondents are residing within the study area with 9% difference.

The present study welcomes respondents from outside Naga City due to the fact that

the development of S&R Membership Shopping Mall would not only attract consumers

from within the city but also from its neighboring towns and municipalities.

The Table 1.2.a shows that 105 out of the 170 respondents from Naga City are

students, 34 are employed, 12 are professionals, 10 are self-employed, and 9 are

unemployed according to their occupations.

Majority of the respondents of the survey that are residing within the study area

are students. Aside from their availability to participate in the survey, the researchers

know that students are one of the huge groups in the commuting population in Naga. It

is because the City of Naga is home to a total of 226 educational institutions as of 2022.

Of these, 10 are tertiary institutions where the students are more likely to commute.
 Table 1.2.a. Respondents Within Naga City

Frequency Percentage
Student 105 61.8%
Employed 34 20%
Occupation
Professional 12 7.1%
Self- Employed 10 5.9%
Unemployed 9 5.3%
Total 170 100%
Frequency Percentage
10-14 4 2.4%
15-19 17 10%
20-24 91 53.3%
25-29 20 11.8%
30-34 14 8.2%
Age Group 35-39 9 5.3%
40-44 4 2.4%
45-49 5 2.9%
50-54 4 2.4%
55-59 1 0.6%
60 and above 1 0.6%
Total 170 100%
Frequency Percentage
Work 43 25.3%
Home 20 11.8%
Reason to Enter
Schooling 44 25.9%
Roxas Avenue
Shopping/Commercial 105 61.8%
Recreation 60 35.3%
Others 6 3.6%
Frequency Percentage
Mode of Public 85 50%
Transportation Used Private 43 25.3%
Both 42 24.7%
Total 170 100%

According to Table 1.2.a, the respondents within the study area are composed

of 91(53.3%) respondents from the age group of 20-24 years old, 20(11.8%) are from the

25-29 age group, 17(10%) are from 15-19 years old, 14(8.2%) are from 30-34 years old
and 9(5.3%) are from 35-39 years old. While the minority of the respondents ages 45-49

having only 5 respondents (2.9%), ages 10-14, 40-44, and 50-54 having 4 respondents

(2.4%) each age group, and 1 respondent aging 55-59 and 60 years old and above.

Since the majority of the respondents are students, they are more likely to belong

in the age group of 20-24 having 53.3% of the respondents. The age group of the

commuting population could also affect how they will assess the acceptability of an

additional development along one of the busiest roads in Naga City.

The researchers also surveyed the reasons for the respondents to enter the

location of the development in Roxas Avenue. The reasons for the respondents to enter

Roxas Avenue include for Shopping and Commercial, for recreation, for schooling, for

work, and to drive to their home, respectively.

The top reason given by 105 out of 170 respondents is for shopping and

commercial purposes. It is because of the adjacent and neighboring commercial

buildings along Roxas Avenue such as the WinWin Mall, ADLP Mall, Robinsons Place

Naga and Yashano Mall.

In terms of the mode of transportation used by the respondents, 50% of the 170

respondents used public transportation, 43 (25.3%) used private vehicles, and 42 (24.7%)

used both public and private transportation.

The modal choice of the majority of the respondents can be based on their

occupation, age group, and reason to enter Roxas Avenue. Since the majority of the

respondents are students, ages 20-24, and enters the Roxas Avenue for Shopping and
Commercial purposes, it could be easily accommodated by public transport, hence

the results.

Table 1.2.b. Respondents Outside Naga City

Frequency Percentage
Student 110 77.5%
Employed 20 14.1%
Occupation
Professional 6 4.2%
Self- Employed 1 0.7%
Unemployed 5 3.5%
Total 142 100%
Frequency Percentage
10-14 1 0.7%
15-19 16 11.3%
20-24 101 71.1%
25-29 20 11.8%
30-34 8 5.6%
Age Group 35-39 2 1.4%
40-44 1 0.7%
45-49 3 2.1%
50-54 1 0.7%
55-59 1 0.7%
60 and above 0 0%
Total 142 100%
Frequency Percentage
Work 17 12%
Home 8 5.6%
Reason to Enter
Schooling 65 45.8%
Roxas Avenue
Shopping/Commercial 81 57%
Recreation 46 32.4%
Others 4 2.8%
Frequency Percentage
Mode of Public 99 69.7%
Transportation Used Private 21 14.8%
Both 22 15.5%
Total 142 100%
 The Table 1.2.b shows the occupations, age groups, the reasons to enter Rixas

Avenue and the mode of transportation used by the respondents residing outside Naga

City. According to the table, 110 out of the 142 respondents are students, 20 are

employed, 6 are professionals, 1 is self-employed, and 5 are unemployed according to

their occupations.

Majority of the respondents are students from the tertiary education institutions in

Naga City who travel from outside the city. According to the website of the City of

Naga, this city is recognized as the regional center for education, hosting some of the

top schools and universities in the region, and is indeed the place where excellence in

education is commonplace. This is why students across the province are travelling all

the way to Naga to receive education.

According to Table 1.2.b, the respondents outside Naga City are composed of

101(71.1%) respondents from the age group of 20-24 years old, 20(11.8%) are from the

25-29 age group, 16(11.3%) are from 15-19 years old, 8 (5.6%) are from 30-34 years old

While the minority of the respondents ages 45-49 having only 3 respondents (2.1%), ages

35-39 with 2 respondents (1.4%), and ages 10-14, 40-44, 50-54, and 55-59 having 1

respondent (0.7%) each age group.

Since the majority of the respondents are students, they are more likely to belong

in the age group of 20-24 having 71.1% of the respondents. The age group of the

commuting population could also affect how they will assess the acceptability of an

additional development along one of the busiest roads in Naga City.

 The reasons for the respondents to enter the location of the development in

Roxas Avenue were also surveyed, along with the mode of transportation used. The

reasons for the respondents to enter Roxas Avenue include for Shopping and

Commercial, for recreation, for schooling, for work, and to drive to their home,

respectively.

Out of the 142 respondents, (57%) say that their reason to enter Roxas Avenue in

Naga City, is for shopping and commercial purposes. It is seconded by the reason for

schooling said by 65 out of 142 respondents (45.8%). Forty-six respondents say that they

enter Roxas Avenue for recreation while only 17 (12%) enter for work.

Roxas Avenue is classified as a primary arterial road according to the Road and

Bridge inventory provided by the Department of Public Works and Highways. Trips along

this road could lead to different commercial places, educational institutions,

workplace, and recreational places throughout Naga City.

In terms of the mode of transportation used by the respondents, 99(69.7%) of the

142 respondents used public transportation, 21 (14.8%) used private vehicles, and 22

(15.5%) used both public and private transportation.

The modal choice of the majority of the respondents can be based on their

location and distance from their destination, occupation, age group, and reason to

enter Roxas Avenue. Since the majority of the respondents are students, ages 20-24,

and enters the Roxas Avenue for Shopping and Commercial purposes, it could be easily

accommodated by public transport, hence the results.

 Table 1.3.a. Private Transportation Used by the Respondents

Frequency Percentage
Car 71 22.76%
Van 9 2.88%
Motorcycle 84 26.92%
Bicycle 12 3.85%

Shown in Table 1.3.a are the private transportation used by the 312 respondents

of the survey, Based from the table, the private mode of transportation used by the

respondents, include private cars, vans, motorcycles, and bicycles. Eighty-one out of

312 respondents rode motorcycles, 71 from the 312 respondents used private cars, 12

rode their bicycles, and 9 respondents rode private vans. Majority of respondents who

use private transportation own motorcycles and cars.

Table 1.3.b. Public Transportation Used by the Respondents

Frequency Percentage
PUJs 219 70.19%
Bus 9 2.88%
Taxi 4 1.28%
UV-Express 1 0.32%
Tricycle 146 46.79%
E-tricycle 3 0.96%

Shown in Table 1.3.a are the public transportation used by the 312 respondents

of the survey. 219 out of 312 respondents are riding PUJs, 146 out of 312 rides tricycles, 9

out of 312 rides buses, 4 out of 312 rides taxi, 1 respondent rides in UV-Express.
 Majority of the respondents ride jeepneys around, in, and out Naga City.

According to the article entitled Philippines Transportation Guide: How to Get Around,

Land & Sea Travel, Local Tips (Anonuevo, n.d.), Jeepney is the most common mode of

public transportation. It can be found all over the country, as their open-air design and

bench-style seating make them one of the cheapest land transportation in the

Philippines, with the current minimum fare at PHP12 in Naga City.

Figure 3: Acceptability of the S&R to Community AND Traffic Flow

Based on the graph shown in Figure 3, 284 out of 312 respondents say that the

construction and the development of the S&R Membership Shopping Mall along Roxas

Avenue Naga is acceptable, while the remaining 28 respondents disagree. In terms of

travelling along Roxas Avenue, 224 respondents claimed that they have experienced

inconvenience throughout their travel in the said road section. On the other hand, 88

out of 312 respondents did not experience any convenience at all. When asked if this

development could add to the total traffic congestion in the area, 224 respondents

said yes, while 88 respondents said that it could not affect the traffic along Roxas

Avenue. Two hundred and fifty-nine respondents agreed that the proposed parking

space of the building could accommodate their customers while 53 out of 312

respondents said otherwise.

3.2 Site and Road Conditions

The site and road condition of the traffic and facilities are shown in the following

figures and tables. The subject site is located in a commercialized area, thus, more

vehicles are passing by the location. Based on our observation, the soon to rise structure

will affect the establishments around it. With regards to traffic, the current situation of

the area is conditional based on its peak hour but the soon to rise structure will

eventually cause congestion to the area.

3.2.1 Road Type and Category

Shown in Table 2 are the classifications and characteristics of the main roads in

Naga City. It includes local streets like Abella St, Misericordia St, Balatas Road,

Mabolo-Camaligan-Gainza Road, Felix Plazo St, and Qeuborac Drive. Tertiary Arterial
roads include Bagumbayan Norte, Elias Angeles St, Magsaysay Ave, MT Villanueva Ave,

Panganiban Drive, Penafrancia Ave, and Biak na Bato St. Roxas Avenue, the location

of the development is among the Primary Arterial roads including Maharlika Highway.

Illustrated in Figure 3 is a map based on the data provided by the Road & Bridge

Information Application: Database of Statistic Division, Planning Service of DPWH.

Whereas, Concepcion – Del Rosario road is identified as a primary road along with

Diversion Road and Mabolo Road. The Panganiban Road and Magsaysay Road, on the

other hand, were classified as Tertiary Roads.

Table 2: Road Classifications and Characteristics

Road Name Road Classification Directional Flow
Abella St Local Street Two-way street
Misericordia St Local Street Two-way street
Balatas Rd Local Street Two-way street
Bagumbayan Norte Tertiary Arterial Two-way street
Elias Angeles Street Tertiary Arterial Two-way street
Maharlika Highway Primary Arterial Two-way street
Roxas Ave Primary Arterial Two-way street
Magsaysay Ave Tertiary Arterial Two-way street
M.T Villanueva Ave Tertiary Arterial Two-way street
Mabolo-Camaligan-Gainza Road Local Street Two-way street
Felix Plazo St Local Street Two-way street
Panganiban Drive (Iglesia ni Cristo) Tertiary Arterial Two-way street
Panganiban Drive (Bicol Medical Center) Tertiary Arterial Two-way street
Maharlika Highway Primary Arterial Two-way street
Penafrancia Ave (PNP-NPCO No.3) Tertiary Arterial Two-way street
Penafrancia Ave (Penafrancia Church) Tertiary Arterial Two-way street
Queborac Drive Local Street Two-way street
Biak na Bato Street Tertiary Arterial Two-way street
 Figure 4: Primary and Tertiary National Road Network

3.2.2 Existing Facilities

The following figures depict the various existing transportation infrastructures to

be found within the study area.

3.2.2.a Different Mode of Transportation

● Road Transport
➢ Private Car ➢ 2-Axle Truck ➢ Taxicle
➢ PUJ ➢ Articulated/ Cargo ➢ Taxi
➢ Motorcycle Truck ➢ Ambulance
➢ Tricycle ➢ UV express ➢ Armored Vehicle
➢ Bicycle ➢ E-bike ➢ Minibus
➢ Delivery Trucks ➢ E-trike ➢ Bus
➢ Pedicab ➢ Multicab ➢ Other Vehicles
 ● Railway Transport
➢ Train
➢ Rail Skates

● Water Transport (Naga City Ferry Terminal)

➢ Motorized Boats
➢ Oar Boat

3.2.2.b Existing Transportation Terminals

In addition to the Bicol Central Station located at CBD II, the city also has existing

terminals that serve inter-municipality/city routes such as the southbound and

northbound terminal. As per the ocular inspection made by the Naga City Resilience

Council team, the following terminals were identified:

Table 3: Transportation Terminals

Existing Transportation Terminals Location
Bicol Central Station CBD Terminal, Ninoy and Cory Ave, Triangulo
Southbound Terminal –LCC Transport Felix Plazo Street, Sabang
Terminal
Northbound Terminal Queborac Drive, Bagumbayan Sur
Eastbound Terminal Carnation Street, Triangulo
Pacol Cararayan Terminal Pandian Street, Dinaga
Naga UV Terminal Carnation Street, Triangulo
PNR Station PNR Road, Tabuco

3.2.2.c Existing Infrastructure

The proposed development is a shopping center and a commercial

development. The following are some of the biggest and well-known shopping centers

and commercial buildings in Naga City.

 Table 4: Infrastructure
Shopping Malls and Supermarkets Location
SM City Naga Ninoy and Cory Aquino Avenue

LCC Central Mall Felix Plazo Street

Puregold Supermarkets General Luna Street; Roxas Avenue

Nagaland E Mall P. Diaz corner Elias Angeles Street

Super Metro Gaisano Supermarket Panganiban Drive

ALDP Mall Roxas Avenue

Robinsons Place Naga Roxas Avenue corner Almeda Highway

Unitop Department Store Ilias Angeles Street

Winwin Mall Naga Roxas Avenue

Vistamall Naga Maharlika Highway

Yashano Mall Naga Roxas Avenue

Grand Master Mall J. Hernandez Avenue

MasterSquare J. Hernandez Avenue

Hong Enterprise Caceres Street

101 Shopping Center Biak na Bato Street corner Plaridel Street

Cabral Bicolandia Supermart J. Hernandez Avenue

3.2.3 Existing Transportation Condition

Shown in Figure 4 is the traffic congestion in the study area which is dominated

by fast to moderate traffic. To determine the traffic situation along the mentioned 18

specified points on different road links in Naga City, a 5-hour traffic volume count was

employed. This traffic congestion is because of the huge daily passenger volume and

vehicle volume. In order to calculate the number of passenger volumes, the

researchers used the 2020 population data to come up with the number of daily

passenger volume per barangay in the whole city of Naga. Shown in Table 5 is the 2020

population density of Naga City according to the Philippine Statistics Authority.

 Table 5: Passenger Volume from 2020 Population Data
BARANGAY 2020 POPULATION PASSENGER VOLUME
Abella 5757 339
Bagumbayan Norte 2203 130
Bagumbayan Sur 7867 463
Balatas 11112 654
Calauag 11295 665
Cararayan 19692 1159
Carolina 6870 405
Concepcion Grande 11125 655
Concepcion Pequena 25139 1480
Dayangdang 4130 243
Del Rosario 10337 609
Dinaga 344 20
Igualidad Interior 3008 177
Lerma 1640 97
Liboton 3105 183
Mabolo 8125 478
Pacol 14747 868
Panicuason 3100 183
Penafrancia 4503 265
Sabang 6838 403
San Felipe 21098 1242
San Francisco 722 43
San Isidro 3432 202
Santa Cruz 7135 420
Tabuco 4240 250
Tinago 2904 171
Triangulo 8702 512
TOTAL 209170 12316

Total Passenger Volume = 12,316 pax/day

The calculation uses the formula

PV= Daily Demand x Peak Hour Factor x Directional Factor x Modal Split Factor

where;

Daily demand = population per traffic analysis zone for all barangay multiplied by

40.89% (percentage of commuting population from 30-64 years old)

Peak Hour Factor = 0.80

Directional Factor = 0.60

Modal Split Factor = 0.30 (Assuming 30% of the population will use public transportation)

Figure 5. Traffic Congestion in the Study Area

3.3 Traffic Count Data

Shown in Table 6.1 to 6.18 are the total traffic counts on the major roads in Naga

City. These roads are classified as two-way streets, hence the two directions of lanes for

each.
Table 6.1: Traffic Count (Abella Street)

Direction Bicycle Pedicab Motorcy Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A 3A Others TOTAL
cle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Truck

EB
250 1511 1034 746 92 149 46 5 26 14 0 0 24 0 3 3900

WB
207 1452 1023 798 88 209 13 2 39 10 0 1 23 0 5 3871

Table 6.2: Traffic Count (Misericordial Street)

Direction Bicycle Pedicab Motorcy Taxi Publiv Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A 3A Others TOTAL
cle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Truck

EB
73 27 794 0 153 76 123 2 1 24 23 0 0 5 0 2 1303

WB
74 28 788 1 169 55 125 0 1 16 21 0 0 8 0 4 1290

Table 6.3: Traffic Count (Balatas Street)

Direction Bicycle Pedicab Motorcy Taxi Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A 3A Others TOTAL
cle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Truck

EB
117 14 1235 10 344 167 663 33 4 10 23 0 0 53 13 22 2708

WB
165 17 1331 0 395 151 818 42 3 26 10 0 0 69 15 5 3047
Table 6.4: Traffic Count (Bagumbayan)

Direction Bicycle Pedicab Motorcycle Taxi Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A 3A Others TOTAL
Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Truck

EB
286 26 2529 2 895 313 984 260 16 250 14 1 3 76 29 17 5701

WB
271 32 2582 0 675 357 968 238 20 226 37 1 6 73 42 21 5549

Table 6.5: Traffic Count (Elias Angeles St)

Bicycle Pedicab Motorcycle Public Private Private Car Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Large 2A Truck 3A Truck Others TOTAL
Tricycle Tricycle Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Bus

EB 290 10 2245 2284 104 1319 152 0 57 13 0 0 21 0 211 6706

WB 329 5 3404 3014 123 1881 98 0 107 19 0 0 40 0 184 9204

Table 6.6: Traffic Count (Mabolo)

Bicycle Pedica Motor- Taxi Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Large 2A 3A Van Other TOTAL
b cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Expres Bus Bus Truck Truck Vehicle
s

SB 169 5 2773 5 382 348 933 141 15 197 68 7 57 390 210 27 41 5768

EB 133 5 2753 6 378 294 883 236 21 180 64 6 36 279 173 78 215 5740
Table 6.7: Traffic Count (Roxas Avenue)

Directio Bicycl Pedica Motorc Taxi Public Private Private Public Private Pick-u UV Mini Large 2A 3A 4A or Van Others TOTAL
n e b ycle Tricycl Tricycl Car Jeep Jeep p Van Express Bus Bus Truck Truck more
e e

EB 199 7 3310 7 454 252 1617 333 17 276 41 2 103 304 161 55 289 26 7453

WB 218 9 3170 5 517 302 1378 306 16 303 32 6 117 244 141 87 259 29 7139

Table 6.8: Traffic Count (Magsaysay Ave)

Direction Bicycle Pedicab Motor- Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A Truck 3A Truck Others TOTAL
cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus

EB 280 15 2922 147 240 1631 341 8 138 19 1 4 352 43 19 6160

WB 339 11 3529 191 266 2146 406 88 118 7 4 8 432 43 18 7606

Table 6.9: Traffic Count (Mt Villanueva)

Bicycle Pedicab Motor- Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A Truck 3A Truck Others TOTAL
cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus

EB 333 283 3009 728 236 1555 29 10 56 6 1 6 184 28 19 6483

WB 328 213 2920 343 274 2062 8 21 348 0 4 5 77 33 12 6648

Table 6.10: Traffic Count(Mabolo - Camaligan)

Bicycle Pedicab Motor- Taxi Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A 3A Other TOTAL
cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Truck Vehicle

EB 105 44 822 2 158 84 141 64 4 7 47 0 0 40 8 6 1532

WB 81 38 698 3 169 128 127 78 12 21 9 0 0 51 10 3 1428

Table 6.11: Traffic Count(Felix Plazo)

Bicycle Pedicab Motor- Taxi Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A 3A Other TOTAL
cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Truck Vehicle

EB 124 500 1459 1 425 192 283 180 9 116 62 1 0 92 8 16 3468

WB 120 193 1471 2 47 186 361 16 3 128 0 1 1 75 14 16 2634

Table 6.12: Traffic Count(Panganiban Drive)

Bicycle Pedicab Motor- Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A Truck 3A Truck Others TOTAL
cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus

EB 181 12 2630 2174 225 1500 220 21 297 0 0 0 33 3 14 7310

WB 260 11 3484 2738 296 1579 215 17 150 77 2 0 131 3 26 8989

Table 6.13: Traffic Count(Panganiban Drive B)

Bicycle Pedicab Motor- Taxi Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A 3A Others TOTAL
cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Truck

EB 160 11 2650 11 860 325 2320 239 29 75 53 0 1 191 12 64 7001

WB 224 14 2472 12 902 221 1837 348 18 99 97 2 2 61 1 29 6339

Table 6.14: Traffic Count(AH26)

Bicycle Pedicab Motor- Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A Truck 3A Truck Others TOTAL
cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus

EB 234 11 3084 299 353 2521 528 29 147 125 4 96 96 240 240 51 51 49 49 7771
7771

WB 187
187 55 3264
3264 324 324 265 265 26182618 520520 26
26 71
71 105
105 22 85
85 326
326 3333 4646 7877
7877

Table 6.15: Traffic Count(Peñafrancia PNP)

Bicycle Pedicab Motor- Taxi Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A 3A Others TOTAL
cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Truck

NEB 275 6 1955 1 504 188 569 624 8 64 19 0 0 57 1 5 4276

SEB 277 2 1643 20 688 93 499 601 3 43 1 0 0 37 2 2 3911

Table 6.16: Traffic Count(Peñafrancia Church)

Bicycle Pedicab Motor- Taxi Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A 3A Others TOTAL
cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Truck

NB 399 17 3067 0 247 365 1187 243 11 151 127 2 0 96 4 14 5930

SB 378 16 3054 6 292 365 1365 274 10 72 51 2 1 167 18 31 6102

Table 6.17: Traffic Count(Queborac Drive)

Bicycle Pedicab Motor- Taxi Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A 3A Others TOTAL
cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Truck

EB 255 260 1693 0 852 230 539 96 3 75 1 0 0 57 11 10 4082

WB 230 227 1565 1 901 228 557 64 3 34 2 0 3 102 18 9 3944

Table 6.18: Traffic Count(Biak na Bato)

Bicycle Pedicab Motor- Taxi Public Private Private Public Private Pick-up UV Mini Bus Large 2A 3A Others TOTAL
cycle Tricycle Tricycle Car Jeep Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Truck

NB 0 0 2096 0 1036 312 534 396 7 123 5 0 0 151 2 18 4680

SB 205 26 2010 1 812 369 492 311 10 33 28 0 0 137 1 6 4441

IV. BASELINE TRAFFIC

4.1 Identification of Critical Movement

Identifying the critical movement is necessary to determine the lanes to be

surveyed and which areas will be affected by the proposed project. The critical

movement is the lane that requires the most time to service its queue. In this proposed

development, it is assumed that all major intersections and routes in the entire Naga

City will be affected as it is a huge commercial building and will be serving not only the

consumers from the city, but also from the neighboring towns and municipalities.

4.2 Base Traffic

A 5-hour traffic volume count was employed in some of the major road sections

in Naga City. To assess the traffic-flow rate on these critical lanes, the traffic volume is

converted to passenger car units (PCU). Different passenger car equivalent factors

were also used as a measure of the impact that a mode of transport has on traffic

variables. The rating of Level of Service in Roxas Avenue is categorized as E and F for

eastbound and westbound respectively. According to the Level of Service (LOS)

Characteristics provided by the lecture of the Local Public Transport Route Planning

and Management Course, the traffic volumes are near or at capacity and the flow is

unstable with momentary stoppage in the eastbound. On the other hand, there is a

forced or congested flow at low speed, and long queues and delays in the westbound.

.
 Table 6. Traffic Analysis in Road Sections
VOLUME ROAD
ROAD SECTION DIRECTION VCR LOS
(pcu/hr) CAPACITY
EASTBOUND 605 720 0.84 D
Abella St
WESTBOUND 649 720 0.9 E
EASTBOUND 190 720 0.26 B
Misericordia St
WESTBOUND 181 720 0.25 B
WESTBOUND 583 720 0.81 D
Balatas Road
EASTBOUND 583 720 0.81 D
WESTBOUND 1152 720 1.6 F
Bagumbayan Norte
EASTBOUND 1103 720 1.53 F
EASTBOUND 1124 720 1.56 F
Elias Angeles St
WESTBOUND 1292 720 1.79 F
EASTBOUND 1169 1440 0.81 D
AH6
SOUTHBOUND 1208 1440 0.84 D
EASTBOUND 1389 1440 0.96 E
Roxas Ave
WESTBOUND 1457 1440 1.01 F
EASTBOUND 1481 1440 1.03 F
Magsaysay Ave
WESTBOUND 1228 1440 0.85 E
EASTBOUND 1206 1440 0.84 D
M.T Villanueva Ave
WESTBOUND 1740 1440 1.21 F
Mabolo-Camaligan-Gainza EASTBOUND 279 720 0.39 B
Road WESTBOUND 251 720 0.35 B
EASTBOUND 612 1440 0.43 B
Felix Plazo St
WESTBOUND 425 1440 0.3 B
Panganiban Drive (near Iglesia EASTBOUND 1141 1440 0.79 D
ni Cristo) WESTBOUND 1602 1440 1.11 F
Panganiban Drive (near Bicol WESTBOUND 1114 1440 0.77 D
Medical Center) EASTBOUND 1290 1440 0.9 E
WESTBOUND 1574 1440 1.09 F
AH26
EASTBOUND 1619 1440 1.12 F
Penafrancia Ave (near NORTHBOUND 744 720 1.03 F
PNP-NPCO No.3 SOUTHBOUND 732 720 1.02 F
Penafrancia Ave (near SOUTHBOUND 1220 1440 0.85 E
Penafrancia Church) NORTHBOUND 1044 1440 0.73 D
EASTBOUND 713 720 0.99 E
Queborac Drive
WESTBOUND 713 720 0.99 E
NORTHBOUND 801 720 1.11 F
Biak na Bato St
SOUTHBOUND 796 720 1.11 F
V. TRIP GENERATION

5.1 Background

Trip generation is the first stage of the classical first generation aggregate

demand models. It is followed by Trip Distribution, Modal Choice, and Traffic

Assignment. It forecasts the number of trips that originate or end in a specific traffic

analysis zone. Traffic flow considers both the number of vehicles and the human factor,

or general trips of people, because traffic includes both people and vehicle trips. A trip

is a one-way directional travel movement with beginning and ending points within the

study area.

Trip rates show the number of traffic/people movements in and out of a

development (or an average of a number of developments within the same land use

category), for a given trip rate parameter factor. Gross Leasable Area (GLA) and Gross

Floor Area (GFA) are the factors used for computing the trip rates.

5.2 Trips Produced and Attracted by the Development

GFA= 9,977.18871 sqm

PM Peak Index

In: 0.0476 person trips of GFA

Out: 0.0521 person trips of GFA

Daily

In: 0.3940 person trips of GFA

 Out: 0.3546 person trips of GFA

Daily Generated Traffic

In: 9,977.18871 sqm * 0.3940 = 3,931 person trip/day

Out: 9,977.18871 sqm * 0.3546 = 3,538 person trip/day

Ave. One-way volume: 3,735 person trip/day

5.3 Traffic Assignment

This study mainly focuses on the traffic movement from major road segments in

Naga City including Abella St, Misericordia St, Balatas Road, Bagumbayan Norte, Elias

Angeles Street, Maharlika Highway, Roxas Avenue, Magsaysay Avenue,

Mabolo-Camaligan-Gainza Road, Felix Plazo St, Panganiban Drive, Penafrancia

Avenue, and Queborac Drive. It is scheduled for a 5-hour count starting from 7:00am to

9:00 am, 12:00 pm to 01:00 pm, and 04:00 pm to 6:00 pm. Vehicles involved in this study

are separated into fifteen categories namely: bicycle, pedicab, motorcycle, private

cars, public and private tricycles, private car, public and private jeepney, PUV, UV

Express, mini and large Bus, 2-axle and 3 axle trucks and other vehicles not mentioned

above. Traffic movement of people will also be considered.

VI. ESTIMATION OF FUTURE TRAFFIC

6.1 Background

This section shows the passenger volume and traffic projection starting 2023 to

2028 using the population data. As the number of occupants of the proposed project

increases, the projected traffic is further forecasted annually for the analysis of traffic.

The “without development” and “with development” scenarios are considered in the

study. “Without development” includes forecasts of the baseline data and would show

the increase in traffic flows in the absence of the proposed development along Roxas

Avenue but with typical background development and growth (i.e., other areas in the

influence area of the project will develop). The traffic generated by the proposed

development will be added to the “without development” values to come up with

values for the “with development” case.

6.2 Future Traffic Without Development

Based on Population data of the Philippines Statistics Authority, the average

annual growth rate of Naga City from 2015 to 2020 census is 1.38%. This rate will be used

to forecast passenger volume from each barangays. The 2020 passenger volume is

shown in Table 5, having an estimated 12,316 passenger/day in Naga City. The future

traffic without the development will be forecasted in five years time.

 Table 7: Demand Forecast Without Development
2020 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
BARANGAY Passenger Passenger Passenger Passenger Passenger Passenger Passenger
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Abella 339 353 358 363 368 373 378
Bagumbayan Norte 130 135 137 139 141 143 145
Bagumbayan Sur 463 482 489 496 503 510 517
Balatas 654 681 691 700 710 720 730
Calauag 665 693 702 712 722 732 742
Cararayan 1159 1208 1224 1241 1258 1276 1293
Carolina 405 422 428 434 440 446 452
Concepcion Grande 655 682 692 701 711 721 731
Concepcion Pequena 1480 1542 1563 1585 1607 1629 1652
Dayangdang 243 253 257 260 264 267 271
Del Rosario 609 635 643 652 661 670 680
Dinaga 20 21 21 21 22 22 22
Igualidad Interior 177 184 187 190 192 195 198
Lerma 97 101 102 104 105 107 108
Liboton 183 191 193 196 199 201 204
Mabolo 478 498 505 512 519 526 533
Pacol 868 904 917 930 942 955 969
Panicuason 183 191 193 196 199 201 204
Penafrancia 265 276 280 284 288 292 296
Sabang 403 420 426 432 438 444 450
San Felipe 1242 1294 1312 1330 1348 1367 1386
San Francisco 43 45 45 46 47 47 48
San Isidro 202 210 213 216 219 222 225
Santa Cruz 420 438 444 450 456 462 469
Tabuco 250 260 264 268 271 275 279
Tinago 171 178 181 183 186 188 191
Triangulo 512 533 541 548 556 564 571
TOTAL 12316 12830 13008 13189 13372 13555 13744

Table 7 shows the forecast of travel demand from the present to 2028. Based on

the forecasted demand for the passenger volume derived from 2020 population data,

the passenger volume in the current year 2023 generates 12,830 pax/day. The future

volume of passengers without the development five years from now is estimated as

13,744 pax/day.
 By 2028, the passenger volume in Naga City will increase according to the

annual growth rate of the city. The present 12,830 passenger/day is estimated to

increase by 914 passenger/day, five years from now, without the development.

6.3 Future Traffic With Development

The traffic generated by the proposed development will be added to the

“without development” values to come up with values for the “with development”

case. The estimated 3,735 person trip/day generated by the development is added to

the forecasted demand shown in table 7.

Table 8: Demand Forecast With Development

2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Passenger Passenger Passenger Passenger Passenger Passenger
Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume
Future Traffic Without
12830 13008 13189 13372 13555 13744
Development
Trips Produced and
Attracted by the 3,735 3,735 3,735 3,735 3,735 3,735
Development
Future Traffic With
16565 16743 16924 17107 17290 17479
Development
VII. ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC

7.1 Background

To assess the road conditions on Roxas Avenue in Naga City, a traffic analysis is

conducted, considering the afternoon (PM) peak hours. The objective is to compare

the current Level of Service (LOS) with the anticipated future traffic conditions.

Additionally, an evaluation is performed to determine if the available parking spaces

meet the requirements of the proposed projects. In terms of traffic congestion, the

future LOS is examined to identify potential impacts and measures to mitigate

congestion are implemented accordingly. The analysis of the current traffic situation

involves the use of the Volume/Capacity ratio (VCR), while the LOS criteria are utilized

to describe the quality of the road conditions. The LOS criteria are detailed as follows:

Table 9. Level of Service (LOS) Criteria

Traffic LOS
VCR Description
Condition Rating
Condition of free flow with high speeds and low
0 – 0.19 traffic volume. Drivers can choose desired speeds Very Light A
without delays.
In the zone of stable flow. Drivers have reasonable
0.20 – 0.44 Light B
freedom to select their speed.
In the zone of stable flow. Drivers are restricted in
0.45 – 0.69 Moderate C
selecting their speed.
Approaches unstable flow with nearly all drivers
Moderately
0.70 – 0.84 restricted. Service volume corresponds to tolerable D
Heavy
capacity.
Traffic volumes near or at capacity. Flow is unstable
0.85 – 1.00 Heavy E
with momentary stoppage.
Forced or congested flow at low speeds. Long
>1.00 Very Heavy F
queues and delays.
7.2 Road Capacity Analysis

Table 10.1 VCR and LOS during Peak Hours in Roxas Avenue

Without Development With Development

Direction
Volume in Volume in
VCR LOS VCR LOS
PCU PCU

EB 1389 0.96 E 2360 1.64 F

WB 1457 1.01 F 2418 1.68 F

Based on the VCR calculation and LOS classification shown in Table 10.1, the

volume capacity ratio with the development increased during the PM peak, from 0.96

to 1.64 for eastbound, and 1.01 to 1.68 for westbound direction. This indicates that the

development will cause and affect the flow of traffic in both lanes. The volume in PCU

with the development is calculated by adding and distributing the 70% of 3735 persons

trip/day for private vehicles such as private cars, private tricycles, jeepneys, pick-up

van, and vans. The distribution of the 2615 passengers among these private vehicles are

based on the percentage distribution of these vehicles during the traffic count in Roxas

Avenue. The remaining 30% of 3735 passengers/day were also distributed among

different public vehicles such as public tricycles, public jeepneys, UV Express, and buses.

The distribution for each passenger is also based on the number of vehicles counted

during the traffic count. Shown in Table 10.2 is the number of vehicles added to the

traffic count used in calculating the Volume Capacity Ratio.

3735 persons trip/day x 70%(private vehicles) = 2615 persons trip/day
3735 persons trip/day x 30%(public vehicles) = 1120 persons trip/day

Table 10.2.a Distribution of Additional Vehicles for “With Development” (Eastbound)

DISTRIBUTION OF PASSENGER VOLUME IN DISTRIBUTION OF PASSENGER VOLUME IN
PRIVATE VEHICLES PUBLIC VEHICLES
No. of No. of No. of No. of
Frequen Percenta Passeng passeng addition Frequen Percenta Passeng passeng addition
Vehicle Vehicle
cy ge er er al cy ge er er al
/vehicle Vehicles /vehicle Vehicles
Priv. Public
51 8.31 217 2 107 88 55.35 620 4 155
Tricycles Tricycles
Private Public
409 66.61 1742 3 581 49 30.82 345 16 22
Cars Jeeps
Private UV-Expre
4 0.65 17 8 2 2 1.25 14 8 2
Jeep ss
Pick-Up
74 12.05 315 4 79 Bus 20 12.58 141 30 5
Van
Van 76 12.38 324 5 65 Total 159 100% 1120
Total 614 100% 2615

Table 10.2.b Distribution of Additional Vehicles for “With Development” (Westbound)

DISTRIBUTION OF PASSENGER VOLUME IN DISTRIBUTION OF PASSENGER VOLUME IN
PRIVATE VEHICLES PUBLIC VEHICLES
No. of No. of No. of No. of
Frequen Percenta Passeng passeng addition Frequen Percenta Passeng passeng addition
Vehicle Vehicle
cy ge er er al cy ge er er al
/vehicle Vehicles /vehicle Vehicles
Priv. Public
87 16.201 424 2 212 134 59.82 670 4 168
Tricycles Tricycles
Private Public
309 57.544 1505 3 502 54 24.11 270 16 17
Cars Jeeps
Private UV-Expre
2 0.372 10 8 1 6 2.68 30 8 4
Jeep ss
Pick-Up
81 15.083 394 4 99 Bus 30 13.39 150 30 5
Van
Van 58 10.8 282 5 56 Total 224 100% 1120
Total 537 100% 2615
Table 10.3 Volume in PCU WITH DEVELOPMENT
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
VEHICLE PCU
Volume Volume in pcu/hr Volume Volume in pcu/hr
Bicycle 0.2 52 10 89 18
Pedicab 0.75 2 2 1 1
Motor 0.5 744 372 886 443
Taxi 1 0 0 0 0
Public Tricycle 0.75 243 182 269 202
Priv. Tricycle 0.75 158 119 299 224
Private Car 1 990 990 811 811
Public Jeep 1.5 71 107 71 107
Priv. Jeep 1.5 6 9 3 5
PUV 1 153 153 180 180
UV Express 1.5 4 6 10 15
Mini Bus 1.5 0 0 3 5
Large Bus 2 25 50 35 70
2A Truck 2.5 46 115 20 50
3A Truck 3 21 63 36 108
4A or More 3.5 10 35 17 60
Van 1 141 141 114 114
Others 1.5 4 6 3 5
TOTAL 2670 2360 2847 2418

Table 10.4: VCR COMPUTATION WITH DEVELOPMENT

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Road Width and
Direction Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR
6.175 meters
EB 2 lanes @ 3.0875 2360 pcu/hour 1440 pcu/hr 1.64
meters
6.1755 meters
WB 2 lanes @ 3.0875 2418 pcu/hour 1440 pcu/hr 1.68
meters
7.3 Parking Requirements

The National Building Code of the Philippines (NBC) dictates the mandatory

provision of parking spaces in development projects. Developers are required to

allocate parking slots to prevent the issues of street parking and sidewalk obstruction,

which contribute to traffic congestion and a decrease in the Level of Service (LOS) of

specific roadways. Based on the floor plans given by Meinhardt Philippines, Inc., S&R

Building has a total of 204 parking slots.

Based on the minimum parking areas given by the National Building Code, for

each 100 square meter of shopping center there should be 1 parking slot allocated or

simply, 1 parking slot/ 100 sq.m. shopping area. The shopping floor area of S&R is

9,977.18871 sq.m. . The following computation will show if the building follows the

minimum parking demand given by NBC:

As mentioned, S&R has allocated 204 parking spaces and as seen above the

minimum requirements recommend 100 parking spaces. The shopping center allocated

104 extra parking spaces which is 49.019% more than the given prerequisites. In

conclusion, the building follows the minimum requirements of the parking demand.
VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS

It is concluded by the researchers that the development has an impact as to the

existing traffic condition along Roxas Avenue and the entire Naga City. Discussed

below are the recommendations of the researchers.

8.1 Traffic Engineering and Management

Considering the heavy to very heavy traffic status of Roxas Ave. At this present

time, it is undoubtedly recommended for Traffic Engineering and Management to

better facilitate the traffic flow with designs, systems or plans that best serve the city’s

public transportation, especially for the coming 5 years or more of population increase

and development.

With the projected patronization of the public to S&R Membership Mall a rise in

the number of vehicles is expected at around 1.64 to 1.68 VCR. This shall also be

considered during the time of traffic intervention.

8.2 Public Transport Facilities

S&R Membership Malls are designed mainly for wholesale consumers. This would

also suggest the need to serve private vehicles over public ones. However, just like any

other malls, an allocated space for loading and unloading sites for public commuters is

still encouraged.
8.3 Pedestrian Facilities

● Conduct a thorough research of the area: Begin by analyzing the pedestrian

traffic patterns in the area and determining where the most effective pedestrian

lanes will be. Look for areas with a lot of foot activity, busy intersections, and

close proximity to schools, parks, and commercial complexes.

● Make sure there is enough room to accommodate pedestrian lanes without

jeopardizing the safety or efficiency of automobile traffic. This may need reusing

street parking or lowering the number of car lanes.

● Use high-visibility materials: It's important to use high-visibility materials for the

pedestrian lanes, such as brightly colored paint or reflective materials. This will

help to ensure that drivers are aware of the pedestrian lanes and that

pedestrians can easily see where they are walking.

● Provide adequate lighting: Ensure that the pedestrian lanes are well-lit,

particularly in areas that are frequented during the evening or night hours. This

will improve visibility and reduce the risk of accidents.

8.4 Internal Circulation

Having learned the scope of a large facility such as the S&R Shopping Mall, it is

understandable the impact it contributes to the traffic within Naga and up to the

neighboring towns. Roxas ave. is where buses from the CBD terminal and travellers
going South of Bicol meet. Thus, it is appropriate for government and private

establishments along Roxas ave. to enhance road facilities at choke points or

intersections that can cater a large number of vehicles coming through and from

outside Naga City. This will better solve the flow of internal circulation to be at its motion.

8.5 Parking

It is recommended that the establishment maintain the minimum parking areas

for shopping centers according to the National Building Code parking ratio of 1 parking

space per 100 square meters of store selling space. As well as a 2.5m x 5m area per

parking space to either perpendicular or diagonal parking means. To which in this case,

the S&R Shopping Mall has 9977.18871 square meters of store selling space with 204

parking space capacity. Thus, the establishments exceed the minimum parking space

requirement to over 104. This shows that the mall can fully accomodate its consumers'

parking demands.
 APPENDICES A -PROCESSED TRAFFIC COUNT DATA

Table 11.1.a.: Traffic count along Abella St. EB

Direction: Eastbound (EB)

Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other

Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 68 284 232 138 16 40 12 9 1 0 0 5 0 0 805
8:00 - 9:00 46 299 223 144 28 36 8 1 7 4 0 0 11 0 1 808
12:00 - 1:00 27 257 164 118 8 18 9 1 5 1 0 0 4 0 1 613
4:00 - 5:00 48 326 182 166 25 23 6 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 783
5:00 - 6:00 61 345 233 180 15 32 11 3 4 4 0 0 2 0 1 891
Total 250 1511 1034 746 92 149 46 5 26 14 0 0 24 0 3 3900

Table 11.1.b.: Traffic count along Abella St. WB

Direction: Westbound (WB)

Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other

Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 33 283 197 178 3 55 9 3 2 0 0 5 0 0 768
8:00 - 9:00 34 254 189 151 21 32 1 8 0 0 10 0 1 701
12:00 - 1:00 29 221 152 116 21 31 5 5 0 0 2 0 0 582
4:00 - 5:00 49 336 210 165 20 44 1 1 19 2 0 1 3 0 1 852
5:00 - 6:00 62 358 275 188 23 47 2 2 4 1 0 0 3 0 3 968
Total 207 1452 1023 798 88 209 13 2 39 10 0 1 23 0 5 3871
Table 11.1.c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Abella St.,
AM Peak (time)
Motorcy Private Pick-Up UV Other
Directio
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Vehicles Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
8:00 - 9:00 EB 9 224 112 108 21 36 12 2 7 6 0 0 28 0 2 567
7:00 - 8:00 WB 7 212 99 134 2 55 14 0 3 3 0 0 13 0 0 542
TOTAL 16 436 211 242 23 91 26 2 10 9 0 0 41 0 2 1109
 Table 11.1.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION

Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
4.8 meters 720 pcu/hr
567 pcu/hour 0.79 D
EB 1 lane
4.8 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 542 pcu/hour 0.75 D
1 lane

Table 11.1.e.: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Abella St.,
PM Peak (time)
Other
Directi Pedica Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
on Bicycle b ycle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
EB 12 259 117 135 11 32 17 5 4 6 0 0 5 0 2 605
5:00 - 6:00
WB 12 269 138 141 17 47 3 3 4 2 0 0 8 0 5 649
TOTAL 24 528 255 276 28 79 20 8 8 8 0 0 13 0 7 1254

Table 11.1.f.: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
4.8 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 605 pcu/hour 0.84 D
1 lane
4.8 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 649 pcu/hour 0.9 E
1 lane
 Table 11.2.a.: Traffic count along Misericordia St. WB
Direction: Westbound (WB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 19 12 186 1 29 12 29 0 0 3 4 0 0 1 0 0 296
8:00 - 9:00 14 5 142 0 50 11 23 0 0 5 5 0 0 4 0 0 259
12:00 - 1:00 10 10 124 0 36 11 14 0 1 3 4 0 0 1 0 2 216
4:00 - 5:00 14 0 126 0 34 10 26 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 217
5:00 - 6:00 17 1 210 0 20 11 33 0 0 2 5 0 0 1 0 2 302
Total 74 28 788 1 169 55 125 0 1 16 21 0 0 8 0 4 1290

Table 11.2.b.: Traffic count along Misericordia St. EB

Direction: Eastbound (EB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 19 17 198 0 27 21 23 1 0 1 6 0 0 1 0 0 314
8:00 - 9:00 10 1 147 0 28 8 12 0 0 3 4 0 0 2 0 0 215
12:00 - 1:00 13 8 122 0 33 19 23 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 0 2 229
4:00 - 5:00 16 0 126 0 31 14 31 0 0 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 232
5:00 - 6:00 15 1 201 0 34 14 34 1 1 10 1 0 0 1 0 0 313
Total 73 27 794 0 153 76 123 2 1 24 23 0 0 5 0 2 1303

Table 11.2.c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Misericordia St.,
AM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
WB 4 9 93 1 22 9 29 0 0 3 6 0 0 3 0 0 179
7:00 - 8:00
EB 4 13 99 0 20 16 23 2 0 1 9 0 0 3 0 0 190
TOTAL 8 22 192 1 42 25 52 2 0 4 15 0 0 6 0 0 369
 Table 11.2.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION

Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
5.3 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 179 pcu/hour 0.25 B
1 lane
5.3 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 190 pcu/hour 0.26 B
1 lane

Table 11.2.e.: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Misericordia St.,
PM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
5:00 - WB 3 1 105 0 15 8 33 0 0 2 8 0 0 3 0 3 181
6:00 EB 3 1 101 0 26 11 34 2 2 10 2 0 0 3 0 0 195
TOTAL 6 2 206 0 41 19 67 2 2 12 10 0 0 6 0 3 376

Table 11.2.f.: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION

Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
5.3 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 181 pcu/hour 0.25 B
1 lane
5.3 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 195 pcu/hour 0.27 B
1 lane
 Table 11.3 a.: Traffic count along Balatas St. WB
Direction: Westbound (WB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 59 5 372 0 97 43 212 12 1 1 5 0 0 12 1 1 821
8:00 - 9:00 36 3 259 0 79 34 155 5 1 3 2 0 0 23 0 1 601
12:00 - 1:00 17 3 195 0 66 17 106 11 0 6 0 0 0 14 3 1 439
4:00 - 5:00 18 1 243 0 66 38 173 5 1 11 2 0 0 9 6 2 575
5:00 - 6:00 35 5 262 0 87 19 172 9 0 5 1 0 0 11 5 0 611
Total 165 17 1331 0 395 151 818 42 3 26 10 0 0 69 15 5 3047

Table 11.3 B.: Traffic count along Balatas St. EB

Direction: Eastbound (EB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 19 2 258 65 30 91 7 1 2 4 0 0 8 0 4 491
8:00 - 9:00 11 2 158 1 59 31 104 4 0 5 7 0 0 10 3 7 402
12:00 - 1:00 7 4 160 1 56 26 95 6 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 3 374
4:00 - 5:00 28 5 260 7 81 37 161 8 2 0 5 0 0 13 4 5 616
5:00 - 6:00 52 1 399 1 83 43 212 8 1 3 7 0 0 8 4 3 825
Total 117 14 1235 10 344 167 663 33 4 10 23 0 0 53 13 22 2708

Table 11.3.c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Balatas St.,
AM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
WB 12 4 186 0 73 32 212 18 2 1 8 0 0 30 3 2 583
7:00 - 8:00
EB 4 2 129 0 49 23 91 11 2 2 6 0 0 20 0 6 345
TOTAL 16 6 315 0 122 55 303 29 4 3 14 0 0 50 3 8 928
Table 11.3.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
3.725 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 583 pcu/hour 0.81 D
1 lane
3.725 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 345 pcu/hour 0.48 C
1 lane

Table 11.3.e.: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Balatas St.,
PM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
5:00 - WB 7 4 131 0 65 14 172 14 0 5 2 0 0 28 15 0 457
6:00 EB 10 1 200 1 62 32 212 12 2 3 11 0 0 20 12 5 583
TOTAL 17 5 331 1 127 46 384 26 2 8 13 0 0 48 27 5 1040

Table 11.3.f: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
3.725 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 457 pcu/hour 0.63 C
1 lane
3.725 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 583 pcu/hour 0.81 D
1 lane
 Table 11.4 a.: Traffic count along Bagumbayan WB
Direction: Westbound (WB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 132 9 816 0 148 108 298 66 5 42 14 0 0 13 5 2 1658
8:00 - 9:00 37 5 503 0 136 66 161 49 3 52 5 0 0 20 6 1 1044
12:00 - 1:00 30 3 387 0 106 64 163 37 2 53 4 0 0 12 12 3 876
4:00 - 5:00 37 9 362 0 127 66 149 31 8 40 6 0 0 15 13 10 873
5:00 - 6:00 35 6 514 0 158 53 197 55 2 39 8 1 6 13 6 5 1098
Total 271 32 2582 0 675 357 968 238 20 226 37 1 6 73 42 21 5549

Table 11.4 b.: Traffic count along Bagumbayqn EB

Direction: Eastbound (EB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 49 4 478 0 209 46 201 52 2 35 8 0 0 10 12 1 1107
8:00 - 9:00 29 4 441 0 156 69 153 55 3 54 2 0 1 25 11 7 1010
12:00 - 1:00 21 3 349 0 142 54 175 43 2 48 3 0 0 17 2 1 860
4:00 - 5:00 74 7 492 0 182 65 183 50 5 61 0 1 0 11 3 1 1135
5:00 - 6:00 113 8 769 2 206 79 272 60 4 52 1 0 2 13 1 7 1589
Total 286 26 2529 2 895 313 984 260 16 250 14 1 3 76 29 17 5701

Table 11.4.c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Bagumbayan.,
AM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
WB 26 7 408 0 111 81 298 99 8 42 21 0 0 33 15 3 1152
7:00 - 8:00
EB 10 3 239 0 157 35 201 78 3 35 12 0 0 25 36 2 836
TOTAL 36 10 647 0 268 116 499 177 11 77 33 0 0 58 51 5 1988
Table 11.4.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
5.2 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 1152 pcu/hour 1.6 F
1 lane
5.2 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 836 pcu/hour 1.16 F
1 lane

Table 11.4.e.: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Bagumbayan
PM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
5:00 - WB 7 5 257 0 119 40 197 83 3 39 12 2 12 33 18 8 835
6:00 EB 23 6 385 2 155 59 272 90 6 52 2 0 4 33 3 11 1103
TOTAL 30 11 642 2 274 99 469 173 9 91 14 2 16 66 21 19 1938

Table 11.4.f: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
5.2 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 835 pcu/hour 1.16 F
1 lane
5.2 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 1103 pcu/hour 1.53 F
1 lane
 Table 11.5 a.: Traffic count along Elias Angeles St. EB
Direction: Eastbound (EB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 73 2 507 439 28 364 36 0 15 5 0 0 2 0 38 1509
8:00 - 9:00 47 1 570 451 20 221 28 0 17 3 0 0 9 0 42 1409
12:00 - 1:00 37 4 460 470 39 210 27 0 8 2 0 0 3 0 46 1306
4:00 - 5:00 55 3 404 472 10 204 29 0 13 2 0 0 5 0 52 1249
5:00 - 6:00 78 0 304 452 7 320 32 0 4 1 0 0 2 0 33 1233
Total 290 10 2245 2284 104 1319 152 0 57 13 0 0 21 0 211 6706

Table 11.5 b.: Traffic count along Elias Angeles St. WB

Direction: Westbound (WB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 71 2 685 631 27 406 16 0 31 3 0 0 11 0 32 1915
8:00 - 9:00 33 0 658 622 20 327 21 0 24 8 0 0 10 0 44 1767
12:00 - 1:00 69 1 676 605 21 390 23 0 11 2 0 0 13 0 30 1841
4:00 - 5:00 74 2 659 584 29 394 22 0 20 4 0 0 4 0 47 1839
5:00 - 6:00 82 0 726 572 26 364 16 0 21 2 0 0 2 0 31 1842
Total 329 5 3404 3014 123 1881 98 0 107 19 0 0 40 0 184 9204

Table 11.5.c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Elias Angeles St.,
AM Peak (time)
Motorcy Private Pick-Up UV Other
Directio
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Vehicles Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
EB 15 2 254 329 21 364 54 0 15 8 0 0 5 0 57 1124
7:00 - 8:00
WB 14 2 343 473 20 406 24 0 31 5 0 0 28 0 48 1394
TOTAL 29 4 597 802 41 770 78 0 46 13 0 0 33 0 105 2518
 Table 11.5.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION

Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.45 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 1124 pcu/hour 1.56 F
1 lane
6.45 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 1394 pcu/hour 1.94 F
1 lane

Table 11.5.e.: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Elias Angeles St.

PM Peak (time)
Motorcy Private Pick-Up UV Other
Directio
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Vehicles Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
12:00 -
1:00 EB 7 3 230 353 29 210 41 0 8 3 0 0 8 0 69 961
5:00 - 6:00 WB 16 0 363 429 20 364 24 0 21 3 0 0 5 0 47 1292
TOTAL 23 3 593 782 49 574 65 0 29 6 0 0 13 0 116 2253

Table 11.5.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.45 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 961 pcu/hour 1.33 F
1 lane
6.45 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 1292 pcu/hour 1.79 F
1 lane
 Table 11.6 a.: Traffic count along Mabolo SB
Direction: Southbound (SB)
Tricycle Jeep Bus Truck Other
Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Van s Total
7:00 - 8:00 27 1 526 0 86 66 179 36 1 28 12 5 7 58 37 8 8 1085
8:00 - 9:00 13 1 558 1 82 69 166 37 6 45 16 0 6 79 29 0 9 1117
12:00 - 1:00 11 1 319 2 84 46 139 22 1 35 9 0 13 77 45 7 16 827
4:00 - 5:00 51 1 557 2 64 67 214 23 5 47 26 1 16 105 61 0 6 1246
5:00 - 6:00 67 1 813 0 66 100 235 23 2 42 5 1 15 71 38 12 2 1493
Total 169 5 2773 5 382 348 933 141 15 197 68 7 57 390 210 27 41 5768

Table 11.6 b.: Traffic count along Mabolo EB

Direction: Eastbound (EB)
Tricycle Jeep Bus Truck Other
Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Van s Total
7:00 - 8:00 35 0 567 1 109 49 120 61 14 30 16 5 13 50 33 19 50 1172
8:00 - 9:00 27 0 751 1 98 56 177 63 3 42 14 1 4 61 37 10 31 1376
12:00 - 1:00 16 1 393 0 65 65 155 29 3 33 19 0 4 69 41 8 51 952
4:00 - 5:00 20 2 473 4 50 78 219 41 0 33 9 0 7 60 38 18 52 1104
5:00 - 6:00 35 2 569 0 56 46 212 42 1 42 6 0 8 39 24 23 31 1136
Total 133 5 2753 6 378 294 883 236 21 180 64 6 36 279 173 78 215 5740

Table 11.6.c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Mabolo
AM Peak (time)
Other
Directi Pedica Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
on Bicycle b ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A Van
SB 3 1 279 1 62 52 166 56 9 45 24 0 12 198 87 0 14 1009
8:00-9:00
EB 5 0 376 1 74 42 177 95 5 42 21 2 8 153 111 10 47 1169
TOTAL 8 1 655 2 136 94 343 151 14 87 45 2 20 351 198 10 61 2178
 Table 11.6.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION

Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.35 meters 1440 pcu/hr
SB 1009 pcu/hour 0.7 D
2 lanes @ 3.175 meters
6.35 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 1169 pcu/hour 0.81 D
2 lanes @ 3.175 meters

Table 11.6.e.: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Mabolo

PM Peak (time)
Other
Directi Pedica Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
on Bicycle b ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A Van
5:00 - SB 13 1 407 0 50 75 235 35 3 42 8 2 30 178 114 12 3 1208
6:00 EB 7 2 285 0 42 35 212 63 2 42 9 0 16 98 72 23 47 955
TOTAL 20 3 692 0 92 110 447 98 5 84 17 2 46 276 186 35 50 2163

Table 11.6.f.: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION

AM Peak
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.35 meters 1440 pcu/hr
SB 1208 pcu/hour 0.84 D
2 lanes @ 3.175 meters
6.35 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 955 pcu/hour 0.66 C
2 lanes @ 3.175 meters
 Table 11.7 a.: Traffic count along Roxas Avenue EB
Direction: Eastbound (EB)
Tricycle Jeep Bus Truck Other
Pedica Motorc Privat Private Privat Pick-Up UV 4A or Vehicle
Time Bicycle b ycle Taxi Public e Car Public e Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A more Van s Total
7:00 - 8:00 77 1 872 1 81 47 275 72 1 33 16 0 21 47 16 9 20 2 1591
8:00 - 9:00 21 1 700 1 94 49 264 82 2 46 18 2 21 87 39 9 73 4 1513
12:00 - 1:00 25 1 464 2 118 44 306 55 6 59 4 0 19 66 34 14 56 12 1285
4:00 - 5:00 24 2 530 3 73 61 363 75 4 64 1 0 22 58 51 13 64 4 1412
5:00 - 6:00 52 2 744 0 88 51 409 49 4 74 2 0 20 46 21 10 76 4 1652
Total 199 7 3310 7 454 252 1617 333 17 276 41 2 103 304 161 55 289 26 7453

Table 11.7 b.: Traffic count along Roxas Avenue WB

Direction: Westbound (WB)
Tricycle Jeep Bus Truck Other
Pedica Motorc Privat Private Privat Pick-Up UV 4A or Vehicle
Time Bicycle b ycle Taxi Public e Car Public e Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A more Van s Total
7:00 - 8:00 50 2 695 0 54 59 253 50 4 29 2 1 30 67 26 12 32 2 1368
8:00 - 9:00 23 2 559 0 106 52 242 71 2 47 9 1 19 69 18 10 62 5 1297
12:00 - 1:00 22 3 434 1 119 54 262 67 4 63 9 0 15 48 32 17 49 13 1212
4:00 - 5:00 34 1 596 4 104 50 312 64 4 83 6 1 23 40 29 31 58 6 1446
5:00 - 6:00 89 1 886 0 134 87 309 54 2 81 6 3 30 20 36 17 58 3 1816
Total 218 9 3170 5 517 302 1378 306 16 303 32 6 117 244 141 87 259 29 7139

Table 11.7.c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Roxas Avenue
AM Peak (time)
UV Other
Pedica Motor Private Pick-U Expres Vehicl
Time Direction Bicycle b cycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep p Van s Bus Truck es Total
4A or
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A More Van
EB 15 1 436 1 61 35 275 108 2 33 24 0 42 118 48 32 20 3 1254
7:00 - 8:00
WB 10 2 348 0 41 44 253 75 6 29 3 2 60 168 78 42 32 3 1196
TOTAL 25 3 784 1 102 79 528 183 8 62 27 2 102 286 126 74 52 6 2450
Table 11.7.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.175 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 1254 pcu/hour 0.87 E
2 lanes @ 3.0875 meters
6.1755 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1196 pcu/hour 0.83 D
2 lanes @ 3.0875 meters

Table 11.6.e.: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Roxas Avenue
AM Peak
(time)
UV Other
Pedica Motor Private Pick-U Expres Vehicl
Directi
Time Bicycle b cycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep p Van s Bus Truck es Total
on
4A or
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A More Van
5:00 - EB 10 2 372 0 66 38 409 74 6 74 3 0 40 115 63 35 76 6 1389
6:00 WB 18 1 443 0 101 65 309 81 3 81 9 5 60 50 108 60 58 5 1457
TOTAL 28 3 815 0 167 103 718 155 9 155 12 5 100 165 171 95 134 11 2846

Table 11.7.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
AM Peak
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.175 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 1389 pcu/hour 0.96 E
2 lanes @ 3.0875 meters
6.1755 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1457 pcu/hour 1.01 F
2 lanes @ 3.0875 meters
 Table 11.8 a.: Traffic count along Magsaysay Avenue WB
Direction: Westbound (WB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 69 9 657 31 44 270 70 1 27 0 0 0 67 8 5 1258
8:00 - 9:00 34 1 406 30 31 72 68 1 16 0 0 3 51 15 4 732
12:00 - 1:00 36 2 495 39 47 381 68 1 22 19 0 0 101 1 0 1212
4:00 - 5:00 56 1 583 29 61 413 76 4 38 0 1 1 91 8 9 1371
5:00 - 6:00 85 2 781 18 57 495 59 1 35 0 0 0 42 11 1 1587
Total 280 15 2922 147 240 1631 341 8 138 19 1 4 352 43 19 6160

Table 11.8 b.: Traffic count along Magsaysay Avenue EB

Direction: Eastbound (EB)

Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other

Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 117 2 1132 63 61 380 88 4 33 1 2 1 91 3 1 1979
8:00 - 9:00 55 0 689 67 51 388 101 1 32 1 0 0 147 3 2 1537
12:00 - 1:00 40 6 486 36 48 441 102 18 12 0 1 0 70 7 4 1271
4:00 - 5:00 51 2 587 10 59 421 81 46 1 2 0 1 86 6 7 1360
5:00 - 6:00 76 1 635 15 47 516 34 19 40 3 1 6 38 24 4 1459
Total 339 11 3529 191 266 2146 406 88 118 7 4 8 432 43 18 7606

Table 11.8.c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Magsaysay Avenue
AM Peak (time)
Motorcy Private Pick-Up UV Other
Directio
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Vehicles Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
WB 14 7 329 23 33 270 105 2 27 0 0 0 168 24 8 1010
7:00 - 8:00
EB 23 2 566 47 46 380 132 6 33 2 3 2 228 9 2 1481
TOTAL 37 9 895 70 79 650 237 8 60 2 3 2 396 33 10 2491
Table 11.8.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
9.3 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1010 pcu/hour 0.7 D
2 lanes @ 4.65
9.3 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 1481 pcu/hour 1.03 F
2 lanes @ 4.65

Table 11.8.e.: Volume in PCU during PM. Peak time along Magsaysay Avenue
PM Peak (time)
Motorcy Private Pick-Up UV Other
Directio
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Vehicles Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
5:00 - WB 17 2 391 14 43 495 89 2 35 0 0 0 105 33 2 1228
6:00 EB 15 1 318 11 35 516 51 29 40 5 2 12 95 72 6 1208
TOTAL 32 3 709 25 78 1011 140 31 75 5 2 12 200 105 8 2436

Table 11.8.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION

Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
9.3 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1228 pcu/hour 0.85 E
2 lanes @ 4.65
9.3 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 1208 pcu/hour 0.84 D
2 lanes @ 4.65
 Table 11.9 a.: Traffic count along MT Villanueva EB
Direction: Eastbound (EB)

Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other

Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 103 73 837 198 49 389 10 2 22 5 1 0 26 4 6 1725
8:00 - 9:00 68 74 696 214 42 283 14 0 4 0 0 0 53 11 0 1459
12:00 - 1:00 34 44 437 145 37 263 2 3 7 0 0 0 35 4 4 1015
4:00 - 5:00 53 52 441 93 67 241 2 2 12 1 0 1 46 3 6 1020
5:00 - 6:00 75 40 598 78 41 379 1 3 11 0 0 5 24 6 3 1264
Total 333 283 3009 728 236 1555 29 10 56 6 1 6 184 28 19 6483

Table 11.9 b.: Traffic count along MT Villanueva WB

Direction: Westbound (WB)

Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other

Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 66 52 800 117 31 283 3 2 76 0 1 0 17 8 1 1457
8:00 - 9:00 23 35 349 68 44 211 2 2 73 0 2 3 22 11 0 845
12:00 - 1:00 23 32 423 66 69 196 2 6 70 0 0 0 11 4 5 907
4:00 - 5:00 78 48 537 52 74 271 1 4 85 0 1 1 18 6 2 1178
5:00 - 6:00 138 46 811 40 56 1101 0 7 44 0 0 1 9 4 4 2261
Total 328 213 2920 343 274 2062 8 21 348 0 4 5 77 33 12 6648

Table 11.9 c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along MT Villanueva
AM Peak (time)
Motorcy Private Pick-Up UV Other
Directio
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Vehicles Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
EB 21 55 419 149 37 389 15 3 22 8 2 0 65 12 9 1206
7:00 - 8:00
WB 13 39 400 88 23 283 5 3 76 0 2 0 43 24 2 1001
TOTAL 34 94 819 237 60 672 20 6 98 8 4 0 108 36 11 2207
Table 11.9.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION

Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
8 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 1206 pcu/hour 0.84 D
2 lanes @ 4m
8 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1001 pcu/hour 0.7 D
2 lanes @ 4m

Table 11.9 e.: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along MT Villanueva
PM Peak (time)

Motorcy Private Pick-Up UV Other

Directio
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Vehicles Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
5:00 - EB 15 30 299 59 31 379 2 5 11 0 0 10 60 18 5 924
6:00 WB 28 35 406 30 42 1101 0 11 44 0 0 2 23 12 6 1740
TOTAL 43 65 705 89 73 1480 2 16 55 0 0 12 83 30 11 2664

Table 11.9.f.: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
8 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 924 pcu/hour 0.64 C
2 lanes @ 4m
8 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1740 pcu/hour 1.21 F
2 lanes @ 4m
 Table 11.10 a.: Traffic count along Mabolo-Camaligan-Gainza WB
Direction: Westbound (WB)

Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep UV Pick-Up Bus Truck Other

Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Express Van Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 26 10 135 0 30 35 25 23 8 4 0 0 0 14 2 1 313
8:00 - 9:00 10 7 134 0 29 20 22 17 2 6 2 0 0 12 3 1 265
12:00 - 1:00 2 7 97 0 41 15 20 14 0 4 2 0 0 9 2 0 213
4:00 - 5:00 19 11 121 1 41 31 23 14 2 6 4 0 0 9 2 1 285
5:00 - 6:00 24 3 211 2 28 27 37 10 0 1 1 0 0 7 1 0 352
Total 81 38 698 3 169 128 127 78 12 21 9 0 0 51 10 3 1428

Table 11.10 b.: Traffic count along Mabolo-Camaligan-Gainza EB

Direction: Eastbound (EB)

Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep UV Pick-Up Bus Truck Other

Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Express Van Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 41 9 249 0 30 25 30 22 0 4 2 0 0 9 1 0 422
8:00 - 9:00 15 8 172 1 34 14 38 23 1 1 9 0 0 8 2 1 327
12:00 - 1:00 14 6 103 0 31 7 26 13 0 0 6 0 0 8 1 1 216
4:00 - 5:00 17 11 159 0 24 26 21 5 3 1 20 0 0 8 0 2 297
5:00 - 6:00 18 10 139 1 39 12 26 1 0 1 10 0 0 7 4 2 270
Total 105 44 822 2 158 84 141 64 4 7 47 0 0 40 8 6 1532

Table 11.10.c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Mabolo-Camaligan-Gainza EB
AM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private UV Pick-Up Vehicle
Time Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Express Van Bus Truck s Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
WB 5 8 68 0 23 26 25 35 12 6 0 0 0 35 6 2 251
7:00 - 8:00
EB 8 7 125 0 23 19 30 33 0 6 2 0 0 23 3 0 279
TOTAL 13 15 193 0 46 45 55 68 12 12 2 0 0 58 9 2 530
 Table 11.10.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
4.6 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 251 pcu/hour 0.35 B
1 lane
4.6 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 279 pcu/hour 0.39 B
1 lane

Table 11.10.e.: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Mabolo-Camaligan-Gainza EB
PM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private UV Pick-Up Vehicle
Time Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Express Van Bus Truck s Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
5:00 -
6:00 WB 5 2 106 2 21 20 37 15 0 2 1 0 0 18 3 0 232
4:00 -
5:00 EB 3 8 80 0 18 20 21 8 5 2 20 0 0 20 0 3 208
TOTAL 8 10 186 2 39 40 58 23 5 4 21 0 0 38 3 3 440

Table 11.10.f.: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
AM Peak
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
4.6 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 232 pcu/hour 0.32 B
1 lane
4.6 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 208 pcu/hour 0.29 B
1 lane
 Table 11.11 a.: Traffic count along Felix Plazo St. EB
Direction: Eastbound (EB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 39 68 462 0 39 59 52 44 3 16 10 0 0 20 1 1 814
8:00 - 9:00 10 50 237 0 53 37 41 46 2 17 13 1 0 22 1 3 533
12:00 - 1:00 23 120 223 1 88 27 48 38 2 14 9 0 0 31 2 5 631
4:00 - 5:00 24 122 208 0 110 34 59 26 2 32 14 0 0 12 2 6 651
5:00 - 6:00 28 140 329 0 135 35 83 26 0 37 16 0 0 7 2 1 839
Total 124 500 1459 1 425 192 283 180 9 116 62 1 0 92 8 16 3468

Table 11.11 b.: Traffic count along Felix Plazo St. WB

Direction: Westbound (WB)

Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other

Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 18 52 366 0 9 56 79 5 1 13 0 1 0 9 2 3 614
8:00 - 9:00 15 36 242 0 12 37 69 5 1 31 0 0 0 14 3 4 469
12:00 - 1:00 11 56 217 1 10 43 52 4 0 19 0 0 0 21 4 0 438
4:00 - 5:00 30 30 268 0 6 26 58 2 1 37 0 0 0 18 1 4 481
5:00 - 6:00 46 19 378 1 10 24 103 0 0 28 0 0 1 13 4 5 632
Total 120 193 1471 2 47 186 361 16 3 128 0 1 1 75 14 16 2634

Table 11.11.c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Felix Plazo St
AM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
EB 8 51 231 0 29 44 52 66 5 16 15 0 0 50 3 2 572
7:00 - 8:00
WB 4 39 183 0 7 42 79 8 2 13 0 2 0 23 6 5 413
TOTAL 12 90 414 0 36 86 131 74 7 29 15 2 0 73 9 7 985
Table 11.11.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.45 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 572 pcu/hour 0.4 B
2 lanes @ 3.225 meters
6.45 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 413 pcu/hour 0.29 B
2 lanes @ 3.225 meters

Table 11.11.e.: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Felix Plazo St
PM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
5:00 - EB 6 105 165 0 101 26 83 39 0 37 24 0 0 18 6 2 612
6:00 WB 9 14 189 1 8 18 103 0 0 28 0 0 2 33 12 8 425
TOTAL 15 119 354 1 109 44 186 39 0 65 24 0 2 51 18 10 1037

Table 11.11.f.: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
AM Peak
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.45 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 612 pcu/hour 0.43 B
2 lanes @ 3.225 meters
6.45 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 425 pcu/hour 0.3 B
2 lanes @ 3.225 meters
 Table 11.12.a.: Traffic Count along Panganiban Drive EB
Direction: Eastbound (EB)

Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other

Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 23 2 412 456 21 276 39 4 42 0 0 0 2 0 1 1278
8:00 - 9:00 79 1 640 415 28 299 56 3 60 0 0 0 6 1 4 1592
12:00 - 1:00 20 2 479 508 65 310 40 5 46 0 0 0 14 1 4 1494
4:00 - 5:00 27 4 515 400 69 298 41 3 75 0 0 0 7 1 5 1445
5:00 - 6:00 32 3 584 395 42 317 44 6 74 0 0 0 4 0 0 1501
Total 181 12 2630 2174 225 1500 220 21 297 0 0 0 33 3 14 7310

Table 11.12.b.: Traffic Count along Panganiban Drive WB

Direction: Westbound (WB)

Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other

Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 72 3 803 534 53 283 35 2 26 6 0 0 10 1 6 1834
8:00 - 9:00 37 5 559 455 71 274 50 6 12 9 1 0 11 0 3 1493
12:00 - 1:00 27 0 605 520 52 305 40 3 42 26 0 0 33 0 9 1662
4:00 - 5:00 50 3 643 623 66 313 43 3 33 18 0 0 37 1 5 1838
5:00 - 6:00 74 0 874 606 54 404 47 3 37 18 1 0 40 1 3 2162
Total 260 11 3484 2738 296 1579 215 17 150 77 2 0 131 3 26 8989

Table 11.12.c.: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Panganiban Drive

AM Peak (time)
Motorcy Private Pick-Up UV Other
Directio
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Vehicles Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
8:00 - 9:00 EB 16 1 320 311 21 299 84 5 60 0 0 0 15 3 6 1141
7:00 - 8:00 WB 14 2 402 401 40 283 53 3 26 9 0 0 25 3 9 1270
TOTAL 30 3 722 712 61 582 137 8 86 9 0 0 40 6 15 2411
Table 11.12.d.: Volume Capacity Ratio AM
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
5.47 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 1141 pcu/hour 0.79 D
2 lanes @ 2.735
5.47 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1270 pcu/hour 0.88 E
2 lanes @ 2.735

Table 11.12.e.: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Panganiban Drive
PM Peak (time)
Motorcy Private Pick-Up UV Other
Directio
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Vehicles Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
5:00 - EB 6 2 292 296 32 317 66 9 74 0 0 0 10 0 0 1104
6:00 WB 15 0 437 455 41 404 71 5 37 27 2 0 100 3 5 1602
TOTAL 21 2 729 751 73 721 137 14 111 27 2 0 110 3 5 2706

Table 11.12.f.: Volume Capacity Ratio PM

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
5.47 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 1104 pcu/hour 0.77 D
2 lanes @ 2.735
5.47 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1602 pcu/hour 1.11 F
2 lanes @ 2.735
 Table 11.13.a: Traffic count along Panganiban Drive Westbound.
Direction: Westbound (WB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 57 2 446 4 158 52 395 81 9 14 23 1 0 8 1 3 1254
8:00 - 9:00 45 0 548 2 275 42 332 80 3 17 23 0 1 27 0 8 1403
12:00 - 1:00 29 3 452 3 179 40 376 61 2 26 22 0 0 15 0 10 1218
4:00 - 5:00 40 5 449 3 153 45 360 57 3 27 16 1 1 10 0 3 1173
5:00 - 6:00 53 4 577 0 137 42 374 69 1 15 13 0 0 1 0 5 1291
Total 224 14 2472 12 902 221 1837 348 18 99 97 2 2 61 1 29 6339

Table 11.13.b: Traffic count along Panganiban Drive Eastbound.

Direction: Eastbound (EB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 41 0 561 1 190 63 434 52 4 7 8 0 0 28 3 9 1401
8:00 - 9:00 16 5 471 5 232 69 395 55 7 17 4 0 0 46 3 11 1336
12:00 - 1:00 16 1 466 3 166 60 465 39 3 20 6 0 1 33 1 14 1294
4:00 - 5:00 47 5 492 2 139 65 488 44 3 16 20 0 0 37 5 20 1383
5:00 - 6:00 40 0 660 0 133 68 538 49 12 15 15 0 0 47 0 10 1587
Total 160 11 2650 11 860 325 2320 239 29 75 53 0 1 191 12 64 7001

Table 11.13.c: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Panganiban Drive.
AM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
8:00 - 9:00 WB 9 0 274 2 206 32 332 120 5 17 35 0 2 68 0 12 1114
7:00 - 8:00 EB 8 0 281 1 143 47 434 78 6 7 12 0 0 70 9 14 1110
TOTAL 17 0 555 3 349 79 766 198 11 24 47 0 2 138 9 26 2224
 Table 11.13.d: Volume Capacity Ratio during A.M. peak time along Panganiban Drive.
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.4 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1114 pcu/hour 0.77 D
2 lanes @ 3.2 meters
6.4 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 1110 pcu/hour 0.77 D
2 lanes @ 3.2 meters

Table 11.13.e: Volume in PCU during P.M. peak time along Panganiban Drive.
PM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
WB 11 3 289 0 103 32 374 104 2 15 20 0 0 3 0 8 964
5:00 - 6:00
EB 8 0 330 0 100 51 538 74 18 15 23 0 0 118 0 15 1290
TOTAL 19 3 619 0 203 83 912 178 20 30 43 0 0 121 0 23 2254

Table 11.13.f: Volume Capacity Ratio during P.M. peak time along Panganiban Drive.
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.4 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 964 pcu/hour 0.67 C
2 lanes @ 3.2 meters
6.4 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1290 pcu/hour 0.9 E
2 lanes @ 3.2 meters
 Table 11.14.a: Traffic count along AH26 WB

Direction: Westbound (WB)

Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 47 2 732 106 44 560 119 8 9 16 1 18 58 9 3 1732
8:00 - 9:00 40 0 730 86 66 533 112 0 4 31 0 17 100 8 17 1744
12:00 - 1:00 24 1 558 43 48 470 80 4 17 9 0 22 45 7 10 1338
4:00 - 5:00 34 1 554 65 39 564 83 5 12 24 1 15 75 5 7 1484
5:00 - 6:00 42 1 690 24 68 491 126 9 29 25 0 13 48 4 9 1579
Total 187 5 3264 324 265 2618 520 26 71 105 2 85 326 33 46 7877

Table 11.14.b: Traffic count along AH26 EB

Direction: Eastbound (EB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 48 2 598 46 99 460 121 8 13 17 4 18 43 6 4 1487
8:00 - 9:00 30 2 552 70 88 350 99 5 27 22 0 20 43 20 18 1346
12:00 - 1:00 6 0 477 85 22 415 91 0 11 39 0 13 45 9 8 1221
4:00 - 5:00 75 6 615 57 91 590 130 2 25 25 0 24 72 13 16 1741
5:00 - 6:00 75 1 842 41 53 706 87 14 71 22 0 21 37 3 3 1976
Total 234 11 3084 299 353 2521 528 29 147 125 4 96 240 51 49 7771

Table 11.14.c: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along AH26
AM Peak (time)
Motorcy Private Pick-Up UV Other
Directio
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Vehicles Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
8:00 - 9:00 WB 8 0 365 65 50 533 168 0 4 47 0 34 250 24 26 1574
7:00 - 8:00 EB 10 2 299 35 74 460 182 12 13 26 6 36 108 18 6 1287
TOTAL 18 2 664 100 124 993 350 12 17 73 6 70 358 42 32 2861
 Table 11.14.d: Volume Capacity Ratio during A.M. peak time along AH26
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
7.39 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1574 pcu/hour 1.09 F
2 lanes @ 3.695 meters
7.37 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 1287 pcu/hour 0.89 E
2 lanes @ 3.685 meters

Table 11.14.e: Volume in PCU during P.M. peak time along AH26
PM Peak (time)
Motorcy Private Pick-Up UV Other
Directio
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck Vehicles Total
n
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
5:00 - WB 8 1 345 18 51 491 189 14 29 38 0 26 120 12 14 1356
6:00 EB 15 1 421 31 40 706 131 21 71 33 0 42 93 9 5 1619
TOTAL 23 2 766 49 91 1197 320 35 100 71 0 68 213 21 19 2975

Table 11.14.f: Volume Capacity Ratio during P.M. peak time along AH26
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
7.39 meters 1440 pcu/hr
WB 1356 pcu/hour 0.94 E
2 lanes @ 3.695 meters
7.37 meters 1440 pcu/hr
EB 1619 pcu/hour 1.12 F
2 lanes @ 3.685 meters
 Table 11.15.a:Traffic count along Penafrancia Ave. (PNP) Northeast Bound.
Direction: Northeast Bound (NEB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 58 1 513 0 133 25 112 130 1 11 8 0 0 7 1 1 1001
8:00 - 9:00 50 2 297 0 141 24 86 128 1 11 1 0 0 11 0 1 753
12:00 - 1:00 37 1 303 0 102 32 85 132 1 15 3 0 0 18 0 3 732
4:00 - 5:00 59 1 388 0 76 56 133 123 4 11 3 0 0 15 0 0 869
5:00 - 6:00 71 1 454 1 52 51 153 111 1 16 4 0 0 6 0 0 921
Total 275 6 1955 1 504 188 569 624 8 64 19 0 0 57 1 5 4276

Table 11.15.a:Traffic count along Penafrancia Ave. (PNP) Southwest Bound.

Direction: Southwest Bound (SEB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 58 0 441 0 172 11 115 148 1 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 960
8:00 - 9:00 45 1 282 4 159 27 78 115 0 9 1 0 0 9 0 0 730
12:00 - 1:00 40 1 236 2 147 11 97 104 1 8 0 0 0 7 1 0 655
4:00 - 5:00 60 0 301 6 105 25 107 119 1 9 0 0 0 11 1 2 747
5:00 - 6:00 74 0 383 8 105 19 102 115 0 9 0 0 0 4 0 0 819
Total 277 2 1643 20 688 93 499 601 3 43 1 0 0 37 2 2 3911

Table 11.15.c: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Penafrancia Ave. (PNP)
AM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
NEB 12 1 257 0 100 19 112 195 2 11 12 0 0 18 3 2 744
7:00 - 8:00
SEB 12 0 221 0 129 8 115 222 2 8 0 0 0 15 0 0 732
TOTAL 24 1 478 0 229 27 227 417 4 19 12 0 0 33 3 2 1476
 Table 11.15.d: Volume Capacity Ratio during A.M. peak time along Penafrancia Ave. (PNP).
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
4.44 meters 720 pcu/hr
NEB 744 pcu/hour 1.03 F
1 lane
4.44 meters 720 pcu/hr
SEB 732 pcu/hour 1.02 F
1 lane

Table 11.15.e: Volume in PCU during P.M. peak time along Penafrancia Ave. (PNP),
PM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
NEB 14 1 227 1 39 38 153 167 2 16 6 0 0 15 0 0 679
5:00 - 6:00
SEB 15 0 192 8 79 14 102 173 0 9 0 0 0 10 0 0 602
TOTAL 29 1 419 9 118 52 255 340 2 25 6 0 0 25 0 0 1281

Table 11.15.f: Volume Capacity Ratio during P.M. peak time along AH26
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
4.44 meters 720 pcu/hr
NEB 679 pcu/hour 0.94 D
1 lane
4.44 meters 720 pcu/hr
SEB 602 pcu/hour 0.84 E
1 lane
 Table 11.16.a: Traffic count along Penafrancia Avenue (Penafrancia Church) SB
Direction: Southbound (SB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 72 1 916 3 73 89 343 71 0 28 17 1 0 37 5 5 1661
8:00 - 9:00 64 2 603 1 65 71 312 56 0 25 17 0 1 46 4 3 1270
12:00 - 1:00 45 7 351 0 52 61 219 40 3 6 3 0 0 27 3 9 826
4:00 - 5:00 63 2 486 2 63 76 272 55 3 3 7 0 0 30 3 6 1071
5:00 - 6:00 134 4 698 0 39 68 219 52 4 10 7 1 0 27 3 8 1274
Total 378 16 3054 6 292 365 1365 274 10 72 51 2 1 167 18 31 6102

Table 11.16.b: Traffic count along Penafrancia Avenue (Penafrancia Church) NB

Direction: Northbound (NB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 110 5 705 0 43 72 240 44 2 16 26 2 0 23 0 2 1290
8:00 - 9:00 74 1 578 0 62 63 221 47 1 34 23 0 0 26 0 3 1133
12:00 - 1:00 43 1 442 0 52 60 202 41 0 31 24 0 0 15 2 0 913
4:00 - 5:00 63 4 519 0 48 82 220 46 4 35 33 0 0 23 1 5 1083
5:00 - 6:00 109 6 823 0 42 88 304 65 4 35 21 0 0 9 1 4 1511
Total 399 17 3067 0 247 365 1187 243 11 151 127 2 0 96 4 14 5930

Table 11.16.c: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Penafrancia Avenue (Church)
AM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
SB 14 1 458 3 55 67 343 107 0 28 26 2 0 93 15 8 1220
7:00 - 8:00
NB 22 4 353 0 32 54 240 66 3 16 39 3 0 58 0 3 893
TOTAL 36 5 811 3 87 121 583 173 3 44 65 5 0 151 15 11 2113
 Table 11.16.d: Volume Capacity Ratio during A.M.
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.7 meters 1440 pcu/hr
SB 1220 pcu/hour 0.85 E
2 lanes @ 3.35 meters
6.7 meters 1440 pcu/hr
NB 893 pcu/hour 0.62 C
2 lanes @ 3.35 meters

Table 11.16.e: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Penafrancia Avenue (Church)
PM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
SB 27 3 349 0 29 51 219 78 6 10 11 2 0 68 9 12 874
5:00 - 6:00
NB 22 5 412 0 32 66 304 98 6 35 32 0 0 23 3 6 1044
TOTAL 49 8 761 0 61 117 523 176 12 45 43 2 0 91 12 18 1918

Table 11.16.f: Volume Capacity Ratio during P.M.

VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
AM Peak
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.7 meters 1440 pcu/hr
SB 874 pcu/hour 0.61 C
2 lanes @ 3.35 meters
6.7 meters 1440 pcu/hr
NB 1044 pcu/hour 0.73 D
2 lanes @ 3.35 meters
 Table 11.17.a: Traffic count along Queborac Drive Westbound.
Direction: Westbound (WB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 25 37 345 0 175 53 111 6 0 10 0 0 0 10 2 1 775
8:00 - 9:00 26 24 237 0 145 53 104 15 0 1 1 0 0 29 2 3 640
12:00 - 1:00 21 40 222 1 142 40 86 28 2 16 1 0 0 14 8 1 622
4:00 - 5:00 60 64 311 0 214 29 117 8 0 2 0 0 0 32 5 2 844
5:00 - 6:00 98 62 450 0 225 53 139 7 1 5 0 0 3 17 1 2 1063
Total 230 227 1565 1 901 228 557 64 3 34 2 0 3 102 18 9 3944

Table 11.17.b: Traffic count along Queborac Drive Eastbound.

Direction: Eastbound (EB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 93 40 519 0 178 69 141 11 0 19 0 0 0 9 3 6 1088
8:00 - 9:00 39 35 304 0 152 63 100 13 1 16 0 0 0 16 3 3 745
12:00 - 1:00 31 49 269 0 166 29 97 43 0 16 0 0 0 15 3 1 719
4:00 - 5:00 47 73 267 0 185 35 79 8 1 12 1 0 0 13 1 0 722
5:00 - 6:00 45 63 334 0 171 34 122 21 1 12 0 0 0 4 1 0 808
Total 255 260 1693 0 852 230 539 96 3 75 1 0 0 57 11 10 4082

Table 11.17.c: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Queborac Drive
AM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
WB 5 28 173 0 131 40 111 9 0 10 0 0 0 25 6 2 540
7:00 - 8:00
EB 19 30 260 0 134 52 141 17 0 19 0 0 0 23 9 9 713
TOTAL 24 58 433 0 265 92 252 26 0 29 0 0 0 48 15 11 1253
 Table 11.17.d: Volume Capacity Ratio during A.M. along Queborac Drive.
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
5.99 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 540 pcu/hour 0.75 D
1 lane
5.99 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 713 pcu/hour 0.99 E
1 lane

Table 11.17.e: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Queborac Drive.
PM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
WB 20 47 225 0 169 40 139 11 2 5 0 0 6 43 3 3 713
5:00 - 6:00
EB 9 47 167 0 128 26 122 32 2 12 0 0 0 10 3 0 558
TOTAL 29 94 392 0 297 66 261 43 4 17 0 0 6 53 6 3 1271

Table 11.17.f: Volume Capacity Ratio during P.M. along Queborac Drive.
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
5.99 meters 720 pcu/hr
EB 713 pcu/hour 0.99 E
1 lane
5.99 meters 720 pcu/hr
WB 558 pcu/hour 0.78 D
1 lane
 Table 11.18.a: Traffic count along Biak na Bato St NB
Direction: Northbound (NB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 0 0 460 0 159 70 124 75 0 16 2 0 0 24 0 8 938
8:00 - 9:00 0 0 492 0 213 67 96 90 1 22 1 0 0 35 0 0 1017
12:00 - 1:00 0 0 295 0 215 40 101 75 3 26 2 0 0 43 0 3 803
4:00 - 5:00 0 0 385 0 200 72 92 77 3 36 0 0 0 28 0 5 898
5:00 - 6:00 0 0 464 0 249 63 121 79 0 23 0 0 0 21 2 2 1024
Total 0 0 2096 0 1036 312 534 396 7 123 5 0 0 151 2 18 4680

Table 11.18.b: Traffic count along Biak na Bato St SB

Direction: Southbound (SB)
Motorcy Tricycle Private Jeep Pick-Up UV Bus Truck Other
Time Bicycle Pedicab cle Taxi Public Private Car Public Private Van Express Mini Large 2A 3A Vehicles Total
7:00 - 8:00 34 9 386 0 191 70 101 62 0 2 0 0 0 26 0 1 882
8:00 - 9:00 28 7 372 0 228 65 59 81 2 0 0 0 0 35 0 1 878
12:00 - 1:00 22 4 277 0 190 49 79 44 2 20 8 0 0 24 1 0 720
4:00 - 5:00 57 5 451 1 183 98 124 68 5 10 14 0 0 30 0 2 1048
5:00 - 6:00 64 1 524 0 20 87 129 56 1 1 6 0 0 22 0 2 913
Total 205 26 2010 1 812 369 492 311 10 33 28 0 0 137 1 6 4441

Table 11.16.c: Volume in PCU during A.M. Peak time along Biak na Bato St
AM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
8:00 - 9:00 NB 0 0 246 0 160 50 96 135 2 22 2 0 0 88 0 0 801
7:00 - 8:00 SB 7 7 193 0 143 53 101 93 0 2 0 0 0 65 0 2 666
TOTAL 7 7 439 0 303 103 197 228 2 24 2 0 0 153 0 2 1467
 Table 11.18.d: Volume Capacity Ratio during A.M.
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.79 meters 720 pcu/hr
NB 801 pcu/hour 1.11 F
1 lane
6.79 meters 720 pcu/hr
SB 666 pcu/hour 0.93 E
1 lane

Table 11.18.e: Volume in PCU during P.M. Peak time along Biak na Bato St.
PM Peak (time)
Other
Directio Motorc Private Pick-Up UV Vehicle
Time
n Bicycle Pedicab ycle Taxi Tricycle Car Jeep Van Express Bus Truck s Total
Public Private Public Private Mini Large 2A 3A
5:00 - 6:00 NB 0 0 232 0 187 47 121 119 0 23 0 0 0 53 6 3 791
4:00 - 5:00 SB 11 4 226 1 137 74 124 102 8 10 21 0 0 75 0 3 796
TOTAL 11 4 458 1 324 121 245 221 8 33 21 0 0 128 6 6 1587

Table 11.18.f: Volume Capacity Ratio during P.M. along Biak na Bato St.
VOLUME CAPACITY RATIO (VCR) COMPUTATION
Direction Road Width and Number of Lanes AM Peak Hour (Time) Road Capacity VCR LOS
6.79 meters 720 pcu/hr
NB 791 pcu/hour 1.1 F
1 lane
6.79 meters 720 pcu/hr
SB 796 pcu/hour 1.11 F
1 lane