Issue Brief: The National Cyber Security Policy of Pakistan 2021
Issue Brief: The National Cyber Security Policy of Pakistan 2021
Web: www.issi.org.pk
ISSUE BRIEF Phone:
Fax:
+92-51-9204423, 24
+92-51-9204658
By
Aamna Rafiq
Research Associate
Arms Control & Disarmament Centre, ISSI
Edited by
Malik Qasim Mustafa
Recently, Pakistan got its first-ever and much-needed National Cyber Security
Policy1 (NCSP). The federal government is raring to kick off its implementation by
the end of June next year.2 Like any other policy in Pakistan, the NCSP 2021
appears almost perfect on paper. However, without timely and effective
implementation, the NCSP 2021 will not achieve the desired results.
Public policy is defined as “a purposive course of action taken or adopted by those in power in
pursuit of certain goals or objectives.”3 According to Thomas Dye and Robert Lineberry, a public
policy is “whatever government choose to do or not to do.” These definitions of public policy hint at
the divergences that exist among what governments decide to do, what governments actually do,
and what governments failed to do.4 In order to identify these divergences, a well-known analytical
model was proposed in 1997 in the field of policy studies. This model involves analysis of any public
policy from three major aspects: context, text and consequences.5 The same model is being used
here to analyse the NCSP 2021.
Policy Context
The policy is generally designated as the outcome of a specific political system. Various issues,
pressures, interests and forces within that political system pave the way for policymaking. The main
driving force behind the NCSP is the “Digital Pakistan Initiative” of the government. The initiative
started in 2018 with the objective to promote connectivity, increase investment in digital skills,
improve digital infrastructure, innovation and tech entrepreneurship in Pakistan. Currently,
Pakistan’s ranking and posture vis-à-vis cybersecurity is not very impressive. According to the ITU
Global Cybersecurity Index (GCI), 20206 Pakistan ranked 76 among 182 countries. With an overall
score of 64.88/100, Pakistan got placement at the level of a developing country. Pakistan got the
highest score of 17.25/20 in the category of capacity development. It got scores of 15.97/20 and
12.26/20 in the categories of legal measures and technical measures respectively. However,
Pakistan’s performance in the categories of organisational measures and cooperative measures is
unsatisfactory with the score of 11.01/20 and 8.38/20 respectively (Figure 1).
5 Carol Cardno, “Policy Document Analysis: A Practical Educational Leadership Tool and a Qualitative
Research Method,” Educational Administration: Theory and Practice 24, no. 4 (2018): 628,
https://www.researchbank.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10652/4576/PDF_Cardno_C._Policy_document_analy
sis_paper.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
6 International Telecommunication Union, “Global Cybersecurity Index 2020,” accessed October 4, 2021,
https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/str/D-STR-GCI.01-2021-PDF-E.pdf
In the category of regional ranking, Pakistan ranked 14 among the 18 countries of the Asia-Pacific
region. Previously, Pakistan was ranked 94/175 and 67/165 in the GCI 2018 and GCI 2017
respectively7 (Figure 2).
7 International Telecommunication Union, “Global Cybersecurity Index 2018,” accessed October 4, 2021,
https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/str/D-STR-GCI.01-2018-PDF-E.pdf ; International
Telecommunication Union, “Global Cybersecurity Index 2017,” accessed October 4, 2021,
https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/str/D-STR-GCI.01-2017-PDF-E.pdf
8 National Cyber Security Policy 2021
9 Microsoft, “Microsoft Security Intelligence Report (January – December 2018),” accessed on October 6,
2021, https://clouddamcdnprodep.azureedge.net/gdc/gdc09FrGq/original
Policy Text
The NCSP 2021 is fundamentally a “national security policy document.” For a state, a national
security policy is considered the most significant and critical document as it outlines a framework for
the formulation of strategies, laws, rules and procedures for the mitigation of risks, challenges and
threats to national security. Although every state enjoys the liberty to tailor the core attributes of its
national security policy, the policy studies identify a set of common attributes a security policy must
possess to qualify as a credible, effective, successful, reliable and implementable policy.10 Therefore,
it is necessary to do a text/documentary analysis of the NCSP 2021 to identify the presence or
absence of those key attributes and determine whether it has the potential to stand the test of time
or not.
The vision or policy statement is thorough and clearly defined in the second section of the policy
text. The vision is to design a robust, secure and progressive digital ecosystem in Pakistan that will
ensure the availability of digital assets leading to national security and socio-economic development
with integrity, confidentiality and accountability.
2. Scope of Policy
The NCSP 2021 covers the entire cyberspace of Pakistan including information and communication
systems used by the citizens of Pakistan, all digital assets, “data processed, managed, stored,
transmitted or any other activities carried out by the public and private sectors in the cyber
domain.” Despite repeated references to the protection and management of data in the entire
policy text, the issue of data created or produced by the public and private sectors within the cyber
domain of Pakistan has not been specifically included in the defined scope of NCSP 2021.
The second section of the NCSP 2021 contains a list of clearly defined objectives to achieve. It calls
for the establishment of the institutional framework, information sharing mechanisms and national
cyber security standardisation to enhance governance, create a culture of compliance and audits
and ensure the integrity of ICT products. It also aspires to develop public-private partnerships, create
cyber security awareness and culture, encourage indigenisation through Research & Development (R
10 Christopher Keller, “Elements of Security Policy,” Global Information Assurance Certification Paper (SANS
Institute), accessed October 4, 2021, https://www.giac.org/paper/gsec/3495/elements-security-policy-
considerations-small-businesses/102691.
& D) and capacity building. It also aims for designing a framework for cooperation at national and
global levels.
5. Policy Values
There is no such thing as a value-free policy. States understand this fact and try to identify and
achieve relevant policy values. As David Easton defines public policy as “the authoritative allocation
of values for the whole society.”11 Therefore, not only the presence but also the absence of certain
core values reflect the real intentions and ethics of policy-makers of that particular state.12 The
references to the malicious use affecting the integrity, privacy and other civil rights at various points
in the policy text highlights the importance of human values for policymakers. Furthermore, the
usage of terms like integrity, transparency, trust and confidence of people, respect for digital
sovereignty, confidentiality, availability, equilibrium, empowerment of organisations, promotion of
online businesses and digital payments and public prosperity in the policy text indicates that
policymakers have given due weight to the socio-economic values.
6. Crisis Management
The second section of NCSP 2021 clearly states that Pakistan will regard a cyber-attack on critical
information infrastructures (CII) as an act of aggression against its national sovereignty and reserves
the right of self-defence with an appropriate national response. According to the policy text, the
energy, telecom, finance, water and healthcare sectors come under CII.
The policy can change with time and it is important to keep the history of modifications for future
audits. As NCSP 2021 is the first policy of its kind, therefore, the issue of policy history is not relevant
as of now. Furthermore, the NCSP text itself has not addressed this issue. On the other hand, the
issue of policy references is significant because policies either stand on their own or achieve their
objectives by extending, overriding or complementing other policies, strategies and laws. The NCSP
2021 text highlights the weak enforcement of existing initiatives but does not categorically indicates
any overriding. However, the third section talks about the formulation of a new Cyber Security Act
by the Cyber Governance Policy Committee (CGPC). How this new legislation will affect the existing
mechanisms is yet to be seen. The various existing initiatives mentioned in the first section of the
NCSP 2021 are as follows:
8. Policy Implementation
The government has planned to achieve the capacity building of relevant stakeholders within the
first year of the policy. However, the policy text is vague on the issue of the overall implementation
timeline. No specific time limit has been set for the achievement of proposed mechanisms. The
fourth section of the policy text acknowledges that the implementation will take considerable time.
Therefore, in the interim period, the federal government will prioritise initiatives for the banking,
telecom, educational and provincial institutions. Yet, the term “interim period” also remains
undefined. The policy text also calls for the establishment of a centralised designated federal
organisation that will not only coordinate and implement the cybersecurity framework at the
national level but also do regulate CERTs at the sectoral and organisational levels.
9. Policy Review
The fifth and last section deals with the policy review process. The NCSP 2021 will go under a
comprehensive and inclusive review after every three years. However, this time the timeframe has
been kept flexible which is a key positive aspect. The NCSP could also be reviewed in consultation
with all relevant stakeholders at any time, depending on the major technological advancements by
national organisations or emerging global trends in the cyber domain.
Policy Consequences
Policy consequences refer to the ways in which any policy is implemented. The NCSP 2021 is a recent
policy, its implementation is yet to be initiated but the procedures, process, principles and structures
proposed in the policy text provide signs of its actual potential and expected challenges in the
implementation process. Apparently, the major challenge in this policy would be the establishment
of the proposed centralised body, which will regulate cybersecurity matters starting from the
national level to the individual level. This level of scope is unrealistically ambitious which could make
the implementation process impractical. Furthermore, the funding sources of this centralised body
as well as many other proposals are unspecified. This lack of harmony between the policy decision-
making and fiscal demands could be a huge problem for the implementation process of such a huge
scale in a country with limited resources like Pakistan. Whether this new body would resolve the
issue of the absence of a central cybersecurity organisation or not but it would definitely create a
tug of war among various federal organisations for budget allocation.
Overall, the NCSP 2021 is a comprehensive policy document according to the criteria defined in the
policy studies and well placed in the overall national and international security context. However,
the placement of this policy in an overall order is improper. Generally, governments first formulate
policies that further guide the strategies and legislation. However, in the case of cybersecurity in
Pakistan, a policy is being formulated years after legislation has been done especially in the absence
of a relevant strategy. The attention of those applauding the NCSP 2021 at this stage, is drawn to the
fact that policy-making and policy implementation are two different things. In Pakistan, policy
implementation is a bigger problem as compared to policy formulation and therefore requires
greater attention to details. Without timely and effective implementation, NCSP 2021 will remain
well short of creating the impact it intends to achieve.