Scribd
Upload
28 views1 page

Team Project Rubric (E)

The document outlines the marking criteria for a team project. It evaluates company overview, situation analysis, and solutions/recommendations sections. It assesses if the company information is clear, the COVID-19 impact is critically analyzed, and recommendations are persuasive and supported. It also evaluates the presentation design, organization, delivery, and mechanics. The presentation will be scored out of 40 total points across these categories.

Uploaded by

Chi Nguyễn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
28 views1 page

Team Project Rubric (E)

The document outlines the marking criteria for a team project. It evaluates company overview, situation analysis, and solutions/recommendations sections. It assesses if the company information is clear, the COVID-19 impact is critically analyzed, and recommendations are persuasive and supported. It also evaluates the presentation design, organization, delivery, and mechanics. The presentation will be scored out of 40 total points across these categories.

Uploaded by

Chi Nguyễn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Team Project Marking Criteria

Contents
Company Company information is sufficiently and
Overview effectively presented. Extensive research on the
company is evident while anyone who watches
your video can readily and instantly understand 0 1 2 3 4 5
the company overview and their business.

Situation Analysis The situation of the company amid COVID-19 is


critically analysed. The explanation of how the
company has dealt (or is dealing) with the issues is 0 2 4 6 8 10
concise yet informative. The current issues of the
company are clearly identified.
Solutions/ The proposal is persuasive, presents logical and
recommendations feasible recommendations to address the
underlying issues, demonstrating strong
applicability to the company. Argument is
compelling, and well supported with ample,
relevant evidence. The overall costs and 0 2 4 6 8 10
alternatives are considered. For all relevant parts,
strong justification is provided.

Presentation
Design Text is clear and easy to read. The use of colours,
fonts, backgrounds, and animations is effective,
consistent, and appropriate to the topic and 0 1 2 3 4 5
audience. It is engaging, not distracting.

Organization Presentation is well organized with a beginning,


middle, and end. Presentation flow is logical,
transitions are smooth and effective (enhance 0 1 2 3 4 5
audience understanding of the presentation)

Projection Presenter is easy to hear and well-prepared.


0 1 2 3 4 5
Speaks clearly and confidently.
Mechanics Free or almost free of grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors. 0 1 2 3 4 5

Total ________
40

26,7%
Total Score (out of 30%) ____________

You might also like